Download README.md from RegalFire/GCC-InvoiceMath-Verified: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 5.86 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/RegalFire/GCC-InvoiceMath-Verified/resolve/main/README.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/RegalFire/GCC-InvoiceMath-Verified/README.md
-
curl -L -o README.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/RegalFire/GCC-InvoiceMath-Verified/resolve/main/README.md
license: mit
task_categories:
- tabular-classification
- text-classification
language:
- ar
- en
tags:
- synthetic-data
- gcc
- invoices
- ecommerce
- erp
- fintech
- testing
- data-quality
- arabic
- benchmark
pretty_name: GCC-InvoiceMath-Verified
size_categories:
- n<1K
GCC-InvoiceMath-Verified
A deterministic synthetic benchmark for testing invoice arithmetic, numeric parsing, rounding, and claimed-total validation across six GCC currencies.
Overview
GCC-InvoiceMath-Verified contains 600 records / 300 causal pairs.
Each pair contains:
- one mathematically correct invoice
- one counterfactual invoice where exactly one claimed total differs by one minor currency unit
The dataset is intended for:
- ERP QA
- e-invoicing integration testing
- financial software regression testing
- structured-output validation
- numerical reasoning evaluation
- synthetic data benchmarking
This benchmark is not a tax-law compliance benchmark.
It does not certify compliance with ZATCA, UAE e-invoicing rules, PINT, UBL, or any national tax regulation.
Countries and currencies
| Country | Currency | Records |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | SAR | 100 |
| United Arab Emirates | AED | 100 |
| Qatar | QAR | 100 |
| Kuwait | KWD | 100 |
| Bahrain | BHD | 100 |
| Oman | OMR | 100 |
SAR, AED and QAR use two benchmark fractional digits.
KWD, BHD and OMR use three benchmark fractional digits.
Scenario families
The benchmark contains 10 deterministic scenario families:
half_up_tieline_vs_document_roundingline_allowanceline_chargeprepaymentcredit_notelarge_amount_stresszero_ratemixed_rateszero_due
Each family contains 60 records.
Numeric rendering
Four rendering styles are equally represented:
- ASCII
- grouped ASCII
- Arabic-Indic digits
- grouped Arabic-Indic digits
Each style contains 150 records.
This makes it possible to test parsers handling both Western and Arabic-Indic numeric representations.
Dataset structure
Important fields include:
{
"id": "...",
"pair_id": "...",
"split": "train",
"country": "SA",
"family": "half_up_tie",
"contract_id": "gcc-invoice-math-1.0",
"invoice": {
"currency": "SAR",
"document_type": "invoice",
"numeric_style": "arabic_indic",
"lines": [],
"prepaid": "...",
"claimed_totals": {}
},
"expected": {
"valid": true,
"totals": {},
"error_fields": []
},
"mutation": null,
"fingerprint_sha256": "..."
}
Ground truth
Ground truth is generated procedurally using Python Decimal arithmetic with explicit ROUND_HALF_UP behavior.
Validation is performed independently using fractions.Fraction.
The validator does not import generator code.
This provides two different arithmetic implementations:
- generator oracle: Decimal
- validation oracle: rational arithmetic
Validation results
- Records generated: 600
- Records validated: 600
- Pass rate: 100%
- Valid examples: 300
- Invalid examples: 300
- Unique causal pairs: 300
The release also checks:
- JSON Schema compliance
- unique IDs
- unique semantic source invoices
- fingerprints
- country/currency consistency
- pair integrity
- train/validation/test pair isolation
- exactly one causal mutation per invalid record
- exactly one minor-unit difference
- generator/validator oracle agreement
Splits
- train: 360
- validation: 120
- test: 120
Positive and negative members of a causal pair are always kept in the same split.
Synthetic provenance
All records are procedurally generated.
- no real invoices
- no PII
- no copied commercial records
- no real tax identifiers
- no customer transaction data
External sources were used only for background research and currency-precision verification.
Important limitations
This dataset does not cover:
- XML / UBL validation
- digital signatures
- QR codes
- live tax submission
- regulatory certification
- real tax IDs
- OCR images
- exchange rates
- payment reconciliation
- jurisdiction-specific VAT interpretation
Tax rates used in the benchmark are synthetic testing parameters.
Intended use
Recommended uses:
- unit tests
- regression tests
- ERP adapter QA
- invoice parser evaluation
- financial-agent evaluation
- data-quality pipelines
- numeric-reasoning benchmarks
Commercial customization
Need a private benchmark matching your ERP, invoice schema, accounting rules, API, or failure modes?
Custom synthetic datasets can be generated with:
- client-specific field mappings
- custom currencies
- custom rounding behavior
- additional failure modes
- private held-out regression suites
- custom JSON / CSV / Parquet / SQL formats
- validation scripts
- QA reports
The commercial value is in adapting the benchmark to a real system, not simply generating more generic rows.
Reproducibility
The generator is deterministic and seed-based.
Default seed:
20260930
See generator.py and validator.py.
License
MIT License for the original benchmark code and synthetic fixtures.
See LICENSE.
---
## RegalFire — Custom / Private Dataset Work
RegalFire builds custom AI datasets, evaluation sets and data pipelines for:
- AI agents
- computer-use systems
- multimodal models
- world models
- RAG systems
- code agents
- enterprise AI
Available services include:
- synthetic data generation
- private evaluation datasets
- agent trajectories
- failure / recovery datasets
- multimodal RGB / segmentation / state-action data
- web data acquisition
- cleaning and deduplication
- structured dataset packaging
- continuous dataset production
For custom or private work:
**Email: ootiris@gmail.com**
Hugging Face: **RegalFire**