| --- |
| license: other |
| task_categories: |
| - visual-question-answering |
| language: |
| - en |
| --- |
| |
| # tat_dqa_cleaned |
|
|
| The **tat_dqa__x** family of the ElliotVL supervised-fine-tuning pool, **after VLM cleaning**. |
| |
| | | | |
| |---|---| |
| | images | 1,216 | |
| | QA turns | 12,650 | |
| | answers rewritten by the cleaning pass | 948 | |
| | QA created by the cleaning pass (`new_qa`) | 4,652 (36.8%) | |
| | shards | 1 | |
| |
| ## How this was cleaned |
| |
| A vision-language model read each image together with its QA and judged the item. The pass is |
| **not a filter that only removes rows** — it rewrites answers it finds wrong but salvageable, |
| drops what it cannot salvage, and adds QA where the image supports more than the source provided. |
| Each row carries the judge's own record in `clean_meta`, including the cleaner identity, the |
| policy it applied, and its per-item scores for legibility, richness and coverage. |
|
|
| **A large share of the QA here was written by the cleaning pass, not by the original dataset.** |
| Across the pool that share runs from roughly half to over 80% of a family's turns, and it is |
| reported in the table above. Those rows have an empty `org_answer` because no pre-clean original |
| exists. Treat them as model-generated supervision: they were judged against the image, but they |
| are not human annotation, and model-written QA is where formatting defects are most likely. |
|
|
| The effect on the answers that *were* carried over is substantive rather than cosmetic. In this pool the pass corrects values, not just |
| wording — a curve's critical point restated from `4.00` to `2.00`, a computed ratio from `1` to |
| `Approximately 1.33` — and for some families it removed the content entirely, which is why those |
| families are absent here rather than published empty. |
|
|
| ## `answer` vs `org_answer` |
| |
| - `answer` — the cleaned answer. **Train on this.** |
| - `org_answer` — the pre-cleaning answer from the same `(image, question)` in the uncleaned pool. |
| It is empty for QA the cleaning pass added, which have no original. |
|
|
| Where the two differ, the difference is the correction. Keeping both makes every edit auditable |
| instead of asking you to take the cleaning on trust. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ## Schema |
|
|
| - `image` — HF `Image()`, renders directly in the dataset viewer |
| - `image_sha256` — content hash of the image |
| - `n_qa` — number of turns attached to this image |
| - `qa` — list of {`question`, `answer`, `org_answer`}, **in source order** |
| - `family` / `clean_meta` — provenance and the judge's per-row record |
|
|
| A row with more than one entry in `qa` is a **conversation over a single image**, not a set of |
| independent questions — the turns depend on each other and the image belongs to all of them. |
| Keep them together and in order when training. |
|
|
| Parquet row groups are written at ~32 MB so the dataset viewer pages without stalling. |
|
|
| ## What is NOT claimed |
|
|
| No rejection sampling was run against this family: there is no accept/reject verdict per row, and |
| `answer` is the cleaned reference rather than a model generation that a string verifier confirmed. |
| For that, use the `*_RS_think` / `*_rejected` datasets in [elliot-mllm](https://huggingface.co/elliot-mllm). |
|
|
|
|
| ## Examples |
| 10 rows taken straight from this dataset. Images are the **original files** as stored here - no downscaling, no recompression - and every turn is shown in full. |
|
|
| ### Example 1 — 13 turns on one image |
|
|
|  |
|
|
| | # | question | answer | |
| |---|---|---| |
| | 1 | According to Everbridge's financial document, What was the increase in the General and administrative in 2018? | According to the financial document, $8.6 million. The relevant text states: "General and administrative expense increased by $8.6 million in 2018 compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to a $3.7 million increase in employee-rela..." | |
| | 2 | Also, What was the General and administrative in 2018 and 2017? | The document shows two values: 31,462 and 22,895 (in thousands). From the document: "General and administrative $ 31,462 $ 22,895 $ 8,567 37.4% General and administrative $ 31,462 $ 22,895 $ 8,567 37.4%..." | |
| | 3 | Also, What was the increase in depreciation and amortization from 2017 to 2018? | According to the financial document, $2.8 million. The relevant text states: "mber 31, 2018. There was an additional increase of $2.8 million in depreciation and amortization, an increase of $1.5 million to support compliance as a public comp..." | |
| | 4 | Also, can you calculate: What is the average General and administrative expense for 2017 and 2018? | To answer this question, I need to perform calculations using the financial data. The calculation is: (31,462 + 22,895) / 2, which equals 27178.5 (in thousands). This is based on the information: "General and administrative $ 31,462 $ 22,895 $ 8,567 37.4% General and administrative $ 31,462 $ 22,895 $ 8,567 37.4%..." The key data points involved are: 22,895, 31,462. | |
| | 5 | Additionally, In which year was General and administrative expense less than 40,000 thousands? | The document shows two values: 2018 and 2017. Locate and analyze general and administrative in row 4. From the document: "2018 2017 $ % 2018 2017 $ %..." | |
| | 6 | According to Everbridge's financial document, What was the increase in the Sales and marketing expense in 2018 compared to 2017? | According to the financial document, $22.6 million. The relevant text states: "Sales and marketing expense increased by $22.6 million in 2018 compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to a $20.0 million increase in employee- re..." | |
| | 7 | Also, What was the Sales and marketing expense in 2018 and 2017? | The document shows two values: 69,608 and 46,998. From the document: "Sales and marketing $ 69,608 $ 46,998 $ 22,610 48.1% Sales and marketing $ 69,608 $ 46,998 $ 22,610 48.1%..." | |
| | 8 | Also, What is the % change in the sales and marketing expense between 2017 and 2018? | According to the financial document, 48.1 (percentage). The relevant text states: "Sales and marketing $ 69,608 $ 46,998 $ 22,610 48.1%..." | |
| | 9 | Also, can you calculate: What is the average Sales and marketing expense for 2017 and 2018? | To answer this question, I need to perform calculations using the financial data. The calculation is: (69,608 + 46,998) / 2, which equals 58303 (in thousands). This is based on the information: "Sales and marketing $ 69,608 $ 46,998 $ 22,610 48.1% Sales and marketing $ 69,608 $ 46,998 $ 22,610 48.1%..." The key data points involved are: 46,998, 69,608. | |
| | 10 | Additionally, In which year was Sales and marketing expenses less than 50,000 thousands? | According to the financial document, 2017. The relevant text states: "2018 2017 $ %..." | |
| | 11 | What were the Research and Development expenses for 2018 and 2017? | $43,333 and $33,000 (in thousands). | |
| | 12 | What was the total Operating Expenses for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017? | $144,403 and $102,893 (in thousands). | |
| | 13 | What was the percentage increase in Research and Development expense from 2017 to 2018? | 31.3%. | |
|
|
|
|
| ### Example 2 — 16 turns on one image |
|
|
|  |
|
|
| | # | question | answer | |
| |---|---|---| |
| | 1 | From Netapp's financial document, What type of cost and value information does the table provide about the contractual maturities of our debt investments as of April 26, 2019? | The document shows two values: Amortized Cost and Fair Value. From the document: "s of April 26, 2019 (in millions): Amortized Cost Fair Value t investments as of April 26, 2019 (in millions): Amortized Cost Fair Value..." | |
| | 2 | Also, What was the amortized cost Due after one year through five years? | According to the financial document, 644 (in millions). The relevant text states: "Due after one year through five years 644 642..." | |
| | 3 | Also, What was the total fair value debt? | According to the financial document, 1,683 (in millions). The relevant text states: "$ 1,690 $ 1,683..." | |
| | 4 | Also, can you calculate: What was the amortized cost that was due in one year or less as a ratio of the fair value for the same period? | Based on the calculation: 591/589, the result is 100.34 (percentage). This is based on the information: "Due in one year or less $ 591 $ 589 Due in one year or less $ 591 $ 589..." The key data points involved are: 589, 591. | |
| | 5 | Also, can you calculate: What was the difference between the amortized cost and fair value that was due after five years through ten years? | Based on the calculation: 455-452, the result is 3 (in millions). This is based on the information: "Due after five years through ten years 455 452 Due after five years through ten years 455 452..." The key data points involved are: 452, 455. | |
| | 6 | Also, can you calculate: What was the difference in the total amortized cost and fair value? | Based on the calculation: 1,690-1,683, the result is 7 (in millions). This is based on the information: "$ 1,690 $ 1,683 $ 1,690 $ 1,683..." The key data points involved are: 1,683, 1,690. | |
| | 7 | According to Netapp's financial document, What does the table show? | summarizes our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The document states: "The following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in millions):..." | |
| | 8 | Also, What was the fair value measurements using Level 2 for Corporate Bonds? | According to the financial document, 1,353 (in millions). The relevant text states: "Corporate bonds 1,353 — 1,353..." | |
| | 9 | Also, What were the total cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments? | According to the financial document, 3,899 (in millions). The relevant text states: "sh, cash equivalents and short-term investments $ 3,899 $ 2,347 $ 1,552..." | |
| | 10 | Also, can you calculate: What was the difference in the fair value for U.S. Treasury and government debt securities between Level 1 and Level 2? | Based on the calculation: 131-82, the result is 49 (in millions). This is based on the information: ". Treasury and government debt securities 213 131 82 U.S. Treasury and government debt securities 213 131 82..." The key data points involved are: 131, 82. | |
| | 11 | Also, can you calculate: What was the fair value of Level 2 Total cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments as a percentage of the total cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments? | Based on the calculation: 1,552/3,899, the result is 39.81 (percentage). This is based on the information: "ents and short-term investments $ 3,899 $ 2,347 $ 1,552 sh, cash equivalents and short-term investments $ 3,899 $ 2,347 $ 1,552..." The key data points involved are: 1,552, 3,899. | |
| | 12 | Also, can you calculate: What was the difference between the Total cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments for Level 1 and Level 2? | Based on the calculation: 2,347-1,552, the result is 795 (in millions). This is based on the information: "ents and short-term investments $ 3,899 $ 2,347 $ 1,552 equivalents and short-term investments $ 3,899 $ 2,347 $ 1,552..." The key data points involved are: 1,552, 2,347. | |
| | 13 | What is the total value of Mortgage-backed securities? | 1,273 (in millions). | |
| | 14 | What is the total value for Long-term investments? | 2,626 (in millions). | |
| | 15 | What is the total value for Total investments? | 6,525 (in millions). | |
| | 16 | What are the amortized cost and fair value for debt investments due after ten years? | 0 for both Amortized Cost and Fair Value. | |
|
|
|
|
| ### Example 3 — 9 turns on one image |
|
|
|  |
|
|
| | # | question | answer | |
| |---|---|---| |
| | 1 | According to Centurylink's financial document, What is the value realized on vesting based on? | the closing trading price of the Common Shares on the applicable vesting date. The document states: "(2) Based on the closing trading price of the Common Shares on the applicable vesting date...." | |
| | 2 | Also, What were the equity awards held by named executives during 2019? | Restricted stock and restricted stock units. The document states: "by our named executives that vested during 2019. Restricted stock and restricted stock units were the only equity awards held by our named executives ..." | |
| | 3 | Also, What does the number of shares acquired on vesting represent? | both time-vested and performance-based equity awards that vested during 2019.. The document states: "(1) Represents both time-vested and performance-based equity awards that vested during 2019. For details on the payout of our performance-based equity..." | |
| | 4 | Also, How many named executives who hold equity awards and vested during 2019 are there? | Counting the relevant items in the document: Mr. Storey, Mr. Dev, Mr. Goff, Mr. Trezise, Mr. Andrews, I find 5 instances. The key data points involved are: Mr. Andrews, Mr. Dev, Mr. Goff. | |
| | 5 | Also, can you calculate: What is the difference in the value realized on vesting between Mr. Trezise and Mr. Dev? | Based on the calculation: $812,600-$749,737, the result is 62863. This is based on the information: "Mr. Dev 55,490 749,737 Mr. Trezise 71,576 812,600..." The key data points involved are: 749,737, 812,600. | |
| | 6 | Also, can you calculate: What is the average number of shares acquired on vesting? | To answer this question, I need to perform calculations using the financial data. The calculation is: (1,063,929+55,490+114,167+71,576+16,678)/5, which equals 264368. This is based on the information: "Mr. Andrews 16,678 221,859 Mr. Goff 114,167 1,338,934 Mr. Dev 55,490 749,737 Mr. Storey 1,063,929 $13,479,617 Mr. Trezise 71,576 812,600..." The key data points involved are: 1,063,929, 114,167, 16,678. | |
| | 7 | What is the full company name listed at the top right of the document? | CENTURYLINK COMMUNICATIONS LLC | |
| | 8 | What document name and page number are visible in the footer? | 2019 Proxy Statement, page 81 | |
| | 9 | What is the title of section 27? | Equity-Based Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
| ### Example 4 — 11 turns on one image |
|
|
|  |
|
|
| | # | question | answer | |
| |---|---|---| |
| | 1 | From Sykes Enterprises Incorporated's financial document, In which years was the Income Statement Data provided for | The document contains multiple relevant values: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015. From the document: "(in thousands, except per share data) 2019 (1) 2018 (2) 2017 2016 2015 (in thousands, except per share data) 2019 (1) 2018 (2) 2017 2016 2015 ds, exce..." | |
| | 2 | Also, What is the basic net income per common share in 2019? | According to the financial document, $1.54. The relevant text states: "Basic $ 1.54 $ 1.16 $ 0.77 $ 1.49 $ 1.64..." | |
| | 3 | Also, For which items in the table does the amount for 2017 includes the sum related to the impact of the 2017 Tax Reform Act? | The document contains multiple relevant values: Net income, Net Income Per Common Share, Balance Sheet Data. From the document: "Net Income Per Common Share: (3)(4)(5)(6) Net Income Per Common Share: (3)(4)(5)(6) Balance Sheet Data: (3)(4)(6)(7)..." | |
| | 4 | Additionally, In which year was the Diluted Net Income per Common Share largest? | According to the financial document, 2015. The relevant text states: "xcept per share data) 2019 (1) 2018 (2) 2017 2016 2015..." | |
| | 5 | Also, can you calculate: What was the change in the basic net income per common share in 2019 from 2018? | Based on the calculation: 1.54-1.16, the result is 0.38. This is based on the information: "Basic $ 1.54 $ 1.16 $ 0.77 $ 1.49 $ 1.64 Basic $ 1.54 $ 1.16 $ 0.77 $ 1.49 $ 1.64..." The key data points involved are: 1.16, 1.54. | |
| | 6 | Also, can you calculate: What was the percentage change in the basic net income per common share in 2019 from 2018? | To answer this question, I need to perform calculations using the financial data. The calculation is: (1.54-1.16)/1.16, which equals 32.76 (percentage). This is based on the information: "Basic $ 1.54 $ 1.16 $ 0.77 $ 1.49 $ 1.64 Basic $ 1.54 $ 1.16 $ 0.77 $ 1.49 $ 1.64..." The key data points involved are: 1.16, 1.54. | |
| | 7 | What is the Net Sales for 2019? | $1,012,971 | |
| | 8 | What is the Diluted Net Income Per Common Share for 2019? | $1.53 | |
| | 9 | What is the page number at the bottom of the document? | 25 | |
| | 10 | What is the company logo visible at the bottom right? | SYKES | |
| | 11 | What is the title of the note? | Note 1. Selected Financial Data | |
|
|
|
|
| ### Example 5 — 11 turns on one image |
|
|
|  |
|
|
| | # | question | answer | |
| |---|---|---| |
| | 1 | According to Iselect's financial document, What is the current assets of the parent entity in 2019? | According to the financial document, 4,297 (in thousands). The relevant text states: "Current Assets 4,297 7,869..." | |
| | 2 | Also, What is the non-current assets of the parent entity in 2018? | According to the financial document, 174,810 (in thousands). The relevant text states: "Non-Current Assets 165,165 174,810..." | |
| | 3 | Also, What is the loss of the parent entity in 2019? | According to the financial document, 4,812 (in thousands). The relevant text states: "Loss of the parent entity (4,812) (163)..." | |
| | 4 | Also, can you calculate: What is the current ratio of the parent entity in 2019? | Based on the calculation: 4,297/92,352, the result is 0.05. This is based on the information: "Current Assets 4,297 7,869 Current Liabilities 92,352 93,067..." The key data points involved are: 4,297, 92,352. | |
| | 5 | Also, can you calculate: What is the debts to assets ratio of the parent entity in 2018? | Based on the calculation: 93,067/182,679, the result is 0.51. This is based on the information: "Current Liabilities 92,352 93,067 Total Assets 169,462 182,679..." The key data points involved are: 182,679, 93,067. | |
| | 6 | Also, can you calculate: What is the percentage change in the total comprehensive loss of the parent entity from 2018 to 2019? | To answer this question, I need to perform calculations using the financial data. The calculation is: (4,812-163)/163, which equals 2852.15 (percentage). This is based on the information: "Loss of the parent entity (4,812) (163) Loss of the parent entity (4,812) (163)..." The key data points involved are: 163, 4,812. | |
| | 7 | What are the Non-Current Liabilities of the parent entity in 2019? | 77,110 (in thousands). | |
| | 8 | What are the Total Liabilities of the parent entity in 2018? | 182,679 (in thousands). | |
| | 9 | What is the Equity of the parent entity in 2019? | 0 (in thousands). | |
| | 10 | What is the title of Section 6? | User Investments. | |
| | 11 | What is the text in the footer? | Iselect Group Annual Report 2019. | |
|
|
|
|
| ### Example 6 — 10 turns on one image |
|
|
|  |
|
|
| | # | question | answer | |
| |---|---|---| |
| | 1 | According to Vmware's financial document, What was the total revenue in 2020? | According to the financial document, 777 (in millions). The relevant text states: "Total revenue $ 777 $ 639 $ 474..." | |
| | 2 | Also, What was the net income in 2018? | According to the financial document, (234) (in millions). The relevant text states: "Net income (204) (832) (234)..." | |
| | 3 | Also, Which years does the table provide information for the effect of the change from the combination to the consolidated statements of income? | The document contains multiple relevant values: 2020, 2019, 2018. From the document: "2020 2019 2018 2020 2019 2018 2020 2019 2018..." | |
| | 4 | Also, can you calculate: What was the change in total revenue between 2018 and 2019? | Based on the calculation: 639-474, the result is 165 (in millions). This is based on the information: "Total revenue $ 777 $ 639 $ 474 Total revenue $ 777 $ 639 $ 474..." The key data points involved are: 474, 639. | |
| | 5 | Also, How many years did total revenue exceed $500 million? | Counting the relevant items in the document: 2020, 2019, I find 2 instances. The key data points involved are: 2019, 2020. | |
| | 6 | Also, can you calculate: What was the percentage change in net income between 2019 and 2020? | To answer this question, I need to perform calculations using the financial data. The calculation is: (-204-(-832))/-832, which equals -75.48 (percentage). This is based on the information: "Net income (204) (832) (234) Net income (204) (832) (234)..." The key data points involved are: 204, 832. | |
| | 7 | What is the name of the company presenting the financial statements? | VMware, Inc. | |
| | 8 | What was the gross profit for the year ended January 31, 2020? | $614 million. | |
| | 9 | What were the total operating expenses for the year ended January 31, 2018? | $372 million. | |
| | 10 | What was the basic net income per share for 2019? | $(1.63). | |
|
|
|
|
| ### Example 7 — 15 turns on one image |
|
|
|  |
|
|
| | # | question | answer | |
| |---|---|---| |
| | 1 | According to Microchip Technology's financial document, What was the reported net sales? | According to the financial document, 5,349.5 (in millions). The relevant text states: "Net sales $ 5,349.5 $ 5,380.1 $ (30.6)..." | |
| | 2 | Also, What was the change in cost of sales due to the standard? | According to the financial document, (15.8) (in millions). The relevant text states: "Cost of sales $ 2,418.2 $ 2,434.0 $ (15.8)..." | |
| | 3 | Also, What was the Balances without adoption of New Revenue Standard for gross profit? | According to the financial document, 2,946.1 (in millions). The relevant text states: "Gross profit $ 2,931.3 $ 2,946.1 $ (14.8)..." | |
| | 4 | Also, can you calculate: What was the difference in amount as reported between net sales and cost of sales? | Based on the calculation: 5,349.5-2,418.2, the result is 2931.3 (in millions). This is based on the information: "Cost of sales $ 2,418.2 $ 2,434.0 $ (15.8) Net sales $ 5,349.5 $ 5,380.1 $ (30.6)..." The key data points involved are: 2,418.2, 5,349.5. | |
| | 5 | Also, can you calculate: What was the difference between Net income from continuing operations and Income before income taxes? | Based on the calculation: 355.9-204.5, the result is 151.4 (in millions). This is based on the information: "Income before income taxes $ 204.5 $ 219.3 $ (14.8) Net income from continuing operations $ 355.9 $ 368.3 $ (12.4)..." The key data points involved are: 204.5, 355.9. | |
| | 6 | Additionally, Which reported amounts exceeded $3,000 million? | According to the financial document, Net sales. The relevant text states: "doption of the new standard impacts the Company's net sales on an ongoing basis depending on the relative amount of revenue sold through its distributors, the..." | |
| | 7 | According to Microchip Technology's financial document, What was the main reason given by the company for the significant changes in their financial statements noted in the table? | Based on the financial document, the answer is the transition from sellthrough revenue recognition to sell-in revenue recognition as required by the New Revenue Standard. | |
| | 8 | Also, What was the effect of change in the net accounts receivable? | According to the financial document, 324.5 (in millions). The relevant text states: "Accounts receivable, net $ 880.6 $ 556.1 $ 324.5..." | |
| | 9 | Also, What was the reported amount of inventories? | According to the financial document, 711.7 (in millions). The relevant text states: "Inventories $ 711.7 $ 724.2 $ (12.5)..." | |
| | 10 | Also, can you calculate: What was the difference in reported amounts between net accounts receivable and inventories? | Based on the calculation: 880.6-711.7, the result is 168.9 (in millions). This is based on the information: "Inventories $ 711.7 $ 724.2 $ (12.5) Accounts receivable, net $ 880.6 $ 556.1 $ 324.5..." The key data points involved are: 711.7, 880.6. | |
| | 11 | Also, can you calculate: What was the difference in reported amount between other assets and other current assets? | Based on the calculation: 191.6-111.8, the result is 79.8 (in millions). This is based on the information: "Other current assets $ 191.6 $ 154.7 $ 36.9 Other assets $ 111.8 $ 106.3 $ 5.5..." The key data points involved are: 111.8, 191.6. | |
| | 12 | Also, can you calculate: What was the Long-term deferred tax liability as a ratio of Accrued liabilities? | Based on the calculation: 706.1/787.3, the result is 89.69 (percentage). This is based on the information: "Long-term deferred tax liability $ 706.1 $ 689.3 $ 16.8 Accrued liabilities $ 787.3 $ 420.3 $ 367.0..." The key data points involved are: 706.1, 787.3. | |
| | 13 | What is the full name of the company whose financial statements are presented in the document? | Microchip Technology Incorporated. | |
| | 14 | According to the 'Business Segments' section, in which specific markets does the company sell its products? | Automotive, industrial, commercial, consumer, computing and communications markets. | |
| | 15 | What is the specific Accounting Standards Update (ASU) number mentioned in the 'Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements' section? | ASU 2014-09. | |
|
|
|
|
| ### Example 8 — 9 turns on one image |
|
|
|  |
|
|
| | # | question | answer (cleaned) | org_answer (pre-judge) | |
| |---|---|---|---| |
| | 1 | According to Teradyne's financial document, What do Prior year additions primarily relate to? | stock-based compensation. The document states: "credits. Prior year additions primarily relate to stock-based compensation. Prior year reductions are primarily composed of federal and state reserves..." | _(unchanged)_ | |
| | 2 | Also, What do Current year additions relate to? | federal and state research credits. The document states: "Current year additions relate to federal and state research credits. Prior year additions primarily relate to stock-based compensation. Prior year red..." | _(unchanged)_ | |
| | 3 | Also, In which years was Teradyne’s gross unrecognized tax benefits calculated? | The document contains multiple relevant values: 2019, 2018, 2017. From the document: "2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017..." | _(unchanged)_ | |
| | 4 | Additionally, In which year was the Ending balance, as of December 31 the largest? | 2019 | According to the financial document, 2018. The relevant text states: "2019 2018 2017..." | |
| | 5 | Also, can you calculate: What was the change in Beginning balance, as of January 1 in 2019 from 2018? | Based on the calculation: 43,395-36,263, the result is 7132 (in thousands). This is based on the information: ") Beginning balance, as of January 1 . $ 43,395 $ 36,263 $ 38,958 Additions: Tax positions for current year . 1,322 4,716 8,208 Tax positions for prior year thousands) Beginning balance, as of January..." The key data points involved are: 36,263, 43,395. | _(unchanged)_ | |
| | 6 | Also, can you calculate: What was the percentage change in Beginning balance, as of January 1 in 2019 from 2018? | To answer this question, I need to perform calculations using the financial data. The calculation is: (43,395-36,263)/36,263, which equals 19.67 (percentage). This is based on the information: ") Beginning balance, as of January 1 . $ 43,395 $ 36,263 $ 38,958 Additions: Tax positions for current year . 1,322 4,716 8,208 Tax positions for prior year thousands) Beginning balance, as of January..." The key data points involved are: 36,263, 43,395. | _(unchanged)_ | |
| | 7 | What is the title of the section containing the table of gross unrecognized tax benefits? | Note 10. INCOME TAXES | _(unchanged)_ | |
| | 8 | What is the Ending balance, as of December 31 for the year 2019? | 44,717 | _(unchanged)_ | |
| | 9 | What is the value for 'Additions: Tax positions for current year' in 2017? | 8,208 | _(unchanged)_ | |
|
|
|
|
| ### Example 9 — 17 turns on one image |
|
|
|  |
|
|
| | # | question | answer (cleaned) | org_answer (pre-judge) | |
| |---|---|---|---| |
| | 1 | According to International Business Machines's financial document, How does the company utilizes certain of its financing receivables? | The company utilizes certain of its financing receivables as collateral for nonrecourse borrowings.. The document states: "The company utilizes certain of its financing receivables as collateral for nonrecourse borrowings. Financing receivables pledged as collateral for bo..." | _(unchanged)_ | |
| | 2 | Also, What amount of Financing receivables pledged as collateral for borrowings in December 2018 and 2019? | Financing receivables pledged as collateral for borrowings were $1,062 million and $710 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.. The document states: "eivables as collateral for nonrecourse borrowings. Financing receivables pledged as collateral for borrowings were $1,062 million and $710 million at ..." | _(unchanged)_ | |
| | 3 | Also, Did the company have any financing receivables held for sale as of December 2019 and 2018. | The company did not have any financing receivables held for sale as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.. The document states: "The company did not have any financing receivables held for sale as of December 31, 2019 and 2018...." | _(unchanged)_ | |
| | 4 | Also, can you calculate: What is the average Unearned income? | The Unearned income values are (526), (37), and (563) for Commercial, Consumer, and Total respectively. The average would be (526+37+563)/3 = -375.33 (in millions). | Based on the calculation: 1,195 / 3, the result is 398.33 (in millions). This is based on the information: "Unearned income (526) (37) (632) (1,195) Unearned income (526) (37) (632) (1,195)..." The key data points involved are: 1,195. | |
| | 5 | Also, can you calculate: What is the average Recorded investment? | The Gross financing receivables are $6,320 million, $11,852 million, and $18,172 million. The average is (6320+11852+18172)/3 = 12114.67 (in millions). | Based on the calculation: 31,153 / 3, the result is 10384.33 (in millions). This is based on the information: "Recorded investment $6,320 $11,852 $12,981 $31,153 Recorded investment $6,320 $11,852 $12,981 $31,153..." The key data points involved are: 31,153. | |
| | 6 | Also, can you calculate: How much is the difference between Unguaranteed and Guaranteed residual value of Investment in Sales-Type and Direct Financing Leases? | Based on the calculation: 589-85 , the result is 504 (in millions). This is based on the information: "Unguaranteed residual value 589 — — 589 Guaranteed residual value 85 — — 85..." The key data points involved are: 589, 85. | _(unchanged)_ | |
| | 7 | According to International Business Machines's financial document, Why are Commercial financing receivables are excluded from financing receivables? | they are short term in nature and the current estimated risk of loss and resulting impact to the company’s financing results are not material.. The document states: "of financing receivables by portfolio segment, as they are short term in nature and the current estimated risk of loss and resulting impact to the com..." | _(unchanged)_ | |
| | 8 | Also, What were the write-offs in December 2019? | According to the financial document, $16 million. The relevant text states: "ffs of lease receivables and loan receivables were $16 million and $47 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2019. Provisions for credit losses re..." | _(unchanged)_ | |
| | 9 | Also, What is the average recorded investment of impaired leases and loans for Americas for December 2019? | According to the financial document, $138 million. The relevant text states: "and loans for Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific was $138 million, $49 million and $45 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2019. Both interest inc..." | _(unchanged)_ | |
| | 10 | Also, can you calculate: What is the average Recorded investment of Lease receivables for Americas and EMEA for December 2019? | To answer this question, I need to perform calculations using the financial data. The calculation is: (3,419+1,186) / 2 , which equals 2302.5 (in millions). This is based on the information: "Lease receivables $ 3,419 $1,186 $ 963 $ 5,567 Lease receivables $ 3,419 $1,186 $ 963 $ 5,567..." The key data points involved are: 1,186, 3,419. | _(unchanged)_ | |
| | 11 | Also, can you calculate: What is the average Recorded investment of Loan receivables for Americas and EMEA for December 2019? | To answer this question, I need to perform calculations using the financial data. The calculation is: (6,726+3,901) / 2 , which equals 5313.5 (in millions). This is based on the information: "Loan receivables 6,726 3,901 2,395 13,022 Loan receivables 6,726 3,901 2,395 13,022..." The key data points involved are: 3,901, 6,726. | _(unchanged)_ | |
| | 12 | Also, can you calculate: What is the average Allowance for credit losses of Lease receivables at the beginning of January 2019? | The Beginning balance for Lease receivables is 99, 37, 25, and 161. The average of the regional values is (99+37+25)/3 = 53.67 (in millions). | Based on the calculation: 99/ 3, the result is 33 (in millions). This is based on the information: "ectively evaluated for impairment $10,032 $5,040 $3,326 $18,399 aluated for impairment $10,032 $5,040 $3,326 $18,399..." The key data points involved are: 99. | |
| | 13 | What is the Gross financing receivables for the Commercial segment? | $6,320 million. | _(unchanged)_ | |
| | 14 | What is the Net financing receivables for the Total segment? | $17,609 million. | _(unchanged)_ | |
| | 15 | What were the provisions for credit losses for loan receivables for the year ended December 31, 2019? | $40 million. | _(unchanged)_ | |
| | 16 | What is the Recorded investment in impaired Lease receivables for Asia Pacific? | $963 million. | _(unchanged)_ | |
| | 17 | What is the Ending balance of the Allowance for credit losses on Loan receivables for the Total segment? | $170 million. | _(unchanged)_ | |
|
|
|
|
| ### Example 10 — 10 turns on one image |
|
|
|  |
|
|
| | # | question | answer | |
| |---|---|---| |
| | 1 | From On Semiconductor's financial document, How much Revenue was recognized for sales agreements for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 respectively? | The document shows two values: $5,492.0 million and $5,849.0 million. From the document: "sales agreements amounted to $5,492.0 million and $5,849.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Revenue recognized fo..." | |
| | 2 | Also, How much Revenue was recognized for product development agreements for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 respectively? | The document shows two values: $25.9 million and $29.3 million. From the document: "velopment agreements amounted to $25.9 million and $29.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. zed for product develop..." | |
| | 3 | Also, What are the three operating and reportable segments? | The document contains multiple relevant values: PSG, ASG, ISG.. From the document: "rating and reportable segments consisting of PSG, ASG and ISG. The Company's wafer manufacturing facilities fabricate ICs for all business units, as n..." | |
| | 4 | Also, can you calculate: What is the change in PSG Revenue from external customers from year ended December 31, 2018 to 2019? | Based on the calculation: 2,788.3-3,038.2, the result is -249.9 (in millions). This is based on the information: "Revenue from external customers $ 2,788.3 $ 1,972.3 $ 757.3 $ 5,517.9 Revenue from external customers $ 3,038.2 $ 2,071.2 $ 768.9 $ 5,878.3..." The key data points involved are: 2,788.3, 3,038.2. | |
| | 5 | Also, can you calculate: What is the change in ASG Revenue from external customers from year ended December 31, 2018 to 2019? | Based on the calculation: 1,972.3-2,071.2, the result is -98.9 (in millions). This is based on the information: "Revenue from external customers $ 3,038.2 $ 2,071.2 $ 768.9 $ 5,878.3 Revenue from external customers $ 2,788.3 $ 1,972.3 $ 757.3 $ 5,517.9..." The key data points involved are: 1,972.3, 2,071.2. | |
| | 6 | Also, can you calculate: What is the average PSG Revenue from external customers for year ended December 31, 2018 to 2019? | To answer this question, I need to perform calculations using the financial data. The calculation is: (2,788.3+3,038.2) / 2, which equals 2913.25 (in millions). This is based on the information: "Revenue from external customers $ 2,788.3 $ 1,972.3 $ 757.3 $ 5,517.9 Revenue from external customers $ 3,038.2 $ 2,071.2 $ 768.9 $ 5,878.3..." The key data points involved are: 2,788.3, 3,038.2. | |
| | 7 | What were the Revenue from external customers for the ISG segment for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018? | $757.3 million and $768.9 million. | |
| | 8 | What was the Total Revenue from external customers for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018? | $5,517.9 million and $5,878.3 million. | |
| | 9 | What was the Total revenue for the PSG segment for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018? | $3,788.3 million and $4,038.2 million. | |
| | 10 | What is the title of the note section shown in the document? | Note 1. Revenue and Segment Information. | |
|
|
|
|
