Datasets:
The dataset viewer is not available for this subset.
Exception: SplitsNotFoundError
Message: The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.
Traceback: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 286, in get_dataset_config_info
for split_generator in builder._split_generators(
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
StreamingDownloadManager(base_path=builder.base_path, download_config=download_config)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
)
^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/webdataset/webdataset.py", line 81, in _split_generators
first_examples = list(islice(pipeline, self.NUM_EXAMPLES_FOR_FEATURES_INFERENCE))
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/webdataset/webdataset.py", line 32, in _get_pipeline_from_tar
fs: fsspec.AbstractFileSystem = fsspec.filesystem("memory")
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/fsspec/registry.py", line 302, in filesystem
cls = get_filesystem_class(protocol)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/fsspec/registry.py", line 239, in get_filesystem_class
raise ValueError(f"Protocol not known: {protocol}")
ValueError: Protocol not known: memory
The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/split_names.py", line 71, in compute_split_names_from_streaming_response
for split in get_dataset_split_names(
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
path=dataset,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
config_name=config,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
token=hf_token,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
)
^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 340, in get_dataset_split_names
info = get_dataset_config_info(
path,
...<6 lines>...
**config_kwargs,
)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 291, in get_dataset_config_info
raise SplitsNotFoundError("The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.") from err
datasets.inspect.SplitsNotFoundError: The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
DuoPose Processed Database
This repository contains the processed target-level database used by the DuoPose project and its evaluated model variants, including GeoPose and the DuoPose family. The archive is reconstructed from the DecoyDB-derived structural source. It is not a copy of the complete upstream DecoyDB repository. The processing pipeline used the project code to convert receptor, native-ligand, and decoy PDBQT structures into one PyTorch/PyTorch Geometric object per target.
Repository files
processed_full.tar
processed_full.tar.sha256
README.md
processed_full.tar: archive containing the processed target-level files.processed_full.tar.sha256: SHA-256 checksum for the archive.README.md: dataset description, reconstruction details, download and verification instructions.
The archive contains one top-level directory, processed_full/, and exactly
61,085 target-level .pt files.
Dataset statistics
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Complete raw target directories identified | 61,104 |
| Successfully processed targets | 61,085 |
| Raw targets excluded from formal statistics | 19 |
| Excluded fraction | 0.031095% |
| Processed coverage of complete raw targets | 99.968905% |
| Extracted processed tensor bytes | 5,675,197,832 |
| Train targets | 48,868 |
| Validation targets | 6,108 |
| Test targets | 6,109 |
| Total fixed-split targets | 61,085 |
The 19 excluded raw targets did not produce valid processed objects. Because the excluded fraction is very small, no imputation was performed. Only successfully reconstructed targets were included in the formal processed dataset and the fixed train/validation/test split lists.
The split lists are maintained in the companion DuoPose source-code
repository. The data archive itself does not create separate train/, val/,
or test/ directories; all target files are stored together under
processed_full/.
Upstream source and reconstruction
The original structural source is DecoyDB:
This project reconstructed a target-level pose-ranking database rather than redistributing the complete upstream repository. The main processing stages were:
- Scan the DecoyDB-derived structural archive and group files by target.
- Parse receptor, native-ligand, and decoy coordinates from PDBQT files.
- Compute the geometric center of the native ligand.
- Extract receptor atoms within an 8 Å pocket radius.
- Construct 32-dimensional protein atom features.
- Parse decoy
MODELblocks and retain decoys with atom counts compatible with the native ligand. - Recompute decoy RMSD values using Kabsch alignment.
- Save one target-level
.ptdictionary for each successfully processed target. - Re-read native ligands to add 32-dimensional ligand atom features and ligand element labels.
The corresponding source-code entry points are:
scripts/process_full_dataset.py
scripts/augment_ligand_features.py
dataset.py::PocketSubgraphExtractor
dataset.py::DTIDataset
scripts/verify_processed_dataset.py
The upstream auxiliary CSV RMSD column is not used as the label source for the
processed .pt objects. RMSD values are recomputed from the coordinates and
are used for decoy selection, curriculum/ranking weights, and reporting; RMSD
is not provided directly as a model node feature.
Processed file structure
Each file is a target-level dictionary serialized with PyTorch. The expected schema is:
<target_id>.pt
protein_graph: torch_geometric.data.Data
x: [N_protein, 32] # protein atom features
pos: [N_protein, 3] # coordinates in Å
true_ligand_coords: [N_ligand, 3] # native pose coordinates in Å
ligand_atom_features: [N_ligand, 32] # ligand atom features
ligand_elements: list[str]
decoys: list[dict]
coords: [N_ligand, 3] # decoy coordinates in Å
rmsd: float # Kabsch-aligned RMSD
target_id: str
The cached target files contain the protein graph node features and positions, but the final model radius graph is constructed dynamically during model execution. The model pipeline uses a dynamic graph cutoff of approximately 12 Å.
Task semantics
Each target contains:
- one receptor pocket;
- one native ligand pose, treated as the positive pose;
- multiple decoy ligand poses, treated as negative candidates;
- recomputed RMSD values for pose quality and ranking-related procedures.
The dataset is used for native-versus-decoy pose ranking rather than as a pre-expanded binary-classification table.
Download
The processed DuoPose dataset can be downloaded from Hugging Face with:
hf download Kilig33/DuoPose-database processed_full.tar \
--repo-type dataset \
--local-dir .
Download the archive checksum with:
hf download Kilig33/DuoPose-database processed_full.tar.sha256 \
--repo-type dataset \
--local-dir .
The repository ID is Kilig33/DuoPose-database.
Archive integrity verification
The archive checksum currently recorded for processed_full.tar is:
70d69cb4b8aa74653d0863d43c16ae73389ebee71b7145760e00b17d2b656387 processed_full.tar
Windows PowerShell
$expected = ((Get-Content .\processed_full.tar.sha256).Trim() -split '\s+')[0].ToLower()
$actual = (Get-FileHash -Algorithm SHA256 .\processed_full.tar).Hash.ToLower()
if ($expected -ne $actual) {
throw "SHA-256 verification failed"
}
Write-Output "SHA-256 verification passed"
Linux or macOS
sha256sum -c processed_full.tar.sha256
The expected result is:
processed_full.tar: OK
Extraction
Windows, Linux, or macOS
tar -xf processed_full.tar
After extraction, the expected directory is:
processed_full/
|-- <target_id>.pt
|-- <target_id>.pt
`-- ...
The archive contains exactly 61,085 .pt files under processed_full/.
Expected project location
After extraction, place or link the directory into the companion source-code repository as:
DuoPose/data/processed_full/
For example:
DuoPose/
|-- data/
| `-- processed_full/
| |-- <target_id>.pt
| `-- ...
|-- dataset.py
|-- scripts/
`-- ...
The code repository provides the authoritative train/validation/test lists and the per-file SHA-256 manifest. After restoring the archive, the processed data can be checked with:
python scripts/verify_processed_dataset.py \
--processed-dir data/processed_full \
--manifest checksums/processed_full_files.sha256 \
--split-dir data
Data integrity audit
The processed directory used to create this archive was audited on August 6, 2026. The audit found:
- 61,085 processed
.ptfiles; - 0 zero-byte files;
- 0 missing files;
- 0 extra files;
- 0 SHA-256 mismatches against the per-file release manifest;
- disjoint train, validation, and test splits;
- complete split coverage of all 61,085 processed targets;
- no ZIP-container integrity errors in the serialized target files;
- all required target-level key markers present.
The per-file manifest and detailed audit record are maintained in the
companion source-code release. The archive-level checksum in this repository
must be regenerated whenever processed_full.tar is replaced.
Licensing and citation
This repository contains the processed target-level dataset used by the DuoPose project.
When using this dataset, please cite the associated DuoPose paper and the original DecoyDB dataset. The processed archive is a project-derived reconstruction and should not be presented as the complete upstream DecoyDB dataset.
The dataset-card metadata currently uses license: other. Update this field
when the final license for the processed derivative dataset has been confirmed.
- Downloads last month
- 50