Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
question_id
stringlengths
1
3
modality
stringclasses
3 values
question
stringlengths
57
572
reference_answer
stringlengths
1
242
choices
null
1
Spectrum
Sequentially download LST and NDVI data for the agricultural region near Urumqi, Xinjiang for the three years 2019, 2020 and 2021. Then, compute the dryness indicator from these two variables, fit its linear trend, and characterize the year-by-year variation.
Decreasing dryness at 0.029 per year
null
2
Spectrum
The Chengdu Plain Agricultural Zone in Sichuan Province is a crucial rice-producing region in southwestern China. On July 12, 2021, researchers analyzed MODIS-derived Land Surface Temperature (LST) and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) data to assess drought conditions across the Chengdu Plain. Using a dryn...
28.00%
null
3
Spectrum
Based on the temperature and vegetation indicators (NDVI and LST) in the Yellow River Basin region from 10 June to 30 September 2023, calculate the number of spikes in the drought index, which may correspond to severe drought events.
2
null
4
Spectrum
Using temperature and vegetation data (NDVI and LST) on August 13, 2022, calculate the dryness indicator distribution in the urban area of Chengdu and its surroundings, and then calculate the percentage of the total area with dryness values above 0.75 to identify possible urban drought hotspots.
15.16%
null
5
Spectrum
Based on temperature and vegetation indices (NDVI and LST) in the Central Valley of California, U.S., from 9 May to 31 October 2021, calculate the number of times when more than 40% of the area exhibited a drought index value exceeding 0.7, indicating widespread extreme drought.
The proportion of pixels with TVDI values exceeding 0.7 surpassed 40% occurred 4 times
null
6
Spectrum
Based on Landsat 8 thermal band 10 and reflectance bands (Red and NIR) data over New York City from 2018 to 2022, calculate the annual linear trend of land surface temperature using the single-channel NDVI-based method. Calculate the approximate rate of change.
+2.42 K/year
null
7
Spectrum
Using Landsat 8 TOA data (Band 10) in Death Valley National Park during the 2021 heatwave season (June-September), calculate how many days showed over 50% of the area with land surface temperatures above 315 K .
5 days
null
8
Spectrum
Based on brightness temperature and reflectance data from Landsat 8 Band 10, Band 4, and Band 5 on August 11, 2021, in the Okavango Delta , calculate the proportion of the area had surface temperature below 300 K.
39.97%
null
9
Spectrum
Based on Landsat 8 Band 10 (brightness temperature) data from January to December 2021 in the Chicago metropolitan area, calculate how many days showed more than 25% of the urban area with surface temperatures above 300 K.
7 days
null
10
Spectrum
Based on brightness temperature and reflectance values from Landsat 8 Band 10, Band 4, and Band 5 over the Black Forest region, Germany on July 29, 2021, calculate how much cooler was the forested area (NDVI > 0.7) compared to the surrounding non-vegetated area (NDVI < 0.2), based on average LST.
8.9 K higher
null
11
Spectrum
Based on thermal Band 31 and Band 32 data over Tokyo metropolitan area on August 10, 2022, calculate the proportion of the area with land surface temperature exceeding 310 K.
50.86%
null
12
Spectrum
Based on thermal Band 31 and Band 32 data over the Murray–Darling Basin in Australia during January 2023, calculate how many days had more than 30% of the area with LST above 310 K, indicating heat stress on crops.
3 days
null
13
Spectrum
Based on thermal Band 31 and Band 32 data over the Sahara Desert region from 2021 to 2023, calculate the linear trend of land surface temperature using the split-window algorithm.
-1.98 K/year
null
14
Spectrum
Based on thermal Band 31 and Band 32 data over the Sahara Desert region from 2021 to 2023, estimate land surface temperature (LST) using the split-window algorithm, derive annual average LST values, and perform the Mann-Kendall trend test on the annual LST time series to report the trend significance.
p = 0.296, non-significant trend
null
15
Spectrum
Based on thermal infrared Band 31 and Band 32 data over the Tibetan Plateau from May 1 to May 15, 2022, determine the date on which the maximum average land surface temperature (LST) occurs.
May 5, 306.50 K
null
16
Spectrum
Based on surface reflectance values from MODIS bands b02 (0.865 ΞΌm), b05 (1.240 ΞΌm), b17 (0.905 ΞΌm), b18 (0.936 ΞΌm), and b19 (0.940 ΞΌm) over the Turpan region in Xinjiang during 2020, estimate the daily atmospheric absorption indicator using the band ratio method. Calculate how many months showed values below 70% of th...
5
null
17
Spectrum
Using MODIS surface reflectance from bands b02 (0.865 ΞΌm), b05 (1.240 ΞΌm), b17 (0.905 ΞΌm), b18 (0.936 ΞΌm), and b19 (0.940 ΞΌm), estimate atmospheric absorption levels over the urban region of Hangzhou on August 10, 2021. Calculate the percentage of the area shows enhanced absorption (above 115% of the urban mean), sugge...
41.15%
null
18
Spectrum
Using MODIS surface reflectance bands b02, b05, b17, b18, and b19 (corresponding to 0.865 ΞΌm, 1.240 ΞΌm, 0.905 ΞΌm, 0.936 ΞΌm, and 0.940 ΞΌm respectively) over the Loess Plateau from 2018 to 2019, apply the band ratio method to estimate yearly atmospheric absorption values. Calculate the observed linear trend over this per...
Decrease of 0.470 g/cmΒ² per year
null
19
Spectrum
Using MODIS bands b02, b05, b17, b18, and b19 (corresponding to 0.865 ΞΌm, 1.240 ΞΌm, 0.905 ΞΌm, 0.936 ΞΌm, and 0.940 ΞΌm respectively), monitor atmospheric absorption over the coast of Guangdong during July 20–31, 2023.Calculate the peak value of absorption observed during this period using the band ratio method.
83.43 g/cmΒ²
null
20
Spectrum
Based on daily atmospheric absorption indicator derived from MODIS b02, b05, b17, b18, and b19 in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain during 2023, identify the number of abrupt increase events (sudden spikes) in water vapor content possibly related to storm occurrences. Calculate how many such events were detected.
6
null
21
Spectrum
Using TES-derived land surface temperature from ASTER Bands 10-14 on June 15, 2022, over the specified Los Angeles metropolitan area, calculate the percentage of urban pixels exhibiting LST > 310 K combined with emissivity < 0.96, indicating urban heat island intensity during early summer.
30.97%
null
22
Spectrum
Using TES-derived land surface temperature and emissivity from ASTER Bands 10–14 on June 15, 2022, over the Los Angeles metropolitan area, identify and count pixels where LST exceeds 310 K and emissivity variation (ΔΡ) exceeds 0.08, representing thermal hotspots linked to intense urban heating.
9467
null
23
Spectrum
Based on TES output from ASTER thermal bands on May 23, 2020 in the Sahara Desert region near Tamanrasset, Algeria, calculate the proportion of the area where emissivity variation (ΔΡ) exceeds 0.06, indicating possible land cover heterogeneity.
100%
null
24
Spectrum
Apply the TES algorithm to ASTER thermal data (Bands 10–14) acquired on May 23, 2020, to estimate land surface temperature. Compute the proportion of valid pixels where LST is greater than 288.5 K.
26.75%
null
25
Spectrum
Apply the TES algorithm to ASTER thermal data from June 15, 2022, to estimate LST and emissivity across the Los Angeles metro area. Identify pixels with LST > 300 K and compute the mean emissivity variation (ΔΡ) within those high-temperature zones.
19.49
null
26
Spectrum
On October 23, 2022, use LST retrieved via the Three-Temperature Method (TTM) from ASTER Bands 10–12 to calculate the percentage of pixels exceeding 278 K over the specified region (as defined by polygon coordinates), in order to identify potential high fire risk areas under drought conditions.
29.57%
null
27
Spectrum
On October 23, 2022, using TTM-derived LST from ASTER Bands 10-12 (10:30 AM local time), compare: calculate the mean LST difference (Ξ”LST) between Saitama Prefecture and Tokyo, two cities at similar latitudes (~34-36Β°N) on opposite sides of the Pacific, considering their partial overlap in latitude.
0.29 K
null
28
Spectrum
On June 28, 2020, using TTM-derived LST from ASTER Bands 10-12 over the Paris metropolitan area (defined by the polygon), calculate the Urban Heat Island Index (UHII) as the mean LST difference between urban pixels (LST > 295K) and surrounding rural pixels (LST ≀ 290K).
43.31 K
null
29
Spectrum
Using ASTER Bands 10–12 data on April 13, 2022, the Three-Temperature Method (TTM) was applied to estimate Land Surface Temperature (LST) in two Australian Outback regions. Calculate the absolute difference in their average LST values.
0.62 K
null
30
Spectrum
Based on TTM-derived land surface temperature from ASTER Bands 10-12 on August 2, 2020, over the specified Mediterranean coastal area near Barcelona, calculate the max daytime LST recorded in urban areas within this region.
296.58 K
null
31
Spectrum
Calculate the land surface temperature (LST) over the Taklamakan Desert near Hotan on February 23, 2020 using the split-window algorithm based on the following local input: Thermal band 31 (~11ΞΌm), Thermal band 32 (~12ΞΌm), Emissivity for band 31, Emissivity for band 32. Calculate the average surface temperature across ...
316.60 K
null
32
Spectrum
Define an extreme temperature event as days when the surface parameter derived from Band 31 and Band 32 using the split-window algorithm exceeds the mean by 10%. Based on data from the region surrounding Taklamakan, Xinjiang from June 3 to June 30, 2021, determine the temporal sequence of data exceeding the 10% thresho...
2 days
null
33
Spectrum
Based on thermal Band 31 and 32 data from irrigated farmland in northern Hebei on August 5, 2021, apply the split-window algorithm to compute LST. Then classify the region into three thermal zones: low (< 295 K), medium (295–305 K), and high (> 305 K). Calculate the percentage of the high-temperature area.
96.92%
null
34
Spectrum
Based on thermal Band 31 and 32 data from the urban area of Guangzhou from 2018 to 2023, use the split-window algorithm to compute land surface temperature (LST). Then calculate the annual average LST for each year and determine which year recorded the highest average temperature, along with the corresponding LST value...
2022, 305.30K
null
35
Spectrum
Based on thermal Band 31 and 32 data from the central urban area of Wuhan on July 15, 2022, apply the split-window algorithm to compute LST. Define high-temperature zones as LST > 310 K, and calculate the percentage of high-temperature area.
55.56%
null
36
Spectrum
Based on MODIS Day and Night brightness temperature and emissivity Bands 31 over North American Great Plains during July 2023, define extreme heat days as days with daytime LST exceeding 320 K. Calculate the percentage of extreme heat days in that month.
80.0%
null
37
Spectrum
Using MODIS Day and Night brightness temperature and emissivity bands 31 over the Ganges River Basin during January 1-7, 2021, count the number of nights when nighttime LST fell below 305 K.
0
null
38
Spectrum
Using thermal Bands 31 and 32 over the Sahara Desert for June 2020 and June 2021, estimate LST via the split-window algorithm. Compute the monthly average LST for each year and calculate the absolute difference.
12.44 K
null
39
Spectrum
Using MODIS Day brightness temperature and emissivity Bands 31 over the southern Sahara edge from July 1 to July 10 in 2023, calculate the number of days when more than 30% of the region's pixels had daytime LST exceeding 315 K.
0 days
null
40
Spectrum
Using MODIS Day brightness temperature and emissivity Band 31 over Central California during July of 2015 and 2023, calculate the average percentage of pixels exceeding 320 K daytime LST for each year, then compute the change between the two years.
Decrease of 9.90%
null
41
Spectrum
Calculate the change in average Apparent Thermal Inertia (ATI) between July 1 and July 10, 2020, over the Mediterranean island of Cyprus. Calculate the approximate change.
No change
null
42
Spectrum
Using Apparent Thermal Inertia (ATI) calculated from satellite thermal bands and albedo, analyze and visualize the areas with lowest ATI values (below 1.0) indicating potential drought stress in the Sahel region for the month of May 2023. Calculate the proportion of the region is affected.
97.82%
null
43
Spectrum
Define a thermal anomaly as Apparent Thermal Inertia (ATI) below 1.2. Based on ATI data derived from daytime/nighttime brightness temperature and albedo in the agricultural region of Central Valley, California during July 2022, count the number of days the anomaly occurs.
5 days
null
44
Spectrum
Based on Apparent Thermal Inertia (ATI) calculated from daytime and nighttime brightness temperature and surface albedo over the urban area of Beijing, China from June 1 to September 30, 2019, calculate the monthly ATI trend. Calculate the month which shows the largest decrease in ATI?
June
null
45
Spectrum
Based on Apparent Thermal Inertia (ATI) and daytime/nighttime brightness temperatures over California during August 2022 wildfire events, identify the percentage of the region with ATI values below 0.4, suggesting burned and dry soil.
99.92%
null
46
Spectrum
Based on temperature and vegetation reflectance data (NDVI and LST) from the agricultural region near Urumqi, Xinjiang in 2019, calculate the daily and annual average of the dryness indicator (TVDI), and describe the overall dryness characteristics for the year.
Annual Mean TVDI: 0.6897
null
47
Spectrum
Using MODIS LST and NDVI data over the Chengdu Plain on July 12, 2021, calculate TVDI and determine the mean TVDI value in areas where the LST exceeds 300 K.
0.6856
null
48
Spectrum
Based on NDVI and LST data over the Yellow River Basin in 2023, calculate the monthly average values of TVDI and analyze their linear trend to describe the temporal variation of drought severity across this period.
0.005
null
49
Spectrum
Using NDVI and LST data from August 13, 2022, calculate the spatial distribution of TVDI in Chengdu and its surroundings, classify drought severity according to the defined TVDI thresholds, TVDI < 0.4: No drought;0.4–0.75: Moderate drought;0.75: Severe drought, and determine the percentage of area in each drought level...
No Drought (TVDI < 0.4): 29.97%; Mild Drought (0.4 ≀ TVDI < 0.75): 54.87%; Severe Drought (TVDI β‰₯ 0.75): 15.16%
null
50
Spectrum
Using NDVI and LST data from June 10 to August 29 in 2021 in the Central Valley, calculate the daily TVDI images, determine the daily proportions of pixels with TVDI > 0.7, compute the monthly average proportions for June and August, and analyze the temporal change of these proportions during the two months.
8.15%
null
51
Spectrum
Using Landsat 8 thermal and reflectance data in 2022 over New York City, estimate LST based on NDVI and thermal band 10 using the single-channel method, then calculate the average LST for summer and autumn, and determine the mean difference to assess seasonal temperature variation between these two periods.
6.26K
null
52
Spectrum
Using Landsat 8 TOA data (Band 10) for Death Valley National Park in June 2021, calculate the daily proportion of pixels with LST > 315 K and then compute the average of these proportions across all days in June.
46.08%
null
53
Spectrum
Based on brightness temperature and reflectance data from Landsat 8 Band 10, Band 4, and Band 5 on August 11, 2021, in the Okavango Delta, calculate the proportion of the area with LST greater than 305 K.
1.17%
null
54
Spectrum
Using Landsat 8 Band 10 data for Chicago from June to August 2021, calculate the daily proportion of pixels with LST > 305 K, then count the number of days where this proportion exceeded 10%, representing extreme urban heat events in summer.
3 days
null
55
Spectrum
Using Landsat 8 Band 10, Band 4, and Band 5 data for the Black Forest region on July 29, 2021, calculate the maximum land surface temperature (LST) in forested areas (NDVI > 0.7) and in non-vegetated areas (NDVI < 0.2), then compute the difference between these maxima.
4.57 K
null
56
Spectrum
Using thermal Band 31 and Band 32 data over Tokyo on August 10, 2022, calculate the proportion of the area with land surface temperature below 300 K.
14.85%
null
57
Spectrum
Using thermal Band 31 and Band 32 data over the Murray-Darling Basin from January 1 to January 10 in 2023, calculate the daily proportion of pixels with LST > 310 K, then compute the average of these proportions across the available dates in this period.
40.19%
null
58
Spectrum
Using thermal Band 31 and Band 32 data over the Sahara Desert in 2023, calculate the monthly average LST and count the number of months when the average LST exceeded 310 K, reflecting extreme heat conditions.
6 months
null
59
Spectrum
Using thermal Band 31 and Band 32 data over the Ganges Delta from September 9 to November 18 in 2020, apply the split-window method to estimate daily LST, then compute the average LST for autumn (September–November) to assess seasonal temperature characteristics.
275.26 K
null
60
Spectrum
Using thermal Band 31 and Band 32 data over the Sahara Desert from June to August 2018, calculate daily LST using the split-window method and compute the average LST across all days to assess regional heat levels during the summer period.
313.53 K
null
61
Spectrum
Using surface reflectance data from MODIS bands b02, b05, b17, b18, and b19 over the Turpan region in July 2020, estimate daily atmospheric water vapor using the band ratio method and compute the monthly average for July.
7.473151206970215
null
62
Spectrum
Using MODIS surface reflectance from bands b02, b05, b17, b18, and b19, estimate atmospheric absorption levels over the East China Sea region on August 10, 2021. Calculate the percentage of the area where absorption exceeds 115% of the daily mean, suggesting possible moisture concentration effects.
48.14%
null
63
Spectrum
Using MODIS bands b02, b05, b17, b18, and b19 over the Loess Plateau in July 2022, estimate daily atmospheric water vapor and calculate the monthly mean for July.
10.3507
null
64
Spectrum
Using MODIS bands b02, b05, b17, b18, and b19 over the Guangdong coast from July 20 to 29, 2023, estimate daily atmospheric absorption using the band ratio method, compute the period average, and count how many days have absorption values above 110% of that mean.
6
null
65
Spectrum
Using MODIS-derived daily atmospheric water vapor over the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain in 2023, calculate monthly averages, aggregate these into seasonal averages, and quantify the max differences in atmospheric water vapor among seasons.
5.9400
null
66
Spectrum
On June 15, 2022, using TES-derived land surface temperature and emissivity from ASTER thermal bands in the Los Angeles metropolitan area, calculate the pixel percentage difference between Moderate UHI (LST > 300 K & emissivity < 0.96) and Severe UHI (LST > 305 K & emissivity < 0.95) to evaluate how stricter thresholds...
16.60%
null
67
Spectrum
On June 15, 2022, over the Los Angeles metropolitan area, use TES-derived LST and surface emissivity from ASTER Bands 10–14 to construct a pixel-wise thermal response index (LST/Ξ΅). Then calculate the regional average of this index to assess the typical heat retention characteristics of surface materials in the area.
360.85
null
68
Spectrum
Based on TES output from ASTER thermal bands on November 15, 2020 in the Sahara Desert region near Tamanrasset, Algeria, calculate the proportion of the area where emissivity variation (ΔΡ) exceeds 0.07, indicating possible land cover heterogeneity.
100%
null
69
Spectrum
Apply the TVDI method to NDVI and LST data from 2022 to detect dry areas (TVDI > 0.75) and compute their average land surface temperature.
306.66 K
null
70
Spectrum
Apply the TVDI method to NDVI and LST data from February 2 to February 8 in 2022, extract areas with NDVI > 0.7, and compute the average TVDI value in these regions.
0.6329
null
71
Spectrum
Using ASTER Bands 10–12 data from October 23, 2022, apply the Three-Temperature Method (TTM) to retrieve pixel-wise LST over the specified region. Then calculate the 70th percentile temperature of all LST values in that region.
277.90 K
null
72
Spectrum
On October 23, 2022, use the TTM method to estimate LST from ASTER Bands 10-12 at 10:30 AM local time over Tokyo (35.5-35.8Β°N, 139.5-140.0Β°E) and Saitama Prefecture (35.8-36.3Β°N, 139.3-139.8Β°E), two vertically aligned regions with overlapping longitude (139.5-139.8Β°E). Calculate the mean LST across both regions, determ...
3.37%
null
73
Spectrum
On June 28, 2020, use LST derived from the Three-Temperature Method (TTM) based on ASTER Bands 10–12 to estimate the land surface temperature across the Paris metropolitan area (defined by the input polygon), and calculate the maximum LST within the region.
297.05 K
null
74
Spectrum
Using ASTER Bands 10–12 data on April 13, 2022, the Three-Temperature Method (TTM) was applied to estimate Land Surface Temperature (LST) in two Australian Outback regions. Calculate the absolute difference in the percentage of pixels where LST exceeds 295 K.
0.94%
null
75
Spectrum
Using TTM-derived LST from ASTER Bands 10–12 on August 2, 2020, over the Mediterranean coastal area near Barcelona, compute the average land surface temperature of the defined region.
296.12 K
null
76
Spectrum
Calculate the land surface temperature (LST) over the Taklamakan Desert near Hotan on February 23, 2020 using the split-window algorithm with Thermal Bands 31 and 32 and their emissivity values. Calculate the average LST, then determine the proportion of pixels exceeding 105% of this average.
0.0%
null
77
Spectrum
Using split-window derived LST from Band 31 and Band 32 over Taklamakan, Xinjiang for June 2021, calculate the average surface temperature for early June (3–15) and late June (16–30), and determine the difference between these two averages.
6.11K
null
78
Spectrum
Using split-window derived LST from thermal Band 31 and 32 over irrigated farmland in northern Hebei on August 5, 2021, classify the area into low (<295 K), medium (295–305 K), and high (>305 K) temperature zones, and calculate the combined percentage of pixels in the medium and high temperature zones.
99.88%
null
79
Spectrum
For the year 2023, use Bands 31 and 32 to compute daily LST in the Guangzhou urban area using the split-window algorithm. Derive seasonal averages for spring, summer, autumn, and winter, then specifically calculate the mean LST difference between summer and autumn.
24.29K
null
80
Spectrum
Using thermal Band 31 and 32 data from Wuhan’s central urban area on July 15, 2022, apply the split-window algorithm to calculate LST. Define high-temperature pixels as those with LST > 310 K and low-temperature pixels as those with LST < 295 K. Calculate the proportion of pixels in each category and find the differenc...
39.88%
null
81
Spectrum
Based on MODIS Day and Night brightness temperature and emissivity Bands 31 over the North American Great Plains during July 2023, calculate the daily proportion of pixels with daytime LST exceeding 320 K, and then compute the average of these daily proportions for the month.
59.49%
null
82
Spectrum
Using MODIS Day and Night brightness temperature and emissivity Band 31 data over the Ganges River Basin during January 2021, identify the number of days when over 35% of the region had daytime LST values greater than 310 K.
31
null
83
Spectrum
Using MODIS daytime brightness temperature and emissivity (Band 31) over Central California for July 5th of 2015 and 2023, calculate the average LST for each date and compute their difference.
0.54 K
null
84
Spectrum
Using MODIS daytime brightness temperature and emissivity (Band 31) over the southern Sahara edge during July 2023, calculate the average daily percentage of pixels with daytime LST exceeding 315 K.
0.0%
null
85
Spectrum
Using MODIS daytime brightness temperature and emissivity (Band 31) over Central California for July of 2015 and 2023, calculate the average monthly LST for each year and then compute the difference between these two averages.
Increase of 8.09 K
null
86
Spectrum
Calculate the difference in average Apparent Thermal Inertia (ATI) between July 1 and July 10, 2020, over the Mediterranean island of Cyprus. Estimate the change based on ATI values.
0.000
null
87
Spectrum
Compute the monthly average Apparent Thermal Inertia (ATI) for the Sahel region in May 2023 by deriving daily ATI from satellite thermal bands and surface albedo, and then averaging the resulting daily ATI maps to obtain the final monthly product.
0.13
null
88
Spectrum
Using ATI data from daytime/nighttime brightness temperature and albedo in California’s Central Valley during July 2022, compute the monthly average ATI and identify the proportion of pixels each day that exceed 115% of that average. Calculate the mean proportion across all days.
20.00%
null
89
Spectrum
Using ATI derived from daytime and nighttime brightness temperature and surface albedo over urban Beijing during July 2019, compute daily ATI and calculate the average ATI value across all valid pixels for the month.
0.07
null
90
Spectrum
Using ATI derived from daytime and nighttime brightness temperatures over California during August 2022, calculate the monthly mean ATI. For each day, identify pixels with ATI below 80% of the monthly mean, and compute the average proportion of such pixels throughout the month.
99.72%
null
91
Spectrum
Calculate the proportion of pixels with TVDI > 0.7 from June 10 to 30 August in 2023 over the Yellow River Basin, then compute the absolute difference between June and August.
30.13%
null
92
Spectrum
Compute the average TVDI over the Central Valley of California during the summer months (from June 10 to 30 August) of 2021 using NDVI and LST data.
0.6392
null
93
Spectrum
Using Landsat 8 Band 10 and reflectance bands (Red and NIR) over New York City in 2018, estimate land surface temperature with the NDVI-based single-channel method, and quantify the absolute difference between the overall mean LST and the mean LST in regions with NDVI greater than 0.7.
18.75 K
null
94
Spectrum
Using Landsat 8 Band 10 and reflectance bands (Red and NIR) over New York City for April 2018 and April 2019, estimate land surface temperature with the NDVI-based single-channel method. Calculate the mean LST for each April and determine the absolute difference between the two values.
5.41 K
null
95
Spectrum
Using MODIS bands over the Turpan region in February and August 2020, estimate atmospheric water vapor via the band ratio method and quantify the absolute difference between the monthly mean values.
3.9364
null
96
Spectrum
Estimate daily atmospheric water vapor using the band ratio method applied to MODIS surface reflectance bands b02, b05, b17, b18, and b19 over the Loess Plateau in January 2018 and January 2022. Determine the 70th percentile of daily averages for each year, and compute their absolute difference to quantify the interann...
3.5868
null
97
Spectrum
Based on daily atmospheric absorption indicators derived from MODIS b02, b05, b17, b18, and b19 over the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain in 2023, estimate daily atmospheric water vapor using the band ratio method. Compute the annual average and the summer (June–August) average, then calculate the absolute difference to assess sea...
2.67
null
98
Spectrum
Over the Yellow River Basin from August 13 to August 30 in 2023, calculate TVDI using NDVI and LST data. Identify all pixels with TVDI > 0.7, then compute the mean NDVI of these pixels to assess vegetation status in drought-affected regions.
0.6123
null
99
Spectrum
Using Landsat 8 Band 10 and reflectance bands (Red and NIR) over New York City for June–July of 2020 and 2021, estimate LST using the NDVI-based single-channel method. Compute the proportion of pixels with LST > 305 K for each year, then calculate the absolute difference between the two yearly values.
0.80%
null
100
Spectrum
Using Landsat 8 Band 10 and reflectance bands (Red and NIR) for October 22, 2021, estimate LST with the NDVI-based single-channel method. Then calculate the proportion of pixels meeting both conditions: LST > 290 K and NDVI > 0.6.
3.29%
null
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

Earth-Bench-OW

Earth-Bench-OW evaluates Earth observation agents on 248 open-world tasks. Agents acquire or discover the required observations at runtime, execute scientific workflows, and produce open-ended answers supported by execution evidence.

This repository releases the Earth-Bench-OW regime described in Earth-Agent-Pro, building on the task cores introduced by Earth-Agent. The Pro paper organizes 248 matched task cores into 744 questions across IF, AP, and OW. This repository contains the 248 OW records. The companion prepared-input release is Earth-Bench-V2.

Papers and code

Task coverage

Modality Task IDs Task cores
Spectrum 1–100 100
Products 101–188 88
RGB 189–248 60
Total 1–248 248

Task IDs match the companion release. The number of local files reflects this snapshot; it is not the number of questions or evaluation instances.

Repository layout

Earth-Bench-OW/
β”œβ”€β”€ README.md
β”œβ”€β”€ LICENSE
β”œβ”€β”€ THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md
β”œβ”€β”€ task_index.jsonl
β”œβ”€β”€ question_open.json
β”œβ”€β”€ data/question189/ ... data/question248/
β”œβ”€β”€ predownload_data/
β”œβ”€β”€ model_results.csv
β”œβ”€β”€ model_out/
└── tools/
Component Contents
question_open.json A JSON object keyed by task IDs "1" through "248"; 248 records.
dialogs User request, reference assistant/tool interactions, and an open-ended final answer.
data (annotation field) Acquisition specifications for Spectrum/Products tasks, or a local input directory for RGB tasks.
Acquisition specifications Region bounds, data collection IDs, selected bands, requested dates, resolution, and optional sampling/scaling settings.
evaluation One entry per task with its reference answer, metric, and AP-style regime label.
data/ (directory) 254 local RGB input files for tasks 189–248.
predownload_data/ 4,223 cached source files: 3,167 GeoTIFFs and 1,056 HDF files; approximately 92.7 GB.
tools, files Reserved fields; both are null in this release.

model_results.csv is a semicolon-delimited expert-model response table with columns file_path, model, text_prompt, bbox, and result. model_out/ holds 26 stored output masks used by the perception tools. These files support replay and are not leaderboard scores.

task_index.jsonl provides one derived row per task for browsing: question_id, modality, question, reference_answer, and choices. The original JSON file remains the source of truth for trajectories, acquisition specifications, and evaluation details. This release provides a single test index and no official training split.

Download

Install huggingface_hub, then download from the Hub. The full snapshot occupies approximately 92.9 GB.

from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download

snapshot_download(
    repo_id="LvZTTTT/Earth-Bench-OW",
    repo_type="dataset",
    local_dir="benchmark",
)

For annotations only:

snapshot_download(
    repo_id="LvZTTTT/Earth-Bench-OW",
    repo_type="dataset",
    local_dir="benchmark",
    allow_patterns=["README.md", "question_open.json", "task_index.jsonl"],
)

Read the annotations

import json
from pathlib import Path

questions = json.loads(Path("benchmark/question_open.json").read_text())
example = questions["1"]
request = example["dialogs"][0]["content"]
reference_trajectory = example["dialogs"][1:-1]
reference_answer = example["dialogs"][-1]["content"]
evaluation = example["evaluation"]

Launch tools from a working directory where benchmark/ resolves to the downloaded repository. The bundled MCP configuration uses tools/... paths; either install those scripts under your framework's tools/ directory or update the configuration to their actual paths. Configure the output directory consistently with the reference benchmark/out/... paths.

Evaluation and reproducibility

Use the papers for the regime definitions, final-answer evaluation, and trajectory metrics. The original Earth-Agent framework provides evaluation code; integration of this snapshot requires selecting the correct annotation file, regime, data paths, and tool implementation. This dataset repository does not include an end-to-end evaluation runner.

  • OW has no candidate-answer field. Reference final answers can be strings or numbers; preserve their meaning when evaluating.
  • Runtime paths such as benchmark/data/<region>_<band>_<date>.tif in the trajectories represent acquired or processed files. They need not exist before execution.
  • predownload_data/ contains cached source observations. For a cached replay, explicitly connect your acquisition tools to this directory. For live OW evaluation, perform runtime acquisition/discovery and report the data source and access date.
  • Keep acquisition specifications, reference trajectories, final answers, model_results.csv, and model_out/ in the evaluator's trusted environment. Expose only the inputs and tool responses prescribed by the selected evaluation protocol.
  • The bundled Data MCP server (tools/Data.py) implements download_product and apply_scale_offset. Set EARTH_ENGINE_PROJECT to your own project and configure Earth Engine authentication. Reference trajectories also call download_mod021km, download_myd021km, and download_aster_l1t; these three helpers require a compatible external implementation. The cache alone does not implement those calls.
  • The included perception tools replay stored expert-model responses. Report this mode explicitly; live expert-model inference requires a separate implementation and model weights.

Intended use

Use this benchmark to evaluate scientific Earth observation workflows, tool selection, argument grounding, and final-answer quality. The released trajectories and answers are evaluation references. Disclose any use of them for training or prompt construction before reporting benchmark performance.

License and sources

Benchmark annotations and release documentation are licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0. Attribute the benchmark and cite the relevant papers. Third-party satellite products, RGB imagery, and inherited code retain their original terms; see THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md. The benchmark license does not replace those terms.

Citation

Please cite both papers when using these matched benchmark releases.

@article{feng2025earthagent,
  title   = {Earth-Agent: Unlocking the Full Landscape of Earth Observation with Agents},
  author  = {Feng, Peilin and Lv, Zhutao and Ye, Junyan and Wang, Xiaolei and Huo, Xinjie and Yu, Jinhua and Xu, Wanghan and Zhang, Wenlong and Bai, Lei and He, Conghui and Li, Weijia},
  journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.23141},
  year    = {2025},
  url     = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.23141}
}

@article{lv2026earthagentpro,
  title   = {Earth-Agent-Pro: Towards Real-World Full-Chain Earth Observation with Agents},
  author  = {Lv, Zhutao and Dang, Chenhao and Feng, Yi and Gong, Yanpei and Wang, Xiaolei and Ye, Junyan and He, Conghui and Li, Weijia},
  journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2609.12533},
  year    = {2026},
  url     = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12533}
}
Downloads last month
-

Papers for LvZTTTT/Earth-Bench-OW