|
Download cases/case46/task.md from Tauben/PhysClosureBench: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 5.11 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/Tauben/PhysClosureBench/resolve/main/cases/case46/task.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/Tauben/PhysClosureBench/cases/case46/task.md
-
curl -L -o task.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/Tauben/PhysClosureBench/resolve/main/cases/case46/task.md
5.11 kB
| # Carrier-envelope control of directional above-threshold ionization | |
| ## Physical setting | |
| Work in atomic units. Consider a linearly polarized few-cycle field along | |
| $z$, | |
| $$ | |
| \mathbf E(t)=E_0\sin^2\!\left(\frac{\omega t}{2N_c}\right) | |
| \sin(\omega t+\phi)\,\mathbf e_z, | |
| \qquad 0\leq t\leq \frac{2\pi N_c}{\omega}, | |
| $$ | |
| with $N_c=4$, $\omega=0.057$, intensity $10^{14}\ \mathrm{W\,cm^{-2}}$, | |
| and $I_p=0.5$. This expression defines the electric field. Use | |
| $$ | |
| \mathbf A(t)=-\int_0^t\mathbf E(s)\,\mathrm ds | |
| $$ | |
| with zero endpoint vector potential. Let | |
| $U_p=E_0^2/(4\omega^2)$. | |
| Use the following separable short-range benchmark in the first-order | |
| rescattering strong-field approximation. Set $\Gamma=1$, $\gamma=38$, and | |
| $\epsilon=0.2$ as independent fixed inputs. Define | |
| $$ | |
| \mathcal N^2= | |
| \frac{\sqrt{2I_p}\left(\Gamma+\sqrt{2I_p}\right)^2}{4\pi^2}, | |
| $$ | |
| $$ | |
| \mathbf d(\mathbf q)= | |
| i\mathcal N\mathbf q\, | |
| \frac{(q^2+\Gamma^2)+(q^2/2+I_p)} | |
| {(q^2+\Gamma^2)^{3/2}(q^2/2+I_p)^2}, | |
| $$ | |
| and | |
| $$ | |
| B(\mathbf q)= | |
| -\frac{2\gamma}{\sqrt{q^2+\Gamma^2}} | |
| \left(1-\frac{4\pi^2 i\gamma}{|\mathbf q|+i\Gamma}\right)^{-1}. | |
| $$ | |
| The continuum-continuum element is | |
| $$ | |
| \begin{aligned} | |
| \mathbf g(\mathbf q_1,\mathbf q_2) | |
| ={}&iB(\mathbf q_2)\mathbf q_1 | |
| \frac{3q_1^2-q_2^2+2\Gamma^2+i\epsilon} | |
| {(q_1^2+\Gamma^2)^{3/2}(q_2^2-q_1^2-i\epsilon)^2}\\ | |
| &-iB^*(\mathbf q_1)\mathbf q_2 | |
| \frac{3q_2^2-q_1^2+2\Gamma^2-i\epsilon} | |
| {(q_2^2+\Gamma^2)^{3/2}(q_1^2-q_2^2+i\epsilon)^2}. | |
| \end{aligned} | |
| $$ | |
| Use a standard first-order rescattering SFA, with a saddle treatment of the | |
| intermediate momentum, to construct the complex direct amplitude | |
| $b_0(\mathbf p)$ and the single-rescattering amplitude $b_1(\mathbf p)$ from | |
| the supplied matrix elements. State the action, saddle-momentum, phase, and | |
| normalization conventions used. Physically equivalent gauge and phase | |
| formulations are acceptable when their mapping preserves the same target, | |
| field, and observable identities. | |
| The observable amplitude is $b=b_0+b_1$. The direct, rescattered, signed | |
| interference, and coherent total contributions are $|b_0|^2$, $|b_1|^2$, | |
| $2\operatorname{Re}(b_0b_1^*)$, and $|b_0+b_1|^2$, respectively. For opposite | |
| longitudinal momenta at the same energy, define | |
| $$ | |
| \mathcal A(E,\phi)= | |
| \frac{P_-(E,\phi)-P_+(E,\phi)} | |
| {P_-(E,\phi)+P_+(E,\phi)}, | |
| $$ | |
| where $P_-$ and $P_+$ denote emission with $p_z<0$ and $p_z>0$ under this | |
| fixed convention. | |
| ## Research problem | |
| Determine how the carrier-envelope phase controls directional | |
| above-threshold ionization in this model. Establish whether one coherent | |
| direct-rescattered account explains both the longitudinal energy asymmetry | |
| and the structure of the polarization-plane momentum distribution. | |
| Support the conclusion with your own physically discriminating numerical | |
| evidence and a causal account tied to the model. The conclusion must be | |
| bounded to the field and target model established by your calculation. | |
| The numerical representation, integration strategy, sampling, evidence | |
| architecture, diagnostic controls, display choices, and report organization | |
| are for you to choose and justify. No particular number, order, range, or | |
| layout of figures is prescribed. | |
| ## Submission and resources | |
| Submit one self-contained scientific report and an auditable offline | |
| calculation package containing the task-specific derivation, code, numerical | |
| data underlying all material claims, a provenance note listing every offline source or software document actually consulted and the method basis for items supplied from general knowledge, and concise run | |
| and environment information. No fixed file tree, filename scheme, panel count, | |
| or complete exploration history is required. | |
| Resource limits are supplied exclusively by the accompanying | |
| `resource_limits.json`. Its fixed CPU allocation, candidate-active | |
| wall time, network boundary are binding. No separate aggregate CPU-hour limit applies. Greater computational expense | |
| receives no additional credit. | |
| ## Reference and integrity policy | |
| This examination is conducted without network access or live literature | |
| retrieval. You may rely on your existing general scientific knowledge and, if any are | |
| explicitly supplied with the examination, on those offline materials or | |
| software documentation. Record every such source actually consulted. For formulas, | |
| methods, constants, or conventions used from general knowledge rather than a | |
| consulted source, state enough of the method basis, definition, value, units, | |
| and convention to make the calculation auditable; do not invent a citation. | |
| You are not required to identify or prove a publication date or to retrieve | |
| literature during the examination. | |
| The hidden target article and its identifying metadata, figures or captions, | |
| supplementary material, author code or data, target-specific reproduction | |
| code, solution or scoring material, online solutions, and worked | |
| reproductions of this case must not be used. All submitted scientific figures | |
| and numerical data must be generated by your own implementation of the stated | |
| problem. | |
| See [submission requirements](../../submission_requirements.md) for the common submission entry points. | |