| # Scientific Sources — Case14 |
|
|
| ## References |
|
|
| Pei-Lun He, Karen Z. Hatsagortsyan, and Christoph H. Keitel. 2022a. *Nondipole Time Delay and Double-Slit Interference in Tunneling Ionization*. *Physical Review Letters*, 128, 183201. [Source](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.183201) |
|
|
| Nondipole Time Delay and Double-Slit Interference in Tunneling Ionization |
|
|
| ## Criterion-to-source crosswalk |
|
|
| Article page identifiers below are journal pages, not PDF viewer indices. Supplemental pages are explicitly marked. The crosswalk distinguishes direct source facts, mathematical entailments and task-defined evidence duties. Original images and PDFs are referenced only; none are reproduced. |
|
|
| | Criteria | Source locations, scientific use and limits | |
| |---|---| |
| | F1, F2 | He, Hatsagortsyan and Keitel (2022), article pp.183201-2-3, Eqs.(1),(2),(5)-(7): light-front momentum, nondegenerate versus laser-dressed degenerate LCAO factors. The task retains the degenerate 1s even/odd branch, not the nondegenerate H2+ or Ne2 branches. | |
| | F3 | He et al. (2022), article pp.183201-2-3, Eqs.(3),(4),(6),(7) and light-front exit-time/phase-difference paragraphs: longitudinal momentum and Wigner-derived exit identity; relative origin is q=p_minus-Ip/c. | |
| | O1, I1, I2, M1, M2 | He et al. (2022), article p.183201-4, Fig.2(a,b,d,e), caption and first paragraph: compact R=5 even single structure versus odd node/two exits near +/-Rw and longitudinal maxima separated by about 2/Rw; article p.183201-3 light-front timing paragraph gives Delta t=Delta z/c. | |
| | O2, I3, M3, M4 | He et al. (2022), article pp.183201-3-4, Fig.2(c,f), caption and separation discussion: R=100 exit separation approaches R; opposite-parity fringes have 2pi/R spacing, distinct from compact odd peak splitting. | |
| | O3, I4 | He et al. (2022), article p.183201-4, Eq.(9), Fig.3(b) and caption: degenerate even-branch phase-averaged longitudinal shift and relative yield versus orientation. Fig.3(a) is the nondegenerate branch and is not the retained target. | |
| | O4, M7 | He et al. (2022), article p.183201-4, Eq.(9), Fig.3(d), caption and destructive-interference/yield discussion: degenerate odd-branch orientation and observability; Fig.3(c) is nondegenerate and out of the retained branch. | |
| | M5, M6 | He et al. (2022), article pp.183201-3-4, Eq.(7), Fig.2 and Fig.3(b,d): parity/dressing sets exit interference, while orientation-dependent signal must be judged with relative yield, not independent per-angle normalization. | |
| | V1, V2 | He et al. (2022), article pp.183201-2-4, leading nondipole PPT/SFA and degenerate-1s model. Relative-observable restriction and triggered validation are task duties; an absolute Ip translation, full Coulomb rerun or out-of-scope Ne2 panel is not compulsory. | |
| |
| ## Formula and convention notes |
| |
| The parity-resolved exit, momentum and orientation formulas refer to article pp.183201-2-4, Eqs.(2)-(7),(9), Fig.2 and Fig.3(b,d). The transverse/longitudinal molecular geometry is $R_z=R\cos\theta_m$, $R_\perp=R\sin\theta_m$ and $R_w=\sqrt{\kappa/|E|}$. At a common $\eta_e=t_e-z_e/c$, $\Delta t_e=\Delta z_e/c$. The compact odd $2/R_w$ peak separation is not a periodic fringe spacing $2\pi/R$; the compact even single-exit object does not support the same two-exit delay. The source absolute common translation $I_p/c$ cannot be manufactured when the retained task gives only relative longitudinal objects. Canonical mean-shift signs in Fig.3(b,d) must not be imposed on a different mathematical diagnostic without deriving its mapping. |
| |
| ## Scope of the source anchors |
| |
| The locators identify scientific objects and mechanisms, not compulsory figure layouts, solver settings, exact grids, pointwise tolerances or a fixed evidence package. Canonical examples may be replaced by functionally equivalent evidence subject to the rubric. Source readback verifies the candidate's science; it cannot supply missing candidate presentation, identification or inference. Reporting, applicability/N/A and descriptive Research Closure duties remain those stated in the rubric and task. |
| |
