Datasets:
|
Download README.md from SourajaKundu123/PhySimCode: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 3.98 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/SourajaKundu123/PhySimCode/resolve/main/README.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/SourajaKundu123/PhySimCode/README.md
-
curl -L -o README.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/SourajaKundu123/PhySimCode/resolve/main/README.md
3.98 kB
| license: mit | |
| pretty_name: PhySimCode | |
| language: | |
| - en | |
| size_categories: | |
| - 1K<n<10K | |
| task_categories: | |
| - video-text-to-text | |
| tags: | |
| - physics | |
| - simulation | |
| - video | |
| - code-generation | |
| - multimodal | |
| - benchmark | |
| # PhySimCode: A Benchmark and Evaluation Method for Physics Video to Code Generation | |
| [**Website**](https://sourajakundu.github.io/PhySimCode/) · [**Paper**](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15722) · [**Code**](https://github.com/SourajaKundu/PhySimCode) | |
| Can a multimodal LLM watch a 2D or 3D physics simulation, work out the involved physics laws and parameter values, and write code from scratch that regenerates it? | |
| This dataset is the **PhySimCode evaluation set**: 2,430 physics simulation videos, each paired with the Python code that rendered it, its true parameter values, and a step-by-step physics explanation (chain-of-thought). It is the set on which all models in the paper are evaluated. | |
| ## Overview | |
| - **162 physics phenomena** across 9 physical domains (rigid body, spring / wave, articulated, constrained, pendulum, real-life mixed, rolling, rope / granular, gravitation / fluid) | |
| - **15 samples per phenomenon**, each with randomly sampled physical parameters | |
| - **Two engines**: analytic SciPy simulations (2D) and PyBullet rigid-body scenes (3D) | |
| - Drawn from the full PhySimCode corpus of 160,614 procedurally generated samples | |
| | Engine | Folder | Phenomena | Samples | Video | | |
| |---|---|---|---|---| | |
| | SciPy (2D) | `scipy/` | 87 | 1,305 | 360×180, 10 FPS | | |
| | PyBullet (3D) | `kubric/` | 75 | 1,125 | 240×240, 10 FPS | | |
| | **Total** | | **162** | **2,430** | | | |
| ## Structure | |
| ``` | |
| scipy/<experiment>/<sample_id>/ | |
| video.mp4 # input to the model | |
| simulation_code.py # ground-truth code that renders video.mp4 | |
| cot.json # ground-truth chain-of-thought | |
| params.json # sampled parameter values | |
| kubric/<experiment>/<sample_id>/ | |
| ... # same four files | |
| ``` | |
| Every `cot.json` contains `simulation`, `physical_observation`, `physical_law` (name, statement, LaTeX formula), `ode_system`, `derivation_steps`, `numerical_method`, `code_validation`, `expected_behavior` and `parameters` (value, unit and description for every parameter). | |
| - SciPy samples also include `physical_constants_derived` (quantities computed from the parameters). | |
| - PyBullet samples also include `category`, `seed`, `modeling_assumptions`, `impulse_model`, `pybullet_numerical_model` and `visual_scene`. | |
| ## Task | |
| Given only `video.mp4` and the engine name (`scipy` or `kubric`), a model must output: | |
| 1. a chain-of-thought JSON with `simulation`, `physical_observation`, `physical_law` and `parameters`, and | |
| 2. a self-contained Python script that regenerates the video. | |
| Models are scored on physical-law correctness and equivalence (three LLM judges), parameter recovery within ±20%, code compilation / execution / video output, CodeBLEU, and DINOv2 / VideoCLIP similarity between the regenerated and input videos. The prompt is given in Appendix A.4 of the paper, and the evaluation code is on [GitHub](https://github.com/SourajaKundu/PhySimCode). | |
| ## Download | |
| ```bash | |
| pip install -U huggingface_hub | |
| hf download SourajaKundu123/PhySimCode --repo-type dataset --local-dir benchmarking_data | |
| ``` | |
| ```python | |
| from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download | |
| snapshot_download("SourajaKundu123/PhySimCode", repo_type="dataset", local_dir="benchmarking_data") | |
| ``` | |
| ## Citation | |
| ```bibtex | |
| @misc{kundu2026physimcode, | |
| title = {PhySimCode: A Benchmark and Evaluation Method for | |
| Physics Video to Code Generation}, | |
| author = {Kundu, Souraja and Gupta, Aditya and Julin, Joel and | |
| Zhao, Yizhou and Xie, Liuyue and Jeni, Laszlo A.}, | |
| year = {2026}, | |
| eprint = {2610.15722}, | |
| archivePrefix = {arXiv}, | |
| primaryClass = {cs.CV}, | |
| url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15722} | |
| } | |
| ``` | |
| ## Contact | |
| Souraja Kundu, [sourajak@cs.cmu.edu](mailto:sourajak@cs.cmu.edu) | |