lhallee commited on
Commit
ed2ebe0
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): e5bab97

Vocabulary interpretations of ESMC-6B SAE features

Browse files
README.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ license: cc-by-4.0
3
+ task_categories:
4
+ - feature-extraction
5
+ tags:
6
+ - protein
7
+ - sparse-autoencoder
8
+ - interpretability
9
+ - annotation-vocabulary
10
+ - swiss-prot
11
+ ---
12
+
13
+ # Vocabulary interpretations of ESMC-6B SAE features
14
+
15
+ One row for every one of the 16,384 features of
16
+ `biohub/ESMC-6B-sae-layer60-k64-codebook16384`, giving the protein annotation vocabulary term
17
+ that best identifies what the feature detects, together with how well that identification holds on
18
+ proteins the assignment never saw.
19
+
20
+ This is the counterpart to `biohub/ESMC-SAE-Features`, produced without a language model. Where that
21
+ release gives a free-text hypothesis per feature, this gives a controlled-vocabulary term plus a
22
+ falsifiable prediction: which held-out proteins the feature should fire on, and how well it does.
23
+
24
+ ## What the numbers mean
25
+
26
+ Every measurement here comes from one of four protein sets that never overlap, because splits are
27
+ assigned to whole MMseqs2 clusters at 30% identity and 50% coverage:
28
+
29
+ | Set | Role |
30
+ |---|---|
31
+ | Discovery, 26,725 train-split cluster representatives | fits the assignment |
32
+ | Validation, 2,402 proteins in 1,582 clusters | chooses the ranking rule and support floor, nothing else |
33
+ | Test, 2,257 proteins in 1,513 clusters | evaluated once against the frozen choice |
34
+ | Biohub's released exemplars | never seen by any of the three; every cluster containing one is removed from all of them |
35
+
36
+ A feature receives a term only if the term clears a threshold set by the largest association any
37
+ feature achieves under a cluster-block permutation null over the full 16,384-feature family. That
38
+ threshold is `z = 15.56`; a nominal Benjamini-Hochberg cut over the same tests would sit at 4.36.
39
+ Among terms clearing it, the term with the highest AUROC wins, subject to a floor of 25 carriers.
40
+
41
+ ## Columns
42
+
43
+ ### `feature_interpretations.parquet`, 16,384 rows
44
+
45
+ | Column | Meaning |
46
+ |---|---|
47
+ | `feature_id` | index into the codebook, 0 to 16,383 |
48
+ | `status` | `assigned_and_evaluated`, `assigned_too_few_test_positives`, or `no_term_above_threshold` |
49
+ | `term_id` | canonical term identity, `aspect:source_database:stable_id`; **use this as the key** |
50
+ | `stable_id`, `source_database` | the parts `term_id` is composed from |
51
+ | `term` | integer token, valid only for the vocabulary build recorded in `provenance.json` |
52
+ | `n_total`, `assigned` | discovery population size, and whether a term cleared every threshold |
53
+ | `label`, `aspect` | human-readable term name and which ontology it came from |
54
+ | `z_score`, `auroc`, `n_carriers` | discovery-set association strength, effect size, and support |
55
+ | `term_by_z`, `label_by_z`, `auroc_by_z` | the alternative ranking, for comparison |
56
+ | `held_out_auroc` | AUROC on the cluster-disjoint test split |
57
+ | `held_out_ap`, `held_out_ap_lift`, `held_out_prevalence` | average precision, and its lift over the base rate |
58
+ | `held_out_recall_at_precision_50` | null for two different reasons: 1,828 evaluated features never reach precision 0.5, and 11,914 were not evaluated at all |
59
+ | `held_out_n_positive` | test-split carriers; null where the feature was not evaluated |
60
+ | `concordance_hits`, `concordance_drawn`, `concordance_enrichment`, `concordance_q` | agreement with Biohub's own 20 top-activating proteins for that feature |
61
+ | `biohub_label` | the released agent label, for side-by-side reading |
62
+
63
+ **Key on `term_id`, not on `term`.** Integer tokens serialize one vocabulary version and shift
64
+ whenever an aspect is added or removed, which has just happened: the released 2026_02 build drops
65
+ Gene3D, so every token above the removed range moves.
66
+
67
+ ### `local_associations.parquet`
68
+
69
+ Residue-level associations between features and annotated spans, tested within each protein against
70
+ a hypergeometric null and combined across proteins by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel.
71
+
72
+ | Column | Meaning |
73
+ |---|---|
74
+ | `feature_id`, `local_term`, `local_term_id`, `local_stable_id` | the pair. **The local vocabulary is not the global one**: `local_term` and `term` are different integer spaces and the two files must never be joined on them |
75
+ | `label`, `aspect` | the local term's name and which UniProt feature key it came from |
76
+ | `z_score`, `enrichment`, `observed`, `expected` | inside-span activity against the within-protein expectation |
77
+ | `n_strata` | contributing proteins |
78
+ | `above_positional_null_max` | **the column that matters**, see below |
79
+ | `positional_null_max_z` | the guardrail value that flag is taken against, 61.96 |
80
+
81
+ The file ships 88,717 pairs above a loose `z = 4`. That cut is not a finding: reshuffling every span
82
+ to a random position inside its own protein, preserving length and count, still puts 6.0% of pairs
83
+ above it. Filter on `above_positional_null_max` for the 2,907 pairs over 1,985 features that exceed
84
+ every value the positional null produced across 507,098 reshuffled pairs. That is an observed
85
+ guardrail, the largest value the null happened to reach, not a calibrated error rate.
86
+
87
+ ## How well the interpretations hold
88
+
89
+ | | |
90
+ |---|---|
91
+ | Features with a term | 8,226 of 16,384 |
92
+ | Distinct terms used | 354 |
93
+ | **Features actually evaluated held-out** | **4,470 of the 8,226** |
94
+ | Median held-out AUROC | 0.889, cluster-bootstrap 95% interval 0.872 to 0.913 |
95
+ | Held-out AUROC above 0.8 | 63.2% of the 4,470 evaluated, 34.3% of the 8,226 assigned |
96
+ | Median precision lift over base rate | 27.5x |
97
+ | Concordance with Biohub's exemplars | 29.2x their Swiss-Prot base rate, 58.2% significant at q < 0.01, over the 8,224 features that could be scored |
98
+
99
+ **Read the denominators.** A feature is evaluated held-out only if its term has at least five
100
+ carriers among the 2,257 test proteins, which 4,470 of the 8,226 assigned features do. The other
101
+ 3,756 are not failures; the test split was too small to score them, and their held-out columns are
102
+ null. Concordance is over 8,224 features, two assigned features having no scoreable exemplar set.
103
+
104
+ ## Limitations, stated rather than buried
105
+
106
+ - **This is concordance, not accuracy.** Biohub publishes no evaluation of description quality and
107
+ its own tutorial calls the descriptions "automatically generated hypotheses". There is no ground
108
+ truth here to be right about, and none is claimed.
109
+ - **8,226 features, 354 terms.** Roughly 10 features share each term at the median. Those features
110
+ are not duplicates, they nominate largely different proteins with median pairwise Jaccard 0.072,
111
+ but the number of distinct nameable concepts is bounded by the discovery set, not by the codebook.
112
+ - **A vocabulary term is not a description.** Where a feature encodes something the vocabulary
113
+ cannot name, the method returns the nearest available term or nothing. Nine of the ten strongest
114
+ assignments resolve
115
+ distinct parts of a bacterial signal peptide all receive the single keyword `Signal`, which 120
116
+ features carry in total.
117
+ - **The test split is cluster-disjoint but not pristine.** It has been evaluated under several run
118
+ configurations. What is claimed is narrower and is what the protocol enforces: the ranking rule and
119
+ support floor were chosen on validation alone, and no configuration was selected on test
120
+ performance.
121
+ - **The association ran against the previous vocabulary**, which still contains Gene3D. Re-running
122
+ with Gene3D withheld gives 8,020 assignments at held-out AUROC 0.884 against 8,226 at 0.889, so the
123
+ difference is small, but it is a difference.
124
+ - **Provenance is partial.** `provenance.json` records digests of the analysis inputs, the analysis
125
+ modules, and the run's own outputs, computed over at most the first 1 GiB of any file. It does not
126
+ contain digests of the six files shipped here, and the module digests describe the code as it
127
+ stood at the run, not necessarily the current repository.
128
+ - **The `biohub_label` column is redistributed from Biohub's released feature table** and is
129
+ governed by that release's terms, not by the license on this dataset. Drop the column if that
130
+ matters for your use.
131
+ - **Activations are recomputed, not the released ones.** Fused attention and layer-norm kernels were
132
+ unavailable, so values differ numerically. The released exemplars sit at median percentile 0.99986
133
+ of our activation distribution for their feature; the same check against an unrelated codebook
134
+ gives 0.464.
135
+
136
+ ## Provenance
137
+
138
+ `provenance.json` carries SHA-256 digests of every input, every analysis module, the resolved
139
+ options, and every output file, plus the seed and permutation count. Analysis code and the report
140
+ that describes the method are in the accompanying repository.
141
+
142
+ ## Citation
143
+
144
+ If you use this table, please also cite Biohub's ESMC and SAE releases, whose feature table and
145
+ exemplar proteins make the comparison in this work possible.
feature_interpretations.csv ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
feature_interpretations.parquet ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
 
 
 
 
1
+ version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
2
+ oid sha256:352aae2485f670cdc9171b9e75e74c9e6dd7a2da34e30aa172abcadede2c6917
3
+ size 863757
interpretations_summary.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "n_features": 16384.0,
3
+ "n_assigned_and_evaluated": 4470.0,
4
+ "n_assigned": 8226.0,
5
+ "median_held_out_auroc": 0.8890832589444182,
6
+ "aspects_used": 8,
7
+ "n_local_pairs": 88717.0,
8
+ "n_local_features": 13698.0,
9
+ "n_local_pairs_above_null_max": 2907.0,
10
+ "n_local_features_above_null_max": 1985.0
11
+ }
local_associations.parquet ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
 
 
 
 
1
+ version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
2
+ oid sha256:bfd9099ddd518f5d9f389419c937ba6b1432048318dcd64142bb5b50d41dbd28
3
+ size 3452833
provenance.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "inputs": {
3
+ "run_dir": "sha256:ea30d91adbc1367b1038e972c7781a623a69f410018d0d4e1af1ceeb99325a85:3765190",
4
+ "protein_table": "sha256:0afd5b471f54a63109b82e3175aac2869ba9774f500a66b669a40e9aa1aa4aa5:26612759",
5
+ "term_table": "sha256:8e2f64b311fb5293978218f6becd80686b53a35b766fe2af01a5176b58e4644c:2724821",
6
+ "pooled": "sha256:0942c2bba0b1488c3b9eaaa00d485cbf28cb79acbda8c5d7080d8b63b4e5262f:67108864"
7
+ },
8
+ "code": {
9
+ "__init__.py": "sha256:41e82cc9acca3659fed8bd618b8340236801e0d29bd56fa5691f5d0b3b10ba77:256",
10
+ "aspect_ablation.py": "sha256:85353fe7cb36f3fa8755b78eb76cd14bd190479c5f8b5d5f7cab8c6b99b668b0:4795",
11
+ "aspect_redundancy.py": "sha256:8176c82d766008316fd4281f1ca5c0c0c881ed3f5811d5b6011d0c669d6aef70:5831",
12
+ "association.py": "sha256:c0df2a682e454f6dda5367bc24d47a8f9a0f86c3ad53b7780d56358f6747e04f:22549",
13
+ "biohub.py": "sha256:09195f39cb7d68d099c55317752a3de57089e10add7d9fe6b79c16080f093ecc:19002",
14
+ "examples.py": "sha256:0714d8dc01e27cb1c2775ccb8aae052ddde69f2b9aa648db8f07a9801f27e382:5692",
15
+ "export_interpretations.py": "sha256:133c040aa02b485449e3e23728361c7a6c32e9d0994b42e214e123723144ab11:5469",
16
+ "extraction.py": "sha256:3e24a39c60b05319070b8c3699b61d652a66c85bf2a2c069dcf454f2dea3c651:14885",
17
+ "fetch_labels.py": "sha256:993b338d3939901236a533b62b4756c321e7d500967f2b1fa388f0542bf9f50b:3156",
18
+ "fidelity_check.py": "sha256:276248bfcfbe49e87b0bf57bc4d932fcfe770a89b721f71824b64b9552e3d39a:5348",
19
+ "figures.py": "sha256:99f8726e9d4f1baa5ea2f7fb05ef8a189e1fb6803fb2ddbf21f15697a3a5752e:15332",
20
+ "implied_terms.py": "sha256:5fa06348ee4969f1f9e35fc4a9b6ce3234e1b4518c401f387c11e5543fc28b0e:9514",
21
+ "local_spans.py": "sha256:6ae9fdc3b69e4526d9fc43448d8b13c116e71180d1c288a5a643fe0efc978b78:11308",
22
+ "merge_runs.py": "sha256:d48260a4f968387fe0d6b7db4b902c8761ad748248eb12f95ae678704cef2183:4969",
23
+ "pipeline.py": "sha256:4c157d9c942e8f8d86b51d38639be830e7b678d670a5f39041d8a70c5c3bf410:55382",
24
+ "recompute_concordance.py": "sha256:ef4e876e893b07aa7b4b0d234f4ac56b8f93d7495d55264081018030166cdd32:4161",
25
+ "report_assets.py": "sha256:7879a20de0ec95188b30bca57ace3ce65e99bb8b2aec3c9a66389fb806dbda0d:16456",
26
+ "secrets_env.py": "sha256:403f775f37cf661c5e644977853cc9fe7de95477dde0cfe70a4bd480123dd65d:1463",
27
+ "sweep.py": "sha256:cfca7531e116b310799d268491f0c340a074e83a4f842b5c83bd1e18088de503:6638",
28
+ "uncertainty.py": "sha256:03921f93aee1a41a25b04b083cbd6603f8a8e40bebb02063490c932e0caf372a:5513",
29
+ "wandb_log.py": "sha256:a66fe8b3da54322872407ace181aec7518c12d001a8fb56821b00d5e7f6f1eb6:2449"
30
+ },
31
+ "options": {
32
+ "pooling": "max",
33
+ "min_auroc": 0.6,
34
+ "min_support_requested": 50,
35
+ "min_support_selected": 25,
36
+ "rank_by_selected": "auroc",
37
+ "exemplar_exclusion": "cluster",
38
+ "representative_rule": "mmseqs",
39
+ "n_permutations": 4,
40
+ "seed": 20260826
41
+ },
42
+ "outputs": {
43
+ "aspect_value.parquet": "sha256:5bc6c076971429b4bcd5f37f2bd55c89f56967d658ff0c8a6000c11456423f93:3920",
44
+ "category_recovery.parquet": "sha256:a5f08274a5519f6419b8f7c7cdc24016212461926e46fc5a35c5a2e12ec51415:57151",
45
+ "concordance.parquet": "sha256:c0b20e0dd6571e6260247c98063d4b904212f5c933ebd7e0e218187679f4bc29:227917",
46
+ "feature_assignment.parquet": "sha256:633948290fedacc99cf9ac10b398528827780477cd614afe4ebc7c54de2f82e3:284370",
47
+ "fidelity_percentile.npy": "sha256:9e5b0714ed3a83eaedea358c1ce631a9e122fa128a270282e120e92f8dc5b6e7:2621064",
48
+ "global_auroc.npy": "sha256:0179e78e35e09dfb32cf8817d4c16c10d6f6eae79f9b95a6e3fc59f9f5b6aeba:1073741824",
49
+ "held_out_metrics.parquet": "sha256:e59aed2f9a21cf14a17f1fe4f44d7fc7e79a4da34a9242019a94afa94e08d638:168261",
50
+ "lexical_agreement.parquet": "sha256:d68e4beaf6c594dd8243f4dc1a65e18cae64bbb5bf03f80d54bf5abf36afacdc:230056",
51
+ "null_z.npy": "sha256:4415a77208720aeb3660f61f87a0180ac963230b43f3f6eebab9cdca4b946590:262272",
52
+ "rule_selection.parquet": "sha256:1e713b608419ebc76c83a69fce556069da2ededef0984ba0e4bfa94aa66112a7:3763"
53
+ }
54
+ }