Missing-Data Prediction Benchmark — results
Two experiments on 5 classification + 5 regression medical datasets under simulated missingness (MCAR/MAR/MNAR, rates 0.1–0.5, seeds 42/1/7), reported as mean [95% CI].
Headline
A cheap Active-Feature-Acquisition arm matches or beats a strong LLM baseline (gpt-5.6-terra) on accuracy while using 97.3–99.5% fewer tokens (cached; 76.2–95.3% under conservative per-step accounting).
Experiment 2 — LLM baseline vs AFA (headline)
| dataset | mech | LLM acc | AFA acc | best AFA | LLM tokens | S2 cached | S2 uncached | ↓ cached | ↓ uncached |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| breast_cancer | MAR | 0.915 | 0.965 | smart | 463,109 | 4,835 | 110,018 | 99.0% | 76.2% |
| breast_cancer | MCAR | 0.924 | 0.98 | mim_smim | 414,789 | 4,515 | 19,485 | 98.9% | 95.3% |
| breast_cancer | MNAR | 0.933 | 0.962 | xgboost | 480,151 | 4,835 | 110,615 | 99.0% | 77.0% |
| gallstone | MAR | 0.49 | 0.771 | random_forest | 1,103,203 | 6,043 | 60,795 | 99.5% | 94.5% |
| gallstone | MCAR | 0.495 | 0.755 | mim_smim | 830,642 | 6,043 | 43,630 | 99.3% | 94.7% |
| gallstone | MNAR | 0.49 | 0.76 | random_forest | 1,289,357 | 6,043 | 76,806 | 99.5% | 94.0% |
| heart_disease | MAR | 0.7 | 0.839 | smart | 258,031 | 2,068 | 25,029 | 99.2% | 90.3% |
| heart_disease | MCAR | 0.694 | 0.856 | mim_smim | 208,505 | 2,068 | 11,775 | 99.0% | 94.4% |
| heart_disease | MNAR | 0.694 | 0.833 | smart | 198,665 | 2,068 | 18,187 | 99.0% | 90.8% |
| parkinsons | MAR | 0.761 | 0.897 | hist_gb | 159,996 | 3,368 | 19,475 | 97.9% | 87.8% |
| parkinsons | MCAR | 0.744 | 0.872 | hist_gb | 234,958 | 3,211 | 22,513 | 98.6% | 90.4% |
| parkinsons | MNAR | 0.752 | 0.897 | lightgbm | 113,330 | 3,097 | 9,260 | 97.3% | 91.8% |
How to read (no download needed)
Every CSV opens in HuggingFace's Dataset Viewer (sortable, in-browser):
experiment2_acquisition/acquisition_ab_report.csv— the table above.experiment1_prediction/prediction_classification_long.csv/prediction_regression_long.csv— one tidy row per (method, dataset, mechanism, rate, seed) with all metrics + status. This is the clean, flat view of every run (no folder-diving).experiment1_prediction/classification_mean_ci.csv/regression_mean_ci.csv— the same, collapsed to mean [95% CI] over seeds (blank cells carry aStatus).experiment2_acquisition/curves_long.csv— per-budget line-plot data.DATA_DICTIONARY.md— column definitions and status meanings.raw_prediction/— per-cell raw Exp-1 metric JSON (in-scope datasets, canonical layout, see raw_prediction/README_LATEST.md).raw_acquisition/— per-cell raw Exp-2 AFA traces + LLM-baseline outputs (no model weights).
Data-use / MIMIC-III notice
One regression dataset (mimic_lengthofstay) is derived from MIMIC-III, credentialed
under the PhysioNet Data Use Agreement. This repository contains only aggregate derived
metrics — no patient-level records, no raw MIMIC data, and no models trained on MIMIC.
Generated 2026-07-28 by scripts/prepare_hf_upload.py.
- Downloads last month
- 3