The dataset viewer is not available for this split.
Error code: UnexpectedError
Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
- What's New in v5.17
- What's New in v5.16
- What's New in v5.15
- What's New in v5.14
- What's New in v5.13
- What's New in v5.12
- What's New in v5.9
- What's New in v5.8
- What's New in v5.7
- What's New in v5.6
- What's New in v5.5
- Snapshot freshness
- Data API — per-record access
- Dataset Description
- Companion Parquet Datasets — User Reviews, News, and Community Comments
- Quick Start
- File Format
- Links
- License
- Citation
FragDB v5.17 — Fragrance Database (Multilingual Sample)
The most comprehensive structured fragrance database available. This is a free sample of FragDB: 140,946 perfumes, 23 languages — 10-row CSV samples at root.
Full dataset: fragdb.net.
What's New in v5.17
- Data updated from v5.16 → v5.17 (snapshot 2026-09-30):
- Fragrances: 140,230 → 140,946 (+716)
- Brands: 8,316 → 8,359 (+43)
- Perfumers: 3,126 → 3,144 (+18)
- Notes: 2,606 → 2,610 rows in
notes.csv(+4)
- Companion parquet refreshed — user reviews 4,986,774 → 4,988,692 (+1,918), editorial articles 25,619 → 25,709 (+90), news comments 276,483 → 277,446 (+963).
- Figures on this page and in
SPEC.mdare measured against the v5.17 files. Several had been left behind by earlier releases — the snapshot dates, the category split, the PID references, the archived share and the reply rate here, and most ofSPEC.md, which still described the May 2026 snapshot. All of them are now restated. - Correction: 84 of the 250 newest articles (NID 25,970 and above) carry
date_unix = 0; earlier text said every non-archived article is dated. - Sample files unchanged: the schema did not move between v5.16 and v5.17.
What's New in v5.16
- Data updated from v5.15 → v5.16 (snapshot 2026-09-19):
- Fragrances: 139,501 → 140,230 (+729)
- Brands: 8,272 → 8,316 (+44)
- Perfumers: 3,116 → 3,126 (+10)
- Notes: 2,596 → 2,606 rows in
notes.csv(+10)
- Companion parquet refreshed for the first time since June — user reviews 4,643,851 → 4,986,774 (+342,923), editorial articles 24,440 → 25,619 (+1,179), news comments 263,798 → 276,483 (+12,685).
- New: a Data API — per-record HTTP access to the same catalogue, priced per record. See the section below.
- Derived figures re-measured against the new files: review coverage 66.9% → 69.8%, English share 1.69M → 1.88M, reply rate 4.9% → 5.5%.
- Sample files unchanged: the schema did not move between v5.15 and v5.16.
What's New in v5.15
- Data updated from v5.14 → v5.15 (full source recrawl, parser run 260910):
- Fragrances: 137,789 → 139,501 (+1,712)
- Brands: 8,247 → 8,272 (+25)
- Perfumers: 3,110 → 3,116 (+6)
- Notes: 2,592 → 2,596 rows in
notes.csv(+7 new, 3 retired)
- Three note IDs retired — the source merged case duplicates:
n473→n2661(Heather),n653→n2646(Icing Pink),n813→n2660(Hazelnut Cocoa Spread). No fragrance references the retired IDs. - Figures on this card restated from the release files. The notes figure is now the row
count of
notes.csv, the number fragdb.net shows; the full-database totals had stayed at v5.10. Review coverage and foreign-key figures are measured against this catalogue. - Reviews, news and news comments — the same parquet files as v5.14.
- Sample files unchanged — the schema is identical to v5.14, so the 10-row CSVs were not rebuilt. A sample shows structure, not freshness.
What's New in v5.14
- Data updated from v5.13 → v5.14 (incremental delta, parser run 260901):
- Fragrances: 137,147 → 137,789 (+642)
- Brands: 8,210 → 8,247 (+37)
- Perfumers: 3,102 → 3,110 (+8)
- Unique note names: 2,586 (unchanged — the notes reference only moves on a full crawl)
- Sample files unchanged — the schema is identical to v5.13, so the 10-row CSVs were not rebuilt. A sample shows structure, not freshness.
What's New in v5.13
- Data updated from v5.12 → v5.13 (incremental delta, parser run 260819):
- Fragrances: 136,682 → 137,147 (+465)
- Brands: 8,175 → 8,210 (+35)
- Perfumers: 3,090 → 3,102 (+12)
- Notes: 2,586 → 2,588 (+2) — including
Kiwano, which arrived with all 22 translations in its first cycle
- Clean delta: no perfume changed its canonical URL and none disappeared; field coverage flat across all 30 columns (max movement 0.22 pp)
- Free sample refreshed — 10-record CSV samples rebuilt from v5.13 data
What's New in v5.12
- Data updated from v5.10 → v5.12 (full source recrawl, parser run 260809):
- Fragrances: 135,308 → 136,682 (+1,374)
- Brands: 8,093 → 8,175 (+82)
- Perfumers: 3,057 → 3,090 (+33)
- Notes: 2,573 → 2,586 (+13) — 100% multilingual, verified per language
- 784 records restored — a resume-scan defect had frozen them since May; their votes, ratings and note pyramids are current again
- Free sample refreshed — 10-record CSV samples rebuilt from v5.12 data
What's New in v5.9
- Data updated from v5.8 → v5.9 (parser run 260710):
- Fragrances: 134,022 → 134,577 (+555)
- Brands: 8,000 → 8,036 (+36) — 154 brand names canonicalized (restored
Fragrance(s)suffix; IDs stable) - Perfumers: 3,035 → 3,046 (+11)
- Notes: 2,562 → 2,567 (+5)
- URL hygiene: pyramid anchors single-domain, photo cache-busters stripped
- Free sample refreshed — 10-record CSV samples rebuilt from v5.9 data
What's New in v5.8
- Data updated from v5.7 → v5.8 (parser run 260701):
- Fragrances: 133,392 → 134,022 (+630)
- Brands: 7,953 → 8,000 (+47)
- Perfumers: 3,020 → 3,035 (+15)
- Notes: 2,559 → 2,562 (+3)
What's New in v5.7
- Data updated from v5.6 → v5.7 (parser run 260619):
- Fragrances: 132,858 → 133,392 (+534)
- Brands: 7,927 → 7,953 (+26)
- Perfumers: 3,005 → 3,020 (+15)
- Notes: 2,550 → 2,559 (+9)
What's New in v5.6
- Data updated from v5.5 → v5.6 (parser run 260609):
- Fragrances: 132,124 → 132,858 (+734)
- Brands: 7,881 → 7,927 (+46)
- Perfumers: 2,988 → 3,005 (+17)
- Notes: 2,533 → 2,550 (+17)
- Notes multilingual 100% coverage (was 99.8%) — 6 previously gap-filled notes now complete across all 22 languages
- Photo URL stability — source cache-buster query params stripped, eliminating phantom diffs across releases
- Schema unchanged from v5.5 — existing loaders work without modification
- Free sample files unchanged (10-record structure preserved)
What's New in v5.5
- Data updated from v5.4 → v5.5 (parser run 260601):
- Fragrances: 130,949 → 132,124 (+1,175)
- Brands: 7,815 → 7,881 (+66)
- Perfumers: 2,968 → 2,988 (+20)
- Notes: 2,522 → 2,533 (+11)
Schema unchanged from v5.4
All F column counts identical (30/54/42/55/27/25) — existing scripts work without modification.
From v5.4 (unchanged in v5.5)
- 23 languages — all labels, note names, accords, countries, statuses translated
- 9 non-Latin scripts for perfumer name transliteration
- translations.csv — vocabulary file (34 entries) for gender and voting labels
- Compact notes pyramid —
note_id,opacity,weight(name/icon via notes.csv JOIN) - Each note name variant has its own ID with translations
- Gender & voting fields use translation IDs for multilingual support
Snapshot freshness
- Data refreshed: 2026-09-30 (v5.17)
- Reviews, news, news comments (parquet): refreshed in this release — latest review 2026-09-30, latest article 2026-09-27, latest news comment 2026-09-30
Data API — per-record access
The whole catalogue, one record at a time. A metered HTTP API over the same database we sell as files. You pay per record returned, at the level of detail you ask for. No subscription and no seats: top up a balance, fetch what your application needs, cache it as long as you like.
fragdb.net/api → · OpenAPI spec · Sign up · FAQ · Terms
Endpoints
GET /api/v1/fragrances/{id} one record
GET /api/v1/brands/{id} one brand
GET /api/v1/notes/{id} one note
GET /api/v1/perfumers/{id} one perfumer
POST /api/v1/{collection}/batch up to 100 ids in one call
GET /api/v1/index the full index, gzipped JSONL
GET /api/v1/release current release label and date — free
GET /api/v1/account balance, limits, usage — free
Detail level is chosen with ?level=list|basic|full.
There are no list endpoints. /api/v1/fragrances?limit=50 answers 404, by design. You
enumerate the catalogue with the index file — id, name, brand, year and change status — search
it on your side, and fetch whole records only for the hits you need. The index costs no units
and needs a paid key: five downloads a day, and an unchanged index answers 304.
Detail levels
| Level | Units | Per record | What comes back |
|---|---|---|---|
list |
1 | $0.0025 | id, brand, name, year, gender, rating with vote count, and a thumbnail |
basic |
2 | $0.005 | plus the photo, the collection, review count, main accords with their strength and the credited perfumers |
full |
4 | $0.01 | the note pyramid as published, seven vote blocks, description, pros and cons, related fragrances, and every label translated inline |
1 unit = $0.0025. Top-ups are multiples of $50, from $100 up to $5,000 — $100 buys 40,000 units. Paid units do not expire while the account is open. Minimum spend is $100 (40,000 units) per 180 days, $16.67 a month, counted from the first top-up. Payment in BTC, ETH, TRX, XMR or USDT.
Try it before you pay
Sign up and a free test key appears straight away. It costs nothing, charges nothing and serves 5 sample records at every level — enough to write your parser against the real shape of a response before you pay for anything.
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer <your test key>" \
"https://fragdb.net/api/v1/fragrances/f_9kwkhn9yqx?level=full"
That id is one of the five public samples, so the call works on a test key.
Already bought a database file? You get 500 units for 30 days to try the API. (The 500 units come with a file purchase, not with signing up.)
Limits
10 requests per second and 300 per minute on a key · 20 per second on an account · 100 ids per batch call · 50,000 charged records per account per UTC day · 5 index downloads per day · 5 keys per account. Call the API from your server, never from a browser.
How it sits next to the files
The API serves the same catalogue that is sold as files, refreshed about three times a month.
Every response carries the release label and its date, and GET /api/v1/release tells you
which release you are on.
Ids are permanent: a record withdrawn at its source stays available with its last known content and a status flag.
Reviews, news articles and community comments are not in the API — those stay in the downloadable files described in this dataset card.
Dataset Description
| File | Records | Fields | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
fragrances.csv |
10 | 30 | Iconic fragrances (v5.9) |
brands.csv |
10 | 54 | Brand profiles + 22 lang translations |
perfumers.csv |
10 | 42 | Perfumer profiles + 22 lang + 9 name translit |
notes.csv |
10 | 55 | Fragrance notes + 22 lang translations |
accords.csv |
10 | 27 | Accords + 22 lang translations |
translations.csv |
34 | 25 | Gender & voting vocabulary (full) |
comments_sample.parquet |
25 | 8 | User reviews preview (parquet) |
news_sample.parquet |
20 | 16 | Editorial articles preview (parquet) |
news_comments_sample.parquet |
20 | 9 | News comments preview (parquet) |
SPEC.md |
— | — | Parquet schema documentation |
Loading the data
from datasets import load_dataset
f = load_dataset("FragDBnet/fragrance-database") # fragrances (default)
brands = load_dataset("FragDBnet/fragrance-database", "brands")
notes = load_dataset("FragDBnet/fragrance-database", "notes")
Companion Parquet Datasets — User Reviews, News, and Community Comments
FragDB ships with three Apache Parquet datasets containing 4.9 million rows of user-generated content and editorial coverage — the largest publicly-organized corpus of fragrance reviews and perfumery journalism. Use them for NLP, sentiment analysis, recommendation systems, market research, or training language models on fragrance-specific text.
Keywords: fragrance reviews · perfume reviews · multilingual UGC corpus · NLP training data · fragrance sentiment · perfumery journalism · perfume recommendation · scent recommendation · review classification · entity linking · knowledge graph · fragrance industry news · perfume articles
comments.parquet — 5.0 Million User Reviews in 23 Languages
The world's largest collection of structured fragrance reviews. Every entry includes the perfume ID (joinable with fragrances.csv), author username, posting date, full review text, avatar URL, and language code.
- 4,988,692 user reviews covering every major perfume in the database
- 23 languages — English (1.88M), Russian, Portuguese, Spanish, Korean, Turkish, Japanese, Polish, Italian, Hungarian, Serbian, Swedish, German, Hebrew, Ukrainian, French, Arabic, Greek, Czech, Chinese, Romanian, Mongolian, Dutch
- Coverage: 69.4% of all fragrances have at least one review (97,849 of 140,946 PIDs)
- Deterministic global primary key — stable comment IDs survive re-scrapes
- Zero duplicate rows; every
pidjoinsfragrances.csvexcept 48 reviews (0.001%) on 10 perfumes no longer in the catalogue - Independent UGC per language — genuine localized content, not machine translation
- 8 fields:
pid,lang,comment_id,author,date,text,avatar_url,gradient_class - PyArrow large_string format — combined corpus exceeds 32-bit string offset limit
Use cases: sentiment analysis · review classification · recommendation systems · perfume similarity from text · language detection benchmark · multilingual NLP training corpus · fragrance market research · author network analysis · trend detection by language
news.parquet — 25,709 Editorial Articles (2008–2026)
Two decades of professional fragrance journalism. Every article includes title, author, full text (plain + HTML), category, related perfumes/brands/perfumers, publication date, and main image.
- 25,709 editorial articles from 2008 to 2026 — complete public archive
- 30+ categories — New Fragrances (34.0%), Fragrance Reviews (24.0%), Niche Perfumery (10.2%), Designer Brands, Interviews, History, Industry News
- Bilingual storage —
text(plain) for NLP,text_html(markup preserved) for rich display - Linked entities —
related_pids[],related_brands[],related_perfumers[]as JSON arrays - 126,428 PID references — all but 175 (0.14%) resolve; those point to perfumes no longer in the catalogue
- 60.1% archived legacy, 39.9% modern articles, all dated except 84 of the 250 newest (NID 25,970 and above)
- 16 fields:
nid,title,category,author,url,is_archived,date_unix,description,text,text_html,main_image,article_images,related_pids,related_brands,related_perfumers,comments_count
Use cases: content recommendation · article search engine · perfume knowledge graph · trend analysis · author influence study · entity linking · timeline analysis · industry research · niche perfumery research
news_comments.parquet — 277,446 Threaded Community Comments
Community discussions attached to editorial articles, with threading support for replies. Joinable with news.parquet via nid.
- 277,446 threaded comments across 22,974 articles (89.4% of news articles have ≥1 comment)
- 5.5% reply rate — threaded conversations with reply detection
- 100% populated timestamps
- 9 fields:
nid,comment_id,is_reply,author,date,date_unix,text,avatar_url,gradient
Use cases: community engagement analysis · threaded discussion mining · reply network construction · comment sentiment · author activity profiles
Tier Availability
The parquet datasets ship with all paid tiers except the $200 Core:
| Tier | CSV Core | Parquet Datasets |
|---|---|---|
| $200 One-Time Core | ✅ | ❌ |
| $400 One-Time Full Database | ✅ | ✅ |
| Annual Subscription | ✅ | ✅ (always latest) |
| Lifetime Access | ✅ | ✅ (always latest) |
See https://fragdb.net/#pricing for complete tier comparison.
Quick Start — Parquet
import pyarrow.parquet as pq
import pandas as pd
import json
reviews = pq.read_table('comments.parquet').to_pandas()
fragrances = pd.read_csv('fragrances.csv', sep='|')
reviews_with_meta = reviews.merge(fragrances, on='pid', how='left')
news = pq.read_table('news.parquet').to_pandas()
news['related_pids_list'] = news['related_pids'].apply(json.loads)
news_comments = pq.read_table('news_comments.parquet').to_pandas()
Full schema in SPEC.md.
Use Cases
CSV Core (all tiers):
- E-commerce — Enrich product listings with detailed fragrance data, notes, accords
- Mobile Apps — Build fragrance collection managers, scent discovery apps, perfume catalog apps
- Data Analysis — Analyze fragrance industry trends by brand, country, perfumer, year
- Recommendations — Content-based or collaborative filtering systems using accord/note vectors
- Multilingual UIs — Localized perfume catalogs in 23 languages out of the box
- Knowledge Graphs — Brand → Perfumer → Fragrance → Notes → Accords graph construction
- Market Research — Country-of-origin analysis, parent company portfolios, perfumer productivity stats
Parquet Datasets ($400+ tiers):
- NLP & Sentiment Analysis — Train models on 5.0M multilingual fragrance reviews
- Recommender Systems — Hybrid models combining CSV structure with review text similarity
- Language Models — Domain-specific corpus for fragrance/perfumery LLM fine-tuning
- Review Classification — Identify positive/negative reviews, fake review detection
- Trend Detection — News article timeline analysis, emerging fragrance trends
- Author Networks — Identify influential reviewers, perfumery journalists, community leaders
- Content-Based Discovery — "Articles about this perfume" — JOIN news.related_pids with fragrances.pid
- Community Analytics — Reply networks, engagement metrics on editorial content
- Cross-Language Studies — Compare review sentiment across 23 languages for the same fragrance
- Search Engines — Full-text search across reviews, articles, and structured metadata
- Knowledge Extraction — Mine 26K editorial articles for perfume facts, launch dates, perfumer interviews
Full Database
| Sample | Full Database | |
|---|---|---|
| Fragrances | 10 | 140,946 |
| Brands | 10 | 8,359 |
| Perfumers | 10 | 3,144 |
| Notes | 10 | 2,610 |
| Accords | 10 | 92 |
| Translations | 34 | 34 |
| Languages | 23 | 23 |
| Total Records | ~84 | 155,185 |
Quick Start
The sample files are independent slices. Each holds the top 10 rows of its own table, so an id taken from
fragrances.csvusually has no matching row in this 10-rowbrands.csv. The snippet below is the join you run against the full database; on the sample it will return few rows or none, and that is the sample being small, not the data being broken.
import pandas as pd
fragrances = pd.read_csv('fragrances.csv', sep='|')
brands = pd.read_csv('brands.csv', sep='|')
notes = pd.read_csv('notes.csv', sep='|')
translations = pd.read_csv('translations.csv', sep='|')
# Join and translate
fragrances['brand_id'] = fragrances['brand'].str.split(';').str[1]
df = fragrances.merge(brands, left_on='brand_id', right_on='id', suffixes=('', '_brand'))
trans = translations.set_index('id')
df['gender_ru'] = df['gender'].map(lambda x: trans.loc[x, 'ru'] if x in trans.index else x)
print(df[['name', 'name_brand', 'country_ru', 'gender_ru']])
File Format
- Format: CSV (pipe
|delimited) - Encoding: UTF-8
- Quote Character:
"(double quote)
Links
- Full Database: fragdb.net
- GitHub: github.com/FragDB/fragrance-database
License
This sample is released under the CC BY-NC 4.0 License. Free for non-commercial use with attribution.
Citation
@dataset{fragdb2026,
title={FragDB Fragrance Database},
author={FragDB},
year={2026},
version={5.10},
url={https://fragdb.net},
note={Multilingual dataset with 6 files, 23 languages}
}
- Downloads last month
- 359