|
Download cases/case38/task.md from Tauben/PhysClosureBench: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 5.05 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/Tauben/PhysClosureBench/resolve/main/cases/case38/task.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/Tauben/PhysClosureBench/cases/case38/task.md
-
curl -L -o task.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/Tauben/PhysClosureBench/resolve/main/cases/case38/task.md
5.05 kB
| # Valley-resolved and Brillouin-zone-integrated topological high-harmonic emission | |
| ## Physical setting | |
| Work in atomic units. Consider a two-band Haldane model on a hexagonal lattice | |
| with two sites per unit cell. Let | |
| $$ | |
| \boldsymbol\delta_1=\frac{a}{2}(1,\sqrt{3}),\qquad | |
| \boldsymbol\delta_2=\frac{a}{2}(1,-\sqrt{3}),\qquad | |
| \boldsymbol\delta_3=-a(1,0), | |
| $$ | |
| and | |
| $$ | |
| \mathbf g_1=\mathbf a_1-\mathbf a_2,\qquad | |
| \mathbf g_2=-\mathbf a_1,\qquad | |
| \mathbf g_3=\mathbf a_2, | |
| $$ | |
| where | |
| $$ | |
| \mathbf a_1=\frac{a}{2}(3,\sqrt{3}),\qquad | |
| \mathbf a_2=\frac{a}{2}(3,-\sqrt{3}). | |
| $$ | |
| Use the Bloch Hamiltonian | |
| $$ | |
| H(\mathbf k)=\mathbf d(\mathbf k)\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma, | |
| $$ | |
| with | |
| $$ | |
| \begin{aligned} | |
| d_x(\mathbf k)&=t_1\sum_{n=1}^{3}\cos(\mathbf k\cdot\boldsymbol\delta_n),\\ | |
| d_y(\mathbf k)&=-t_1\sum_{n=1}^{3}\sin(\mathbf k\cdot\boldsymbol\delta_n),\\ | |
| d_z(\mathbf k)&=M+2\,\operatorname{Im}(t_2) | |
| \sum_{n=1}^{3}\sin(\mathbf k\cdot\mathbf g_n). | |
| \end{aligned} | |
| $$ | |
| The shared parameters are | |
| $$ | |
| a=2.683,\qquad M=0.026,\qquad t_1=-0.1. | |
| $$ | |
| Compare two physical cases, $t_2=-0.0013i$ and $t_2=-0.0087i$. Drive the | |
| system along the $\Gamma$-$M$ direction through the Peierls shift | |
| $\mathbf k\mapsto\mathbf k+\mathbf A(t)$, with | |
| $$ | |
| \mathbf A(t)=A_0\sin^2\!\left(\frac{\omega t}{2n_{\mathrm{cyc}}}\right) | |
| \sin(\omega t)\,\hat{\mathbf e}_{\parallel}, | |
| \qquad 0\le t\le\frac{2\pi n_{\mathrm{cyc}}}{\omega}, | |
| $$ | |
| and $\mathbf A(t)=0$ outside the pulse. Use | |
| $A_0=0.1$, $\omega=0.0075$, and $n_{\mathrm{cyc}}=5$. | |
| Treat the driven crystal within independent-electron dynamics of this | |
| two-band Bloch Hamiltonian, starting from its lower band. Characterize the | |
| emitted high-harmonic field through its complex components parallel and | |
| perpendicular to the driver. Use one consistent Fourier convention and a | |
| common normalization; absolute spectral intensity is not a grading target. | |
| ## Research problem | |
| Determine whether and how the change between the two Haldane-model cases affects the | |
| polarization and helicity of high-harmonic emission, and establish the relation | |
| between the valley-resolved response at the inequivalent $K$ and $K'$ points | |
| and the observable response of a completely occupied lower band. | |
| Use your computed harmonic yields and complex channel phases to decide whether | |
| the valley response follows one common rule at both valleys. Determine whether | |
| any polarization information remains in the integrated | |
| response, and state what that observable can and cannot establish about its | |
| microscopic crystal-momentum origin. Limit all conclusions to the bulk, | |
| independent-electron, two-band model specified above. | |
| Your evidence must keep the two model cases, the $K$ and $K'$ initial states, | |
| the fixed-valley and filled-band calculations, and the two response directions | |
| unambiguous. The derivation, numerical representation, Brillouin-zone sampling, | |
| propagator, time step, differentiation and Fourier procedures, treatment of | |
| weak components, reliability strategy, normalization, plotting choices, and | |
| report organization are for you to decide and justify. No particular number, | |
| order, or layout of figures is prescribed. | |
| ## Submission and resources | |
| Submit one self-contained scientific report and an auditable offline | |
| calculation package containing the task-specific derivation, code, numerical | |
| data underlying all material claims, a provenance note listing every offline source or software document actually consulted and the method basis for items supplied from general knowledge, and concise run | |
| and environment information. No fixed file tree, filename scheme, panel count, | |
| or complete exploration history is required. | |
| Resource limits are supplied exclusively by the accompanying | |
| `resource_limits.json`. Its fixed CPU allocation, candidate-active | |
| wall time, network boundary are binding. No separate aggregate CPU-hour limit applies. Greater computational expense | |
| receives no additional credit. | |
| ## Reference and integrity policy | |
| Complete this task without network access or live literature | |
| retrieval. You may rely on your existing general scientific knowledge and, if any are | |
| explicitly supplied with this task, on those offline materials or | |
| software documentation. Record every such source actually consulted. For formulas, | |
| methods, constants, or conventions used from general knowledge rather than a | |
| consulted source, state enough of the method basis, definition, value, units, | |
| and convention to make the calculation auditable; do not invent a citation. | |
| You are not required to identify or prove a publication date or to retrieve | |
| literature while completing this task. | |
| The hidden target article and its identifying metadata, figures or captions, | |
| supplementary material, author code or data, target-specific reproduction | |
| code, solution or scoring material, online solutions, and worked | |
| reproductions of this case must not be used. All submitted scientific figures | |
| and numerical data must be generated by your own implementation of the stated | |
| problem. | |
| See [submission requirements](../../submission_requirements.md) for the common submission entry points. | |