Datasets:
The dataset viewer is not available for this split.
Error code: StreamingRowsError
Exception: CastError
Message: Couldn't cast
id: string
group: string
category: string
harmful_request: int64
refusal: int64
harmful_response: int64
n_tokens_estimate: int64
to
{'id': Value('string'), 'group': Value('string'), 'harmful_request': Value('int64'), 'refusal': Value('int64'), 'harmful_response': Value('int64'), 'n_tokens_estimate': Value('int64')}
because column names don't match
Traceback: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/utils.py", line 149, in get_rows_or_raise
return get_rows(
dataset=dataset,
...<4 lines>...
column_names=column_names,
)
File "/src/libs/libcommon/src/libcommon/utils.py", line 272, in decorator
return func(*args, **kwargs)
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/utils.py", line 129, in get_rows
rows_plus_one = list(itertools.islice(safe_iter(ds, dataset=dataset), rows_max_number + 1))
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/utils.py", line 544, in safe_iter
yield from ds.decode(False) if ds.features else ds
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/iterable_dataset.py", line 3052, in __iter__
for key, example in ex_iterable:
^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/iterable_dataset.py", line 2559, in __iter__
for key, pa_table in self._iter_arrow():
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/iterable_dataset.py", line 2584, in _iter_arrow
for key, pa_table in self.ex_iterable._iter_arrow():
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/iterable_dataset.py", line 558, in _iter_arrow
for key, pa_table in iterator:
^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/iterable_dataset.py", line 440, in _iter_arrow
for key, pa_table in self.generate_tables_fn(**gen_kwags):
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/json/json.py", line 361, in _generate_tables
self._cast_table(pa_table, json_field_paths=json_field_paths),
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/json/json.py", line 132, in _cast_table
pa_table = table_cast(pa_table, self.info.features.arrow_schema)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 2381, in table_cast
return cast_table_to_schema(table, schema)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 2309, in cast_table_to_schema
raise CastError(
...<3 lines>...
)
datasets.table.CastError: Couldn't cast
id: string
group: string
category: string
harmful_request: int64
refusal: int64
harmful_response: int64
n_tokens_estimate: int64
to
{'id': Value('string'), 'group': Value('string'), 'harmful_request': Value('int64'), 'refusal': Value('int64'), 'harmful_response': Value('int64'), 'n_tokens_estimate': Value('int64')}
because column names don't matchNeed help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
Tiny Aya compression evaluation: numbers and ids only
Released 2026-11-14. Code and reproduction: https://github.com/Muditkumar123/tiny-aya-unlearning-4bit.
This dataset holds the per-question and per-prompt scores behind two studies of CohereLabs/tiny-aya-global under 4-bit compression:
- Study U: does TOFU unlearning survive qint4 quantization?
- Study S: does keeping a refusal circuit in bf16 change refusal behaviour, compared with plain qint4 and a same-size random choice?
It contains no prompts, gold answers, model answers or raw judge text. The prompts are rebuilt from their pinned public sources with the builder scripts in the code repository. Everything here is ids, labels and numbers.
Contents
| Path | What | Rows |
|---|---|---|
export/study_u/<model>/ (original, c0v2, c1, c2, c3) |
TOFU forget/retain: id, author, ROUGE-L recall, gold/paraphrase/perturbed log-probs, truth ratio. Global-MMLU en/hi: id, subject, gold letter, letter log-probs, prediction, correct. Plus settings (manifest.json) and summaries. |
400 + 400 + 500 + 200 per model |
export/study_s/eval/<model>/ (original, plain-q4, random30-q4, protected-q4) |
per prompt: id, language, HarmBench category or XSTest type, WildGuard labels as 0/1 (harmful request, refusal, harmful answer), KL to the original, estimated answer length | 168 + 50 + 50 + 250 per model |
export/study_s/mmlu/<model>/ |
Global-MMLU rows | 500 + 200 per model |
export/tables/ |
the result tables, as reviewed | — |
ids/discovery_ids.json |
the 32 HarmBench / Alpaca pairs used for circuit discovery: row ids and text sha256 only | 32 |
ids/data_sha256.txt |
sha256 of the 8 rebuilt prompt-set files, to check a rebuild | 8 |
logs/ |
numeric run, training, merge and re-verification logs, with local paths shortened | — |
Reproduce the tables (CPU)
From the code repository:
python Vedika/scripts/build_prompt_sets.py && python Vedika/scripts/build_tofu_sets.py # optional: rebuild prompts, compare with ids/data_sha256.txt
python Vedika/release/reproduce.py <path to export/>
reproduce.py recomputes every table in export/tables/ from the rows and stops on any difference.
Sources and notices
This repository adds no licence to anyone else's material. The numbers refer to these sources, each under its own terms, as read from the dataset or model cards. That reading is not legal advice.
| Source | Revision | Card licence | Used as | Citation (from its card) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
walledai/HarmBench (standard) |
fb6c2afd | MIT | ids hb_std_<row> |
Mazeika et al. 2024, arXiv:2402.04249 |
CohereLabs/aya_redteaming |
5a16fee0 | Apache-2.0 | ids aya_<lang>_<line> |
Aakanksha et al. 2024, arXiv:2406.18682 |
Paul/XSTest |
f600c994 | CC-BY-4.0 | ids and prompt type | Röttger et al. 2024, NAACL, aclanthology 2024.naacl-long.301, arXiv:2308.01263 (same title on arxiv.org); authors' code paul-rottger/xstest (paper and code as linked from the card at f600c994) |
locuslab/TOFU |
324592d8 | MIT | ids and author index | Maini et al. 2024, arXiv:2401.06121 |
CohereLabs/Global-MMLU |
0e619dbe | Apache-2.0 | ids, subject, gold letter | Singh et al. 2024, arXiv:2412.03304 |
tatsu-lab/alpaca |
dce01c9b | CC-BY-NC-4.0 | row ids and hashes only (no text) | per its card |
allenai/wildguard (judge) |
— | Apache-2.0; gated, AI2 research-use terms | labels it produced | Han et al. 2024, arXiv:2406.18495 |
CohereLabs/tiny-aya-global and the derived models |
af89d219 | CC-BY-NC-4.0 + Cohere acceptable-use policy | the models measured | per its card |
The scores describe outputs of Tiny Aya and its derivatives, so their non-commercial licence and acceptable-use policy apply to any use of those models. The team's own original numeric results and aggregate tables are offered under CC-BY-4.0, only to the extent of the rights the team can grant. This does not cover the third-party datasets, their ids or content, the toolkits or the model weights, which keep their own terms above, and it gives no permission for commercial use of the models.
Limits
- Judge labels. Refusal and harmfulness are WildGuard's labels, not human ratings, and they are not validated on Hindi or Arabic answers. A planned blind human check did not produce a validation. Two team members' annotation sheets for 140 answers (25 Hindi and 10 English prompts × 4 models) have identical labels, and whether they were rated independently is unconfirmed. They were used only in an exploratory comparison, documented in the code repository at
Mudit/release/j3_public/J3_EXPLORATORY_RESULTS_20261114.public.md. There, 14 of 100 Hindi refusal labels and 10 of 100 Hindi harmful-answer labels differed from WildGuard's, all with the annotation yes where WildGuard said no; in English, 0 of 40 and 1 of 40 differed. The annotations themselves are not in this dataset. Arabic was not examined. - Truncated answers. Many answers reach the 256-token limit (an estimate from re-tokenized text), so some were judged on truncated text.
- Small samples. 20 authors per TOFU set, 50 prompts per Aya language, and one random control in Study S.
- Selection and overlap. The C2 unlearned model was selected on the same TOFU rows. All TOFU rows scored are training rows, so for Study U, Global-MMLU is the only held-out utility measure. The Study S safety sets are not training data. HarmBench held-out also excludes the 32 prompts used for circuit discovery.
- Multiplicity. No correction. The headline cells are Study U's U2 forget retention and Study S's S1 HarmBench refusal; the other cells are supporting.
- Proxy metrics. ROUGE-L recall is word overlap, not factual recall. Size is parameter-memory accounting, not file or GPU memory.
- Downloads last month
- 61