Scientific sources - Case29
References
Alba de las Heras, Carlos Hernández-García, Javier Serrano, Aleksandar Prodanov, Dimitar Popmintchev, Tenio Popmintchev, and Luis Plaja. 2025. Attosecond Rabi oscillations in high harmonic generation resonantly driven by extreme ultraviolet laser fields. Physical Review Research, 7, 023268. Source.
Correlated population/subspace dynamics and full HHG linked by Rabi scales, with identity-preserving two-state/continuum discrimination. Source timing, fit and spectral conventions are bounded physical anchors rather than fixed display or fit obligations.
Criterion-to-source crosswalk
Locations refer to the article or named preprint/manuscript page, not a figure-file index. Source examples establish scientific identity and robust structure; the task defines required reporting, case coverage and risk-triggered validation. No original source images are reproduced.
| Criteria | Source locations, scientific use and limits |
|---|---|
| F1 | article pp. 023268-2-3, Eq. (1), methodology and 32-cycle field definition The two-active-electron soft-core target and ground state under the specified finite EUV pulse define production, not a standalone two-level propagation. |
| F2, O1, I1, M1 | article pp. 023268-2-3, Eq. (3), Fig. 1(c) and population discussion Named ground/excited populations and their sum identify coherent exchange and actual two-state survival/leakage; total norm is not a replacement. |
| F3, O2, I2 | article pp. 023268-2-4, Eq. (2), Fig. 1(d), Fig. 3(a,b) Full correlated-TDSE radiation carries material high-order split branches. A two-state component is not the full production observable. |
| F4, O3, I3, M5, M6 | article pp. 023268-2-3, Eqs. (2)-(3), Fig. 1(d); pp. 023268-5-7, Appendices A-B and comparison discussion An exact TDSE two-state transition component, standalone two-level coherence and fitted loss/return model are distinct. Their comparison exposes captured satellites versus continuum/other-state response. |
| M2, M4 | article p. 023268-4, Fig. 2(a-d), Fig. 3(a,b) and generalized-Rabi-frequency paragraph Detuning/field-strength and spectral contrasts discriminate resonance-driven dynamics; the source scans are examples, not fixed comparison grids. |
| M3, M7 | article pp. 023268-3-4, Fig. 1(c-e), Fig. 3(a,b) and triplet discussion Satellite separation is connected to the temporal Rabi scale, with a candidate-authored cross-domain causal answer rather than an examiner-supplied synthesis. |
| V1 | article pp. 023268-2-4, dimensional reduction and soft-core resonance-energy discussion; Sec. IV The resonance energy of the reduced model differs from real helium; the conclusion is single-atom and finite-pulse bounded. |
| V2, V3 | article p. 023268-2, Eqs. (2)-(3); pp. 023268-5-7, Appendices A-C and model/continuum discussion Transform artifacts, component/fit identity and continuum or macroscopic extrapolation are potential claim-specific risks. The source appendices do not mandate fitted decay rates or macroscopic propagation. |
Formula and convention notes
Source-numbered identities below are paraphrased mathematically. Explicit algebraic consequences and accepted model-conditioned representations are identified as such; they do not add a required solver, plot or validation recipe.
For the named field-free states, $c_g=\langle g|\Psi\rangle$, $c_e=\langle e|\Psi\rangle$, $P_g=|c_g|^2$, $P_e=|c_e|^2$ and $P_{2\rm L}=P_g+P_e$; leakage is outside this same named subspace, not mere norm loss. This projection accounting is the direct entailment underlying Fig. 1(c), with equivalent same-content representations allowed.
The full acceleration is $a_{\rm full}=-\langle\Psi|(\partial_{x_1}+\partial_{x_2})V|\Psi\rangle$ (Eq. (2)); the selected transition component is $a_{ge}=-c_g^*c_e\langle g|(\partial_{x_1}+\partial_{x_2})V|e\rangle$ (Eq. (3), with the declared conjugate/real-signal convention). Do not conflate its exact TDSE coefficients with an isolated two-level coherence or a fit.
$S(\omega)\propto|\widetilde a(\omega)|^2$. Rabi satellites occur near $q\omega_0\pm\Omega$, with $T_R=2\pi/\Omega$; the elementary two-level comparison has $\Omega=\sqrt{\Delta^2+|\chi|^2}$ (pp. 023268-3-4). The source central period near 854 as is a scale example, not an exact imposed timing/peak coordinate. Continuum/depletion effects bound the isolated two-state interpretation.
Scope of the source anchors
Figure panels, displayed source coordinates, curve multipliers, numerical grids and named controls are reference examples, not compulsory submission layouts or hidden pointwise targets. Equivalent evidence must preserve the actual physical observable, case, relative scale and discriminating function. Correct data, candidate identification, causal explanation and risk resolution are separate evidential acts. Existing branch-local dependencies, applicability/N/A and descriptive Research Closure rules remain in the case rubric.