You need to agree to share your contact information to access this dataset

This repository is publicly accessible, but you have to accept the conditions to access its files and content.

Log in or Sign Up to review the conditions and access this dataset content.

Missing-Data Prediction Benchmark — results

Two experiments on medical datasets under simulated missingness (MCAR/MAR/MNAR, rates 0.1–0.5, seeds 42/1/7), reported as mean [95% CI].

This release contains the complete Information-Acquisition benchmark at a uniform missing rate of 0.3. Scenario 2 includes local AFA-engine results, curves, seed-aggregated CI tables, qualitative examples, classification AUROC, and per-engine cached/uncached token accounting across five classification datasets (arrhythmia, breast_cancer, gallstone, heart_disease, parkinsons) and four regression datasets (diabetes, nhanes, who_life_expectancy, medical_cost).

Scenario 1 uses gpt-5.6-terra to select features and predict directly. It is complete for the same classification and regression dataset sets. Classification Scenario 1 reports accuracy, F1, precision, and recall are preserved from the original label-only query. Classification AUROC comes from a separate probability replay with the original selection path unchanged; this mixed provenance is noted in the A/B report. Regression Scenario 1 predicts a continuous numeric target and reports RMSE, MAE, and R2. MIMIC Scenario 1 is absent because credentialed MIMIC-derived records are not sent to third-party APIs.

No patient-level records, raw MIMIC data, trained models, or LLM traces containing MIMIC features are published.

Classification Scenario 1 vs Scenario 2

dataset mech LLM acc AFA acc LLM F1 AFA F1 LLM AUROC AFA AUROC best AFA LLM tokens S2 cached S2 uncached ↓ cached ↓ uncached
arrhythmia MAR 0.458 0.736 0.44 0.734 0.494 0.772 random_forest 10,516,156 31,992 417,730 99.7% 96.0%
arrhythmia MCAR 0.473 0.74 0.456 0.738 0.431 0.784 random_forest 10,544,703 31,992 404,444 99.7% 96.2%
arrhythmia MNAR 0.513 0.707 0.495 0.704 0.423 0.771 random_forest 10,926,848 31,992 414,435 99.7% 96.2%
breast_cancer MAR 0.921 0.977 0.921 0.977 0.979 0.996 smart 348,937 4,835 56,524 98.6% 83.8%
breast_cancer MCAR 0.927 0.98 0.927 0.979 0.979 0.996 mim_smim 373,315 4,191 13,165 98.9% 96.5%
breast_cancer MNAR 0.927 0.974 0.927 0.974 0.983 0.995 smart 348,073 4,835 67,905 98.6% 80.5%
gallstone MAR 0.495 0.771 0.483 0.769 0.543 0.838 hist_gb 823,103 5,990 50,355 99.3% 93.9%
gallstone MCAR 0.495 0.755 0.482 0.755 0.484 0.814 mim_smim 830,642 6,043 43,630 99.3% 94.7%
gallstone MNAR 0.51 0.771 0.499 0.77 0.49 0.817 random_forest 814,237 6,043 48,555 99.3% 94.0%
heart_disease MAR 0.7 0.844 0.698 0.844 0.78 0.903 smart 197,635 2,068 18,610 99.0% 90.6%
heart_disease MCAR 0.694 0.856 0.693 0.855 0.672 0.893 mim_smim 208,505 2,068 11,775 99.0% 94.4%
heart_disease MNAR 0.694 0.833 0.693 0.833 0.768 0.899 smart 198,665 2,068 18,187 99.0% 90.8%
parkinsons MAR 0.761 0.897 0.776 0.889 0.841 0.961 hist_gb 159,996 3,368 19,475 97.9% 87.8%
parkinsons MCAR 0.752 0.889 0.767 0.887 0.87 0.931 hist_gb 155,967 3,322 15,660 97.9% 90.0%
parkinsons MNAR 0.744 0.872 0.759 0.873 0.836 0.948 xgboost 164,584 3,373 14,908 98.0% 90.9%

How to read (no download needed)

Every CSV opens in HuggingFace's Dataset Viewer (sortable, in-browser):

  • experiment1_prediction/prediction_classification_long.csv / prediction_regression_long.csv — one tidy row per (method, dataset, mechanism, rate, seed) with all metrics + status. This is the clean, flat view of every run (no folder-diving).
  • experiment1_prediction/classification_mean_ci.csv / regression_mean_ci.csv — the same, collapsed to mean [95% CI] over seeds (blank cells carry a Status).
  • experiment2_acquisition/acquisition_ab_report.csv — matched-sample classification Scenario 1 vs Scenario 2 accuracy and token comparison.
  • experiment2_acquisition/curves_long.csv — per-budget Scenario 2 trajectories and Scenario 1 trajectories for both tasks.
  • experiment2_acquisition/acquisition_curves_ci.csv / acquisition_final_ci.csv — seed-aggregated metrics for both scenarios.
  • experiment2_acquisition/scenario2_method_token_accounting.csv — per-engine cached and uncached Scenario-2 token accounting.
  • DATA_DICTIONARY.md — column definitions and status meanings.
  • raw_prediction/ — per-cell raw Exp-1 metric JSON (in-scope datasets, canonical layout, see raw_prediction/README_LATEST.md).
  • raw_acquisition/ — per-cell raw complete Scenario-1 LLM and Scenario-2 AFA outputs (no model weights).

Data-use / MIMIC-III notice

One regression dataset (mimic_lengthofstay) is derived from MIMIC-III, credentialed under the PhysioNet Data Use Agreement. This repository contains only aggregate derived metrics — no patient-level records, no raw MIMIC data, and no models trained on MIMIC.

Generated 2026-09-09 by scripts/reporting/prepare_hf_upload.py.

Downloads last month
54