Datasets:
Tasks:
Token Classification
Modalities:
Text
Formats:
json
Sub-tasks:
named-entity-recognition
Languages:
Persian
Size:
10K - 100K
ArXiv:
DOI:
License:
Download annotation/scripts/compare_to_silver.py from Phazel/fa-perdt-ner: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 5.17 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/Phazel/fa-perdt-ner/resolve/main/annotation/scripts/compare_to_silver.py
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/Phazel/fa-perdt-ner/annotation/scripts/compare_to_silver.py
-
curl -L -o compare_to_silver.py https://huggingface.co/datasets/Phazel/fa-perdt-ner/resolve/main/annotation/scripts/compare_to_silver.py
5.17 kB
| #!/usr/bin/env python | |
| """Compare token-aligned LLM annotations against the PerDT silver layer. | |
| python scripts/annotation/compare_to_silver.py \ | |
| --llm annotation/data/llm/ner-v1-default/select-100.jsonl \ | |
| --ref annotation/data/select-100.jsonl \ | |
| --out annotation/data/llm/ner-v1-default/select-100.agreement.json | |
| Exact span match (start, end, label); silver is the reference, so "precision" reads as | |
| "share of LLM spans the silver layer also has". Silver is not gold — the disagreement list | |
| is the human review queue, not an error list. `expected_corrections` counts silver spans | |
| that end on an opening parenthesis, the tokenization artefact GUIDELINES.md rule 10 tells | |
| the annotator to correct, so those disagreements are not read as LLM mistakes. | |
| With --self <other llm jsonl>, also reports span agreement between two LLM runs over their | |
| overlapping ids (a run-to-run consistency sample). | |
| """ | |
| import argparse | |
| import json | |
| from collections import defaultdict | |
| from pathlib import Path | |
| LABELS = ("PER", "LOC", "ORG", "DAT") | |
| def load(path): | |
| return {json.loads(line)["id"]: json.loads(line) for line in Path(path).open(encoding="utf8")} | |
| def span_set(spans): | |
| return {(s["start"], s["end"], s["label"]) for s in spans} | |
| def prf(tp, fp, fn): | |
| p = tp / (tp + fp) if tp + fp else 0.0 | |
| r = tp / (tp + fn) if tp + fn else 0.0 | |
| f = 2 * p * r / (p + r) if p + r else 0.0 | |
| return {"tp": tp, "fp": fp, "fn": fn, "p": round(p, 4), "r": round(r, 4), "f": round(f, 4)} | |
| def score(pairs): | |
| """pairs: [(ref_spans, hyp_spans)] -> {label: prf, micro: prf}.""" | |
| tp = defaultdict(int) | |
| fp = defaultdict(int) | |
| fn = defaultdict(int) | |
| for ref, hyp in pairs: | |
| for s in hyp & ref: | |
| tp[s[2]] += 1 | |
| for s in hyp - ref: | |
| fp[s[2]] += 1 | |
| for s in ref - hyp: | |
| fn[s[2]] += 1 | |
| out = {lab: prf(tp[lab], fp[lab], fn[lab]) for lab in LABELS} | |
| out["micro"] = prf(sum(tp.values()), sum(fp.values()), sum(fn.values())) | |
| return out | |
| def render(tokens, spans): | |
| return [f"[{' '.join(tokens[s['start']:s['end']])}]({s['label']})" | |
| for s in sorted(spans, key=lambda s: s["start"])] | |
| def main(): | |
| ap = argparse.ArgumentParser(description=__doc__) | |
| ap.add_argument("--llm", required=True) | |
| ap.add_argument("--ref", required=True) | |
| ap.add_argument("--out", required=True) | |
| ap.add_argument("--self", dest="self_path", default=None) | |
| args = ap.parse_args() | |
| llm, ref = load(args.llm), load(args.ref) | |
| missing_ids = sorted(set(ref) - set(llm), key=lambda i: int(i.split(":")[1])) | |
| pairs, disagreements, expected = [], [], 0 | |
| for sid, r in sorted(ref.items(), key=lambda kv: int(kv[0].split(":")[1])): | |
| h = llm.get(sid) | |
| if h is None: | |
| continue | |
| tokens = r["tokens"] | |
| rs, hs = span_set(r["silver"]), span_set(h["entities"]) | |
| pairs.append((rs, hs)) | |
| artefacts = [s for s in r["silver"] if tokens[s["end"] - 1] in ("(", ")")] | |
| expected += len(artefacts) | |
| if rs != hs: | |
| disagreements.append({ | |
| "id": sid, | |
| "text": r["text"], | |
| "silver": render(tokens, r["silver"]), | |
| "llm": render(tokens, h["entities"]), | |
| "silver_paren_artefact": bool(artefacts), | |
| }) | |
| result = { | |
| "llm": args.llm, | |
| "ref": args.ref, | |
| "sentences": len(pairs), | |
| "missing_ids": missing_ids, | |
| "scores": score(pairs), | |
| "expected_corrections": { | |
| "rule": "10 (silver span ending on a parenthesis token)", | |
| "spans": expected, | |
| "sentences": sum(1 for d in disagreements if d["silver_paren_artefact"]), | |
| }, | |
| "disagreements": disagreements, | |
| } | |
| if args.self_path: | |
| other = load(args.self_path) | |
| shared = sorted(set(other) & set(llm), key=lambda i: int(i.split(":")[1])) | |
| sp = [(span_set(other[i]["entities"]), span_set(llm[i]["entities"])) for i in shared] | |
| result["self_agreement"] = { | |
| "against": args.self_path, | |
| "sentences": len(shared), | |
| "identical_sentences": sum(1 for a, b in sp if a == b), | |
| "scores": score(sp), | |
| } | |
| Path(args.out).parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True) | |
| Path(args.out).write_text(json.dumps(result, ensure_ascii=False, indent=2), encoding="utf8") | |
| m = result["scores"]["micro"] | |
| print(f"sentences={result['sentences']} micro p={m['p']} r={m['r']} f={m['f']} " | |
| f"(tp={m['tp']} fp={m['fp']} fn={m['fn']})") | |
| for lab in LABELS: | |
| s = result["scores"][lab] | |
| print(f" {lab}: p={s['p']} r={s['r']} f={s['f']} (tp={s['tp']} fp={s['fp']} fn={s['fn']})") | |
| print(f"disagreeing sentences={len(disagreements)} " | |
| f"expected_corrections={result['expected_corrections']['spans']} spans -> {args.out}") | |
| if "self_agreement" in result: | |
| sa = result["self_agreement"] | |
| print(f"self_agreement: {sa['identical_sentences']}/{sa['sentences']} sentences identical, " | |
| f"micro f={sa['scores']['micro']['f']}") | |
| if __name__ == "__main__": | |
| main() | |