|
Download cases/case02/task.md from Tauben/PhysClosureBench: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 6.13 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/Tauben/PhysClosureBench/resolve/main/cases/case02/task.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/Tauben/PhysClosureBench/cases/case02/task.md
-
curl -L -o task.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/Tauben/PhysClosureBench/resolve/main/cases/case02/task.md
6.13 kB
| # Multiphoton ionization from driven scattering responses | |
| ## Background | |
| Time-independent perturbation theory can avoid the long propagation times of | |
| a pulsed calculation, but multiphoton ionization becomes difficult once an | |
| intermediate absorption step is already in the continuum. A useful method | |
| must then recover absolute channel amplitudes from a driven scattering | |
| response without confusing open intermediate continua with the selected final | |
| photoelectron channel. | |
| ## Research problem | |
| Develop and assess a time-independent method for extracting absolute | |
| generalized multiphoton ionization cross sections from driven responses of | |
| ground-state hydrogen. Apply it to two-, three-, and four-photon ionization, | |
| including photon-energy regions in which one or more intermediate steps are | |
| open. Determine what the resulting partial-wave family establishes about the | |
| opening of above-threshold pathways and whether the asymptotic content of a | |
| representative complex response supports the extraction principle. | |
| The derivation, numerical construction, choice of scientific evidence and | |
| organization of the argument are yours. Establish the validity and limits of | |
| the extraction from your calculated responses rather than assuming that an | |
| outgoing-wave fit is automatically meaningful. | |
| ## Physical inputs | |
| Use atomic units internally. The target is hydrogen in its normalized, | |
| positive-real $1s$ ground state, with energy $E_0=-1/2$. The light is linearly | |
| polarized along $z$, and the interaction operator for each absorbed photon is | |
| the velocity-form dipole $D=p_z$. | |
| Treat the following photon orders: | |
| | Photon order | Conventional reported unit | | |
| |---|---| | |
| | $K=2$ | $\mathrm{cm^4\,s}$ | | |
| | $K=3$ | $\mathrm{cm^6\,s^2}$ | | |
| | $K=4$ | $\mathrm{cm^8\,s^3}$ | | |
| Resolve every electric-dipole-allowed final partial wave reached from the | |
| $1s$ state. For $K=2$, also report the arithmetic total of those partial | |
| cross sections. The allowed angular channels and their order dependence are | |
| part of your derivation. | |
| Choose an energetically allowed photon-energy domain sufficient to establish | |
| the channel-opening and high-energy claims you make. The primary graded | |
| objects are the real-energy, unbroadened perturbative responses away from | |
| exact bound-state poles. Exact pole samples may be omitted or explicitly | |
| flagged; do not replace the primary result with a phenomenologically | |
| broadened spectrum. | |
| As a method-level audit, also treat at least one student-chosen complex radial | |
| response for which an intermediate absorption step is open. Assess its | |
| outgoing Coulomb-wave content in the unscaled asymptotic region. Any real-axis | |
| continuation beyond the ECS onset must be distinguished from the computed | |
| response on the ECS contour. | |
| State the Coulomb-wave normalization, phase, radial-wave convention, | |
| atomic-unit conversion constants and generalized-cross-section convention | |
| used. Absolute cross sections, rather than independently normalized display | |
| curves, are the grading target. | |
| ## Method boundary | |
| Use ordered time-independent perturbative driven equations and ECS outgoing | |
| boundary conditions. In the response convention for this task, every photon | |
| step consists of one application of $D$; do not insert an additional | |
| factorial, permutation, field-amplitude or order-dependent coefficient into | |
| the successive response states. | |
| You must derive the task-specific response hierarchy, the asymptotic | |
| coefficient extraction and the conversion from the selected outgoing | |
| coefficient to the reported cross section. Standard Coulomb functions, ECS, | |
| linear algebra and atomic-unit conversions may be selected and cited. No | |
| particular radial basis, knot sequence, ECS angle, box extent, sampling grid, | |
| fit implementation, solver, tolerance or plotting layout is prescribed. | |
| You are responsible for checking that the calculated evidence is sufficiently | |
| reliable and reproducible for the conclusions made. Numerical reliability has | |
| no separate deliverable or prescribed test sequence; it is reflected in the | |
| correctness and quality of the reported physical evidence. | |
| ## Submission | |
| Submit one self-contained scientific report and an offline reproduction | |
| package containing the derivation, executable code, reconstructible absolute | |
| partial-cross-section data, the complex radial data and asymptotic | |
| reconstruction used in the method assessment, a provenance note listing every offline source or software document actually consulted and the method basis for items supplied from general knowledge, and | |
| concise run and environment information. The organization and number of | |
| figures are yours. No fixed file tree, filename scheme, complete exploratory | |
| history or examiner-selected diagnostic is required. | |
| The active examination resources and limits are defined in the companion | |
| `resource_limits.json`. All retained production calculations must run | |
| within that fixed allocation and active wall time. More expensive modelling | |
| does not receive additional credit. | |
| ## Reference and integrity policy | |
| This examination is conducted without network access or live literature | |
| retrieval. You may rely on your existing general scientific knowledge and, if any are | |
| explicitly supplied with the examination, on those offline materials or | |
| software documentation. Record every such source actually consulted. For formulas, | |
| methods, constants, or conventions used from general knowledge rather than a | |
| consulted source, state enough of the method basis, definition, value, units, | |
| and convention to make the calculation auditable; do not invent a citation. | |
| You are not required to identify or prove a publication date or to retrieve | |
| literature during the examination. | |
| The hidden target article and its identifying metadata, figures or captions, | |
| supplementary material, author code or data, target-specific reproduction | |
| code, solution or scoring material, online solutions, and worked | |
| reproductions of this case must not be used. All submitted scientific figures | |
| and numerical data must be generated by your own implementation of the stated | |
| problem. | |
| See [submission requirements](../../submission_requirements.md) for the common submission entry points. | |