You need to agree to share your Hugging Face information to access this dataset

This repository is publicly accessible, but you have to accept the conditions to access its files and content.

Log in or Sign Up to review the conditions and access this dataset content.

MVX Benchmark

Overview

MVX Benchmark is a dataset designed to evaluate multi-video reasoning capabilities of modern multimodal large language models (MLLMs).

Most existing video benchmarks evaluate models on single-video understanding, where the model processes only one video at a time. However, many real-world scenarios require reasoning across multiple videos, such as comparing actions, matching events, or aggregating information from different video sources.

To address this gap, MVX introduces a benchmark that requires models to jointly analyze multiple videos and perform cross-video reasoning.

The benchmark contains 1,442 samples across 11 tasks, covering a range of perception and reasoning abilities.


Motivation

Current video understanding benchmarks primarily evaluate:

  • single-video question answering
  • temporal reasoning within one video
  • object or action recognition in a single scene

However, real-world reasoning often requires comparing multiple videos simultaneously. For example:

  • identifying which video shows the same action as a reference
  • comparing events across videos
  • aggregating information from multiple sources

MVX is designed to evaluate whether multimodal models can perform such cross-video reasoning tasks.


Benchmark Structure

MVX organizes tasks into three categories:

1. Low-Level Perception

These tasks test basic visual perception abilities across videos.

Examples include:

  • object recognition
  • counting
  • attribute identification

Although simple individually, these tasks become challenging when models must compare multiple videos simultaneously.


2. Cross-Video Matching

These tasks require identifying relationships between different videos.

Examples include:

  • action matching
  • video similarity
  • event correspondence

Models must determine whether different videos depict the same action or event.


3. High-Level Reasoning

These tasks require more complex reasoning across videos.

Examples include:

  • cross-video comparison
  • multi-video inference
  • aggregation reasoning

These tasks test whether models can synthesize information from multiple videos to reach a conclusion.


Dataset Statistics

  • Total Samples: 1,442
  • Number of Tasks: 11
  • Modality: Video + Question
  • Output Format: Multiple-choice answers

Each example typically includes:

  • a reference video
  • multiple candidate videos
  • a question requiring cross-video reasoning
  • a multiple-choice answer

Example

Below is a simplified example from the benchmark.

Question

Which candidate video shows the same action as the reference video?

Videos

Reference Video
Candidate A
Candidate B
Candidate C
Candidate D

Answer

B

The model must analyze all videos and determine which candidate matches the reference action.


Access Policy

This dataset contains video content and is released under a controlled access policy.

Users requesting access to the dataset must agree to the following conditions:

  • The dataset will be used for research purposes only
  • Redistribution of the dataset is not permitted
  • The dataset will not be used for commercial purposes
  • Users must cite the dataset paper when publishing results

Access requests will be manually reviewed and approved.


Intended Use

The dataset is intended for:

  • evaluating multimodal large language models
  • studying multi-video reasoning
  • benchmarking cross-video understanding

The dataset should not be used for commercial applications.

Downloads last month
13