PureOne's picture
MIND-QX research v1.0.0; agent and expert review kit v1.0.1
c05989c verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
2.39 kB

Proof-assistant roadmap

No Lean, Isabelle, Coq, or other kernel-checked proof is supplied. This plan describes concrete obligations for a future formalization; it is not itself verification.

Finite foundation

Represent the universe as a finite tagged type containing mandatory marker labels and allocated ordered-pair records. States are finite subsets ordered by inclusion. Define every eraser from its input state using the exact simultaneous guard rule.

Prove deflationarity, monotonicity, and idempotence for all states. Express the distinct-label protocol property explicitly. Define trace composition, fixed upward observers, common reset, and extinction time without identifying the observer with the entire state.

Dependency order

Stage Claim IDs Formal obligation
A C01 Operator axioms on arbitrary subsets
B C02/C03 Inductive survivor formula, count, injectivity, antichain, and subsequence observer semantics
C C04/C05 Adjacent-swap state comparison; missing-pair and singly represented-pair obstructions; exceptional constructions
D C06 Set-valued parity rails, balanced reduction, unresolved partial words, reset, and extinction formula
E C07 Prefix-set invariance under commuting maps and parity-reversing fixed-point-free involutions
F C08 Live-term partial-order closure, mixed parity of nonunique extensions, adjacent chain necessity
G C09-C11 Disjoint block actions, local product sign, second-block context reversal, and tensor certificates
H C12 Strict-loss and representational pigeonhole bounds

Keep arithmetic cell bounds separate from observer-circuit costs. A proof of a finite exhaustive case is not a formal proof of the theorem for all $n,m$.

Statements that must remain distinct

  • The positive-DNF lower bound on saturated reachable states.
  • The compact monotone circuit's total function on every subset.
  • Their agreement only on the specified protocol domain.
  • The existence of a pair-guard implementation.
  • The minimality of records only within that architecture.

Export exact assumptions and theorem statements with any kernel-checked release. Include the proof-assistant version, imported libraries, build command, and logs. Do not set proof_assistant_checked to true while a proof relies on placeholders or untrusted axioms for the main result.