raw_dataset / CVE /results /paper_method.md
linhai
data: add IoTProber CVE evaluation dataset
4bfe235
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
1.97 kB
## Statistical Method
We constructed a live candidate pool by querying the Censys Platform for 11
IoT device classes and iteratively expanding underrepresented classes until
the pool contained 5,800 cross-class unique public IP
addresses. IoTProber identified a type label and vendor label from the
46-column multi-perspective fingerprint evidence. We retained candidates only
when the Shodan host query returned `ok` and the IoTProber vendor label was not
`Unknown`, then selected the first 200 eligible addresses per class (2,200
instances in total). Consequently, 100% Shodan host coverage and 100%
IoTProber vendor-label availability are sampling constraints and must not be
interpreted as unbiased population-level performance estimates.
For every validation IP, we queried Censys and Shodan and applied a
native-first mapping hierarchy. Platform-reported CVEs were used first,
followed by platform-reported CPEs. Only when neither was available did we
construct a type-compatible CPE from that method's own device type, vendor,
product, and version observations; baseline methods never reused the
IoTProber vendor label. Candidate mappings were restricted to the CISA
Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and explicit product versions were
validated against affected-version ranges from CVE.org.
We report pooled and per-device-class coverage on the balanced validation set.
Binary proportions include Wilson 95% confidence intervals. Since all methods
were evaluated on the same IPs, pairwise differences were tested using the
two-sided exact McNemar test and are accompanied by absolute percentage-point
differences. Platform-native CVE reports, product-level candidates, and
version-confirmed mappings are reported separately.
For the shared vendor metric, we report agreement between each method's device
vendor and the IoTProber vendor label. Generic software component vendors such
as Apache or Linux are not counted as device-vendor identifications.