Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
operator
stringclasses
4 values
location
stringclasses
10 values
W_d_ML_d
float64
0.09
14.6
r
float64
0.58
0.83
PF
float64
2.21
30
K_ML_d
float64
7.6
52
stated_WCI
float64
0.18
1.86
grid_region
stringclasses
10 values
reservoir
stringclasses
2 values
dam
stringclasses
2 values
double_coupled_candidate
stringclasses
2 values
source_tag
stringclasses
8 values
motive_tier
stringclasses
3 values
cooling
stringclasses
2 values
WUE_L_per_kWh
float64
0.2
1.8
EWIF_lo
float64
0.8
5
EWIF_hi
float64
1.5
15
Meta
Lebanon, IN
4.81
0.77
6.3
30.3
0.77
MISO-Indiana
null
null
null
ren_seed_NOT_operational_closedloop
planning_not_measured
closed_loop
0.2
1.8
3
Google
Council Bluffs, IA
14.62
0.716
6.5
36.6
1.86
MISO-Iowa
null
null
null
google_fy2024_verified
primary
evaporative
1.8
1.5
3
Google
Mayes Co., OK
11.49
0.752
2.5
52
0.44
SPP-Oklahoma
null
null
null
utility_openrecords_2024_verified
primary
evaporative
1.8
0.8
1.5
Google
The Dalles, OR
4.78
0.784
2.21
45.4
0.18
Columbia-River
Columbia-River
The-Dalles-Dam
Y_primary
google_fy2024_verified
primary
evaporative
1.8
5
15
Google
Douglas Co., GA
4.6
0.826
2.5
22.7
0.41
Southern-Co-GA
null
null
null
google_fy2024_reclaimed_verified
primary
evaporative
1.8
1.8
3.5
Microsoft
Wisconsin
0.087
0.77
30
7.6
0.34
MISO-Wisconsin
null
null
null
ren_table6
framework_secondary
closed_loop
0.2
1.8
3
Google
Botetourt Co., VA
7.57
0.77
2.5
10.2
1.45
PJM-Dominion-VA
null
null
null
contracted_2MGD_NOT_operational
planning_not_measured
evaporative
1.8
1.8
3
xAI
Memphis, TN
3.79
0.77
4.5
22.7
0.57
TVA-Tennessee
null
null
null
ren_seed_W_in_primary_range_multisite
framework_secondary
evaporative
1.8
2
3.5
Google
Midlothian, TX
2.29
0.825
2.5
15.1
0.31
ERCOT-Texas
null
null
null
google_fy2024_verified
primary
evaporative
1.8
0.8
1.5
Google
Henderson, NV
3.73
0.576
2.5
15.2
0.36
Colorado-River
Lake-Mead
Hoover-Dam
Y_source_confirmed
henderson_city_2024_Wverified_r_unconf
primary
evaporative
1.8
2
6

AI Data-Centre Water Tracker

An open, reproducible referee for the water burden of AI data centres. It rebuilds the Water Consumption Impact index for ten sites from public data, self-checks each value against its source, and adds the two channels the original framework leaves open: the hydropower coupling, and the off-site relocation of water that closed-loop cooling produces. Figures are bands and decompositions, every input named and motive-tagged.

Files

  • sites.csv (10 rows): the per-site inputs and rebuilt index. Columns include operator, location, W_d_ML_d (daily water, ML/day), r, PF, K_ML_d, stated_WCI, grid_region, reservoir, dam, double_coupled_candidate, source_tag, motive_tier, cooling, WUE_L_per_kWh, EWIF_lo, EWIF_hi.
  • reproduce.py: standard-library reproducer that rebuilds the index from sites.csv.
  • SOURCES.md: per-input provenance and motive tags.
  • LICENSE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.

Method

Each site's Water Consumption Impact value is rebuilt from public data and checked against its source, then decomposed into on-site use and the off-site relocation that closed-loop cooling moves to the grid (roughly 92 to 95 per cent of the footprint). Every input is named and tagged by the incentive of its source. Drafting is AI-assisted; the judgement is not.

Citation

NM AI Research. AI Data-Centre Water Tracker. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21318960 . Licensed CC BY 4.0.

Downloads last month
57