Dataset Preview
Duplicate
The full dataset viewer is not available (click to read why). Only showing a preview of the rows.
Job has been terminated due to a temporary spike in resource usage and may be restarted later.
Error code:   JobManagerCrashedError

Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.

question
string
type
string
arxiv_ids
list
gold_answer
string
evidence
list
arxiv_id
string
reference_answer
string
cluster
string
qa_source
string
benchmark
string
benchmark_role
string
gate_pass
bool
A CMS paper comparing measured Higgs cross sections with theoretical predictions states that the predictions are evaluated for a standard model Higgs boson mass of 125.09 GeV. A later CMS mass paper identifies the same number as the result of a specific ATLAS+CMS combination. Which combination is that, and what is the ...
T1
[ "1807.03825", "2002.06398" ]
The 125.09 GeV value is the Run 1 (2011-2012) combined measurement of the Higgs boson mass by the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, quoted as 125.09 +/- 0.24 GeV.
[ { "arxiv_id": "1807.03825", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "All measurements are found to be in agreement with the theoretical predictions for the standard model Higgs boson with a mass of 125.09 GeV within the experimental and theoretical uncertainties." }, { "arxiv_id": "2002.06398", "s...
1807.03825
The 125.09 GeV value is the Run 1 (2011-2012) combined measurement of the Higgs boson mass by the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, quoted as 125.09 +/- 0.24 GeV.
Hgg_run2_run3
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
A CMS differential Higgs cross-section paper says that its approach is complementary to an earlier analysis, labeled [14], whose aim was to maximize observation sensitivity for the SM Higgs boson by relying on theoretical predictions. What inclusive signal strength relative to the standard model was reported by that ea...
T1
[ "1807.03825", "1804.02716" ]
The earlier analysis, CMS H to gamma gamma properties measurement using the same 35.9/fb 13 TeV data set, reported an inclusive signal strength relative to the SM of 1.18 with uncertainties +0.17/-0.14, before separating the statistical, systematic, and theoretical components.
[ { "arxiv_id": "1807.03825", "section": "Introduction", "snippet": "In contrast, the complementary approach adopted in [14] aims at maximizing the observation sensitivity for the SM Higgs boson by explicitly relying on theoretical predictions and their uncertainties." }, { "arxiv_id": "1804.02716...
1807.03825
The earlier analysis, CMS H to gamma gamma properties measurement using the same 35.9/fb 13 TeV data set, reported an inclusive signal strength relative to the SM of 1.18 with uncertainties +0.17/-0.14, before separating the statistical, systematic, and theoretical components.
Hgg_run2_run3
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
The same CP-odd coupling a3 is used in two CMS four-lepton coupling studies. How does the earlier H → 4l width study translate its fractional f_a3 to the coupling ratio, and what relation between a3 and CP violation is stated by the later anomalous-coupling study?
T1
[ "1901.00174", "2104.12152" ]
The width-study paper defines effective fractional ZZ cross sections f_ai and gives the translation a_i/a_1 = sqrt[(f_ai/f_a1)*(sigma_1/sigma_i)] exp(i phi_ai); for a3 it tabulates sigma_1/sigma_3 = 6.53. The anomalous-coupling paper writes the HVV amplitude with a3^VV in front of the CP-odd tensor term and states that...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1901.00174", "section": "Section 2, around Eq. (5) and Table 1", "snippet": "The a_i/a_1 ratios can be obtained from the ratio f_ai/f_a1, the cross-section ratios, and the phase phi_ai ... Table 1: a3, phi_a3, f_a3, translation constant sigma_1/sigma_3 = 6.53, for H to 2e2mu with m_H = 12...
1901.00174
The width-study paper defines effective fractional ZZ cross sections f_ai and gives the translation a_i/a_1 = sqrt[(f_ai/f_a1)*(sigma_1/sigma_i)] exp(i phi_ai); for a3 it tabulates sigma_1/sigma_3 = 6.53. The anomalous-coupling paper writes the HVV amplitude with a3^VV in front of the CP-odd tensor term and states that...
HZZ4l
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
Which Monte Carlo generator is shared between the CMS width/couplings study and the CMS 137 fb^-1 H → 4l cross-section paper? Give the role it plays there and the numerical translation constants associated with it for the two Lambda couplings.
T1
[ "1901.00174", "2103.04956" ]
The generator shared by the two CMS studies is JHUGEN. In the width/couplings paper, JHUGEN is used with m_H = 125 GeV to compute the translation constants for H -> 2e2mu, giving sigma_1/sigma_tilde_Lambda1 = 1.47 x 10^4 TeV^-4 and sigma_1/sigma_tilde_Lambda1^Zgamma = 5.80 x 10^3 TeV^-4. In the 137 fb^-1 production cro...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1901.00174", "section": "Table 1 caption and Section 2", "snippet": "The definition of the effective fractions f_ai is discussed in the text and the translation constants are the cross-section ratios corresponding to the processes H to 2e2mu with m_H = 125 GeV and calculated using JHUGEN....
1901.00174
The generator shared by the two CMS studies is JHUGEN. In the width/couplings paper, JHUGEN is used with m_H = 125 GeV to compute the translation constants for H -> 2e2mu, giving sigma_1/sigma_tilde_Lambda1 = 1.47 x 10^4 TeV^-4 and sigma_1/sigma_tilde_Lambda1^Zgamma = 5.80 x 10^3 TeV^-4. In the 137 fb^-1 production cro...
HZZ4l
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
One CMS exotic Higgs-decay paper discusses NMSSM as a particular case of 2HDM+S, while a companion 2b2tau paper specifies it more concretely. Give the full meaning of NMSSM, the 2HDM+S type assigned to it, and the coupling structure used in that type.
T1
[ "1805.04865", "1805.10191" ]
NMSSM stands for the next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model / SM. It is described as a particular case of 2HDM+S; the 2b2tau h to aa search specifies NMSSM as a particular case of 2HDM+S of type II, in which up-type quarks couple to one doublet while leptons and down-type quarks couple to the other doublet.
[ { "arxiv_id": "1805.04865", "section": "Introduction", "snippet": "The next-to-minimal supersymmetric SM (NMSSM) is a particular case of 2HDM+S." }, { "arxiv_id": "1805.10191", "section": "Introduction", "snippet": "In type II, up-type quarks couple to the first doublet, whereas leptons ...
1805.04865
NMSSM stands for the next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model / SM. It is described as a particular case of 2HDM+S; the 2b2tau h to aa search specifies NMSSM as a particular case of 2HDM+S of type II, in which up-type quarks couple to one doublet while leptons and down-type quarks couple to the other doublet.
Hbb_tautau_mumu
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
The MSSM tau-tau paper uses h as the lighter CP-even neutral Higgs boson. The exotic h to aa papers also use h for the discovered 125 GeV scalar. How is the symbol h connected across these papers, and what mass is assumed for h in the h to aa searches?
T1
[ "1803.06553", "1805.04865", "1805.10191" ]
In both contexts h denotes the SM-like Higgs scalar of mass approximately 125 GeV. The MSSM paper says that for m_A above about 300 GeV, h takes the role of the observed SM-like Higgs boson at 125 GeV. The h to aa papers likewise identify h as the scalar compatible with the discovered 125 GeV particle, and the 2mu2tau ...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1803.06553", "section": "Introduction", "snippet": "For values of m_A greater than about 300 GeV, which seem to be favored by data, the MSSM is close to the decoupling limit: the h usually takes the role of the observed SM-like Higgs boson at 125 GeV and the H and A are nearly degenerate ...
1803.06553
In both contexts h denotes the SM-like Higgs scalar of mass approximately 125 GeV. The MSSM paper says that for m_A above about 300 GeV, h takes the role of the observed SM-like Higgs boson at 125 GeV. The h to aa papers likewise identify h as the scalar compatible with the discovered 125 GeV particle, and the 2mu2tau ...
Hbb_tautau_mumu
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
A search for VBF production of HH in the four-b-quark final state defines the quartic HHVV coupling modifier κ2V. A later nonresonant HH→bbγγ analysis reports a 95% confidence-level interval for the same modifier κ2V. What interval does that analysis report, and what does the four-b-quark VBF search exclude?
T1
[ "2001.05178", "2310.12301" ]
The same HHVV/quartic coupling modifier κ2V is constrained by the nonresonant HH→bbγγ analysis to -0.5 < κ2V < 2.7 at 95% confidence level; the VBF HH→bbbb search excludes κ2V < -0.43 and κ2V > 2.56 at 95% confidence level.
[ { "arxiv_id": "2001.05178", "section": "Introduction", "snippet": "The coupling modifiers κλ, κV and κ2V control the strength of the HHH, VVH and VVHH couplings with respect to the SM value, respectively... the VBF topology has unique sensitivity to κ2V." }, { "arxiv_id": "2310.12301", "sect...
2001.05178
The same HHVV/quartic coupling modifier κ2V is constrained by the nonresonant HH→bbγγ analysis to -0.5 < κ2V < 2.7 at 95% confidence level; the VBF HH→bbbb search excludes κ2V < -0.43 and κ2V > 2.56 at 95% confidence level.
HH_diHiggs
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
A search for GMSB higgsinos notes that the same HH plus missing transverse momentum signature was also studied by CMS with the full Run-2 data set. What is the CMS simplified-model label for that signal, and what is the lightest supersymmetric particle in that model?
T1
[ "2401.14922", "2201.04206" ]
The CMS simplified model is TChiHH-G; the goldstino is the LSP. The neutralino chi1~0 is the next-to-lightest supersymmetric particle and decays to the goldstino plus a Higgs boson, producing the HH plus missing momentum signature.
[ { "arxiv_id": "2401.14922", "section": "Introduction", "snippet": "A similar search using the full Run 2 dataset was performed by the CMS Collaboration." }, { "arxiv_id": "2201.04206", "section": "Introduction", "snippet": "In the TChiHH-G simplified model, the LSP is the goldstino. In a...
2401.14922
The CMS simplified model is TChiHH-G; the goldstino is the LSP. The neutralino chi1~0 is the next-to-lightest supersymmetric particle and decays to the goldstino plus a Higgs boson, producing the HH plus missing momentum signature.
HH_diHiggs
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
Several 13 TeV ttbar analyses normalize their simulated top-quark-pair events to an inclusive theory cross section near 832 pb. What central value and uncertainty notation is quoted in the ATLAS highly boosted all-hadronic ttbar paper, and what value with which uncertainty decomposition is quoted by the CMS ttbar event...
T1
[ "1801.02052", "1803.03991" ]
Both use the same central inclusive ttbar cross-section value of 832 pb. ATLAS quotes 832 +46/-51 pb from NNLO+NNLL calculations; CMS quotes 832 +20/-29 (scale) ± 35 (PDF + alpha_s) pb, calculated with TOP++ v2.0. Both simulations assume a top-quark mass of 172.5 GeV.
[ { "arxiv_id": "1801.02052", "section": "3 Data sets and Monte Carlo event generation", "snippet": "The tt samples are normalized using the next-to-next-to-leading-order cross-section plus next-to-next-to-leading-logarithm corrections (NNLO+NNLL) sigma_tt = 832 +46/-51 pb, where the uncertainties reflect...
1801.02052
Both use the same central inclusive ttbar cross-section value of 832 pb. ATLAS quotes 832 +46/-51 pb from NNLO+NNLL calculations; CMS quotes 832 +20/-29 (scale) ± 35 (PDF + alpha_s) pb, calculated with TOP++ v2.0. Both simulations assume a top-quark mass of 172.5 GeV.
top_antitop
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
The symbol $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$ appears in ATLAS 13 TeV SUSY papers with two different roles: stable LSP in one charm-jet search, and NLSP decaying to a photon plus gravitino in the photonic GGM search. How is it treated in each case?
T1
[ "1805.01649", "1802.03158" ]
In the charm-jet search for top and charm squarks, R-parity conservation is assumed and $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$ is the lightest neutralino and stable LSP; top/charm squarks decay as $\tilde{t}_1 \to c\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$ and $\tilde{c}_1 \to c\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$. In the generalized gauge-mediated photonic search, the...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1805.01649", "section": "1 Introduction", "snippet": "In the present work, the LSP is assumed to be the lightest neutralino $\\tilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}$." }, { "arxiv_id": "1805.01649", "section": "1 Introduction", "snippet": "The present analysis considers top-squark pair pro...
1805.01649
In the charm-jet search for top and charm squarks, R-parity conservation is assumed and $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$ is the lightest neutralino and stable LSP; top/charm squarks decay as $\tilde{t}_1 \to c\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$ and $\tilde{c}_1 \to c\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$. In the generalized gauge-mediated photonic search, the...
SUSY
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
Two ATLAS simplified-model searches at 13 TeV both concern the lighter top squark $\tilde{t}_1$. What are the assumed decay products when it is searched in tau-lepton plus b-jet final states and when it is searched through charm-tagged jets? Which mass limits are excluded?
T1
[ "1803.10178", "1805.01649" ]
In the tau-slepton GMSB-inspired model, $\tilde{t}_1$ is pair-produced and each top squark undergoes a three-body decay to a b-quark, a tau neutrino, and a tau slepton $\tilde{\tau}_1$; the tau slepton then decays to a tau lepton and a nearly massless gravitino. This model excludes $m(\tilde{t}_1)$ up to 1.16 TeV and $...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1803.10178", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "masses up to $m(\\tilde{t}_{1}) = 1.16$ TeV and $m(\\tilde{\\tau}_{1}) = 1.00$ TeV are excluded at 95% confidence level." }, { "arxiv_id": "1803.10178", "section": "1 Introduction", "snippet": "In the benchmark scenario consi...
1803.10178
In the tau-slepton GMSB-inspired model, $\tilde{t}_1$ is pair-produced and each top squark undergoes a three-body decay to a b-quark, a tau neutrino, and a tau slepton $\tilde{\tau}_1$; the tau slepton then decays to a tau lepton and a nearly massless gravitino. This model excludes $m(\tilde{t}_1)$ up to 1.16 TeV and $...
SUSY
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
The symbol 'a' is used in two different ways in four-lepton analyses: as a pseudoscalar boson and as an anomalous coupling parameter. In which two papers does each meaning appear, and what is the mass range considered for the pseudoscalar 'a'?
T1
[ "1802.03388", "1901.00174" ]
In 1802.03388, 'a' is a pseudoscalar boson with mass between 1 and 60 GeV (from H → aa decays). In 1901.00174, 'a_i' denotes anomalous HVV couplings a_3, a_2, 1/Λ_1, and 1/Λ_1^{Zγ}.
[ { "arxiv_id": "1802.03388", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "X is a new vector boson Z_d or pseudoscalar a with mass between 1 and 60 GeV." }, { "arxiv_id": "1802.03388", "section": "2.2", "snippet": "The decay H → aa is allowed, where a is a light pseudoscalar mass eigenstate mostly c...
1802.03388
In 1802.03388, 'a' is a pseudoscalar boson with mass between 1 and 60 GeV (from H → aa decays). In 1901.00174, 'a_i' denotes anomalous HVV couplings a_3, a_2, 1/Λ_1, and 1/Λ_1^{Zγ}.
HZZ4l
newgen:t3a-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
In four-lepton analyses, the notation Z(*) and H(*) appears. What does the asterisk indicate in each case, and in which papers are these notations used?
T1
[ "1902.05892", "1901.00174" ]
In 1902.05892, Z(*) refers to a Z boson that may be either on-shell or off-shell. In 1901.00174, H(*) refers to an off-shell Higgs boson.
[ { "arxiv_id": "1902.05892", "section": "1", "snippet": "The notation Z(*) refers to a Z boson which may be either on-shell or off-shell." }, { "arxiv_id": "1901.00174", "section": "1", "snippet": "The box diagram gg → 4ℓ and gg → H(*) → 4ℓ processes interfere destructively in the SM." ...
1902.05892
In 1902.05892, Z(*) refers to a Z boson that may be either on-shell or off-shell. In 1901.00174, H(*) refers to an off-shell Higgs boson.
HZZ4l
newgen:t3a-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
Two analyses of 13 TeV proton-proton collisions at 35.9 fb^-1 use the combined secondary vertex (CSV) b-tagging algorithm. What is the reported efficiency for identifying b quark jets at the tight working point in one analysis, and what are the efficiencies at the medium and loose working points in the other?
T1
[ "1807.03825", "1804.02716" ]
Tight working point efficiency ~55% (1807.03825); medium ~70%, loose ~85% (1804.02716).
[ { "arxiv_id": "1807.03825", "section": "4 Event reconstruction", "snippet": "A tight working point on this discriminant is used in this analysis, which provides a misidentification rate for jets from light quarks and gluons of 0.1% and an efficiency for identifying b quark jets of about 55%." }, { ...
1807.03825
Tight working point efficiency ~55% (1807.03825); medium ~70%, loose ~85% (1804.02716).
Hgg_run2_run3
newgen:t3a-b-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
The diphoton vertex identification algorithm is used in multiple analyses of 13 TeV data. In one analysis, the average vertex finding efficiency is reported as about 81%. In another analysis, what is the efficiency of assigning the event to a vertex within 1 cm of the true vertex in simulated H→γγ events?
T1
[ "1807.03825", "2002.06398" ]
Approximately 81% in both analyses.
[ { "arxiv_id": "1807.03825", "section": "4 Event reconstruction", "snippet": "The average vertex finding efficiency of this algorithm is about 81% [14]." }, { "arxiv_id": "2002.06398", "section": "5.3 Vertex selection", "snippet": "The efficiency of assigning the event to a vertex within ...
1807.03825
Approximately 81% in both analyses.
Hgg_run2_run3
newgen:t3a-b-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
A 137 fb−1 CMS measurement of WZ and same-sign WW boson pairs in association with two jets uses a b-tagging algorithm whose b-jet efficiency is about 72%. A separate 137 fb−1 CMS measurement of polarized same-sign WW production uses the same algorithm. What is the algorithm's name, and what b-jet efficiency does the po...
T1
[ "2005.01173", "2009.09429" ]
The algorithm is DEEPCSV. The polarized same-sign WW measurement quotes a b-jet efficiency of about 70% for the chosen working point.
[ { "arxiv_id": "2005.01173", "section": "Section 4 Event reconstruction", "snippet": "The DEEPCSV b tagging algorithm [59] is used to identify events containing a jet that is consistent with the fragmentation of a bottom quark. ... For the chosen working point, the efficiency to select b quark jets is ab...
2005.01173
The algorithm is DEEPCSV. The polarized same-sign WW measurement quotes a b-jet efficiency of about 70% for the chosen working point.
VBS_EW
newgen:t3a-b-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
A CMS measurement of polarized same-sign W±W± production in association with two jets with 137 fb−1 notes that unpolarized electroweak W±W± production was previously measured at the LHC. In the ATLAS observation of electroweak same-sign W boson pair production with two jets using 36.1 fb−1, what were the observed numbe...
T1
[ "2009.09429", "1906.03203" ]
The ATLAS observation reported 122 candidate events for a background expectation of 69±7 events, corresponding to an observed signal significance of 6.5 standard deviations.
[ { "arxiv_id": "2009.09429", "section": "Section 1 Introduction", "snippet": "The unpolarized EW $ W^{\\pm}W^{\\pm} $ production has been previously measured at the LHC in the leptonic decay modes at $ \\sqrt{s} = 8 $ and 13 TeV [11–15]." }, { "arxiv_id": "1906.03203", "section": "Abstract", ...
2009.09429
The ATLAS observation reported 122 candidate events for a background expectation of 69±7 events, corresponding to an observed signal significance of 6.5 standard deviations.
VBS_EW
newgen:t3a-b-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
The HH→bbbb search uses the MV2c10 tagger at a working point giving 70% b-tagging efficiency for b-jets with pT > 20 GeV. In the resonant WZ search, what b-tagging efficiency and light-flavour jet rejection factor are quoted for the MV2c10 working point? Compare the two MV2c10 working points.
T1
[ "1804.06174", "1806.01532" ]
In the HH→bbbb analysis, MV2c10 is used at 70% b-tagging efficiency for b-jets with pT > 20 GeV, with a light-flavour jet rejection of 380 for R = 0.4 jets (and 120 for track-jets). In the resonant WZ search, MV2c10 is used at 85% b-tagging efficiency with a light-flavour jet rejection of about 34 and c-jet rejection o...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1804.06174", "section": "Section 4", "snippet": "The $b$-tagging requirements of both the resolved and the boosted analyses use working points that lead to an efficiency of 70% for $b$-jets with $p_T > 20$ GeV when evaluated in a sample of simulated $t\\bar{t}$ events. This working point ...
1804.06174
In the HH→bbbb analysis, MV2c10 is used at 70% b-tagging efficiency for b-jets with pT > 20 GeV, with a light-flavour jet rejection of 380 for R = 0.4 jets (and 120 for track-jets). In the resonant WZ search, MV2c10 is used at 85% b-tagging efficiency with a light-flavour jet rejection of about 34 and c-jet rejection o...
WW_WZ_ZZ_diboson
newgen:t3a-b-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
Both the HH→bbbb search and the VLQ B search trim R = 1.0 large-R jets using R = 0.2 subjets and a 5% pT fraction cut. What pT and eta acceptance requirements are applied to the trimmed large-R jets in the VLQ B search, and does the HH→bbbb search state the same explicit pT > 200 GeV requirement for its trimmed large-R...
T1
[ "1804.06174", "1806.01762" ]
The VLQ B search requires trimmed large-R jets to have pT > 200 GeV and |η| < 2.0. The HH→bbbb search describes the same R = 0.2 subjet and <5% pT trimming procedure but does not state the same explicit pT > 200 GeV and |η| < 2.0 acceptance requirement in the quoted trimming description.
[ { "arxiv_id": "1804.06174", "section": "Section 4", "snippet": "Trimming proceeds by reclustering the jet with the $k_T$ algorithm [57] into $R = 0.2$ subjets and then removing those subjets with $p_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mathrm{subjet}} / p_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mathrm{jet}} < 0.05$, where $p_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mat...
1804.06174
The VLQ B search requires trimmed large-R jets to have pT > 200 GeV and |η| < 2.0. The HH→bbbb search describes the same R = 0.2 subjet and <5% pT trimming procedure but does not state the same explicit pT > 200 GeV and |η| < 2.0 acceptance requirement in the quoted trimming description.
WW_WZ_ZZ_diboson
newgen:t3a-b-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
The CMS all-jet ttH search uses the CSVv2 algorithm for b-tagging with a medium working point efficiency of 65%. The ATLAS ttH observation requires at least one b-tagged jet in the H->gamma gamma channel. What is the b-tagging efficiency used in that ATLAS analysis?
T1
[ "1803.06986", "1806.00425" ]
77%
[ { "arxiv_id": "1803.06986", "section": "Section 4", "snippet": "The least restrictive (“loose”) and “medium” working points of the CSVv2 algorithm have respective efficiencies of ≈80 and 65% for tagging jets originating from b quarks" }, { "arxiv_id": "1806.00425", "section": "Section 2", ...
1803.06986
77%
ttH_Higgs_associated
newgen:t3a-c-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
The CMS observation of ttH production uses multivariate algorithms including deep neural networks and boosted decision trees. The ATLAS ttH observation uses boosted decision trees (BDTs) in the H->gamma gamma channel. What is the name of the BDT training package used by ATLAS, and how many BDT bins are used in the Had ...
T1
[ "1804.02610", "1806.00425" ]
XGBoost; four bins
[ { "arxiv_id": "1804.02610", "section": "After event samples", "snippet": "Multivariate algorithms [37–41] based on deep neural networks, boosted decision trees, and matrix element calculations are used to reduce backgrounds." }, { "arxiv_id": "1806.00425", "section": "Section 2", "snippe...
1804.02610
XGBoost; four bins
ttH_Higgs_associated
newgen:t3a-c-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
The CMS 13 TeV top quark mass measurement in lepton+jets uses a specific version of the POWHEG event generator for its tt signal simulation. The ATLAS 8 TeV top quark mass measurement in the same final state also uses a POWHEG-family generator for tt and single-top simulation. Which versions are used, and are they iden...
T1
[ "1805.01428", "1810.01772" ]
The CMS 13 TeV measurement uses POWHEG v2 for the tt signal. The ATLAS 8 TeV measurement uses PowHEG-Box v1 for tt and single-top events. They are not the same version.
[ { "arxiv_id": "1805.01428", "section": "Section 3", "snippet": "Simulated tt signal events are generated at next-to-leading order (NLO) with POWHEG v2 [23–26] and the PYTHIA 8.219 PS generator [27] using the CUETP8M2T4 tune [28, 29] for seven different top quark mass values of 166.5, 169.5, 171.5, 172.5...
1805.01428
The CMS 13 TeV measurement uses POWHEG v2 for the tt signal. The ATLAS 8 TeV measurement uses PowHEG-Box v1 for tt and single-top events. They are not the same version.
top_mass_single
newgen:t3a-c-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
In the CMS tW production measurement at 13 TeV, what top quark mass value is assumed for the theoretical tW cross section? In the ATLAS 8 TeV top mass measurement, the same assumed top quark mass value is used to normalize the tt sample; what tt cross section is quoted for that mass?
T1
[ "1805.07399", "1810.01772" ]
Both assume m_t = 172.5 GeV. The ATLAS tt cross section at that mass is σ_{tt} = 253_{-15}^{+13} pb.
[ { "arxiv_id": "1805.07399", "section": "Section 1", "snippet": "The corresponding theoretical prediction for the tW cross section in pp collisions at $\\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV, assuming a top quark mass ($m_t$) of 172.5 GeV, is $\\sigma_{\\mathrm{tW}}^{\\mathrm{ref}} = 71.7 \\pm 1.8$ (scale) $\\pm 3.4$ (PDF)...
1805.07399
Both assume m_t = 172.5 GeV. The ATLAS tt cross section at that mass is σ_{tt} = 253_{-15}^{+13} pb.
top_mass_single
newgen:t3a-c-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
In one listed paper, the symbol $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ denotes the next-to-lightest supersymmetric particle (NLSP) in gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking models. In another listed paper, the same symbol denotes the lightest neutralino. Identify the paper where $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ is the lightest neutralino and state the a...
T1
[ "1802.03158", "1801.03957" ]
The paper is the CMS combined search for electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos (arXiv:1801.03957). In its chargino-neutralino simplified model, the lightest neutralino $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ is the LSP.
[ { "arxiv_id": "1802.03158", "section": "Section 2", "snippet": "In this paper, the neutral NLSP is denoted $\\tilde{\\chi}_1^0$ irrespective of its composition." }, { "arxiv_id": "1801.03957", "section": "Section 2", "snippet": "The first class of models assumes $\\tilde{\\chi}_1^\\pm \\...
1802.03158
The paper is the CMS combined search for electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos (arXiv:1801.03957). In its chargino-neutralino simplified model, the lightest neutralino $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ is the LSP.
SUSY
newgen:t3a-c-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
Two ATLAS 13 TeV searches, one for boosted Higgs-boson pairs in HH->bbbb and one for vector-like B quarks in the lepton-plus-jets final state, both rely on large-radius jets that are clustered and then trimmed in the same way. What are the exact large-jet radius and trimming configuration common to these searches?
T1
[ "1804.06174", "1806.01762" ]
Both analyses use anti-k_t large-radius jets with R = 1.0. They use k_T trimming, reclustering the jet into subjets of radius R = 0.2 and removing subjets whose pT is less than 5% of the large-jet pT.
[ { "arxiv_id": "1804.06174", "section": "4 Object reconstruction", "snippet": "Jets are reconstructed using the anti-$k_t$ algorithm with different values of the radius parameter $R$." }, { "arxiv_id": "1804.06174", "section": "4 Object reconstruction", "snippet": "The jets with $R = 1.0$...
1804.06174
Both analyses use anti-k_t large-radius jets with R = 1.0. They use k_T trimming, reclustering the jet into subjets of radius R = 0.2 and removing subjets whose pT is less than 5% of the large-jet pT.
WW_WZ_ZZ_diboson
newgen:probe-t36-20260908
benchmark_100
main
true
For the 13 TeV long-lived-particle searches that set gluino mass limits, what lower gluino mass bounds are quoted by the ATLAS ionisation-based R-hadron search and by the CMS displaced-vertex multijet search, and what lifetime conditions apply?
T2
[ "1808.04095", "1808.03078" ]
The ATLAS ionisation (pixel dE/dx) R-hadron search excludes R-hadrons with lifetimes above 1.0 ns at 95% CL and sets lower limits on the gluino mass ranging between 1290 GeV and 2060 GeV; for stable R-hadrons the lower limit on the gluino mass is 1890 GeV. The CMS displaced-vertex multijet search excludes gluino masses...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1808.04095", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "R-hadrons with lifetimes above 1.0 ns are excluded at the 95% confidence level, with lower limits on the gluino mass ranging between 1290 GeV and 2060 GeV. In the case of stable R-hadrons, the lower limit on the gluino mass at the 95% confid...
1808.04095
The ATLAS ionisation (pixel dE/dx) R-hadron search excludes R-hadrons with lifetimes above 1.0 ns at 95% CL and sets lower limits on the gluino mass ranging between 1290 GeV and 2060 GeV; for stable R-hadrons the lower limit on the gluino mass is 1890 GeV. The CMS displaced-vertex multijet search excludes gluino masses...
Rparity_stealth
newgen:t4-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
For GMSB-inspired searches for pair-produced higgsinos or neutralinos decaying to two Higgs bosons, each decaying to bb, plus missing transverse momentum, what ranges of the neutralino/higgsino mass are excluded at 95% confidence level by the CMS and ATLAS full Run-2 analyses? Compare the lower and upper edges of the t...
T2
[ "2201.04206", "2401.14922" ]
CMS excludes neutralino masses in the range 175 to 1025 GeV for electroweak production of nearly mass-degenerate higgsinos whose decay chains yield a neutralino decaying to a massless goldstino and a Higgs boson. ATLAS excludes higgsino masses between 130 and 940 GeV for higgsinos decaying exclusively into a Higgs boso...
[ { "arxiv_id": "2201.04206", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "For the electroweak production of nearly mass-degenerate higgsinos, each of whose decay chains yields a neutralino (χ̃_{1}^{0}) that in turn decays to a massless goldstino and a Higgs boson, χ̃_{1}^{0} masses in the range 175 to 1025 GeV are...
2201.04206
CMS excludes neutralino masses in the range 175 to 1025 GeV for electroweak production of nearly mass-degenerate higgsinos whose decay chains yield a neutralino decaying to a massless goldstino and a Higgs boson. ATLAS excludes higgsino masses between 130 and 940 GeV for higgsinos decaying exclusively into a Higgs boso...
HH_diHiggs
newgen:t4-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
At the start of LHC Run 3, both the ATLAS and CMS experiments described their upgraded detectors for the same LHC beam parameters. What total proton-proton integrated luminosity and centre-of-mass energy do their Run-3 papers quote as the LHC delivery goal, and do the numbers agree?
T2
[ "2305.16623", "2309.05466" ]
Both papers agree on the LHC Run-3 pp goal: a centre-of-mass energy of 13.6 TeV and a total integrated luminosity of about 250 fb^-1. The ATLAS detector paper states: 'The LHC is expected to deliver ... an integrated luminosity of 250 fb^-1 of proton-proton collision data at a centre-of-mass energy of sqrt(s)=13.6 TeV....
[ { "arxiv_id": "2305.16623", "section": "1.1 Brief history of the ATLAS detector performance and LHC roadmap", "snippet": "Run 3, 2022 – 2025: The LHC is expected to deliver a peak instantaneous luminosity of approximately L = 2 x 10^34 cm^-2 s^-1 and an integrated luminosity of 250 fb^-1 of proton-proto...
2305.16623
Both papers agree on the LHC Run-3 pp goal: a centre-of-mass energy of 13.6 TeV and a total integrated luminosity of about 250 fb^-1. The ATLAS detector paper states: 'The LHC is expected to deliver ... an integrated luminosity of 250 fb^-1 of proton-proton collision data at a centre-of-mass energy of sqrt(s)=13.6 TeV....
run3_13p6
newgen:t4-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
Two CMS diboson-resonance searches quote 95% CL lower mass limits for a W' boson in the heavy vector triplet (HVT) model B benchmark. In the analysis using a leptonically decaying W plus a merged hadronic jet, what lower limit is obtained? In the analysis using Z->nu-nu plus a hadronically decaying vector boson, what l...
T2
[ "1802.09407", "1803.03838" ]
The lepton-plus-merged-jet WW/WZ search excludes spin-1 WZ resonances (W' in HVT model B) with mass below 3.05 TeV at 95% CL. The Z->nu-nu plus hadronic-V search sets lower limits on the W' mass in the two HVT versions as 3.1 TeV and 3.4 TeV; these correspond to HVT model A and model B respectively, so the HVT model B ...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1802.09407", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "spin-2 WW resonances with mass smaller than 1.07 TeV and spin-1 WZ resonances lighter than 3.05 TeV, respectively, are excluded at 95% confidence level." }, { "arxiv_id": "1802.09407", "section": "Benchmark signal models", "s...
1802.09407
The lepton-plus-merged-jet WW/WZ search excludes spin-1 WZ resonances (W' in HVT model B) with mass below 3.05 TeV at 95% CL. The Z->nu-nu plus hadronic-V search sets lower limits on the W' mass in the two HVT versions as 3.1 TeV and 3.4 TeV; these correspond to HVT model A and model B respectively, so the HVT model B ...
Exotic_BSM
newgen:t4-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
Several four-lepton Higgs and Z/ZZ analyses at 13 TeV quote different sizes of LHC proton-proton collision data sets. What integrated luminosities are used by (a) the CMS off-shell Higgs-width/four-lepton study including earlier 7 and 8 TeV results, (b) the CMS full Run 2 H→ZZ→4ℓ cross-section analysis, (c) the ATLAS 2...
T2
[ "1901.00174", "2103.04956", "1902.05892", "2103.01918" ]
(a) 80.2 fb^-1 at 13 TeV, combined with 5.1 fb^-1 at 7 TeV and 19.7 fb^-1 at 8 TeV. (b) 137 fb^-1. (c) 36.1 fb^-1. (d) 139 fb^-1.
[ { "arxiv_id": "1901.00174", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "The data sample used in this analysis corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 80.2 fb^{-1} at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. These results are combined with those obtained from the data collected at center-of-mass energies of 7 and 8 ...
1901.00174
(a) 80.2 fb^-1 at 13 TeV, combined with 5.1 fb^-1 at 7 TeV and 19.7 fb^-1 at 8 TeV. (b) 137 fb^-1. (c) 36.1 fb^-1. (d) 139 fb^-1.
HZZ4l
newgen:t4-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
After combining all available Higgs-boson decay channels and the 7, 8, and 13 TeV data sets, what observed and expected significances did CMS and ATLAS report for the production of a Higgs boson in association with a top-quark pair? How do the two combined measurements compare?
T2
[ "1804.02610", "1806.00425" ]
CMS reported an observed significance of 5.2 standard deviations and an expected significance of 4.2 standard deviations for the combined 7+8+13 TeV analysis. ATLAS reported an observed (expected) significance of 6.3 (5.1) standard deviations when the 13 TeV analysis was combined with the 7 and 8 TeV analyses; ATLAS's ...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1804.02610", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "An excess of events is observed, with a significance of 5.2 standard deviations, over the expectation from the background-only hypothesis. The corresponding expected significance from the standard model for a Higgs boson mass of 125.09 GeV i...
1804.02610
CMS reported an observed significance of 5.2 standard deviations and an expected significance of 4.2 standard deviations for the combined 7+8+13 TeV analysis. ATLAS reported an observed (expected) significance of 6.3 (5.1) standard deviations when the 13 TeV analysis was combined with the 7 and 8 TeV analyses; ATLAS's ...
ttH_Higgs_associated
newgen:t4-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
Using the same CMS 13 TeV 35.9 fb^-1 data set, the multilepton ttH search and the H->bb (with leptonic ttbar) ttH search both quoted a 95% CL observed upper limit on the ttH signal-strength modifier mu = sigma/sigma_SM. What observed upper limits did they set, and what was the expected limit for the H->bb search?
T2
[ "1803.05485", "1804.03682" ]
The multilepton ttH search set an observed 95% CL upper limit of 2.1 times the SM ttH rate. The H->bb search set an observed 95% CL upper limit of 1.5, with an expected limit of 0.9. Thus, in this comparison, the H->bb analysis gives a tighter observed upper limit, although its expected limit of 0.9 is even tighter.
[ { "arxiv_id": "1803.05485", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "An upper limit on the signal rate of $2.1$ times the standard model production rate is set at $95\\%$ confidence level." }, { "arxiv_id": "1804.03682", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "A combined fit of multivariate discrim...
1803.05485
The multilepton ttH search set an observed 95% CL upper limit of 2.1 times the SM ttH rate. The H->bb search set an observed 95% CL upper limit of 1.5, with an expected limit of 0.9. Thus, in this comparison, the H->bb analysis gives a tighter observed upper limit, although its expected limit of 0.9 is even tighter.
Hbb_tautau_mumu
newgen:t4-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
Two CMS leptoquark searches quote observed 95% CL lower limits on a scalar leptoquark mass, but under different production and decay assumptions. What mass limits do the pair-production reinterpretation of scalar leptoquarks decaying to a quark and a neutrino and the singly produced third-generation scalar leptoquark d...
T2
[ "1805.10228", "1806.03472" ]
The reinterpretation of the CMS M_T2 search for scalar leptoquark pair production, with each LQ decaying 100% to a quark and a neutrino, excludes LQ_S masses below 980 GeV. The dedicated single-production search for a third-generation scalar leptoquark decaying to a tau lepton and a bottom quark, assuming unit Yukawa c...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1805.10228", "section": "Table 1 / Section 4 Interpretation", "snippet": "LQ → q ν ... LQ_S ... mass [GeV] 980 (940)" }, { "arxiv_id": "1806.03472", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "a third-generation scalar leptoquark decaying to a τ lepton and a bottom quark, assuming...
1805.10228
The reinterpretation of the CMS M_T2 search for scalar leptoquark pair production, with each LQ decaying 100% to a quark and a neutrino, excludes LQ_S masses below 980 GeV. The dedicated single-production search for a third-generation scalar leptoquark decaying to a tau lepton and a bottom quark, assuming unit Yukawa c...
Exotic_BSM
newgen:t4-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
The 13 TeV LHC proton-proton collision data used by different supersymmetry searches were recorded in 2015 and/or 2016, and the quoted integrated luminosities differ slightly between collaborations. What integrated luminosity is quoted by CMS for its 2016 dataset used in this collection, and what integrated luminosity ...
T2
[ "1801.03957", "1802.03158" ]
CMS quotes 35.9 fb^-1 for its 2016 pp dataset at sqrt(s)=13 TeV, while ATLAS quotes 36.1 fb^-1 for its combined 2015+2016 pp dataset at sqrt(s)=13 TeV.
[ { "arxiv_id": "1801.03957", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "recorded with the CMS detector at the LHC in 2016 and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $ 35.9\\,fb^{-1} $." }, { "arxiv_id": "1802.03158", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "corresponding to an integrated luminosi...
1801.03957
CMS quotes 35.9 fb^-1 for its 2016 pp dataset at sqrt(s)=13 TeV, while ATLAS quotes 36.1 fb^-1 for its combined 2015+2016 pp dataset at sqrt(s)=13 TeV.
SUSY
newgen:t4-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
One reason the bbbb Higgs-pair search does not use the full 36.1 fb^-1 dataset in its resolved channel is a specific data-quality issue in 2016. What is that issue, what 2016 luminosity is left for the resolved analysis, and what 2016 luminosity is quoted in the ATLAS 13 TeV Higgs mass measurement's dataset description...
T2
[ "1804.06174", "1806.00242" ]
The HH->bbbb resolved analysis lost part of the 2016 data because an inefficiency in the online vertex reconstruction reduced the efficiency of the algorithms used to identify b-jets, so the affected events were not retained. This reduces the 2016 integrated luminosity for the resolved analysis to 24.3 fb^-1. The ATLAS...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1804.06174", "section": "Data and simulation / 3.1 Data", "snippet": "During 2016 data-taking, a fraction of the data was affected by an inefficiency in the online vertex reconstruction, which reduced the efficiency of the algorithms used to identify b-jets; those events were not retained...
1804.06174
The HH->bbbb resolved analysis lost part of the 2016 data because an inefficiency in the online vertex reconstruction reduced the efficiency of the algorithms used to identify b-jets, so the affected events were not retained. This reduces the 2016 integrated luminosity for the resolved analysis to 24.3 fb^-1. The ATLAS...
WW_WZ_ZZ_diboson
newgen:t4-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
What is the measured fiducial cross section times branching fraction for the 125 GeV Higgs boson in the diphoton channel, and how does it compare numerically with the observed 95% CL upper limits on the same quantity for a low-mass Higgs-like boson in the diphoton channel from the 2016 data set?
T2
[ "1807.03825", "1811.08459" ]
The measured fiducial σ×B(H→γγ) at 125 GeV is 84 ± 11 (stat) ± 7 (syst) fb = 84 ± 13 fb. The observed 95% CL upper limits on σ×B for a low-mass Higgs-like boson from the 2016 data set range from 161 fb down to 26 fb. The 125 GeV measurement (84 fb) lies within this range.
[ { "arxiv_id": "1807.03825", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "The total cross section in the chosen fiducial phase space is measured to be 84 ± 11 (stat) ± 7 (syst) fb = 84 ± 13 fb, to be compared with a theoretical prediction of 73 ± 4 fb." }, { "arxiv_id": "1811.08459", "section": "Abstra...
1807.03825
The measured fiducial σ×B(H→γγ) at 125 GeV is 84 ± 11 (stat) ± 7 (syst) fb = 84 ± 13 fb. The observed 95% CL upper limits on σ×B for a low-mass Higgs-like boson from the 2016 data set range from 161 fb down to 26 fb. The 125 GeV measurement (84 fb) lies within this range.
Hgg_run2_run3
newgen:t4extra-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
ATLAS publications based on the 2015+2016 13 TeV proton-proton dataset often quote 36.1 fb^-1. In the search for Higgs-boson pair production in the bbbb final state, do both the resolved and boosted analyses use that full luminosity, and how does this compare with the luminosity quoted in the combined H->gamma-gamma an...
T2
[ "1804.06174", "1805.10197", "1806.00242", "1806.01762", "1808.01191" ]
The HH->bbbb search uses up to 36.1 fb^-1 overall, but not in both channels: the resolved analysis uses 27.5 fb^-1 (3.2 fb^-1 from 2015 and 24.3 fb^-1 from 2016), while the boosted analysis uses 36.1 fb^-1 (3.2 fb^-1 from 2015 and 32.9 fb^-1 from 2016). By contrast, the combined H->gamma-gamma/H->ZZ*->4l cross-section ...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1804.06174", "section": "Introduction", "snippet": "The dataset comprises 2015 and 2016 data, corresponding to 27.5 fb^{-1} for the resolved analysis and 36.1 fb^{-1} for the boosted analysis, with the difference due to the trigger selections used." }, { "arxiv_id": "1804.06174", ...
1804.06174
The HH->bbbb search uses up to 36.1 fb^-1 overall, but not in both channels: the resolved analysis uses 27.5 fb^-1 (3.2 fb^-1 from 2015 and 24.3 fb^-1 from 2016), while the boosted analysis uses 36.1 fb^-1 (3.2 fb^-1 from 2015 and 32.9 fb^-1 from 2016). By contrast, the combined H->gamma-gamma/H->ZZ*->4l cross-section ...
WW_WZ_ZZ_diboson
newgen:t4-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
A lepton+jets ideogram analysis at 13 TeV determined the top-quark mass together with a jet energy scale factor, while another lepton+jets template analysis at 8 TeV used a three-dimensional fit for the top-quark mass, an overall jet energy scale factor, and a relative b-to-light-jet energy scale factor. What final top...
T2
[ "1805.01428", "1810.01772" ]
The 13 TeV ideogram analysis reports m_top = 172.25 ± 0.08 (stat+JSF) ± 0.62 (syst) GeV. The 8 TeV three-dimensional template analysis reports m_top = 172.08 ± 0.39 (stat) ± 0.82 (syst) GeV. The difference is 0.17 GeV, which is well within the combined uncertainties, so the two measurements are consistent. The ATLAS te...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1805.01428", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "The top quark mass is found to be 172.25 ± 0.08 (stat+JSF) ± 0.62 (syst) GeV." }, { "arxiv_id": "1810.01772", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "The mass of the top quark is measured to be m_top = 172.08 ± 0.39 (stat) ± 0.82 ...
1805.01428
The 13 TeV ideogram analysis reports m_top = 172.25 ± 0.08 (stat+JSF) ± 0.62 (syst) GeV. The 8 TeV three-dimensional template analysis reports m_top = 172.08 ± 0.39 (stat) ± 0.82 (syst) GeV. The difference is 0.17 GeV, which is well within the combined uncertainties, so the two measurements are consistent. The ATLAS te...
top_mass_single
newgen:t4-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
For the CMS ttH searches at 13 TeV with 35.9 fb^-1, one analysis selected multilepton final states and the other selected H->bb final states with leptonic top-pair decays. What best-fit signal strengths relative to the standard model and what observed significances did the two analyses report?
T2
[ "1803.05485", "1804.03682" ]
In the multilepton analysis, the measured signal rate is 1.23 (+0.45/-0.43) times the SM prediction, corresponding to an observed (expected) significance of 3.2 sigma (2.8 sigma). In the H->bb analysis with single-lepton or dilepton ttbar decays, the best fit signal strength is mu = 0.72 +/- 0.24 (stat) +/- 0.38 (syst)...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1803.05485", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "The measured signal rate amounts to $1.23_{-0.43}^{+0.45}$ times the production rate expected in the standard model, with an observed (expected) significance of $3.2\\sigma$ ($2.8\\sigma$), which represents evidence for ttH production in tho...
1803.05485
In the multilepton analysis, the measured signal rate is 1.23 (+0.45/-0.43) times the SM prediction, corresponding to an observed (expected) significance of 3.2 sigma (2.8 sigma). In the H->bb analysis with single-lepton or dilepton ttbar decays, the best fit signal strength is mu = 0.72 +/- 0.24 (stat) +/- 0.38 (syst)...
Hbb_tautau_mumu
newgen:t4-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
For the same type of combined ttH observation searches at 7, 8, and 13 TeV, what integrated luminosities did the CMS and ATLAS datasets correspond to at each centre-of-mass energy?
T2
[ "1804.02610", "1806.00425" ]
In their combined ttH-observation analyses, CMS used up to 5.1 fb^-1 at 7 TeV, 19.7 fb^-1 at 8 TeV, and 35.9 fb^-1 at 13 TeV. ATLAS used 4.5 fb^-1 at 7 TeV, 20.3 fb^-1 at 8 TeV, and up to 79.8 fb^-1 at 13 TeV. Therefore ATLAS had roughly 2.2 times more 13 TeV data than CMS, while their Run 1 data sets were similar.
[ { "arxiv_id": "1804.02610", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "based on a combined analysis of proton-proton collision data at center-of-mass energies of $ \\sqrt{s} = 7 $, 8, and 13 TeV, corresponding to integrated luminosities of up to 5.1, 19.7, and 35.9 fb $ ^{-1} $, respectively." }, { "arx...
1804.02610
In their combined ttH-observation analyses, CMS used up to 5.1 fb^-1 at 7 TeV, 19.7 fb^-1 at 8 TeV, and 35.9 fb^-1 at 13 TeV. ATLAS used 4.5 fb^-1 at 7 TeV, 20.3 fb^-1 at 8 TeV, and up to 79.8 fb^-1 at 13 TeV. Therefore ATLAS had roughly 2.2 times more 13 TeV data than CMS, while their Run 1 data sets were similar.
ttH_Higgs_associated
newgen:t4-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
CMS has searched for new diphoton resonances both below and above the 125 GeV Higgs boson mass at 13 TeV. For spin-0 or scalar-like resonances decaying to two photons, what mass ranges are explored and what 95% confidence-level limit information is reported by the low-mass search and the high-mass beyond-standard-model...
T2
[ "1811.08459", "1809.00327" ]
The low-mass search covers standard model-like Higgs boson masses from 70 to 110 GeV in the 13 TeV data (80 to 110 GeV in the 8 TeV data). Its observed 95% CL upper limit on the product of cross section and branching fraction into two photons for the 2016 data ranges from 161 fb at low mass to 26 fb at high mass; the 8...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1811.08459", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "The observed upper limit for the 2012 (2016) data set ranges from 129 (161) fb to 31 (26) fb. The statistical combination of the results from the analyses of the two data sets in the common mass range between 80 and 110 GeV yields an upper l...
1811.08459
The low-mass search covers standard model-like Higgs boson masses from 70 to 110 GeV in the 13 TeV data (80 to 110 GeV in the 8 TeV data). Its observed 95% CL upper limit on the product of cross section and branching fraction into two photons for the 2016 data ranges from 161 fb at low mass to 26 fb at high mass; the 8...
Hgg_run2_run3
newgen:t4-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
An ATLAS Run 2 search for H→ZX/XX→4ℓ (36.1 fb^-1), an ATLAS measurement of the four-lepton invariant-mass spectrum at 13 TeV (36.1 fb^-1), and a CMS H→ZZ→4ℓ cross-section measurement (137 fb^-1) each quote a reference value for the Higgs boson mass. What central Higgs mass value is used by each analysis?
T2
[ "1802.03388", "1902.05892", "2103.04956" ]
The ATLAS exotic-decay search uses m_H = 125 GeV as the Higgs mass defining the kinematic range 15 GeV to m_H/2. The ATLAS four-lepton invariant-mass spectrum paper quotes the resonant Higgs peak at m_H = 124.97 ± 0.24 GeV. The CMS H→ZZ→4ℓ cross-section analysis fixes the signal-strength measurement at m_H = 125.38 GeV...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1802.03388", "section": "1 Introduction", "snippet": "...for particles in the mass range from 15 GeV to m_H/2, where m_H = 125 GeV." }, { "arxiv_id": "1902.05892", "section": "1 Introduction", "snippet": "There is resonant production around the Higgs boson mass of m_H = 12...
1802.03388
The ATLAS exotic-decay search uses m_H = 125 GeV as the Higgs mass defining the kinematic range 15 GeV to m_H/2. The ATLAS four-lepton invariant-mass spectrum paper quotes the resonant Higgs peak at m_H = 124.97 ± 0.24 GeV. The CMS H→ZZ→4ℓ cross-section analysis fixes the signal-strength measurement at m_H = 125.38 GeV...
HZZ4l
newgen:t4-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
In analyses of LHC pp collisions at sqrt(s)=13 TeV, two different simplified SUSY decay assumptions for directly pair-produced top squarks were considered: one in which the top squark decays via an off-shell chargino to a b quark, a tau lepton, and a gravitino through a tau slepton, and one in which it decays with 100%...
T2
[ "1803.10178", "1805.01649" ]
In the tau-slepton simplified model, masses up to m(top squark) = 1.16 TeV (and m(tau slepton) = 1.00 TeV) are excluded at 95% CL. In the charm-flavour simplified model, top and charm squark masses up to 850 GeV are excluded for a massless neutralino; for m(squark) - m(neutralino) < 100 GeV, only masses up to 500 GeV a...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1803.10178", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "masses up to $ m(\\tilde{t}_{1}) = 1.16 $ TeV and $ m(\\tilde{\\tau}_{1}) = 1.00 $ TeV are excluded at 95% confidence level." }, { "arxiv_id": "1805.01649", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "top and charm squarks with masses...
1803.10178
In the tau-slepton simplified model, masses up to m(top squark) = 1.16 TeV (and m(tau slepton) = 1.00 TeV) are excluded at 95% CL. In the charm-flavour simplified model, top and charm squark masses up to 850 GeV are excluded for a massless neutralino; for m(squark) - m(neutralino) < 100 GeV, only masses up to 500 GeV a...
SUSY
newgen:t4-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
At sqrt(s) = 13 TeV, the first measurement giving evidence for electroweak Z-gamma plus two-jet (Zγjj) production quoted a fiducial cross-section. A later measurement using a much larger dataset established observation of the same process and quoted its own fiducial electroweak Zγjj cross-section. What were the two mea...
T2
[ "1910.09503", "2106.11082" ]
The earlier ATLAS result, using 36.1 fb^-1 of 13 TeV data, measured the fiducial electroweak Zγjj cross-section as 7.8 ± 2.0 fb and reported an observed (expected) significance of 4.1 (4.1) standard deviations. The later CMS result, using 137 fb^-1 of 13 TeV data, measured the fiducial electroweak Zγjj cross-section to...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1910.09503", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "The analysis uses data collected by the ATLAS detector in 2015 and 2016 that corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 36.1 fb^{-1}. Events that contain a Z boson candidate decaying leptonically into either e^+e^- or mu^+mu^-, a photon, and...
1910.09503
The earlier ATLAS result, using 36.1 fb^-1 of 13 TeV data, measured the fiducial electroweak Zγjj cross-section as 7.8 ± 2.0 fb and reported an observed (expected) significance of 4.1 (4.1) standard deviations. The later CMS result, using 137 fb^-1 of 13 TeV data, measured the fiducial electroweak Zγjj cross-section to...
photons_ewk
newgen:t4-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
What is the right-handed W polarization fraction FR measured in the 8 TeV combined top-quark-decay analysis, what SM prediction is quoted for it, and how does this compare with the right-handed W fractions quoted by the CMS 13 TeV inclusive W-boson helicity study? Why is the inclusive-production right-handed fraction n...
T2
[ "2005.03799", "2008.04174" ]
The combined 8 TeV top-decay measurement gives FR = -0.008 ± 0.007, consistent with the SM NNLO prediction FR = 0.0017 ± 0.0001. This near-zero right-handed fraction in top decays constrains anomalous right-handed tWb couplings. In contrast, the CMS 13 TeV inclusive-W helicity study quotes right-handed fractions of abo...
[ { "arxiv_id": "2005.03799", "section": "Introduction", "snippet": "Theoretical calculations at next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) in perturbative quantum chromodynamics (QCD) predict the fractions to be F0 = 0.687 ± 0.005, FL = 0.311 ± 0.005, and FR = 0.0017 ± 0.0001 [1], assuming a top quark mass of ...
2005.03799
The combined 8 TeV top-decay measurement gives FR = -0.008 ± 0.007, consistent with the SM NNLO prediction FR = 0.0017 ± 0.0001. This near-zero right-handed fraction in top decays constrains anomalous right-handed tWb couplings. In contrast, the CMS 13 TeV inclusive-W helicity study quotes right-handed fractions of abo...
EW_fit_WW_WZ_pol
newgen:t4-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
For top-quark-pair production at 13 TeV, the observable |p_out^{t tbar}| is used by ATLAS both in a highly boosted all-hadronic analysis and in a lepton+jets t tbar + jets analysis. How is the observable defined in the two measurements and what integrated luminosities do they use?
T2
[ "1801.02052", "1802.06572" ]
The highly boosted all-hadronic ATLAS analysis, using 36.1 fb^{-1}, defines |p_out^{t tbar}| as the absolute value of the out-of-plane momentum, namely the projection of the three-momentum of one of the top-quark jets onto the direction perpendicular to the plane defined by the other top quark and the beam axis z. The ...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1801.02052", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "The data set corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 36.1 fb^{-1}, recorded in 2015 and 2016 with the ATLAS detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider." }, { "arxiv_id": "1801.02052", "section": "1 Introduction", "snippet"...
1801.02052
The highly boosted all-hadronic ATLAS analysis, using 36.1 fb^{-1}, defines |p_out^{t tbar}| as the absolute value of the out-of-plane momentum, namely the projection of the three-momentum of one of the top-quark jets onto the direction perpendicular to the plane defined by the other top quark and the beam axis z. The ...
top_antitop
newgen:t4-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
What integrated luminosities are quoted by the CMS disappearing-track search and the CMS displaced-vertex multijet search using proton-proton collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV during 2015 and 2016?
T2
[ "1804.07321", "1808.03078" ]
The CMS disappearing-track search uses a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 38.4 fb^-1. The CMS displaced-vertex multijet search uses a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 38.5 fb^-1. Both were recorded in 2015 and 2016 at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV.
[ { "arxiv_id": "1804.07321", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "This search uses data collected with the CMS detector in 2015 and 2016 from proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 38.4 fb^-1." }, { "arxiv_id": "1808.03...
1804.07321
The CMS disappearing-track search uses a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 38.4 fb^-1. The CMS displaced-vertex multijet search uses a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 38.5 fb^-1. Both were recorded in 2015 and 2016 at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV.
Rparity_stealth
newgen:t4-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
Two top-quark mass papers from different LHC collision energies list the previous combined ATLAS and CMS top-quark masses in their introductory overviews. What combined central values do both papers quote for ATLAS and CMS, how are the quoted uncertainties expressed, and are the values consistent?
T2
[ "1805.01428", "1810.01772" ]
Both papers quote the earlier experiment combinations with the same central values: ATLAS combined m_top = 172.84 GeV and CMS combined m_top = 172.44 GeV. The 13 TeV CMS paper gives these as total uncertainties: ATLAS 172.84 ± 0.70 GeV and CMS 172.44 ± 0.49 GeV. The ATLAS 8 TeV paper decomposes them as ATLAS 172.84 ± 0...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1805.01428", "section": "1 Introduction", "snippet": "while the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations measured m_t = 172.84 ± 0.70 GeV [5] and m_t = 172.44 ± 0.49 GeV [6], respectively, from the combination of their most precise results." }, { "arxiv_id": "1810.01772", "section": "1 In...
1805.01428
Both papers quote the earlier experiment combinations with the same central values: ATLAS combined m_top = 172.84 GeV and CMS combined m_top = 172.44 GeV. The 13 TeV CMS paper gives these as total uncertainties: ATLAS 172.84 ± 0.70 GeV and CMS 172.44 ± 0.49 GeV. The ATLAS 8 TeV paper decomposes them as ATLAS 172.84 ± 0...
top_mass_single
newgen:t4-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
In the nonresonant HH → bbγγ search, what 95% CL result was reported for the HH signal strength μHH and the trilinear coupling modifier κλ using the 140 fb-1 Run-2 dataset, and how did these numbers change in the later analysis that added 168 fb-1 of 13.6 TeV data? Compare the observed values and intervals.
T2
[ "2310.12301", "2507.03495" ]
With 140 fb-1, the observed 95% CL upper limit was μHH < 4.0 and the observed κλ interval was -1.4 < κλ < 6.9. In the later analysis with 308 fb-1 (140 fb-1 at 13 TeV plus 168 fb-1 at 13.6 TeV), the measured signal strength was μHH = 0.9^{+1.4}_{-1.1} and the observed 95% CL upper limit improved slightly to μHH < 3.7, ...
[ { "arxiv_id": "2310.12301", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "No significant excess above the expected background from Standard Model processes is observed. An observed upper limit μ_{HH} < 4.0 is set at 95% confidence level on the Higgs boson pair production cross-section normalised to its Standard Mo...
2310.12301
With 140 fb-1, the observed 95% CL upper limit was μHH < 4.0 and the observed κλ interval was -1.4 < κλ < 6.9. In the later analysis with 308 fb-1 (140 fb-1 at 13 TeV plus 168 fb-1 at 13.6 TeV), the measured signal strength was μHH = 0.9^{+1.4}_{-1.1} and the observed 95% CL upper limit improved slightly to μHH < 3.7, ...
HH_diHiggs
newgen:t4-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
In the 13 TeV searches/measurements of same-sign W-boson pair production in association with two jets, how do the quoted electron charge-misidentification rates compare between the two experiments? Give the central/barrel and forward/endcap values quoted by each experiment.
T2
[ "1906.03203", "2005.01173" ]
The ATLAS-based measurement quotes the measured charge-misreconstruction probability from Z→ee events as about 0.1% in the central region, rising to a few percent for |η|>2. The CMS VBS measurement quotes an estimated electron charge-misidentification rate from Drell-Yan events of about 0.01% in the barrel and 0.3% in ...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1906.03203", "section": "Background estimation / charge misreconstruction paragraph", "snippet": "Opposite-sign lepton pairs pass the full event selection when an electron undergoes an interaction with the detector material resulting in incorrect charge reconstruction. The probability of ...
1906.03203
The ATLAS-based measurement quotes the measured charge-misreconstruction probability from Z→ee events as about 0.1% in the central region, rising to a few percent for |η|>2. The CMS VBS measurement quotes an estimated electron charge-misidentification rate from Drell-Yan events of about 0.01% in the barrel and 0.3% in ...
VBS_EW
newgen:t4-20260910
benchmark_100
main
true
Two CMS analyses of the 2016 13 TeV data set quote different overall normalizations of H to gamma gamma production: one quotes an inclusive signal strength mu, while the other quotes a fiducial total cross section and the corresponding theoretical prediction. Using the measured fiducial cross section and its SM predict...
T3
[ "1804.02716", "1807.03825" ]
The properties paper quotes mu = 1.18 (+0.17/-0.14). The differential paper measures the fiducial total cross section as 84 +/- 11 (stat) +/- 7 (syst) fb = 84 +/- 13 fb and quotes a theoretical prediction of 73 +/- 4 fb, giving mu_fid ~ 84/73 ~ 1.15. The two normalization ratios are consistent within uncertainties.
[ { "arxiv_id": "1804.02716", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "Allowing the Higgs mass to float, the measurement yields a signal strength relative to the standard model prediction of 1.18 (+0.17/-0.14) = 1.18 (+0.12/-0.11) (stat) (+0.09/-0.07) (syst) (+0.07/-0.06) (theo)." }, { "arxiv_id": "1807...
1804.02716
The properties paper quotes mu = 1.18 (+0.17/-0.14). The differential paper measures the fiducial total cross section as 84 +/- 11 (stat) +/- 7 (syst) fb = 84 +/- 13 fb and quotes a theoretical prediction of 73 +/- 4 fb, giving mu_fid ~ 84/73 ~ 1.15. The two normalization ratios are consistent within uncertainties.
Hgg_run2_run3
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
How is the off-shell region defined in the CMS Higgs-width analysis, which SM subprocess is common to that analysis and to the ATLAS four-lepton invariant-mass spectrum measurement, and how does the measured width compare with the SM expectation quoted there?
T3
[ "1901.00174", "1902.05892" ]
The CMS width analysis uses the on-shell region 105 < m4l < 140 GeV and the off-shell region m4l > 220 GeV. The common SM subprocess is gg -> H* -> ZZ -> 4l, which the ATLAS spectrum paper denotes as gg(->H(*))->ZZ(*)->4l and notes interferes destructively with the gg -> 4l box, with maximal interference around m4l = 2...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1901.00174", "section": "Section 2", "snippet": "The constraints on Gamma_H are set using the off-shell production method, which considers the H boson production relationship between the on-shell (105 < m4l < 140 GeV) and off-shell (m4l > 220 GeV) regions." }, { "arxiv_id": "1901....
1901.00174
The CMS width analysis uses the on-shell region 105 < m4l < 140 GeV and the off-shell region m4l > 220 GeV. The common SM subprocess is gg -> H* -> ZZ -> 4l, which the ATLAS spectrum paper denotes as gg(->H(*))->ZZ(*)->4l and notes interferes destructively with the gg -> 4l box, with maximal interference around m4l = 2...
HZZ4l
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
Two CMS searches at 13 TeV in the same 2016 dataset quote best-fit signal-strength modifiers for the same standard-model process, one using multilepton plus hadronic-tau final states and one using H to bb with one or two leptons. What does the shorthand ttH / t tbar H denote, what are the measured signal strengths and ...
T3
[ "1803.05485", "1804.03682" ]
ttH / t tbar H denotes associated production of a standard model Higgs boson with a top quark-antiquark pair, assuming m_H = 125 GeV. The multilepton/hadronic-tau search measures a signal rate of 1.23^{+0.45}_{-0.43} times the SM prediction, with observed (expected) significance 3.2 sigma (2.8 sigma) and a 95% CL upper...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1803.05485", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "The measured signal rate amounts to 1.23_{-0.43}^{+0.45} times the production rate expected in the standard model, with an observed (expected) significance of 3.2 sigma (2.8 sigma), which represents evidence for ttH production in those final...
1803.05485
ttH / t tbar H denotes associated production of a standard model Higgs boson with a top quark-antiquark pair, assuming m_H = 125 GeV. The multilepton/hadronic-tau search measures a signal rate of 1.23^{+0.45}_{-0.43} times the SM prediction, with observed (expected) significance 3.2 sigma (2.8 sigma) and a 95% CL upper...
Hbb_tautau_mumu
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
In the ATLAS multijet search for R-parity-violating gluinos, what is the defining formula of the total jet mass variable? Two ATLAS SUSY searches in this set generated signal samples with the same MadGraph/Pythia setup; identify them, and compare the integrated luminosities used by their high-mass searches.
T3
[ "1804.03568", "1806.04030" ]
The variable M_J^Sigma is defined as the sum of the masses of the four leading large-R jets. Both the gluino RPV search (1804.03568) and the higgsino GGM/GMSB search (1806.04030) used MadGraph5_aMC@NLO v2.3.3 with PYTHIA 8.186 for SUSY signal generation, with A14 tune and NNPDF2.3 PDF in the stated configurations. Thei...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1804.03568", "section": "Analysis strategy", "snippet": "The observable $ M_J^\\Sigma $ is defined as the sum of the masses of the four leading large-R jets." }, { "arxiv_id": "1804.03568", "section": "Simulation samples", "snippet": "Signal samples were generated at leadi...
1804.03568
The variable M_J^Sigma is defined as the sum of the masses of the four leading large-R jets. Both the gluino RPV search (1804.03568) and the higgsino GGM/GMSB search (1806.04030) used MadGraph5_aMC@NLO v2.3.3 with PYTHIA 8.186 for SUSY signal generation, with A14 tune and NNPDF2.3 PDF in the stated configurations. Thei...
ttH_Higgs_associated
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
Compare two CMS EFT searches for non-standard top quark production, one based on 35.9 fb^-1 of 2016 dilepton data and one based on 2017 multilepton data. (a) What are the exact integrated luminosity and data-taking year in each analysis? (b) In the 2016 analysis, the coefficient C_G multiplies which operator and does i...
T3
[ "1903.11144", "2012.04120" ]
(a) The 2016 dilemma/analysis uses 35.9 fb^-1 collected in 2016; the 2017 multilepton analysis uses 41.5 fb^-1 collected in 2017. (b) C_G multiplies the triple-gluon field-strength operator O_G = f_abc G^a_nu G^b_rho G^c_mu; it modifies only t-tbar production, not tW production. (c) The 2016 paper says no significant d...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1903.11144", "section": "Abstract and Introduction", "snippet": "The data set corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb^-1 collected in 2016 with the CMS detector. In the case of the C_G coupling, only t-tbar production is modified." }, { "arxiv_id": "2012.04120", "se...
1903.11144
(a) The 2016 dilemma/analysis uses 35.9 fb^-1 collected in 2016; the 2017 multilepton analysis uses 41.5 fb^-1 collected in 2017. (b) C_G multiplies the triple-gluon field-strength operator O_G = f_abc G^a_nu G^b_rho G^c_mu; it modifies only t-tbar production, not tW production. (c) The 2016 paper says no significant d...
VBS_EW
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
Two analyses quote different b-tagging working points for the same ATLAS b-tagging algorithm. In a four-b-jet HH search the R=0.4 jet working point gives 70% b-jet efficiency and light-jet rejection of 380; in a fully leptonic WZ resonance search the chosen working point gives 85% b-jet efficiency and light-jet rejecti...
T3
[ "1804.06174", "1806.01532" ]
The common algorithm is MV2c10. Yes, the numbers are consistent: requiring a higher b-jet efficiency (85% vs 70%) corresponds to a looser tagging requirement and therefore a smaller rejection of light-quark/gluon jets (about 34 vs 380).
[ { "arxiv_id": "1804.06174", "section": "4 Object reconstruction", "snippet": "Jets containing b-hadrons are identified using a score value computed from a multivariate b-tagging algorithm MV2c10 ... The b-tagging requirements of both the resolved and the boosted analyses use working points that lead to ...
1804.06174
The common algorithm is MV2c10. Yes, the numbers are consistent: requiring a higher b-jet efficiency (85% vs 70%) corresponds to a looser tagging requirement and therefore a smaller rejection of light-quark/gluon jets (about 34 vs 380).
WW_WZ_ZZ_diboson
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
Compare the 95% confidence-level EFT bounds from CMS ttbar spin correlations and CMS Wgamma production: what is the interval for the top-quark chromomagnetic dipole coefficient C_tG/Lambda^2, what is the observed interval for c_WWW/Lambda^2, and why can they be compared although they have different names?
T3
[ "1907.03729", "2102.02283" ]
The ttbar spin-correlation result gives -0.24 < C_tG/Lambda^2 < 0.07 TeV^-2 for the chromomagnetic top-quark dipole. The Wgamma result gives an observed 95% CL interval -0.90 < c_WWW/Lambda^2 < 0.91 TeV^-2. Both are 95% CL bounds on dimension-six Wilson coefficients written with the common c_i/Lambda^2 EFT normalizatio...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1907.03729", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "The normalized differential cross sections are used in fits to constrain the anomalous chromomagnetic and chromoelectric dipole moments of the top quark to -0.24 < C_tG/Lambda^2 < 0.07 TeV^-2 and -0.33 < C_tG/Lambda^2 < 0.20 TeV^-2, respecti...
1907.03729
The ttbar spin-correlation result gives -0.24 < C_tG/Lambda^2 < 0.07 TeV^-2 for the chromomagnetic top-quark dipole. The Wgamma result gives an observed 95% CL interval -0.90 < c_WWW/Lambda^2 < 0.91 TeV^-2. Both are 95% CL bounds on dimension-six Wilson coefficients written with the common c_i/Lambda^2 EFT normalizatio...
EW_fit_WW_WZ_pol
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
Two ATLAS 13 TeV ttbar measurements define the transverse out-of-plane momentum with the same projection formula. The lepton+jets ttbar + associated-jets analysis used 2015 data corresponding to 3.2 fb^-1; the all-hadronic highly boosted analysis defined its fiducial region with two large-radius jets. What pT threshold...
T3
[ "1801.02052", "1802.06572" ]
Vector hop: the all-hadronic highly boosted analysis requires one top-quark jet with pT > 500 GeV and a second with pT > 350 GeV, and uses 36.1 fb^-1 of 13 TeV data. Graph hop: despite the notation difference, |p_out^tt| in the lepton+jets paper and |p_out^ttbar| in the boosted paper are the same observable: the projec...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1801.02052", "section": "Abstract / 1 Introduction", "snippet": "Events with two large-radius jets in the final state, one with transverse momentum pT > 500 GeV and a second with pT > 350 GeV, are used for the measurement. ... The data set corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 36.1 f...
1801.02052
Vector hop: the all-hadronic highly boosted analysis requires one top-quark jet with pT > 500 GeV and a second with pT > 350 GeV, and uses 36.1 fb^-1 of 13 TeV data. Graph hop: despite the notation difference, |p_out^tt| in the lepton+jets paper and |p_out^ttbar| in the boosted paper are the same observable: the projec...
top_antitop
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
Compare the CMS searches for single top quark production with a photon (t-gamma-j) and for tZq production: what integrated luminosities and observed significances were reported, what cross-section-type quantities were extracted, and what forward-jet/associated-electroweak-production feature connects them?
T3
[ "1808.02913", "1812.05900" ]
The t-gamma-j evidence paper used 35.9 fb^-1 of 2016 data, observed a 4.4 standard-deviation excess (median expected 3.0), and quoted a fiducial product sigma(pp -> t gamma j) B(t -> mu nu b) = 115 ± 17 (stat) ± 30 (syst) fb. The tZq observation paper used 77.4 fb^-1 of 2016+2017 data, observed tZq with significance we...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1808.02913", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "An excess above the background-only hypothesis is observed, with a significance of 4.4 standard deviations. A fiducial cross section is measured for isolated photons with transverse momentum greater than 25 GeV in the central region of the d...
1808.02913
The t-gamma-j evidence paper used 35.9 fb^-1 of 2016 data, observed a 4.4 standard-deviation excess (median expected 3.0), and quoted a fiducial product sigma(pp -> t gamma j) B(t -> mu nu b) = 115 ± 17 (stat) ± 30 (syst) fb. The tZq observation paper used 77.4 fb^-1 of 2016+2017 data, observed tZq with significance we...
top_mass_single
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
Several ATLAS 13 TeV results use gauge-mediated or GGM models. The photonic GGM analysis quotes an upper-limit range on the visible BSM cross section; the same models identify the gravitino $\tilde{G}$ as LSP. In a separate GMSB-inspired stop-to-tau-slepton model, what stop mass is excluded, and how does that compare w...
T3
[ "1802.03158", "1803.10178", "1805.01649" ]
The ATLAS photonic GGM search sets 95% CL upper limits of between 0.083 fb and 0.32 fb on the visible cross section of BSM contributions. In both the photonic GGM and stop-to-tau-slepton GMSB-inspired models, $\tilde{G}$ is the gravitino LSP; in the photonic GGM binolike case the neutral NLSP decays as $\tilde{\chi}_1^...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1802.03158", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "No significant excess of events is observed above the Standard Model prediction, and 95% confidence-level upper limits of between 0.083 fb and 0.32 fb are set on the visible cross section of contributions from physics beyond the Standard Mod...
1802.03158
The ATLAS photonic GGM search sets 95% CL upper limits of between 0.083 fb and 0.32 fb on the visible cross section of BSM contributions. In both the photonic GGM and stop-to-tau-slepton GMSB-inspired models, $\tilde{G}$ is the gravitino LSP; in the photonic GGM binolike case the neutral NLSP decays as $\tilde{\chi}_1^...
SUSY
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
Two CMS diboson-resonance searches, one in the νν qq final state and one in the lepton+merged-jet final state, both use the HVT model B W' benchmark. What parameter values do the two analyses quote for this benchmark? The lepton+merged-jet analysis observed its largest background deviation at what mass and with what lo...
T3
[ "1802.09407", "1803.03838" ]
The νν qq paper quotes HVT model B with g_V = 3, c_F = 1.024, c_H = 0.976. The lepton+merged-jet paper quotes HVT model B with g_V = 3, c_H = -0.98, c_F = 1.02. The lepton+merged-jet search observed its largest local deviation for a mass near 1.4 TeV, with a local significance of 2.5 standard deviations. For the final ...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1802.09407", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "The largest deviation from the background-only hypothesis is observed for a mass near 1.4 TeV and corresponds to a local significance of 2.5 standard deviations." }, { "arxiv_id": "1802.09407", "section": "Section 3: Benchmark si...
1802.09407
The νν qq paper quotes HVT model B with g_V = 3, c_F = 1.024, c_H = 0.976. The lepton+merged-jet paper quotes HVT model B with g_V = 3, c_H = -0.98, c_F = 1.02. The lepton+merged-jet search observed its largest local deviation for a mass near 1.4 TeV, with a local significance of 2.5 standard deviations. For the final ...
Exotic_BSM
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
A GGM displaced-dimuon search generated gluino-pair signal samples with one fixed gluino mass while varying the neutralino mass and lifetime. This same model has a neutralino NLSP decaying to an LSP whose name also appears in a Stealth SUSY benchmark where a singlino decays to two gluons plus a light version of that LS...
T3
[ "1808.03057", "1811.07370", "1808.03078" ]
The GGM samples were generated with m_gluino = 1100 GeV. The common LSP is the gravitino. The displaced-vertex multijet search excludes gluino masses below 2200 GeV for mean proper decay lengths between 0.6 and 80 mm, so its mass reach extends to about twice the 1100 GeV GGM benchmark point; the two statements refer to...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1808.03057", "section": "3.1 BSM signal samples", "snippet": "Six signal samples were generated with m_gluino = 1.1 TeV and neutralino masses and lifetimes given in Table 1." }, { "arxiv_id": "1808.03057", "section": "3.1 BSM signal samples", "snippet": "Hence, the graviti...
1808.03057
The GGM samples were generated with m_gluino = 1100 GeV. The common LSP is the gravitino. The displaced-vertex multijet search excludes gluino masses below 2200 GeV for mean proper decay lengths between 0.6 and 80 mm, so its mass reach extends to about twice the 1100 GeV GGM benchmark point; the two statements refer to...
Rparity_stealth
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
A rare-decay ATLAS search uses B_s^0 → μ+μ− to measure a B_s^0 branching fraction, while a CMS heavy-ion measurement uses B_s^0 → J/ψφ → μ+μ−K+K− to obtain the B_s^0 nuclear modification factor. Using these two channels, what is the ATLAS measured B(B_s^0 → μ+μ−), what are the CMS R_AA values in the two pT intervals, a...
T3
[ "1810.03022", "1812.03017" ]
ATLAS measures B(B_s^0 → μ+μ−) = (3.2 +1.1/−1.0) × 10^-9 with the 26.3 fb^-1 13 TeV dataset. CMS reports R_AA = 1.5 ± 0.6 (stat) ± 0.5 (syst) for pT = 7–15 GeV/c and R_AA = 0.87 ± 0.30 (stat) ± 0.17 (syst) for pT = 15–50 GeV/c in PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV. Both measurements concern the same neutral B_s^0 meson, but C...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1812.03017", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "A study of the decays B_s^0 → μ+μ− and B^0 → μ+μ− has been performed using 26.3 fb^-1 of 13 TeV LHC proton–proton collision data collected with the ATLAS detector in 2015 and 2016." }, { "arxiv_id": "1810.03022", "section": "Abst...
1810.03022
ATLAS measures B(B_s^0 → μ+μ−) = (3.2 +1.1/−1.0) × 10^-9 with the 26.3 fb^-1 13 TeV dataset. CMS reports R_AA = 1.5 ± 0.6 (stat) ± 0.5 (syst) for pT = 7–15 GeV/c and R_AA = 0.87 ± 0.30 (stat) ± 0.17 (syst) for pT = 15–50 GeV/c in PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV. Both measurements concern the same neutral B_s^0 meson, but C...
B_flavour
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
ATLAS isolated-photon measurements in pp collisions at 13 and 8 TeV and in p+Pb collisions at 8.16 TeV use the same photon-isolation definition. What is that definition; what are the integrated luminosities of the two pp data sets in the 13/8 TeV ratio measurement; and to what is the p+Pb nuclear modification factor Rp...
T3
[ "1901.10075", "1903.02209" ]
The shared isolation requirement is E_T^iso < 4.2 × 10^-3 E_T^γ + 4.8 GeV inside a cone of ΔR = 0.4. The pp ratio uses 3.16 ± 0.07 fb^-1 at 13 TeV and 20.2 ± 0.4 fb^-1 at 8 TeV. The p+Pb RpPb is dσ(p+Pb→γ+X)/dE_T^γ divided by A·dσ(pp→γ+X)/dE_T^γ, with A=208 for Pb, using a pp √s=8 TeV reference spectrum obtained with t...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1901.10075", "section": "Introduction / Analysis strategy", "snippet": "The photon is isolated by requiring that the transverse energy inside a cone of size ΔR = 0.4 ... E_T^iso, is smaller than E_Tcut^iso ≡ 4.2 · 10^-3 · E_T^γ + 4.8 GeV [8,9]." }, { "arxiv_id": "1901.10075", ...
1901.10075
The shared isolation requirement is E_T^iso < 4.2 × 10^-3 E_T^γ + 4.8 GeV inside a cone of ΔR = 0.4. The pp ratio uses 3.16 ± 0.07 fb^-1 at 13 TeV and 20.2 ± 0.4 fb^-1 at 8 TeV. The p+Pb RpPb is dσ(p+Pb→γ+X)/dE_T^γ divided by A·dσ(pp→γ+X)/dE_T^γ, with A=208 for Pb, using a pp √s=8 TeV reference spectrum obtained with t...
photons_ewk
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
ATLAS introduced FASTDIPS as a fast b-tagging filter at the high-level trigger. How is FASTDIPS related to the previous offline DIPS b-tagger, what quantitative effect does this filter have for SM HH to b b b b events, and how does that factor compare with the Run-3 tracking software speed-up and fake-track reduction r...
T3
[ "2306.09738", "2308.09471" ]
FASTDIPS is a deep-sets neural-network b-tagger based on the offline ATLAS DIPS algorithm and retrained for the fast preselection. For Standard Model HH to b b b b, the fast filter lowers the input rate to the remaining high-level trigger by a factor of five, at the cost of reducing the overall signal efficiency by rou...
[ { "arxiv_id": "2306.09738", "section": "4 Fast b-tagging", "snippet": "b-jets are identified with FASTDIPS, a deep-sets-based neural network [27], based on the offline ATLAS DIPS algorithm [28], which ingests tracks and jets as inputs." }, { "arxiv_id": "2306.09738", "section": "Abstract", ...
2306.09738
FASTDIPS is a deep-sets neural-network b-tagger based on the offline ATLAS DIPS algorithm and retrained for the fast preselection. For Standard Model HH to b b b b, the fast filter lowers the input rate to the remaining high-level trigger by a factor of five, at the cost of reducing the overall signal efficiency by rou...
run3_13p6
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
Several CMS H→γγ publications based on the same 2016 13 TeV dataset categorize production modes in slightly different wording. In the H→γγ property paper, the dominant production modes are gluon-gluon fusion with additional contributions from vector boson fusion, associated vector-boson production, and associated top-q...
T3
[ "1804.02716", "1807.03825" ]
(i) The four modes are ggH, VBF, VH and ttH. The inclusive/differential paper calls the same vector-boson-associated mode 'associated production with a W/Z boson (VH)', while the property paper calls it 'production in association with a vector boson (VH)'; the top-pair mode is called 'associated production with a top q...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1804.02716 and 1807.03825", "section": "1804: 3 Analysis strategy; 1807: 1 Introduction", "snippet": "1804: 'The dominant Higgs boson production mechanism ... is gluon-gluon fusion (ggH), with additional contributions from vector boson fusion (VBF), and production in association with a ve...
1804.02716
(i) The four modes are ggH, VBF, VH and ttH. The inclusive/differential paper calls the same vector-boson-associated mode 'associated production with a W/Z boson (VH)', while the property paper calls it 'production in association with a vector boson (VH)'; the top-pair mode is called 'associated production with a top q...
1804.02716,1807.03825,1809.00327
newgen:qa_v2_new-20260908
benchmark_100
main
true
An ATLAS four-lepton invariant-mass measurement defines a matrix-element discriminant whose numerator is the gg->H(*) -> ZZ(*) -> 4l process. A CMS four-lepton width analysis uses the same on-shell/off-shell virtual-Higgs process to measure the Higgs width. What exact mass and width assumptions does ATLAS use when eval...
T3
[ "1901.00174", "1902.05892" ]
ATLAS evaluates the gg->H(*) -> ZZ(*) -> 4l contribution with the Higgs boson mass set to 125.0 GeV and the width set to the SM prediction. CMS labels the same process as on-shell and off-shell Higgs boson production and, under SM-like HZZ couplings, reports Gamma_H = 3.2 (+2.8, -2.2) MeV, with the SM expectation aroun...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1902.05892", "section": "Section 3: Definition of fiducial cross-section / D_ME definition", "snippet": "The squared matrix elements are computed at leading-order QCD precision using the MCFM ... The Higgs boson mass is set to m_H=125.0 GeV, and its width to the Standard Model prediction ...
1901.00174
ATLAS evaluates the gg->H(*) -> ZZ(*) -> 4l contribution with the Higgs boson mass set to 125.0 GeV and the width set to the SM prediction. CMS labels the same process as on-shell and off-shell Higgs boson production and, under SM-like HZZ couplings, reports Gamma_H = 3.2 (+2.8, -2.2) MeV, with the SM expectation aroun...
1802.03388,1901.00174,1902.05892
newgen:qa_v2_new-20260908
benchmark_100
main
true
With the CMS 2016 data set at sqrt(s)=13 TeV (35.9 fb^-1), two direct searches for production of the 125 GeV Higgs boson with a top-antiquark pair quote different best-fit signal strengths: one in the H to b bbar decay mode with leptonic top decays, and one in final states with electrons, muons, and hadronically decayi...
T3
[ "1804.03682", "1803.05485", "1803.06553" ]
The H to b bbar ttH search gives best-fit signal strength mu = 0.72 ± 0.24 (stat) ± 0.38 (syst), an observed (expected) 95% CL upper limit on mu of 1.5 (0.9), and observed (expected) significance 1.6 sigma (2.2 sigma), so its central value lies below the SM expectation. The multilepton e/mu/tau_h ttH search gives a mea...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1804.03682", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "A combined fit of multivariate discriminant distributions in all categories results in an observed (expected) upper limit on mu of 1.5 (0.9) at 95% confidence level, and a best fit value of 0.72 ± 0.24 (stat) ± 0.38 (syst), corresponding to ...
1804.03682
The H to b bbar ttH search gives best-fit signal strength mu = 0.72 ± 0.24 (stat) ± 0.38 (syst), an observed (expected) 95% CL upper limit on mu of 1.5 (0.9), and observed (expected) significance 1.6 sigma (2.2 sigma), so its central value lies below the SM expectation. The multilepton e/mu/tau_h ttH search gives a mea...
1803.05485,1803.06553,1804.03682
newgen:qa_v2_new-20260908
benchmark_100
main
true
A CMS Run-2 search confined to the all-jet ttbar H final state reports its result with a 'signal strength' mu, with best fit mu-hat = 0.9 ± 1.5. A later CMS paper that observes ttbar H uses the same physical parameter but calls it the signal strength modifier mu_ttbarH. What is the combined best-fit signal strength and...
T3
[ "1803.06986", "1804.02610" ]
The all-jet-only CMS paper defines the result as mu = sigma/sigma_SM and measures mu-hat = 0.9 ± 0.7 (stat) ± 1.3 (syst) = 0.9 ± 1.5 (tot), with observed 95% CL upper limit mu < 3.8 and expected < 3.1. The observation paper uses the same type of normalized ttH signal-strength parameter, named the signal-strength modifi...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1803.06986", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "The results are provided in terms of an observed t tbar H signal strength relative to the standard model production cross section, assuming a Higgs boson mass of 125 GeV. The best fit value is 0.9 ± 0.7 (stat) ± 1.3 (syst) = 0.9 ± 1.5 (tot),...
1803.06986
The all-jet-only CMS paper defines the result as mu = sigma/sigma_SM and measures mu-hat = 0.9 ± 0.7 (stat) ± 1.3 (syst) = 0.9 ± 1.5 (tot), with observed 95% CL upper limit mu < 3.8 and expected < 3.1. The observation paper uses the same type of normalized ttH signal-strength parameter, named the signal-strength modifi...
1803.06986,1804.02610,1804.03568
newgen:qa_v2_new-20260908
benchmark_100
main
true
Two CMS analyses of 13 TeV pp collisions use H→bb decays in different ways. In one analysis, the inclusive combined secondary-vertex b-tagging algorithm is applied to the two subjets of a large-cone jet; in the other, events are split into ‘resolved’ and ‘boosted’ H→bb signatures. What exact working point is quoted for...
T3
[ "1808.01365", "2201.04206" ]
The subjet tagger in the earlier analysis uses a working point with ≈85% efficiency for identifying b jets and a ≈10% misidentification rate. In the later CMS classification, the ‘boosted’ signature is the case where the two b jets from a single high-momentum H→bb decay merge into one wider jet; the ‘resolved’ signatur...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1808.01365", "section": "Section 4: Event reconstruction", "snippet": "The inclusive, combined secondary-vertex b tagging algorithm [57] is applied to the two subjets, which are considered as b-tagged if they pass a working point that provides a misidentification rate of ≈10% while mainta...
1808.01365
The subjet tagger in the earlier analysis uses a working point with ≈85% efficiency for identifying b jets and a ≈10% misidentification rate. In the later CMS classification, the ‘boosted’ signature is the case where the two b jets from a single high-momentum H→bb decay merge into one wider jet; the ‘resolved’ signatur...
1808.01365,2001.05178,2201.04206
newgen:qa_v2_new-20260908
benchmark_100
main
true
In an ATLAS search for doubly charged scalar bosons decaying into same-sign W boson pairs, the signal object is H±± → W±W±. In a separate ATLAS paper, electroweak production of a same-sign W±W± pair in association with two jets is observed. Are these the same W±W± object or different processes? If the second analysis o...
T3
[ "1808.01899", "1906.03203", "1903.11144" ]
The two analyses involve the same same-sign W±W± system, but accessed through different processes: in the BSM search it comes from H±±→W±W± decay, while in the other analysis it is the electroweak W±W±jj final state. The electroweak WWjj observation sees 122 candidate events for an expected background of 69±7, correspo...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1808.01899", "section": "Title / Abstract", "snippet": "A search for doubly charged scalar bosons decaying into W boson pairs is presented. ... doubly charged scalar bosons H±±. Those bosons are produced in pairs ... and decay predominantly into electroweak gauge bosons H±± → W±W±." }, ...
1808.01899
The two analyses involve the same same-sign W±W± system, but accessed through different processes: in the BSM search it comes from H±±→W±W± decay, while in the other analysis it is the electroweak W±W±jj final state. The electroweak WWjj observation sees 122 candidate events for an expected background of 69±7, correspo...
1808.01899,1903.11144,1906.03203
newgen:qa_v2_new-20260908
benchmark_100
main
true
An ATLAS paper combining H to gamma gamma and H to ZZ* to 4l measurements quotes inclusive acceptance factors of 50% and 42%, and a separate 13 TeV ATLAS paper measures the Higgs mass in the same two channels. What Higgs mass is used as the hypothesis for the branching-fraction predictions, what are the per-channel mea...
T3
[ "1805.10197", "1806.00242" ]
The branching-fraction predictions are evaluated for a Higgs boson mass of mH = 125.09 GeV. The 13 TeV mass paper measures mH^gamma-gamma = 124.93 +/- 0.40 GeV and mH^ZZ*->4l = 124.79 +/- 0.37 GeV. The assumed 125.09 GeV hypothesis is therefore 0.16 GeV higher than the measured diphoton-only mass. The H to ZZ* to 4l fi...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1805.10197", "section": "Section 2", "snippet": "Predicted branching ratios and production cross sections are obtained for m_H = 125.09 GeV [15], as described in Section 2." }, { "arxiv_id": "1805.10197", "section": "Section 3 (Acceptance correction)", "snippet": "The incl...
1805.10197
The branching-fraction predictions are evaluated for a Higgs boson mass of mH = 125.09 GeV. The 13 TeV mass paper measures mH^gamma-gamma = 124.93 +/- 0.40 GeV and mH^ZZ*->4l = 124.79 +/- 0.37 GeV. The assumed 125.09 GeV hypothesis is therefore 0.16 GeV higher than the measured diphoton-only mass. The H to ZZ* to 4l fi...
1804.06174,1805.10197,1806.00242
newgen:qa_v2_new-20260908
benchmark_100
main
true
A 13 TeV CMS analysis of ttbar dilepton spin correlations and an 8 TeV CMS measurement of chi_c1/chi_c2 polarizations quote different integrated luminosities. What are these luminosities, what is the ratio, and how do the two measurements compare on the hypothesis that the produced particles are unpolarized?
T3
[ "1907.03729", "1912.07706" ]
Both data sets were recorded by the CMS Collaboration. The 13 TeV ttbar sample is 35.9 fb^-1 and the 8 TeV chi_c sample is 19.1 fb^-1, so the 13 TeV luminosity is larger by 35.9/19.1 ≈ 1.88. The top-quark measurement is consistent with the standard model: top quarks are unpolarized at leading order and only receive <1%...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1907.03729", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "The data were recorded by the CMS experiment at the LHC in 2016 and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb⁻¹." }, { "arxiv_id": "1912.07706", "section": "Introduction", "snippet": "This Letter reports the first mea...
1907.03729
Both data sets were recorded by the CMS Collaboration. The 13 TeV ttbar sample is 35.9 fb^-1 and the 8 TeV chi_c sample is 19.1 fb^-1, so the 13 TeV luminosity is larger by 35.9/19.1 ≈ 1.88. The top-quark measurement is consistent with the standard model: top quarks are unpolarized at leading order and only receive <1%...
1907.03729,1912.07706,2001.04201
newgen:qa_v2_new-20260908
benchmark_100
main
true
In LHC Run-2 analyses involving top quarks, three datasets are used: the CMS dark-matter search with a single hadronically decaying boosted top quark, the ATLAS measurement of highly boosted all-hadronic top-quark pairs, and the ATLAS differential ttbar-plus-jets measurement in the lepton+jets channel. What are the exa...
T3
[ "1801.02052", "1801.08427", "1802.06572" ]
The CMS monotop search uses pp collision data recorded by CMS in 2016 at 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36 fb-1. The ATLAS boosted all-hadronic ttbar differential measurement uses data recorded in 2015 and 2016, corresponding to 36.1 fb-1. The ATLAS lepton+jets ttbar+jets differential measurement ...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1801.02052", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "The data set corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 36.1 fb-1, recorded in 2015 and 2016 with the ATLAS detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider." }, { "arxiv_id": "1802.06572", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "The me...
1801.02052
The CMS monotop search uses pp collision data recorded by CMS in 2016 at 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36 fb-1. The ATLAS boosted all-hadronic ttbar differential measurement uses data recorded in 2015 and 2016, corresponding to 36.1 fb-1. The ATLAS lepton+jets ttbar+jets differential measurement ...
1801.02052,1801.08427,1802.06572
newgen:qa_v2_new-20260908
benchmark_100
main
true
In three CMS analyses based on the 2016 dataset at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV, event selection is triggered by muons. Which single-muon trigger pT threshold appears in all three? In the top-quark-mass lepton+jets analysis and in the single-top-plus-photon analysis, the offline muon pT requirement is the same; what is it, and why...
T3
[ "1805.01428", "1805.07399", "1808.02913" ]
All three analyses use a single-muon trigger threshold of 24 GeV. The lepton+jets top-mass analysis and the single-top+photon analysis each require an isolated muon with pT above 26 GeV, i.e. 2 GeV above the 24 GeV trigger threshold. The tW analysis also uses a single-lepton muon trigger threshold of 24 GeV, with a lea...
[ { "hop": "vector", "arxiv_id": "1805.01428", "section": "Section 3 Data samples, event generation, and selection", "snippet": "Events are required to pass a single-muon trigger with a minimum threshold on the pT of an isolated muon of 24 GeV or a single-electron trigger with a pT threshold for isola...
1805.01428
All three analyses use a single-muon trigger threshold of 24 GeV. The lepton+jets top-mass analysis and the single-top+photon analysis each require an isolated muon with pT above 26 GeV, i.e. 2 GeV above the 24 GeV trigger threshold. The tW analysis also uses a single-lepton muon trigger threshold of 24 GeV, with a lea...
1805.01428,1805.07399,1808.02913
newgen:qa_v2_new-20260908
benchmark_100
main
true
The symbol H is used in one search for a standard-model-like Higgs boson with mass between 70 and 110 GeV, and it is also used in another CMS paper to denote the discovered 125 GeV Higgs boson whose H to gamma gamma mass is measured. The low-mass search reports an excess at 95.3 GeV with local (global) significance 2.8...
T4
[ "1811.08459", "2002.06398" ]
No. The low-mass search explicitly defines H as an additional SM-like Higgs boson with mass below 125 GeV, not as the observed 125 GeV state. The discovered Higgs boson has m_H = 125.78 +/- 0.26 GeV in the H to gamma gamma measurement (and 125.38 +/- 0.14 GeV after the full CMS combination), so the 95.3 GeV excess is a...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1811.08459", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "The results of a search for a standard model-like Higgs boson in the mass range between 70 and 110 GeV decaying into two photons are presented ... an observed excess with respect to the standard model prediction, which is maximal for a mass ...
1811.08459
No. The low-mass search explicitly defines H as an additional SM-like Higgs boson with mass below 125 GeV, not as the observed 125 GeV state. The discovered Higgs boson has m_H = 125.78 +/- 0.26 GeV in the H to gamma gamma measurement (and 125.38 +/- 0.14 GeV after the full CMS combination), so the 95.3 GeV excess is a...
Hgg_run2_run3
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
ATLAS has addressed BSM vector bosons in four-lepton events in several ways. The dark U(1)_d vector boson Z_d is searched through exotic Higgs decays H → ZX/XX → 4l, while inclusive four-lepton measurements discuss a generic additional gauge boson Z'. Using the exact parameters and null result of the H-decay search, th...
T4
[ "1802.03388", "2103.01918", "1902.05892" ]
No. The Z_d in the exotic-decay search is a dark U(1)_d gauge boson searched through H → ZX/XX → 4l, whereas the generic Z' in the inclusive-measurement paper is an illustrative additional gauge boson that can be pair-produced and decay into lepton pairs; the two should not be conflated. The dedicated search used 36.1 ...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1802.03388", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "The search uses pp collision data collected with the ATLAS detector at the LHC with an integrated luminosity of 36.1 fb^-1 at a centre-of-mass energy sqrt(s)=13 TeV. No significant excess of events above Standard Model background predictions...
1802.03388
No. The Z_d in the exotic-decay search is a dark U(1)_d gauge boson searched through H → ZX/XX → 4l, whereas the generic Z' in the inclusive-measurement paper is an illustrative additional gauge boson that can be pair-produced and decay into lepton pairs; the two should not be conflated. The dedicated search used 36.1 ...
HZZ4l
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
The CMS HH to bbbb resonance search uses a b-tagging discriminant called DEEPCSV, while another CMS search for h to aa to 2b2tau uses CSVv2. How are DEEPCSV and CSVv2 related? Give the quoted DEEPCSV misidentification rates and b-jet efficiency, and compare them with the CSVv2 working point quoted in the 2b2tau search.
T4
[ "1805.10191", "1806.03548" ]
DEEPCSV is not identical to CSVv2. DEEPCSV is described as a new b-tagging algorithm based on a deep neural network with four hidden layers; it uses the same set of observables as the combined secondary vertex CSV/CSVv2 algorithm, except that its track selection is expanded to include up to six tracks, further improvin...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1806.03548", "section": "Event reconstruction", "snippet": "Jets are identified as originating from b quarks using the DEEPCSV discriminator, a new b tagging algorithm based on a deep neural network with four hidden layers. The DEEPCSV discriminator employs the same set of observables as ...
1805.10191
DEEPCSV is not identical to CSVv2. DEEPCSV is described as a new b-tagging algorithm based on a deep neural network with four hidden layers; it uses the same set of observables as the combined secondary vertex CSV/CSVv2 algorithm, except that its track selection is expanded to include up to six tracks, further improvin...
Hbb_tautau_mumu
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
Compile evidence from the CMS and ATLAS ttH papers: (1) What is the best-fit signal strength of the standalone CMS all-jet H→bb analysis? (2) How is that all-jet, zero-lepton H→bb search described among the channels in the CMS observation combination? (3) What observed and expected significances do the CMS and ATLAS co...
T4
[ "1803.06986", "1804.02610", "1806.00425" ]
(1) The standalone CMS all-jet H→bb search has best-fit μ = 0.9 ± 1.5. (2) The CMS observation combination describes its H→bb selection as using events with at least three tagged b jets and zero leptons, exactly matching the all-jet search's signal region with ≥7 jets and ≥3 CSVM b-tagged jets plus a lepton veto. (3) T...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1803.06986", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "The best fit value is $\\hat{\\mu} = 0.9 \\pm 0.7$ (stat) $\\pm 1.3$ (syst) $= 0.9 \\pm 1.5$ (tot), and the observed and expected upper limits are, respectively, $\\mu < 3.8$ and < 3.1 at 95% confidence levels." }, { "arxiv_id": "180...
1803.06986
(1) The standalone CMS all-jet H→bb search has best-fit μ = 0.9 ± 1.5. (2) The CMS observation combination describes its H→bb selection as using events with at least three tagged b jets and zero leptons, exactly matching the all-jet search's signal region with ≥7 jets and ≥3 CSVM b-tagged jets plus a lepton veto. (3) T...
ttH_Higgs_associated
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
A CMS electroweak-SUSY search excludes chi1~0 masses from 175 to 1025 GeV for a decay chain in which chi1~0 decays to H plus a massless goldstino. An ATLAS GMSB search excludes higgsino masses from 130 to 940 GeV for decays to H plus a gravitino. Are these two exclusions for the same physical state, and how do the excl...
T4
[ "2201.04206", "2401.14922" ]
The two analyses target analogous higgsino-like states: the massless goldstino in the CMS/GMSB picture corresponds to the nearly massless gravitino in the ATLAS model, where the gravitino mass is set explicitly to 1 MeV. CMS excludes chi1~0 masses of 175–1025 GeV, while ATLAS excludes higgsino masses of 130–940 GeV; th...
[ { "arxiv_id": "2201.04206", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "For the electroweak production of nearly mass-degenerate higgsinos, each of whose decay chains yields a neutralino (chi1~0) that in turn decays to a massless goldstino and a Higgs boson, chi1~0 masses in the range 175 to 1025 GeV are exclude...
2201.04206
The two analyses target analogous higgsino-like states: the massless goldstino in the CMS/GMSB picture corresponds to the nearly massless gravitino in the ATLAS model, where the gravitino mass is set explicitly to 1 MeV. CMS excludes chi1~0 masses of 175–1025 GeV, while ATLAS excludes higgsino masses of 130–940 GeV; th...
HH_diHiggs
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
Consider the history of same-sign WpmWpm scattering measurements at 13 TeV. (a) Extract the measured fiducial signal cross section from the first ATLAS observation of electroweak WpmWpm jj production. (b) In the subsequent CMS polarization paper, the same process is decomposed by W helicity; identify the helicity label...
T4
[ "1906.03203", "2009.09429" ]
(a) ATLAS measured sigma_fid = 2.89 +0.51/-0.48 (stat) +0.29/-0.28 (syst) fb. (b) CMS uses W_L for longitudinal, W_T for transverse, and W_X for either; the fully longitudinal W_L^pm W_L^pm component has an observed (expected) 95% CL upper limit of 1.17 (0.88) fb. (c) The ATLAS unpolarized observation used 36.1 fb^-1 a...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1906.03203", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "The measured fiducial signal cross section is sigma^fid = 2.89 +0.51/-0.48 (stat.) +0.29/-0.28 (syst.) fb." }, { "arxiv_id": "2009.09429", "section": "Abstract and Introduction", "snippet": "Each of the W bosons can be polari...
1906.03203
(a) ATLAS measured sigma_fid = 2.89 +0.51/-0.48 (stat) +0.29/-0.28 (syst) fb. (b) CMS uses W_L for longitudinal, W_T for transverse, and W_X for either; the fully longitudinal W_L^pm W_L^pm component has an observed (expected) 95% CL upper limit of 1.17 (0.88) fb. (c) The ATLAS unpolarized observation used 36.1 fb^-1 a...
VBS_EW
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
Consider three 95% confidence-level results from CMS-related EFT/top analyses: the interval for the top-quark chromomagnetic dipole coefficient C_tG/Lambda^2, the observed interval for c_WWW/Lambda^2 in Wgamma production, and the allowed interval for the anomalous right-handed tensor tWb coupling g_R from the ATLAS+CMS...
T4
[ "1907.03729", "2102.02283", "2005.03799" ]
The top-quark chromomagnetic coefficient is constrained to -0.24 < C_tG/Lambda^2 < 0.07 TeV^-2. The observed Wgamma constraint is -0.90 < c_WWW/Lambda^2 < 0.91 TeV^-2. Both are dimension-six Wilson coefficients in the common EFT expansion c_i/Lambda^2, so the comparison in TeV^-2 is meaningful: the top-spin bound is ti...
[ { "arxiv_id": "1907.03729", "section": "Abstract", "snippet": "The normalized differential cross sections are used in fits to constrain the anomalous chromomagnetic and chromoelectric dipole moments of the top quark to -0.24 < C_tG/Lambda^2 < 0.07 TeV^-2 and -0.33 < C_tG/Lambda^2 < 0.20 TeV^-2, respecti...
1907.03729
The top-quark chromomagnetic coefficient is constrained to -0.24 < C_tG/Lambda^2 < 0.07 TeV^-2. The observed Wgamma constraint is -0.90 < c_WWW/Lambda^2 < 0.91 TeV^-2. Both are dimension-six Wilson coefficients in the common EFT expansion c_i/Lambda^2, so the comparison in TeV^-2 is meaningful: the top-spin bound is ti...
EW_fit_WW_WZ_pol
newgen:v2raw-20260909
benchmark_100
main
true
End of preview.

LHCpublications

This repository holds three things that are easy to confuse, so they are named separately below: the corpus, the indexed subset, and the benchmark.

Role What it is Files
Corpus every paper we collected and converted (curated) corpus_manifest.jsonl, ATLAS.json, CMS.json, arxiv/, failed_*.csv, removed_papers.json, excluded_records.json
Indexed subset the 96 papers that the retrieval index is built over indexes/
Benchmark 100 questions written over the indexed subset benchmark.jsonl

The corpus

Collected from INSPIRE and converted from the arXiv sources:

Source Metadata records With arXiv id Without arXiv id
ATLAS 1,677 1,560 117
CMS 1,912 1,633 279
Total 3,589 3,193 396

57 ATLAS records that referred only to the astronomy papers described under Known composition issues were moved to excluded_records.json during curation, which is why the ATLAS row is smaller than the 1,734 records originally fetched.

The 3,193 records that carry at least one identifier refer to 2,338 distinct papers, and all of them are present in the corpus. The 396 records without an identifier are listed in failed_ATLAS.csv and failed_CMS.csv (columns Title, DOI, arXiv, with the last one empty) rather than dropped silently; they are records with no arXiv source to download, which is not an extraction failure.

arxiv/ holds 2,771 converted papers as markdown, one directory each, with <id>.md, <id>.pdf and figure files. That is 2,338 papers from the metadata lists plus 433 further documents that the same corpus collection returned — mainly conference proceedings, notes and early detector papers.

corpus_manifest.jsonl lists every paper in the corpus (2,771 rows, one per paper) with its INSPIRE title, collaborations, document type and year, plus flags recording whether the paper appears in ATLAS.json or CMS.json and whether an INSPIRE record was found at all. Use it to enumerate the corpus without walking arxiv/:

Field Meaning
arxiv_id, directory identifier and the directory holding the files
title, collaborations, document_type, year INSPIRE metadata
in_atlas_json, in_cms_json whether the snapshot files list this paper
inspire_record whether any INSPIRE record was found

Known composition issues

  • Removed during curation (62 papers). 58 papers of the Herschel-ATLAS astronomy survey, which share the name "ATLAS" and were returned by the same collection, and four documents unrelated to the LHC: 1310.6807 (a galaxy-ring paper), 1711.04330 (a black-hole X-ray binary), 2501.08313 (an LLM technical report) and 2309.11285 (an NLP shared-task overview). Every removed paper is listed with its reason in removed_papers.json, and the 57 INSPIRE records that referred only to them are kept in excluded_records.json, so the removal is auditable rather than silent.
  • One paper is stored in a single directory at its latest version (2506.05018v2); the earlier version directory was removed.
  • 58 papers are LHC sub-detector papers whose INSPIRE records carry a group name instead of the plain collaboration (CMS Tracker, CMS HCAL, ATLAS TDAQ, ATLAS Forward Detectors, ...). They are part of the corpus.
  • The 96-paper indexed subset used in the paper contains none of the removed papers. Every paper cited as benchmark evidence is inside that subset.
  • Old-style identifiers are stored with an underscore, e.g. hep-ex_0007045 for hep-ex/0007045.

Rebuild or re-fetch arxiv/ with benchmarks/LHCpubs_run2/scripts/build_corpus.py from the code repository.

The indexed subset

The retrieval index is built over a fixed 96-paper subset of the corpus, listed in corpus_papers.json in the code repository. indexes/ contains the graph and vector index over that subset: 4,772 chunks, 24,909 entities and 61,874 relations, with 512-token chunks and 50-token overlap. Chunk, entity and relation counts anywhere in the paper describe this subset, not the full corpus.

The benchmark: benchmark.jsonl

100 questions over the indexed subset, 25 per genotype. Every question requires evidence from at least two papers, so it cannot be answered by a single retrieval call over one document. The file was named benchmark_100.jsonl in earlier revisions.

One JSON object per line:

Field Meaning
question the question, phrased without naming the source papers
reference_answer gold answer
type genotype, one of T1-T4 (below)
evidence verbatim gold spans, each with arxiv_id, section and snippet
arxiv_ids, arxiv_id the papers carrying the evidence
cluster the paper cluster the question was generated from
qa_source generation batch the question came from (e.g. newgen:v2raw-20260909)
benchmark, benchmark_role, gate_pass main question that passed the retrievability gate

Genotypes

25 questions per genotype:

Id Genotype What it requires
T1 complementary bridge one paper supplies a value or entity that the other names but does not resolve; neither paper alone answers the question
T2 cross-document aggregation the same measured quantity reported in two or more papers, which must be collected and compared
T3 heterogeneous multi-hop hops that genuinely need different retrieval strategies (a verbatim detail, an entity-centred hop, an aggregate)
T4 three-retriever a concrete numeric or verbatim value plus two further hops of a different kind

The ids were renumbered from an earlier seven-type generation taxonomy, in which these four were numbered T3/T4/T5/T7. If you are matching against an older revision of the paper, T1/T2/T3/T4 here correspond to T3/T4/T5/T7 there.

Retrievability gate

Every question passed a partial corpus-level reachability check before release: for each gold evidence item of at least 40 normalized characters, the first 80 characters starting one quarter of the way in must occur in a vector top-20 chunk, or the cited paper id must appear in the metadata of a top-20 chunk. A question is kept when at least half of its eligible evidence items are hits. The gate does not require one query to retrieve every supporting item. The question generation pools and the composer log that produced this file ship with the code repository, so the composition can be recomputed.

Licenses

Our own artifacts in this repository (the metadata compilation, the index, the benchmark questions, and the code that builds them) are released under MIT. The paper texts under arxiv/ are third-party material: they remain under the terms of their original arXiv listings and publishers and are included here for research use. If you redistribute this repository, keep that distinction.

Downloads last month
1,014