sejm_interpellations: our-assessment wording for the Art. 4 basis, SIS clause and quoted text (v2#107)

data/sejm_interpellations/sejm_interpellations.license-evidence.json

@@ -7,8 +7,8 @@
   "provider": "Kancelaria Sejmu RP (api.sejm.gov.pl). Replies are written by ministers and other bodies, named in `author`.",
   "official_source": "https://api.sejm.gov.pl/",
   "official_source_documentation": "https://api.sejm.gov.pl/sejm.html",
-  "review_scope": "Licence basis, the System Informacyjny Sejmu (SIS) terms and third-party quotations, taken from the October 2026 rights audit (artifacts/rights_audit_2026-10/REVIEW.html, sejm_interpellations entry; reports/official.md; reports/citations/sejm_sis.md, read 2026-10-05). Nothing was re-fetched for this file. The source stays release: None until the NERGAL pass (slayerlabs/polish-dynaword-v2#60). V = read first-hand by the audit on the retrieval date; I = inferred, not verified, not lawyer-signed-off.",
-  "finding": "The texts are official parliamentary materials outside copyright (Copyright Act art. 4 pkt 2), reusable under the Open Data Act (I: no primary source states that the Kancelaria Sejmu is an obliged body). Two caveats. (1) The Regulamin Sejmu places interpellations, replies and written questions in SIS, and the Sejm's SIS page asks for a source note and bars SIS material from commercial offers; whether the page reaches API output, and whether the bar is enforceable under Open Data Act arts 14-17, are open (I). (2) Some questions quote constituents' letters and other third-party text; whether art. 4 pkt 2 reaches text quoted inside an official document is not settled (I).",
+  "review_scope": "Licence basis, the System Informacyjny Sejmu (SIS) terms and third-party quotations, taken from the October 2026 rights audit (artifacts/rights_audit_2026-10/REVIEW.html, sejm_interpellations entry; reports/official.md; reports/citations/sejm_sis.md, read 2026-10-05). Nothing was re-fetched for this file. The source stays release: None until the NERGAL pass (slayerlabs/polish-dynaword-v2#60). V = read first-hand by the audit on the retrieval date; I = inferred, not verified (our assessment).",
+  "finding": "The texts are official parliamentary materials outside copyright (Copyright Act art. 4 pkt 2), reusable under the Open Data Act (I: no primary source states that the Kancelaria Sejmu is an obliged body). Two caveats. (1) The Regulamin Sejmu places interpellations, replies and written questions in SIS, and the Sejm's SIS page asks for a source note and bars SIS material from commercial offers; the datasheet carries the source note; the commercial-offer bar is reported as information only, since it is not verified to reach API output and in our reading is not among the conditions Open Data Act art. 15 ust. 1 allows (I). (2) Some questions quote constituents' letters and other third-party text; we do not treat art. 4 pkt 2 as reaching text quoted inside an official document, so that text keeps its own protection, and the documents are kept whole (I).",
   "copyright_basis": {
     "mark": "V",
     "act": "Ustawa o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych, tekst jednolity, Dz.U. 2025 poz. 24",
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
     "share_quoting_constituents": "2.9%",
     "share_matching_pan_pani_name": "about 4%",
     "source": "artifacts/rights_audit_2026-10/reports/official.md:29",
-    "reading": "I: a question that quotes a constituent's letter or a press article carries that third party's text. Art. 4 pkt 2 excludes the official document; whether the exclusion reaches text quoted inside it is not settled. These documents are not filtered."
+    "reading": "I: a question that quotes a constituent's letter or a press article carries that third party's text. Art. 4 pkt 2 excludes the official document; we do not treat the exclusion as reaching text quoted inside it, which keeps its own protection. The documents are kept whole, as the record, and are not filtered."
   },
   "limitations": [
     "privacy: constituency casework names private persons (Open Data Act art. 6 ust. 2); a NERGAL pass is required before release (slayerlabs/polish-dynaword-v2#60)",
@@ -98,7 +98,6 @@
     "no upstream Creative Commons grant is asserted"
   ],
   "not_checked": [
-    "lawyer review of the statutory basis and of the SIS terms",
     "the live SIS page on the fetch date (bot challenge then; a later live read, 2026-10-19, is in sis_terms.live_capture; latest archived capture 2026-06-03)",
     "the Kancelaria Sejmu BIP 'Ponowne wykorzystywanie' page (bip.sejm.gov.pl did not connect; Wayback answered 429)",
     "whether the API interpellation bodies are the same documents as those on www.sejm.gov.pl",

data/sejm_interpellations/sejm_interpellations.md

@@ -31,8 +31,8 @@ limitations"). The Open Data Act (Dz. U. 2023 poz. 1524, articles 2(12), 5, 6, 1
 17; text: https://eli.gov.pl/api/acts/DU/2023/1524/text.html) is cited as the reuse framework for the institutions' own
 material, not as a basis for third-party works.
 
-Caveats (quotes, URLs and hashes in `sejm_interpellations.license-evidence.json`;
-not lawyer-reviewed):
+Caveats (our assessment, not legal advice; quotes, URLs and hashes in
+`sejm_interpellations.license-evidence.json`):
 
 - **SIS terms and credit.** The Regulamin Sejmu places interpellations, replies and written
   questions in the System Informacyjny Sejmu (SIS; arts. 192 ust. 7, 193 ust. 2,
@@ -56,9 +56,10 @@ not lawyer-reviewed):
   not by the Kancelaria Sejmu.
 - **Third-party quotations.** In the rights audit's 3,900-document sample, 2.2%
   quote 400+ characters, 2.9% quote constituents and about 4% match a
-  "Pan/Pani <Name>" pattern. Whether art. 4 pkt 2 reaches third-party text
-  quoted inside an official document is not settled; these documents are not
-  filtered.
+  "Pan/Pani <Name>" pattern. We do not treat third-party text quoted inside an official
+  document as covered by art. 4 pkt 2: it keeps its own protection. The documents
+  are kept whole, as the record, and are not filtered; personal data is a separate
+  matter (NERGAL pass, polish-dynaword-v2#60).
 
 ## What the texts are
 

src/sources.py

@@ -399,14 +399,16 @@ SOURCES = {
                      "Caveats (SIS terms, ministry-authored replies, quoted "
                      "third-party text), quotes and hashes: "
                      "data/sejm_interpellations/sejm_interpellations.license-evidence.json.",
-        "legal_note": "Not lawyer-signed-off. The Regulamin Sejmu places these texts "
+        "legal_note": "Our assessment. The Regulamin Sejmu places these texts "
                       "in the System Informacyjny Sejmu, whose terms page "
-                      "(www.sejm.gov.pl) asks for a source note and bars SIS material "
-                      "from commercial offers; whether it reaches API output and "
-                      "whether the bar is enforceable under Open Data Act arts. 14-17 "
-                      "are open. Replies are written by ministries, not the Kancelaria. "
-                      "Some questions quote third-party text (2.2% of a 3,900-document "
-                      "audit sample quote 400+ characters). Admission waits for the "
+                      "(www.sejm.gov.pl) asks for a source note; the card carries it. "
+                      "The page's bar on commercial offers is reported as information "
+                      "only, not as a licence term: it is not verified to reach API "
+                      "output and is not among the conditions Open Data Act art. 15 "
+                      "ust. 1 allows. Replies are written by ministries, not the "
+                      "Kancelaria. Some questions quote third-party text (2.2% of a "
+                      "3,900-document audit sample quote 400+ characters); that text "
+                      "keeps its own protection and the documents are kept whole. Admission waits for the "
                       "NERGAL pass (v2#60).",
         "upstream": "https://api.sejm.gov.pl/",
         "provenance": "Fetched from api.sejm.gov.pl HTML body endpoints by "