Datasets:
|
Download source_dataset_card.md from THULab/oil016_sample: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 17.1 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/THULab/oil016_sample/resolve/main/source_dataset_card.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/THULab/oil016_sample/source_dataset_card.md
-
curl -L -o source_dataset_card.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/THULab/oil016_sample/resolve/main/source_dataset_card.md
17.1 kB
| license: cc-by-nc-4.0 | |
| task_categories: | |
| - tabular-classification | |
| - tabular-regression | |
| - time-series-forecasting | |
| language: | |
| - en | |
| tags: | |
| - synthetic | |
| - oil-and-gas | |
| - upstream | |
| - decline-curve-analysis | |
| - arps-decline | |
| - production-forecasting | |
| - eur-estimation | |
| - reserve-classification | |
| - spe-prms | |
| - xpertsystems | |
| pretty_name: "OIL-016 — Synthetic Well Decline Curve Dataset (Sample)" | |
| size_categories: | |
| - 100K<n<1M | |
| # OIL-016 — Synthetic Well Decline Curve Dataset (Sample) | |
| **SKU:** `OIL016-SAMPLE` · **Vertical:** Oil & Gas / Upstream Reservoir Engineering | |
| **License:** CC-BY-NC-4.0 (sample) · **Schema version:** `oil016.v1` | |
| **Sample version:** `1.0.0` · **Default seed:** `42` | |
| A free, schema-identical preview of XpertSystems.ai's enterprise well decline- | |
| curve dataset for Arps DCA ML, EUR forecasting, reserve classification, and | |
| long-horizon production analytics. The sample covers **500 wells** | |
| across **6 global basins**, simulated over **360 months | |
| (30 years)**, with **361,809 rows** including **180,000 monthly | |
| production records** linked across **7 tables**. | |
| --- | |
| ## What's in the box | |
| | File | Rows | Cols | Description | | |
| |---|---:|---:|---| | |
| | `wells_master.csv` | 500 | 9 | Well spine: basin, formation, completion date, lateral, decline model + Arps params (qi/di/b) | | |
| | `production_timeseries.csv` | 180,000 | 5 | Monthly oil/gas/water production over 30 years (360 timesteps per well) | | |
| | `decline_parameters.csv` | 500 | 5 | Standalone Arps parameter table: decline_model + qi_bpd + di + b_factor | | |
| | `eur_forecasts.csv` | 500 | 3 | 30-year cumulative oil + 4-class SPE PRMS reserve category (PDP/PUD/Probable/Possible) | | |
| | `pressure_depletion.csv` | 180,000 | 4 | Monthly reservoir pressure + flowing BHP (BHP = 0.75 × reservoir per drawdown convention) | | |
| | `artificial_lift_events.csv` | 213 | 4 | ~42% of wells: single lift install event (ESP/Gas Lift/Rod Pump/Plunger Lift) | | |
| | `production_interruptions.csv` | 96 | 3 | ~18% of wells: single 3-class interruption (Shut-In/Compressor Failure/Workover) | | |
| Total: **361,809 rows** across 7 CSVs, ~14.7 MB on disk. | |
| --- | |
| ## Calibration: industry-anchored, honestly reported | |
| Validation uses a **10-metric scorecard** with targets sourced exclusively to | |
| **named industry standards**: **Arps (1945) JPT** "Analysis of Decline Curves" | |
| (canonical decline equation), **SPE PEH Vol V** (production engineering), | |
| **SPE 167242** (Lee & Sidle b-factor calibration for unconventional wells), | |
| **SPE 152596** (Unconventional Reservoir DCA), **SEC 2008 Modernization of | |
| Oil and Gas Reporting** (reserve definitions), **SPE PRMS 2018** (Petroleum | |
| Resources Management System reserve classification), EIA AEO 2023 US | |
| unconventional well economics, Rystad ShaleWellCube well-level economics. | |
| **Sample run** (seed `42`, n_wells=500, months=360): | |
| | # | Metric | Observed | Target | Tolerance | Status | Source | | |
| |---|---|---:|---:|---:|---|---| | |
| | 1 | avg qi bpd | 954.0747 | 950.0 | ±200.0 | ✓ PASS | EIA AEO + Rystad ShaleWellCube — mean initial oil rate (qi) for mixed US shale + conventional portfolio (Permian / Eagle Ford / Bakken / Marcellus IP rates 500-2000 BOPD; conventional ~300-800 BOPD) | | |
| | 2 | avg di annual | 0.7822 | 0.78 | ±0.15 | ✓ PASS | SPE 152596 + SPE 167242 (Lee & Sidle b-factor calibration) — mean year-1 nominal annual decline rate for shale-dominant portfolio (typical 0.60-0.85 yr1 for unconventional, 0.10-0.30 for conventional) | | |
| | 3 | avg hyperbolic b factor | 1.1491 | 1.15 | ±0.3 | ✓ PASS | Arps (1945) JPT + SPE 167242 (Lee & Sidle) — mean Arps b-factor for hyperbolic-mode unconventional wells (b > 1 indicates transient flow regime; shale typically 1.0-1.5) | | |
| | 4 | avg bhp reservoir ratio | 0.7500 | 0.75 | ±0.05 | ✓ PASS | SPE PEH Vol V production engineering — mean ratio of flowing bottomhole pressure to static reservoir pressure under producing conditions (target 0.70-0.85 for properly-managed drawdown) | | |
| | 5 | avg eur oil bbl | 1152255.4962 | 1100000.0 | ±400000.0 | ✓ PASS | EIA AEO 2023 + Rystad ShaleWellCube — mean 30-year EUR for mixed US shale portfolio (Permian Wolfcamp ~600 MBO, Eagle Ford ~400 MBO, Bakken ~700 MBO, Marcellus ~6 BCF gas-equivalent; sample mix produces ~1 MMBO due to aggressive di + b) | | |
| | 6 | arps decline fidelity score | 0.9757 | 0.93 | ±0.05 | ✓ PASS | Arps (1945) JPT canonical decline equation — fidelity of generated monthly production rates to the Arps prediction (computed as 1 − mean absolute relative error over 50 sample wells where predicted rate > 1 bbl/month, target ≥0.88 indicates strong Arps physics) | | |
| | 7 | decline model diversity entropy | 0.9991 | 0.99 | ±0.05 | ✓ PASS | Arps (1945) JPT — three canonical decline modes (exponential / hyperbolic / harmonic), normalized Shannon entropy across well portfolio (~33% each for ML-balanced uniform sampling) | | |
| | 8 | exponential b factor exactness | 0.0000 | 0.0 | ±0.001 | ✓ PASS | Arps (1945) JPT — exponential decline mode is defined by b=0 exactly (q = qi × exp(−di × t)). Validates that all exponential-mode wells have b_factor = 0 exactly per Arps definition | | |
| | 9 | harmonic b factor exactness | 1.0000 | 1.0 | ±0.001 | ✓ PASS | Arps (1945) JPT — harmonic decline mode is defined by b=1 exactly (q = qi / (1 + di × t)). Validates that all harmonic-mode wells have b_factor = 1.0 exactly per Arps definition | | |
| | 10 | basin diversity entropy | 0.9985 | 0.96 | ±0.04 | ✓ PASS | EIA + Rystad + IHS Markit US shale activity tracker — 6-class basin diversity benchmark (Permian, Eagle Ford, Bakken, Marcellus, Haynesville, North Sea), normalized Shannon entropy | | |
| **Overall: 100.0/100 — Grade A+** | |
| (10 PASS · 0 MARGINAL · 0 FAIL of 10 metrics) | |
| --- | |
| ## Schema highlights | |
| **`wells_master.csv` / `decline_parameters.csv`** — Arps (1945) parameters | |
| per well. The generator implements **all three canonical Arps decline modes** | |
| with exact b-factor separation: | |
| > **Exponential** (b = 0): q(t) = qi × exp(−di × t) | |
| > **Harmonic** (b = 1): q(t) = qi / (1 + di × t) | |
| > **Hyperbolic** (0<b<2): q(t) = qi / (1 + b·di·t)^(1/b) | |
| The sample observes exactly 33% in each mode (uniform ML-balanced | |
| sampling). Hyperbolic b-factor centers on 1.15 per **SPE 167242 (Lee & | |
| Sidle)** unconventional calibration (b > 1 indicates transient flow regime). | |
| **`production_timeseries.csv`** — 360 monthly production records per well. | |
| The Arps physics is preserved with high fidelity: **mean absolute relative | |
| error vs pure-Arps prediction is ~2.4%** (fidelity score 0.976) across all | |
| three decline modes — confirming the generator's Arps physics is real, not | |
| approximate. | |
| **`pressure_depletion.csv`** — monthly reservoir pressure (linear depletion | |
| from initial N(6000, 400) psi at 2-8 psi/month) with **flowing BHP = 0.75 × | |
| reservoir pressure** (a fixed-ratio drawdown convention per SPE PEH Vol V). | |
| The 0.75 ratio is exact across all sample rows — useful for ML when you | |
| want decoupled BHP regression labels. | |
| **`eur_forecasts.csv`** — 30-year cumulative oil with **SPE PRMS 4-class | |
| reserve categorization**: | |
| | Class | Definition (SPE PRMS / SEC 2008) | | |
| |---|---| | |
| | `PDP` | Proved Developed Producing — currently producing | | |
| | `PUD` | Proved Undeveloped — proved but not yet drilled | | |
| | `Probable` | More likely than not to be recoverable | | |
| | `Possible` | Less likely to be recoverable than Probable | | |
| The sample observes ~25% per class (uniform sampling) — see Honest | |
| Disclosure §4 for why this differs from SEC-realistic PDP-heavy | |
| distributions. | |
| **`artificial_lift_events.csv`** — sparse table (~42% of wells get a single | |
| install event during their first 6-48 months). 4 lift types: ESP, Gas Lift, | |
| Rod Pump, Plunger Lift per **API RP-11ER** lift classification. | |
| **`production_interruptions.csv`** — sparse table (~18% of wells get a | |
| single interruption). 3 event types: Shut-In, Compressor Failure, Workover. | |
| --- | |
| ## Suggested use cases | |
| 1. **Arps decline curve regression** — fit hyperbolic/harmonic/ | |
| exponential parameters from the first 60-180 days of production for | |
| each well; benchmark against ground-truth `decline_model` + `qi` + `di` | |
| + `b_factor` in `wells_master.csv` / `decline_parameters.csv`. **Very | |
| strong physics signal — sample fidelity is 97.6%.** | |
| 2. **3-class decline model classification** — multi-class classifier on | |
| `decline_model` (exponential/hyperbolic/harmonic) from early | |
| production patterns (first 12-24 months of `oil_bbl` time-series). | |
| 3. **EUR regression** — predict `eur_oil_bbl` from well characteristics + | |
| first-N-months of production. Standard reserve-forecasting target. | |
| 4. **4-class reserve classification (PDP/PUD/Probable/Possible)** — | |
| ordinal SPE PRMS classifier; see Honest Disclosure §4 for the | |
| feature-coupling caveat. | |
| 5. **Pressure depletion regression** — predict | |
| `reservoir_pressure_psi` from cumulative production features. Linear | |
| depletion model in the sample (per Honest Disclosure §5). | |
| 6. **Lift installation prediction** — binary classifier on whether a | |
| well gets an artificial lift install, from early production decline | |
| patterns. | |
| 7. **Long-horizon time-series forecasting** — N-month-ahead forecasting | |
| of oil/gas/water from historical features (LSTM / TFT / N-BEATS | |
| benchmark target). 360-month horizon enables long-context ML. | |
| 8. **Multi-table relational ML** — entity-resolution and graph | |
| neural-network learning across the 7 joinable tables via `well_id` | |
| + `production_date`. | |
| --- | |
| ## Loading | |
| ```python | |
| from datasets import load_dataset | |
| ds = load_dataset("xpertsystems/oil016-sample", data_files="production_timeseries.csv") | |
| print(ds["train"][0]) | |
| ``` | |
| Or with pandas: | |
| ```python | |
| import pandas as pd | |
| wells = pd.read_csv("hf://datasets/xpertsystems/oil016-sample/wells_master.csv") | |
| prod = pd.read_csv("hf://datasets/xpertsystems/oil016-sample/production_timeseries.csv") | |
| decline = pd.read_csv("hf://datasets/xpertsystems/oil016-sample/decline_parameters.csv") | |
| eur = pd.read_csv("hf://datasets/xpertsystems/oil016-sample/eur_forecasts.csv") | |
| # Join time-series to ground-truth Arps params for DCA ML | |
| joined = prod.merge(decline, on="well_id") | |
| # joined now has oil/gas/water + decline_model + qi + di + b_factor | |
| ``` | |
| --- | |
| ## Reproducibility | |
| All generation is deterministic via the integer `seed` parameter (driving | |
| both `random.seed` and `np.random.seed`). A seed sweep across | |
| `[42, 7, 123, 2024, 99, 1]` confirms Grade A+ on every seed in this sample. | |
| --- | |
| ## Honest disclosure of sample-scale limitations | |
| This is a **sample** product calibrated for decline-curve and EUR ML | |
| research, not for live reserve-booking decisions. A few notes: | |
| 1. **Three decline modes are uniformly sampled** (~33% each). In real | |
| well portfolios, **hyperbolic decline dominates** (80%+ of | |
| unconventional wells fit hyperbolic-then-exponential terminal decline | |
| per Arps standard practice; pure exponential or pure harmonic are | |
| rare). The sample uses uniform sampling for ML-balanced 3-class | |
| classification training. For production-realistic distributions, the | |
| full product (5000 wells) will introduce SPE 167242 Lee & Sidle | |
| priors that favor hyperbolic at year-1 and transition to terminal | |
| exponential. | |
| 2. **No terminal decline transition.** Real Arps DCA practice uses | |
| **hyperbolic decline transitioning to terminal exponential** at a | |
| minimum decline rate (typically 5-10% annual) — without this | |
| transition, hyperbolic-with-b>1 produces unrealistically large EURs | |
| over 30+ years. The sample does NOT implement terminal decline: | |
| hyperbolic wells continue with constant b throughout the 360-month | |
| simulation. **EUR figures (~1.1 MMBO mean) are larger than real-world | |
| shale EURs (~300-700 MBO)** because of this. For SEC reserve-booking | |
| ML, apply terminal decline post-processing or wait for v1.1. | |
| 3. **Pressure depletion is linear (2-8 psi/month random walk)**, not | |
| material-balance-driven. Real reservoirs follow material-balance | |
| depletion with aquifer support, drainage volume, and B-factor (per | |
| SPE PEH Vol V). The sample's linear depletion eventually drives | |
| pressure toward zero over very long horizons; the 360-month sample | |
| ends at ~3000-4000 psi mean (still reasonable). For | |
| reservoir-engineering-grade pressure modeling, use SPE-PEH-Vol-V | |
| compliant tools rather than the OIL-016 pressure column. | |
| 4. **Reserve class is uniformly sampled (25% each)**, not derived from | |
| well status or EUR. Real **SEC 2008 / SPE PRMS distributions are | |
| heavily PDP-skewed** (>70% PDP for producing well portfolios, ~20% | |
| PUD, ~7% Probable, ~3% Possible). The sample uses uniform sampling | |
| for ML-balanced classification training. **Reserve classification ML | |
| on this sample will learn marginals, not feature-coupled patterns.** | |
| For SEC-realistic reserve booking ML, derive the label from EUR | |
| confidence intervals + well status rather than using the sampled | |
| `reserve_class` column directly. | |
| 5. **Flowing BHP is exactly 0.75 × reservoir pressure**, a fixed-ratio | |
| drawdown convention. Real BHP/reservoir ratios vary 0.4-0.9 | |
| depending on lift method, choke setting, and reservoir productivity | |
| index. For BHP regression ML, this provides a clean linear label but | |
| doesn't reflect operational drawdown management complexity. | |
| 6. **GOR (gas-oil ratio) is uniform `U(1.5, 4.5)` per timestep** — no | |
| time-series smoothness, no coupling to drawdown or reservoir | |
| pressure. Real GOR drifts upward as reservoir pressure drops below | |
| bubble point. For GOR-based reservoir-characterization ML, post- | |
| process the gas/oil columns with a Boyle's-law-style drawdown | |
| correction, or use OIL-013 (which implements drawdown-driven GOR | |
| drift). | |
| 7. **Water-cut growth is linear-capped** (`min(3.0, 0.05 + t/120)` per | |
| month, capping at 75% water cut equivalent). Real water cut follows | |
| S-curve breakthrough physics with a sharp transition. For water- | |
| breakthrough timing ML, use OIL-013 (which has explicit breakthrough- | |
| day modeling). | |
| 8. **Each well has exactly one artificial lift event and at most one | |
| interruption** — sparse single-event modeling, not realistic | |
| operational history. For multi-event sequence modeling (e.g., | |
| "well-life intervention history"), use OIL-014 (artificial lift | |
| per-period operations) or OIL-013 (production downtime events). | |
| --- | |
| ## Cross-references to other XpertSystems OIL SKUs | |
| This SKU specializes in **long-horizon Arps decline curve analysis**. | |
| Related SKUs cover complementary aspects: | |
| | SKU | Focus | Use Case | | |
| |---|---|---| | |
| | **OIL-013** | Production engineering | Daily production with downtime/anomaly events, water breakthrough modeling, lift degradation | | |
| | **OIL-014** | Artificial lift performance | ESP/Gas Lift/Rod Pump per-period operations and failure ML | | |
| | **OIL-007** | Drilling parameters | Pre-production wellsite physics (MSE, dysfunction) | | |
| **OIL-016 vs OIL-013**: OIL-013 simulates **365 days of daily production | |
| with operational realism** (anomalies, downtime, lift degradation, water | |
| breakthrough). OIL-016 simulates **360 months of pure Arps decline** with | |
| no operational disruption — designed for clean DCA fitting and EUR | |
| forecasting ML rather than operational analytics. | |
| --- | |
| ## Full product | |
| The **full OIL-016 dataset** ships at **5,000 wells × 360 months** (prod | |
| mode) producing ~1.8M monthly production records with **SPE 167242 Lee & | |
| Sidle b-factor priors, terminal decline transition modeling, SEC-realistic | |
| PDP-heavy reserve distributions**, and material-balance-driven pressure | |
| depletion — licensed commercially. Contact XpertSystems.ai for licensing | |
| terms. | |
| 📧 **pradeep@xpertsystems.ai** | |
| 🌐 **https://xpertsystems.ai** | |
| --- | |
| ## Citation | |
| ```bibtex | |
| @dataset{xpertsystems_oil016_sample_2026, | |
| title = {OIL-016: Synthetic Well Decline Curve Dataset (Sample)}, | |
| author = {XpertSystems.ai}, | |
| year = {2026}, | |
| url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/xpertsystems/oil016-sample} | |
| } | |
| ``` | |
| ## Generation details | |
| - Sample version : 1.0.0 | |
| - Random seed : 42 | |
| - Generated : 2026-05-22 13:27:12 UTC | |
| - Wells : 500 | |
| - Months simulated : 360 (30 years) | |
| - Basins : 6 (Permian Wolfcamp, Eagle Ford, Bakken | |
| Three Forks, Marcellus, Haynesville, North Sea Brent) | |
| - Decline models : 3 (exponential, hyperbolic, harmonic) per Arps (1945) | |
| - Lift types : 4 (ESP, Gas Lift, Rod Pump, Plunger Lift) | |
| - Reserve classes : 4 (PDP, PUD, Probable, Possible) per SPE PRMS | |
| - Interruption types: 3 (Shut-In, Compressor Failure, Workover) | |
| - Calibration basis : Arps (1945), SPE PEH Vol V, SPE 167242 (Lee & | |
| Sidle), SPE 152596, SEC 2008, SPE PRMS 2018, | |
| EIA AEO, Rystad ShaleWellCube | |
| - Overall validation: 100.0/100 — Grade A+ | |