EdwardoSunny's picture
Pipeline code snapshot (rubric_gen + gke) matching commit bee1bd2
f45837e verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
24.9 kB
# AGENTS.md — handoff for the rubric collection + wall-clock experiments
Written 2026-08-16. Read `CLAUDE.md` first for the project's hard rules; this file
is the operational state on top of it: what is running, what is measured, what is
built but unrun, and the traps that have already cost time.
---
## 0. TL;DR for a new agent
- **You do not need a GPU on your machine.** All GPU work runs on GKE. Your box is
a coordinator; a laptop is enough.
- **Nothing irreplaceable lives on any single box except `.env`.** Code, rubric
libraries, prompts, splits and `rubric_gen/results/*.json` are in git. All 46
experiment runs are in GCS. 36 prepared competitions (153 GB) are in GCS.
- **The wall-clock experiment is complete and the interpreter wins.** Ten
implementation defects were found and fixed; the honest conclusion is that
feedback *precision* is the binding constraint, not speed.
- **The new targeted-collection pipeline is BUILT AND NEVER RUN.** Three scripts,
two known blockers. See §5. *Update 2026-08-15: now RUNNING at K=10 — see §8;
Blockers B and C are fixed in code, A is being diagnosed by a live pilot.*
---
## 1. Setting up on a new machine
```bash
git clone git@github.com:7peng/agent-cwm.git && cd agent-cwm
# 1. credentials. NOTE: in the original checkout `.env` was a SYMLINK to
# /root/.agent-cwm.env, which lives on the pod's EPHEMERAL overlay, not on the
# network volume -- one teardown from losing every key. A durable copy is at
# /workspace/agent-cwm/.env.backup-onvolume (gitignored via `.env*`).
cp /workspace/agent-cwm/.env.backup-onvolume .env && chmod 600 .env
# keys present: ANTHROPIC_API_KEY OPENAI_API_KEY GEMINI_API_KEY GITHUB_TOKEN
# KAGGLE_API_TOKEN HF_TOKEN WANDB_API_KEY OPENROUTER_API_KEY ELEVENLABS_API_KEY
# 2. GCP auth (interactive — a human must do this)
gcloud auth application-default login # project edward-sun, region us-east1
# 3. coordinator venv (no kubectl, no docker needed)
python3 -m venv gke/.venv
gke/.venv/bin/pip install google-cloud-storage kubernetes google-auth
# 4. analysis venv (only for local plotting / probes)
python3 -m venv .mlebench/venv
.mlebench/venv/bin/pip install -e "swe-rubrics[openai,anthropic]" matplotlib pytest
# 5. restore experiment results from GCS (they are gitignored)
V=gke/.venv/bin/python
for r in v5A v5B v6 v7 gated1 cont1 errcol1 errcol2; do
$V gke/submit_eval.py collect --run $r
done
```
You do **not** need to download competition data locally. Pods fetch prepared
tarballs from `gs://edward-sun-agent-cwm-evals/data/<comp>/prepared.tar.gz`
in-region at ~850 MiB/s — measured 0.1–1.6 min per competition. Only prepare data
locally if you are adding NEW competitions. **`KAGGLE_API_TOKEN` IS in `.env`** --
an earlier note in this file said Kaggle was unavailable, which was wrong: the test
that produced that conclusion ran without the env file loaded. `~/.kaggle` is empty
and the installed client (2.2.4) wants OAuth or `KAGGLE_API_TOKEN`, so
`export KAGGLE_API_TOKEN=...` from `.env` first. Rules acceptance per competition is
still manual on kaggle.com.
**Gitignored, so do not assume a fresh clone has it:** `.env`, `.mlebench/`,
`reports/plots/`, `gke/.venv/`, `data/gke_runs/`.
---
## 2. Where everything lives
| thing | location | durable? |
|---|---|---|
| performance rubrics | `rubric_gen/out/performance_dl/` (430 md) | git |
| runtime rubrics | `rubric_gen/out/runtime_cost/` (56 md) | git |
| error rubrics | `rubric_gen/pools/rubric_db_errors_v8_branched.jsonl` (245) | git |
| gated performance set | `rubric_gen/out/performance_gated/` (22) | git |
| held-out eval programs | `rubric_gen/pools/eval_scored_wallclock_v1.jsonl` (26) | git |
| frozen split | `rubric_gen/splits/error_side_5_15.json` | git |
| experiment rows | `data/gke_runs/*.jsonl` | **GCS only** |
| competition data | `gs://edward-sun-agent-cwm-evals/data/` (36 comps, 153 GB) | GCS |
| findings write-up | `rubric_gen/WALLCLOCK_FINDINGS.md` | git |
| dashboard | `dashboard.html`, published to https://codingwm.github.io/ | git |
GCS bucket `gs://edward-sun-agent-cwm-evals`, GKE cluster `agent-cwm-evals`,
project `edward-sun`, region `us-east1`. **Never point anything at
probe-factory/qd-bloom (us-central1).**
---
## 3. Experiment state
Complete, all on the frozen 5/15 split, 1800 s per arm, coder
`claude-haiku-4-5`, world model `claude-opus-5`, selector = the coder's model:
| run | what it tested | result |
|---|---|---|
| `v5A`+`v5B` | baseline after 8 fixes, 731 rubrics | interpreter improves 58% of programs vs 25% for the best WM arm |
| `gated1` | 22 causally-gated vs 430 ungated | gating cuts breakage 10→7, wins head-to-head 4/7, still loses to interpreter |
| `v6` | 9th fix: rubric body delivered to the coder | head-to-head +4.4% on race, but improved-rate 20%→18% |
| `v7` | 10th fix: rubric body reaches the INDEX | **IN FLIGHT** (was 9/20 at handoff) |
| `cont1` | GPU contention A/B | 1.74× slowdown at 3 workers/GPU; timeouts 26%→38% |
Headline numbers (`v5`, complete, 97 arm-runs / 20 programs):
| arm | graded | improved | broke | median turns | budget used |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| `wc_interp` | 79% | **58%** | 4 | 14 | 97% |
| `wc_race` | 55% | 25% | 9 | 84 | 66% |
| `wc_cwm` | 47% | 21% | 10 | 80 | 62% |
| `wc_patchrev` | 45% | 15% | 11 | 64 | 62% |
| `wc_revise` (floor) | 16% | 11% | 16 | 100 | — |
### The mechanism, in one line
The world model takes 8× more turns and delivers **fewer** actionable signals
(6/program) than the interpreter (10 executions/program), because **87% of its
turns find nothing**. At causal precision 0.196 the effective signal is ~1.2
against the interpreter's ~10 — an ~8× deficit. That, not speed, is the result.
### Ten defects found (all were implementation, not method)
1. error family never retrieved (0.1% of slots) → per-family stratified slots
2. silent world model triggered a blind rewrite (80% of turns) → widen, never edit
3. same bug in the race arm's own branch
4. repeated fires thrashed → escalate to a surgical diff on the 2nd fire
5. sweep spent the budget on the LLM selector → embedding-only sweep
6. programs hardcoded the collecting box's data root → `relocalize_data_root`
7. keep-best froze on the original at 0 violations → ties go to the later version
8. predictive rubric body dropped when the WM **judged** → raw markdown as `wm_text`
9. predictive rubric body dropped in the **coder's feedback** → carry `detail`
10. predictive rubric body dropped at **indexing** (41% of library keyed by a
one-line title) → `embed_key` includes `wm_text`
Fixes 8–10 are the same root cause at three stages. Fix 10 was found by a
planted-target probe, not by reading traces — a retrieval miss leaves no trace.
### Corrections already made (do not re-derive these wrongly)
- **Runtime rubrics select hard programs; they do not break them.** 11/11 broke
looked causal until the interpreter control showed it also fails on those
programs (3/7 vs 12/12). Any "the feedback caused X" claim needs the
interpreter's outcome on the SAME programs.
- **The race arm uses 66% of its budget, not 18%.** The 18% came from 7 rows.
- **Duplication is error-family-specific**: performance 98% unique titles, runtime
100%, error only 54%.
- **Gating the 430 is blocked by lost provenance**, not only compute.
---
## 4. Measured numbers for planning
Do not re-estimate these; they are measured.
| quantity | value | source |
|---|---|---|
| states per initial program | 1.9 | errcol2 |
| eligible code error rate | 27% of states | errcol2 |
| clean rate | 52% | errcol2 |
| timeout rate | 21% @1800 s, 38% @3 workers/900 s | errcol2, cont1 |
| **error curation emit rate** | **25%** (20 states → 5 written) | `out/error_focused_summary.json` |
| **→ error rubrics per program** | **0.13** (≈8 programs per rubric) | chained |
| perf pairs → candidates | 1.56 (333 → 520) | `out/conceptual_candidates_summary.json` |
| candidates → rubrics | ~83% | 520 → 430 |
| GPU contention factor | 1.74× at 3 workers | cont1 |
| curation throughput | 9.6 calls/s @32 workers | measured |
| whole-library curation | 10–15 min | computed from above |
| collection, 77 states | 15.8 h serial → ~16 min at 60-way | errcol2 |
**Curation is minutes. Collection is hours. The bill is set by the emit-rate
chain (0.13 rubrics/program), not by GPU count.**
GPU quota, `us-east1` (verified via the compute REST API, not assumed):
L4 16 on-demand + 16 spot, T4 8 + 8, A100 16 + 64. **~115 of 128 idle.**
A100s exist only in `us-east1-b` in this region and spot stockouts there are real.
---
## 5. The new collection pipeline — BUILT, NEVER RUN
Three scripts, all committed, 244 tests passing:
```bash
# one competition per invocation, so each gets its own GPU pod
python3 rubric_gen/collect_targeted.py --competition <comp> \
--n-error 10 --n-perf 10 --max-programs 15 --perf-turns 3 --timeout 900 \
--out data/tgt_<comp>.jsonl
# both families, provenance preserved; perf goes to the VALIDATED spine
python3 rubric_gen/curate_targeted.py --states data/tgt_*.jsonl \
--out out/targeted_v1 --workers 32
python3 rubric_gen/write_rubrics.py --library out/targeted_v1/candidates_perf.jsonl \
--out-dir out/targeted_v1/perf_rubrics # stage 3, do not skip
# K-source / M-eval manifest
python3 rubric_gen/make_split.py --k 10 --add-eval <5 ids> \
--acknowledge-invalidates --out splits/scale_10_15.json
```
Routing: crash that is a code defect → error state; clean+graded → climb for score,
each improved variant → performance state; timeout → runtime state. Stops when both
per-family targets are met. Replaces `--n`, which cannot control what you get.
**Prompts are unchanged from the validated banks.** Error reuses
`errors/prompts.py`. Performance drives `prompts/conceptual_prompts.py`
(`TRACE_DIAGNOSE`) and hands candidates to `write_rubrics.py`. An earlier draft
invented its own performance prompt; that was removed because rubrics from a
different prompt are not comparable with the bank that produced the good
precision/recall. The real spine also gives you the **novelty constraint**
(dedup against existing criteria — the error family's missing 46%) and
**`proposed_patch`**, which `wc_patchrev` applies and the surviving 430-rubric
export lacks.
### Blocker A — the performance path yields 0 rubrics
`errcol2` produced 40 clean programs and **0 graded** ones, so climbing never ran
(`one_trajectory` only climbs `if grading:`). Diagnosed as far as:
- `DATA_DIR` is env-driven and correct; `run_shard.py do_cmd` sets
`MLEBENCH_DATA_DIR=/scratch/data/mle`
- a CPU-only pod confirmed `prepared/private/` is present and a self-grade returns
a score
So the failure is in **the submission each program writes**. `_grade_train`
swallowed the exception; it now logs it. **Next step: one-competition pilot and
read the logged error.** Until then the perf ETA has an unmeasured factor (the
climb improvement rate).
### Blocker B — the split arithmetic
Only 20 competitions are in the split, so `K + M <= 20`. `--k 10 --m 20` is
impossible. The fix is `--k 10 --add-eval <5 new>`, and **5 usable spare
competitions are already prepared in GCS** (no Kaggle needed):
```
detecting-insults-in-social-commentary 0.00 GB
the-icml-2013-whale-challenge-right-whale-redux 0.20 GB
histopathologic-cancer-detection 5.31 GB
aptos2019-blindness-detection 8.60 GB
siim-isic-melanoma-classification 86.24 GB <- impractical per pod
```
Note `make_split.py --add-eval` currently checks for **local** prepared files; it
needs extending to accept GCS-resident competitions. Promoting 5 eval competitions
to source **voids prior eval numbers on them** — the script refuses without
`--acknowledge-invalidates`, and that is a human decision, not an agent's.
---
## 6. Traps that have already cost time
- **`/workspace` is a RunPod network volume (`mfs#...runpod.net`, 755 T); `/`,
`/root` and `/tmp` are a disposable 100 G overlay.** The repo and all 7.4 GB of
untracked `temp/` work survive a pod teardown; anything under `/root` does not.
That is how the credential symlink above became a hazard. `df -h <path>` before
assuming a file is safe.
- **`--mode cmd` gives EVERY shard ALL listed competitions.** One job per
competition, or every pod downloads 28 GB.
- **Pod resources are not in pod logs.** `--memory` is a string (`48Gi`, not `48`
— `48` means 48 *bytes*) and ephemeral storage comes from `GKE_EPHEMERAL`
(default `10Gi`). Reconstructing a command from a log silently drops both and
you get `FailedMount ... no space left on device`. **Diff against a Job that
completed cleanly**, not against the failing pod's events. Known-good:
`GKE_EPHEMERAL=100Gi --cpu 8 --memory 48Gi --scratch 150 --gpu nvidia-l4`.
- **Regenerating `dashboard.html` destroys 19 figures.** `reports/plots/` is
gitignored and most PNGs were built on a retired machine, so `make_dashboard.py`
emits "missing figure" boxes. Use `codeworld-gym/scripts/inject_tab.py` to
transplant one tab into the complete page. Same for the published
`index.html`, which also carries a hand-added banner no template knows about.
- **`prepared/` directories can exist with zero files.**
`detecting-insults-in-social-commentary` locally is an empty shell. Check file
counts, not directory existence.
- **`--workers 3` inflates timeouts 26%→38%.** Fine for error collection (a
TypeError is contention-immune), wrong for runtime collection (a timeout is only
meaningful under sole occupancy). The existing 56 runtime rubrics were collected
at 3–4 workers and should be re-examined.
- **Collection on containers changes what you collect.** 14 of 20 "eligible"
states in `errcol2` were `/dev/shm` exhaustion, not code defects. The filter is
in `collect.py is_eligible_error`; keep it.
- **Spot is right for collection, wrong for eval.** A preempted collection shard
loses a few programs; a preempted eval shard destroys a paired comparison.
- **Do not fit anything on the eval set.** A fire→outcome rubric filter derived
from eval and then reported on eval is leakage. Derive on train, apply to eval.
---
## 7. What I would do next, in order
1. **Finish `v7`** and compare against `v6` on common programs. Registered
prediction: the retrieval fix raises the head-to-head margin and may again
LOWER the improved-rate. If so, three individually-correct fixes all point at
precision being the binding constraint.
2. **One-competition collection pilot** to fix Blocker A and measure the climb
improvement rate — the last guess in the collection ETA.
3. **Train-side fire→outcome filter.** The only unblocked precision lever: label
each fire by whether the arm underperformed the interpreter on that same
program, derive on train, apply to eval. 846 firing turns are already logged;
64 rubrics have ≥3 fires; 5 always fired on a program the arm lost.
4. **k-vote world-model judge** — fire only on majority of k independent verdicts.
Free: the budget is only 62% used and a WM turn is ~9 s. Do NOT gate on
self-reported confidence; that was measured uninformative.
5. **Per-family embedding keys.** Measured: keying prose rubrics on `wm_text`
alone puts a planted target at median rank 5 (vs 45 shipped, 287 before), but
costs the performance family (6 → 22). Since retrieval is stratified per
family, per-family keys should get both.
6. Only then scale the library. 83% of the current 731 never fires once, so
"mine more rubrics" is the weakest lever until precision and retrieval are
fixed.
---
## 8. Session 2026-08-15: K=10 scale-up launched (fixes + fleet state)
Continuation of §5/§7 by the next agent. Four fixes landed (all committed,
249 tests pass), then the collection and eval-pool fleets were launched.
### Eleventh defect: the GPU spread assumed the retired 4-GPU box
`collect.execute` and `wallclock_assist` pinned every program to
`CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES` ∈ {"1","3","0"} — correct on the old shared box,
wrong on every fleet pod, which has exactly ONE GPU enumerated as device 0.
Two thirds of programs were pinned to a device that does not exist and
silently trained on CPU. Verified in the banked rows: of device-printing
programs, errcol2 ran 27 cpu / 11 cuda, cont1 24 cpu / 5 cuda.
Consequences: paired arm comparisons stay fair (the device is a function of
state_id, shared by all arms of a program), but ALL absolute rates from pod
runs carry the handicap — the 21–38% timeout rates, cont1's "GPU contention"
(which was substantially CPU contention), and the runtime family's mined
timeout states. The pool is now detected per process (`collect.gpu_pool`,
override `RUBRIC_GEN_GPUS=1,3,0` to reproduce the old box); on GKE note
nvidia-smi is NOT on PATH (driver mount is `/usr/local/nvidia/bin`), which
`gpu_pool` handles. **v5/v6/v7/gated1 all ran pre-fix; the runtime-cost
family should be re-examined against this in addition to the 1.74×
contention factor.**
### Blocker C (new, fixed): target_family never reached disk
`one_trajectory` appends states to `--out` BEFORE `collect_targeted`
classifies them, and the annotation was never re-serialized, so
`curate_targeted` — which selects error states by `target_family` — would
have read a file where the field never occurs and silently curated zero
error rubrics. Fixed: `persist_families` writes the annotation back after
each program, and `curate_targeted` re-derives via `classify()` when the
field is missing. Regression tests in `tests/test_targeted_persistence.py`.
### Blocker B (fixed): make_split accepts GCS-resident competitions
`make_split.py --gcs-bucket edward-sun-agent-cwm-evals` accepts an
`--add-eval` id whose `data/<id>/prepared.tar.gz` + `meta.json` exist in the
bucket (the empty-shell hazard cannot occur there — the prep job refuses to
upload an empty prepared/public). Ids on the frozen excluded list are
refused.
### The active split: splits/scale_10_15.json
K=10 source = frozen 5 + promoted {random-acts-of-pizza,
tabular-playground-series-dec-2021, dogs-vs-cats-redux-kernels-edition,
new-york-city-taxi-fare-prediction, tweet-sentiment-extraction}. Eval
backfilled to 15 with {detecting-insults-in-social-commentary,
the-icml-2013-whale-challenge-right-whale-redux,
histopathologic-cancer-detection, aptos2019-blindness-detection,
ranzcr-clip-catheter-line-classification} — all GCS-prepared; siim (86 GB)
deliberately left out; ranzcr was prepared-but-unlisted in §5's spare list.
**Prior eval numbers on the 5 promoted competitions are void**
(--acknowledge-invalidates recorded in the manifest). 10 of the 26 rows in
`pools/eval_scored_wallclock_v1.jsonl` are on promoted competitions and MUST
be filtered out of any eval under the new split.
### Fleet runs in flight (all `--mode cmd`, code snapshot carries the fixes)
| run(s) | what | resources |
|---|---|---|
| `tgt10-<comp>` ×10 | targeted collection, one per source comp, `--n-error 10 --n-perf 10 --max-programs 15 --perf-turns 3 --timeout 900` | spot L4 |
| `tgtpilot2` | small dog-breed pilot whose job is to surface the `[grade_train]` exception (Blocker A) | on-demand L4 |
| `pool-<comp>` ×8 | eval-pool extension: `collect.py --split eval` + `score_states.py` on the 5 new eval comps (n=3) + nfl (3), billion-word (2), stanford-covid (2), `--timeout 1200` | on-demand L4 |
Collect artifacts with `submit_eval.py collect --run <name>` (cmd-mode
artifacts land in `shards/0-artifacts/`). Every collection/pool command runs
under `RUBRIC_GEN_SPLIT=splits/scale_10_15.json`.
### Update, later that session: collection done (9/10), P/R measured, scaling started
- **Targeted library v1 exists**: `out/targeted_v1/` — 74 error + 20 perf +
47 runtime rubrics from 9 source comps, full provenance, 0 curation
failures. facebook still collecting (see below); fold it in as batch 2 and
extend `_existing_criteria` to read `out/targeted_v1` first so batch 2
dedupes against batch 1.
- **P/R on the new eval side** (`results/pr_results_targeted_v1.json`,
104 states / 15 comps, opus judge, annotation truth, 6.8k decisions):
error precision **0.958** per decision [0.86, 1.0] (23 TP / 1 FP),
library-level 0.889 / recall 0.211; conceptual end-to-end **0.25/0.25**
vs chance 0.0105 (24x lift; canonical ungated was 0.19 at 4.1x); all
controls 0.000. Precision survives scaling; recall is the scaling lever.
- **Three more traps found live**: (1) fleet pods have no reliable external
internet — Connection-class download failures are environment facts, now
excluded from error eligibility (11 of dog-breed's 18 "errors" were this);
(2) shm worker crashes can hide UNDER a different terminal exception —
stderr is now checked for the narrow marker; (3) `candidates_perf.jsonl`
rows must carry `id` (annotate_truth keys on it) — emitted at curation now.
- **facebook-recruiting needs a 100Gi pod AND a solution memory cap.** Its
programs OOMKilled four pods at 48/60/100Gi. `RUBRIC_GEN_SOLUTION_MEM_GB=85`
(env-gated RLIMIT_AS in `collect._pin_to_block`) makes the program die as a
MemoryError state instead of killing the container — canary-verified live.
- **Anthropic org TPM is a fleet-wide budget** (12M in/min haiku): the old
5×20-180s backoff died under sync retry from ~20 pods; now 8 attempts,
300s cap, jittered. Size any future fleet's parallelism to this.
- **Scale-up in motion**: 39 prep jobs submitted for every unprepared,
non-excluded MLE-bench comp; failures = the manual Kaggle rules-acceptance
list for Edward. Next split: `--k 15` + eval to 30 at the same rate, then
full MLE-bench; re-measure P/R at each stage. **Do NOT launch end-to-end
wall-clock evals — Edward decides when.** (Pool v2 for that eval already
exists: `pools/eval_scored_wallclock_v2.jsonl`, 26 programs / 14 comps.)
### Remaining sequence after these land
1. Read `tgtpilot2` / `tgt10-*` logs for `[grade_train]` lines → fix Blocker A
→ re-run climb where needed.
2. `curate_targeted.py` over `tgt_*.jsonl` (+ `curate_runtime.py` for the
timeout states) → `write_rubrics.py` stage 3 for perf candidates.
3. Assemble the v2 eval pool: surviving 16 rows + new `pool_scored_*` clean
graded states (dedupe per trajectory, ~2/comp), under the new split.
4. The larger eval: wallclock arms **including wc_interp and wc_revise** (the
GPU fix changes execution, so v5's interpreter rows are NOT comparable —
every arm must be re-run post-fix), expanded library, new pool,
`--stratified-retrieval`, per-family fire rates in the report.
5. Noise floors on this hardware (`noise_floor.py`) before any causal claim.
### Scale-up dataset inventory (post-prep-fleet, 2026-08-16)
Bucket now holds **50 prepared competitions**. The 39-comp prep sweep ended
14 ok / 10 rules-blocked / 14 size-killed (+1 rules-blocked from a diagnostic
rerun: plant-pathology-2021-fgvc8).
Rules acceptance needed (one click each on kaggle.com, then re-run
`prep_datasets.py submit --competitions ...`): plant-pathology-2021-fgvc8,
predict-volcanic-eruptions-ingv-oe, rsna-2022-cervical-spine-fracture-detection,
rsna-breast-cancer-detection, tensorflow-speech-recognition-challenge,
tensorflow2-question-answering, tgs-salt-identification-challenge,
us-patent-phrase-to-phrase-matching, uw-madison-gi-tract-image-segmentation,
vesuvius-challenge-ink-detection, vinbigdata-chest-xray-abnormalities-detection.
Size-killed at the default prep shape (died 26-55 min in; need bigger
scratch/memory AND are per-pod-impractical like siim): 3d-object-detection,
cdiscount, contrails, h-and-m, herbarium-2020/21/22, icecube,
inaturalist-2019, iwildcam-2019/20, rsna-miccai, seti, siim-covid19.
"All of MLE-bench" will have to either solve streaming/shared storage for
these or document their exclusion.
### Final K=27 state (2026-08-18)
Library: 139 error (post-lint) / 209 perf (92 causally-proven core) / 257
runtime, from 27 source comps; eval side 37 comps, corpus v5 (347 states),
annotations v5 (69 literal positives, 99% agreement). Finals on the frozen
eval: error 0.595 strict / 0.810 lenient precision, library recall 0.054;
conceptual ungated 0.091/0.622 at 21x chance, gated 0.164/0.545 (12 true
explanations). Gate pass rate 92/179 (51% proven movers). Structural
finding: missing-import failures cannot be caught precisely without
per-package rubrics (universal templates are banned at curation now — the
sweep-only lint let wave 4 re-derive them 6 ways). The annotation-precision
vs causal-precision distinction matters for e2e: the eval punishes fires on
real-but-secondary patterns; the gate measures score-moving fixes directly.
e2e remains parked for Edward's explicit go.