AdithyaSK's picture
AdithyaSK HF Staff
openai/math as Harbor environments: 355 validated tasks
16a4018 verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
14.9 kB
import Mathlib
namespace OAI
noncomputable section
universe u
open Set
open scoped ENNReal Classical
namespace BoundedTreePotentials
section TestNorms
variable {I : Type*}
structure TestFamily (I : Type*) where
carrier : Set (I → ℝ)
zero_mem : (0 : I → ℝ) ∈ carrier
neg_mem : ∀ f ∈ carrier, -f ∈ carrier
coeff_bound : ∀ f ∈ carrier, ∀ i, |f i| ≤ 1
singleton_mem : ∀ i, (fun j => if j = i then (1 : ℝ) else 0) ∈ carrier
instance : CoeSort (TestFamily I) (Type _) := ⟨fun K => K.carrier⟩
instance (K : TestFamily I) : Nonempty K.carrier := ⟨⟨0, K.zero_mem⟩⟩
def finitePairing (f : I → ℝ) : (I →₀ ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ :=
Finsupp.linearCombination ℝ f
def testNorm (K : TestFamily I) (x : I →₀ ℝ) : ℝ :=
⨆ f : K, |finitePairing f.val x|
def testSeminorm (K : TestFamily I) : Seminorm ℝ (I →₀ ℝ) := by
have finitePairing_apply (f : I → ℝ) (x : I →₀ ℝ) :
finitePairing f x = ∑ i ∈ x.support, x i * f i := rfl
have finitePairing_abs_bound (K : TestFamily I) (f : K) (x : I →₀ ℝ) :
|finitePairing f.val x| ≤ ∑ i ∈ x.support, |x i| := by
rw [finitePairing_apply]
calc
|∑ i ∈ x.support, x i * f.val i| ≤ ∑ i ∈ x.support, |x i * f.val i| :=
Finset.abs_sum_le_sum_abs _ _
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ x.support, |x i| := by
apply Finset.sum_le_sum
intro i hi
rw [abs_mul]
exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (abs_nonneg _) (K.coeff_bound _ f.property i)
have testNorm_bddAbove (K : TestFamily I) (x : I →₀ ℝ) :
BddAbove (range fun f : K => |finitePairing f.val x|) :=
⟨∑ i ∈ x.support, |x i|, by rintro _ ⟨f, rfl⟩; exact finitePairing_abs_bound K f x⟩
have finitePairing_le_testNorm (K : TestFamily I) (f : K) (x : I →₀ ℝ) :
|finitePairing f.val x| ≤ testNorm K x := le_ciSup (testNorm_bddAbove K x) f
have testNorm_nonneg (K : TestFamily I) (x : I →₀ ℝ) : 0 ≤ testNorm K x :=
(abs_nonneg _).trans (finitePairing_le_testNorm K ⟨0, K.zero_mem⟩ x)
have testNorm_le_l1 (K : TestFamily I) (x : I →₀ ℝ) :
testNorm K x ≤ ∑ i ∈ x.support, |x i| := by
apply ciSup_le
exact fun f => finitePairing_abs_bound K f x
have testNorm_zero (K : TestFamily I) : testNorm K 0 = 0 := by
apply le_antisymm
· simpa using testNorm_le_l1 K 0
· exact testNorm_nonneg K 0
have testNorm_add_le (K : TestFamily I) (x y : I →₀ ℝ) :
testNorm K (x + y) ≤ testNorm K x + testNorm K y := by
apply ciSup_le
intro f
rw [map_add]
exact (abs_add_le _ _).trans (add_le_add
(finitePairing_le_testNorm K f x) (finitePairing_le_testNorm K f y))
have testNorm_smul_le (K : TestFamily I) (a : ℝ) (x : I →₀ ℝ) :
testNorm K (a • x) ≤ ‖a‖ * testNorm K x := by
apply ciSup_le
intro f
rw [map_smul, smul_eq_mul, abs_mul, Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (finitePairing_le_testNorm K f x) (abs_nonneg a)
exact Seminorm.ofSMulLE (testNorm K) (testNorm_zero K) (testNorm_add_le K) (testNorm_smul_le K)
def TestVector (_ : TestFamily I) := I →₀ ℝ
instance (K : TestFamily I) : AddCommGroup (TestVector K) := inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (I →₀ ℝ))
instance (K : TestFamily I) : Module ℝ (TestVector K) := inferInstanceAs (Module ℝ (I →₀ ℝ))
instance (K : TestFamily I) : Norm (TestVector K) := ⟨testNorm K⟩
instance (K : TestFamily I) : NormedAddCommGroup (TestVector K) := by
have finitePairing_apply (f : I → ℝ) (x : I →₀ ℝ) :
finitePairing f x = ∑ i ∈ x.support, x i * f i := rfl
have finitePairing_abs_bound (K : TestFamily I) (f : K) (x : I →₀ ℝ) :
|finitePairing f.val x| ≤ ∑ i ∈ x.support, |x i| := by
rw [finitePairing_apply]
calc
|∑ i ∈ x.support, x i * f.val i| ≤ ∑ i ∈ x.support, |x i * f.val i| :=
Finset.abs_sum_le_sum_abs _ _
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ x.support, |x i| := by
apply Finset.sum_le_sum
intro i hi
rw [abs_mul]
exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (abs_nonneg _) (K.coeff_bound _ f.property i)
have testNorm_bddAbove (K : TestFamily I) (x : I →₀ ℝ) :
BddAbove (range fun f : K => |finitePairing f.val x|) :=
⟨∑ i ∈ x.support, |x i|, by rintro _ ⟨f, rfl⟩; exact finitePairing_abs_bound K f x⟩
have finitePairing_le_testNorm (K : TestFamily I) (f : K) (x : I →₀ ℝ) :
|finitePairing f.val x| ≤ testNorm K x := le_ciSup (testNorm_bddAbove K x) f
have finitePairing_single_test (x : I →₀ ℝ) (i : I) :
finitePairing (fun j => if j = i then (1 : ℝ) else 0) x = x i := by
classical
rw [finitePairing_apply]
simp only [mul_ite, mul_one, mul_zero]
by_cases hi : i ∈ x.support
· simp [hi]
· simp [hi, Finsupp.notMem_support_iff.mp hi]
have coordinate_le_testNorm (K : TestFamily I) (x : I →₀ ℝ) (i : I) :
|x i| ≤ testNorm K x := by
convert finitePairing_le_testNorm K ⟨_, K.singleton_mem i⟩ x using 1
rw [finitePairing_single_test]
exact NormedAddCommGroup.ofCore (𝕜 := ℝ) {
norm_nonneg := apply_nonneg (testSeminorm K)
norm_smul := map_smul_eq_mul (testSeminorm K)
norm_triangle := map_add_le_add (testSeminorm K)
norm_eq_zero_iff := fun x => ⟨by
intro h
apply Finsupp.ext
intro i
exact abs_nonpos_iff.mp (h ▸ coordinate_le_testNorm K x i), by
rintro rfl
exact map_zero (testSeminorm K)⟩ }
instance (K : TestFamily I) : NormedSpace ℝ (TestVector K) where
norm_smul_le a x := le_of_eq (map_smul_eq_mul (testSeminorm K) a x)
abbrev TestCompletion (K : TestFamily I) := UniformSpace.Completion (TestVector K)
end TestNorms
namespace TreeCalculus
abbrev Node := List ℕ
def potential (f : Node → ℝ) (s : Node) : ℝ := (s.inits.map f).sum
inductive QuadraticKind where
| sibling | antichain | global
deriving DecidableEq
def QuadraticGroup : QuadraticKind → Finset Node → Prop
| .sibling, B => ∃ r, ∀ s ∈ B, ∃ j, s = r ++ [j]
| .antichain, B => (B : Set Node).Pairwise (fun s t => ¬s <+: t ∧ ¬t <+: s)
| .global, _ => True
def QuadraticBudget (k : QuadraticKind) (f : Node → ℝ) : Prop :=
∀ B : Finset Node, QuadraticGroup k B → ∑ s ∈ B, f s ^ 2 ≤ 1
def CoefficientSupport : QuadraticKind → (Node → ℝ) → Prop
| .sibling, _ => True
| .antichain, f => (Function.support f).Finite
| .global, f => Memℓp f 2
structure IsTreeTest (includeRoot : Bool) (k : QuadraticKind) (f : Node → ℝ) : Prop where
root_zero : includeRoot = false → f [] = 0
potential_bound : ∀ s, |potential f s| ≤ 1
quadratic_budget : QuadraticBudget k f
coefficient_support : CoefficientSupport k f
abbrev TreeCoordinate (includeRoot : Bool) := {s : Node // includeRoot = true ∨ s ≠ []}
def liftCoefficients (r : Bool) (f : TreeCoordinate r → ℝ) (s : Node) : ℝ :=
if h : r = true ∨ s ≠ [] then f ⟨s, h⟩ else 0
def treeTestFamily (r : Bool) (k : QuadraticKind) : TestFamily (TreeCoordinate r) := by
have potential_root (f : Node → ℝ) : potential f [] = f [] := by simp [potential]
have potential_child (f : Node → ℝ) (s : Node) (j : ℕ) :
potential f (s ++ [j]) = potential f s + f (s ++ [j]) := by
simp [potential, List.inits_append]
have potential_smul (a : ℝ) (f : Node → ℝ) (s : Node) :
potential (a • f) s = a * potential f s := by
induction s using List.reverseRecOn with
| nil => simp [potential_root]
| append_singleton s j ih => simp only [potential_child, ih, Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul]; ring
have quadratic_singleton (k : QuadraticKind) {s : Node} (hs : s ≠ []) :
QuadraticGroup k {s} := by
cases k with
| sibling =>
cases s using List.reverseRecOn with
| nil => exact (hs rfl).elim
| append_singleton s j =>
refine ⟨s, ?_⟩
intro t ht
have ht' : t = s ++ [j] := by simpa using ht
exact ⟨j, ht'⟩
| antichain => simp [QuadraticGroup]
| global => trivial
have test_coefficient_bound {r : Bool} {k : QuadraticKind} {f : Node → ℝ}
(hf : IsTreeTest r k f) (s : Node) : |f s| ≤ 1 := by
by_cases hs : s = []
· subst s; simpa only [potential_root] using hf.potential_bound []
· have h := hf.quadratic_budget {s} (quadratic_singleton k hs)
rw [Finset.sum_singleton] at h
exact (sq_le_one_iff_abs_le_one (f s)).mp h
have quadraticBudget_dominate {k : QuadraticKind} {f g : Node → ℝ}
(hf : QuadraticBudget k f) (h : ∀ s, |g s| ≤ |f s|) : QuadraticBudget k g := by
intro B hB
apply le_trans _ (hf B hB)
apply Finset.sum_le_sum
intro s hs
exact (sq_le_sq).mpr (h s)
have coefficientSupport_dominate {k : QuadraticKind} {f g : Node → ℝ}
(hf : CoefficientSupport k f) (h : ∀ s, |g s| ≤ |f s|) : CoefficientSupport k g := by
cases k with
| sibling => trivial
| antichain =>
apply hf.subset
intro s hs
change g s ≠ 0 at hs
change f s ≠ 0
intro hzero
have hh := h s
rw [hzero, abs_zero] at hh
exact hs (abs_nonpos_iff.mp hh)
| global =>
exact (hf.norm).mono (by intro s; simpa only [Real.norm_eq_abs] using h s)
have zero_isTreeTest (r : Bool) (k : QuadraticKind) : IsTreeTest r k 0 := by
constructor
· simp
· intro s
change |(s.inits.map fun _ => (0 : ℝ)).sum| ≤ 1
simp
· intro B hB; simp
· cases k with
| sibling => trivial
| antichain => simp [CoefficientSupport]
| global => exact zero_memℓp
have neg_isTreeTest {r : Bool} {k : QuadraticKind} {f : Node → ℝ}
(hf : IsTreeTest r k f) : IsTreeTest r k (-f) := by
constructor
· intro hr; simpa using congrArg Neg.neg (hf.root_zero hr)
· intro s
have he : -f = (-1 : ℝ) • f := by ext s; simp
rw [he, potential_smul, neg_one_mul, abs_neg]
exact hf.potential_bound s
· exact quadraticBudget_dominate hf.quadratic_budget (by intro s; simp)
· exact coefficientSupport_dominate hf.coefficient_support (by intro s; simp)
have inits_nodup (s : Node) : s.inits.Nodup := by
induction s using List.reverseRecOn with
| nil => simp
| append_singleton s j ih =>
have he : (s ++ [j]).inits = s.inits ++ [s ++ [j]] := by simp [List.inits_append]
rw [he, List.nodup_append]
refine ⟨ih, by simp, ?_⟩
intro a ha b hb hab
have hb' : b = s ++ [j] := by simpa using hb
have hp := ((List.mem_inits a s).mp ha).length_le
rw [hab, hb', List.length_append, List.length_singleton] at hp
exact Nat.not_succ_le_self _ hp
have potential_single (i s : Node) :
potential (Pi.single i (1 : ℝ)) s = if i <+: s then 1 else 0 := by
rw [potential, ← List.sum_toFinset _ (inits_nodup s)]
simp only [Pi.single_apply]
by_cases h : i <+: s
· have hm : i ∈ s.inits.toFinset := List.mem_toFinset.mpr ((List.mem_inits i s).mpr h)
simp [hm, h]
· have hm : i ∉ s.inits.toFinset := fun hm => h ((List.mem_inits i s).mp (List.mem_toFinset.mp hm))
simp [hm, h]
have single_isTreeTest (r : Bool) (k : QuadraticKind) {i : Node}
(hi : r = true ∨ i ≠ []) : IsTreeTest r k (Pi.single i (1 : ℝ)) := by
constructor
· intro hr
have hn : [] ≠ i := by
rcases hi with hi | hi
· simp_all
· exact Ne.symm hi
exact Pi.single_eq_of_ne hn _
· intro s
rw [potential_single]
split_ifs <;> norm_num
· intro B hB
simp only [Pi.single_apply, ite_pow, one_pow, zero_pow (by decide : (2 : ℕ) ≠ 0)]
by_cases h : i ∈ B <;> simp [h]
· cases k with
| sibling => trivial
| antichain =>
change (Function.support (Pi.single i (1 : ℝ))).Finite
exact (Set.finite_singleton i).subset (by intro s hs; simpa [Function.mem_support, Pi.single_apply] using hs)
| global => exact (lp.single (E := fun _ : Node => ℝ) 2 i (1 : ℝ)).property
have liftCoefficients_coord {r : Bool} (f : TreeCoordinate r → ℝ) (s : TreeCoordinate r) :
liftCoefficients r f s.val = f s := by simp [liftCoefficients, s.property]
have liftCoefficients_zero (r : Bool) : liftCoefficients r 0 = 0 := by
ext s; simp [liftCoefficients]
have liftCoefficients_neg (r : Bool) (f : TreeCoordinate r → ℝ) :
liftCoefficients r (-f) = -liftCoefficients r f := by
ext s
by_cases h : r = true ∨ s ≠ [] <;> simp [liftCoefficients, h]
exact {
carrier := {f | IsTreeTest r k (liftCoefficients r f)}
zero_mem := by
change IsTreeTest r k (liftCoefficients r 0)
rw [liftCoefficients_zero]
exact zero_isTreeTest r k
neg_mem := by
intro f hf
change IsTreeTest r k (liftCoefficients r (-f))
rw [liftCoefficients_neg]
exact neg_isTreeTest hf
coeff_bound := by
intro f hf i
simpa only [liftCoefficients_coord] using test_coefficient_bound hf i.val
singleton_mem := by
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
change IsTreeTest r k (liftCoefficients r _)
convert single_isTreeTest r k hi using 1
ext s
by_cases h : r = true ∨ s ≠ []
· simp [liftCoefficients, h, Pi.single_apply, Subtype.mk.injEq]
· have hn : s ≠ i := by rintro rfl; exact h hi
simp [liftCoefficients, h, hn] }
end TreeCalculus
section AsymptoticModuli
variable (E : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
structure ClosedFiniteCodim where
space : Submodule ℝ E
closed : IsClosed (space : Set E)
finiteCodim : Module.Finite ℝ (E ⧸ space)
def averagedModulusReal (t : ℝ) : ℝ :=
⨅ x : {x : E // ‖x‖=1},⨆ F : ClosedFiniteCodim E,
⨅ y : {y : E // y ∈ F.space ∧ 1≤‖y‖},
(‖x.val+t • y.val‖+‖x.val-t • y.val‖)/((2 : ℕ) : ℝ)-1
def oneSidedModulusReal (t : ℝ) : ℝ :=
⨅ x : {x : E // ‖x‖=1},⨆ F : ClosedFiniteCodim E,
⨅ y : {y : E // y ∈ F.space ∧ ‖y‖=1},‖x.val+t • y.val‖-1
def IsAUCReal : Prop := ∀ t : ℝ, 0 < t → 0 < oneSidedModulusReal E t
end AsymptoticModuli
open TreeCalculus in
theorem TreeCalculus.main_counterexample (r : Bool) (k : QuadraticKind) :
(CompleteSpace (TestCompletion (treeTestFamily r k)) ∧
TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace (TestCompletion (treeTestFamily r k)) ∧
¬Module.Finite ℝ (TestCompletion (treeTestFamily r k))) ∧
(∀ t : ℝ, 0 < t → t < 1 →
Real.sqrt (1 + t ^ 2 / 4) - 1 ≤
averagedModulusReal (TestCompletion (treeTestFamily r k)) t) ∧
(∀ (Y : Type u) [NormedAddCommGroup Y] [NormedSpace ℝ Y],
(TestCompletion (treeTestFamily r k) ≃L[ℝ] Y) → ¬IsAUCReal Y) := by
sorry
end BoundedTreePotentials
end
end OAI