Download README.md from LocalLLaMA/datainventor-typed-extraction-expand: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 6.51 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/LocalLLaMA/datainventor-typed-extraction-expand/resolve/main/README.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/LocalLLaMA/datainventor-typed-extraction-expand/README.md
-
curl -L -o README.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/LocalLLaMA/datainventor-typed-extraction-expand/resolve/main/README.md
license: cc-by-sa-4.0
language:
- en
task_categories:
- token-classification
- question-answering
tags:
- synthetic
- datainventor
- expand
size_categories:
- n<1K
configs:
- config_name: like-yours
data_files:
- split: train
path: data/like-yours.jsonl
- config_name: related-tasks
data_files:
- split: train
path: data/related-tasks.jsonl
pretty_name: 'DataInventor Expand: typed extraction'
DataInventor Expand: typed extraction
Synthetic typed-extraction cases in the format of LocalLLaMA/typed-extraction: a document (state), a map of typed fields to extract (fields), and the gold answer for each (gold: value, source, alts and character spans). It was grown with the Expand mode of DataInventor, which takes a small dataset you own and writes more rows in the same schema. 167 rows in total; each growth mode is a separate config.
Seed
16 rows of the train split of LocalLLaMA/typed-extraction (9,642 cases): four each from the squad2, drop, lease and wikipedia families. Released under CC BY-SA 4.0 like the seed.
Engine
openai/gpt-oss-20b on DeepInfra through the Hugging Face router (reasoning effort low). Each row is written in two calls: the input fields first, then the output fields given that input and three full seed rows as examples.
Checks applied to every row
- Schema: the seed's columns and types;
n_fieldsis recomputed fromfields;fieldsandgoldmust have the same keys. - Entry structure, measured from the seed: every
fieldsentry hasname,type,instructionsandoptions, withtypeone of the seed's (text,number,date,duration); everygoldentry hasvalue,source,altsandspans, withsourceone of the seed's (span,computed,normalised). Flat or partial entries are rejected; extra keys are dropped. - Values fit their field type: numbers for
numberandduration, ISO dates fordate(or null). - Spans: a
spananswer must appear in the document (text exactly or ignoring case, numbers as written, with or without thousands separators), and its character offsets are recomputed from the document; the model's offsets are never kept. Empty strings become null. - Text: degenerate text, prompt leaks, placeholders, tables and code fences (the seed has none), and length bounds from the seed (in
like-yours; per-task bounds from the plan inrelated-tasks). - Duplicates: exact and near-duplicates of seed rows and of other new rows, and 13-gram overlap with six public benchmarks.
Rows that fail any check are rejected and counted by reason; the counts are below.
Configs
like-yours (92 rows)
More data like yours: new rows on the seed's own topics, three rotating seed rows shown as examples for each.
- Plan: Historical events, Sports statistics, Real estate contracts, Wikipedia city profiles, Film metadata, Medical statistics, War history, Business contracts, Government appointments, Economic data, Demographics, Legal documents.
- Attempts: 159. Kept by the run: 100. Rejected during the run:
- span not in the document: 30
- malformed entry in gold: 8
- entry value not in the seed (fields.type): 3
- rule broken: 3
- too short: 2
- entry value not in the seed (gold.source): 2
- broken JSON: 1
- missing a field: 1
- malformed entry in fields: 1
- Removed after the run, by a check added after it finished or by hand review: 8
- span not in the document: 7
- removed after hand review: 1
- Near-duplicates: mean highest word-3-gram overlap with a seed row 0.051, with another new row 0.065; no row at 0.5 or above.
- Topic spread (topic labels from the seed, one model call per 25 rows): 2.78 bits in the seed, 3.17 bits in the new rows.
- Time 2.9 min; endpoint cost $0.0412.
related-tasks (75 rows)
Related tasks: six other tasks from the same domain, written in the same fields and language.
- Plan: Event Timeline, Key Figures, Statistical Summary, Location Mapping, Cause and Effect, Source Attribution.
- Attempts: 380. Kept by the run: 78. Rejected during the run:
- span not in the document: 143
- malformed entry in gold: 62
- malformed entry in fields: 51
- entry value not in the seed (fields.type): 22
- rule broken: 10
- broken JSON: 10
- entry value not in the seed (gold.source): 3
- missing a field: 1
- Removed after the run, by a check added after it finished or by hand review: 3
- span not in the document: 3
- Near-duplicates: mean highest word-3-gram overlap with a seed row 0.007, with another new row 0.015; no row at 0.5 or above.
- Topic spread (topic labels from the seed, one model call per 25 rows): 2.83 bits in the seed, 2.92 bits in the new rows.
- Time 5.6 min; endpoint cost $0.0876.
Columns
id, family, origin, held_out, state, reference_date, fields (JSON string), gold (JSON string), n_fields, plus expand_mode and expand_topic. family, origin and held_out copy the seed's values so the rows load alongside it; they do NOT mean a row came from SQuAD 2.0, DROP or Wikipedia: every row here is synthetic.
Limits
- The checks prove that every span is in its document and every value has the right type. They do not prove that the right span was chosen or that a
computedornormalisedvalue is right. A 15-row read per config found one wrong computed answer inlike-yours(a question about a war the document does not mention, answered with a number instead of null; that row was removed) and fields that repeat the same question. Expect similar errors in rows nobody read. - Documents are invented and some contain false history or garbled facts (for example, a misdated battle); the gold answers follow the document, not the world.
reference_datecopies seed values and does not always fit the document.- An
outside-domainconfig was generated and left out: in a 15-row read, 2 rows filled a review date the document never gives. - Every row was written by a language model and has not been checked by a person beyond a 15-row read per config. The checks catch format faults, not wrong facts.
- Synthetic data repeats the habits and blind spots of the model that wrote it. Read a sample before you train on it.
Make your own with DataInventor. License: CC-BY-SA-4.0.