Datasets:
Formats:
json
Languages:
English
Size:
< 1K
Tags:
artificial-intelligence
recursive-self-improvement
continual-learning
representation-learning
world-models
cognitive-architecture
|
Download docs/CLAIMS.md from PureOne/FNE-AXIOMESH: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 2.74 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/PureOne/FNE-AXIOMESH/resolve/main/docs/CLAIMS.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/PureOne/FNE-AXIOMESH/docs/CLAIMS.md
-
curl -L -o CLAIMS.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/PureOne/FNE-AXIOMESH/resolve/main/docs/CLAIMS.md
2.74 kB
| # Claim ledger | |
| ## Proved in the manuscript, within explicit mathematical assumptions | |
| 1. The all-future operational quotient is the coarsest action-compatible quotient | |
| preserving the declared observations. This is established behavioral-equivalence | |
| mathematics, not claimed as a new foundational theorem. | |
| 2. The finite linear quotient is generated by the action closure of the query row space. | |
| 3. Current-query recoverability does not imply mixed-composition recoverability. | |
| 4. The additional ancestral tether has minimal length equal to the difference between | |
| parent closure rank and the rank of the combined child views, in field symbols. | |
| 5. Future-query recovery is exact iff the surviving memory nullspace lies in the | |
| operational quotient nullspace. | |
| 6. Minimum additional unrestricted scalar acquisitions equal the relevant rank gap. | |
| 7. Recursive lossless reconstruction composes by induction when every internal | |
| co-basis tether and required child information survives. | |
| 8. Quotient erasure recovery needs at least r+e field symbols for r unconstrained | |
| quotient coordinates and e arbitrary erasures; a classical polynomial code attains it. | |
| 9. Individually valued branch selection can miss unbounded mixed-operation synergy. | |
| 10. Arbitrary future linear operations rule out universal lossless state compression. | |
| Proofs are human-readable and internally checked. They are not Lean/Coq-certified | |
| and have not been independently peer reviewed. Many are standard facts or direct | |
| new applications of those facts, rather than novel mathematics. | |
| ## Executed | |
| 77 automated tests; five seeded experiment runs; exact learned-family composition; | |
| recursive fracture/reunification; identifiable recall; erasure and bounded-radius | |
| small-code checks; frozen execution; chart gauge checks; counterexample-based hole | |
| certificates; an intentionally non-submodular scheduler example. | |
| ## Not established | |
| A trained self-improving transformer; general intelligence multiplication; | |
| superiority over optimized equal-resource baselines; autonomous discovery of the | |
| algebraic family; unrestricted world-model reconstruction; novel causal discovery | |
| from observation alone; the novelty of the full architecture as a distinct RSI class. | |
| ## Explicit baseline results | |
| Conventional pooled group identification matches 10,000/10,000 outputs in the learned | |
| pipeline. A conventional observable-quotient compiler matches the frozen tests. | |
| An optimized classical worklist can match the proposed closure's row-product count. | |
| Classical polynomial erasure coding matches the coded-memory tests. | |
| The scheduler example uses equal live-operator budgets, not equal total selection | |
| compute. The conventional exhaustive pair baseline obtains the same best bundle. | |