Datasets:
The dataset viewer is not available for this split.
Error code: StreamingRowsError
Exception: CastError
Message: Couldn't cast
annotation: struct<adjudicated: bool, guideline_version: string, source: string, state: string>
child 0, adjudicated: bool
child 1, guideline_version: string
child 2, source: string
child 3, state: string
filing: struct<accession: string, form: string, url: string>
child 0, accession: string
child 1, form: string
child 2, url: string
issuer: struct<cik: string, name: string>
child 0, cik: string
child 1, name: string
labels: struct<disclosure_controls_effectiveness: struct<status: string, value: string>, icfr_effectiveness: (... 212 chars omitted)
child 0, disclosure_controls_effectiveness: struct<status: string, value: string>
child 0, status: string
child 1, value: string
child 1, icfr_effectiveness: struct<status: string, value: string, reason: string>
child 0, status: string
child 1, value: string
child 2, reason: string
child 2, material_weakness_disclosed: struct<status: string, value: bool, reason: string>
child 0, status: string
child 1, value: bool
child 2, reason: string
child 3, remediation_status: struct<status: string, value: string, reason: string>
child 0, status: string
child 1, value: string
child 2, reason: string
record_id: string
split: string
prediction: struct<document: struct<schema_version: string, source_url: string>, fields: struct<disclosure_contr (... 1181 chars omitted)
child 0, document: struct<schema_version: string, source_url: string>
child 0, s
...
ld 1, evidence: list<item: struct<concept: null, context_ref: null, end_char: int64, method: string, raw_text: strin (... 59 chars omitted)
child 0, item: struct<concept: null, context_ref: null, end_char: int64, method: string, raw_text: string, section: (... 47 chars omitted)
child 0, concept: null
child 1, context_ref: null
child 2, end_char: int64
child 3, method: string
child 4, raw_text: string
child 5, section: string
child 6, source_url: string
child 7, start_char: int64
child 2, reason: string
child 3, status: string
child 4, value: string
child 2, telemetry: struct<inference_cost_usd: double, latency_ms: double, model: string, peak_python_memory_mb: double>
child 0, inference_cost_usd: double
child 1, latency_ms: double
child 2, model: string
child 3, peak_python_memory_mb: double
scores: struct<disclosure_controls_effectiveness: struct<correct: bool>, icfr_effectiveness: struct<correct: (... 102 chars omitted)
child 0, disclosure_controls_effectiveness: struct<correct: bool>
child 0, correct: bool
child 1, icfr_effectiveness: struct<correct: bool>
child 0, correct: bool
child 2, material_weakness_disclosed: struct<correct: bool>
child 0, correct: bool
child 3, remediation_status: struct<correct: bool>
child 0, correct: bool
to
{'prediction': {'document': {'schema_version': Value('string'), 'source_url': Value('string')}, 'fields': {'disclosure_controls_effectiveness': {'confidence': Value('float64'), 'evidence': List({'concept': Value('null'), 'context_ref': Value('null'), 'end_char': Value('int64'), 'method': Value('string'), 'raw_text': Value('string'), 'section': Value('string'), 'source_url': Value('string'), 'start_char': Value('int64')}), 'reason': Value('null'), 'status': Value('string'), 'value': Value('string')}, 'icfr_effectiveness': {'confidence': Value('float64'), 'evidence': List({'concept': Value('null'), 'context_ref': Value('null'), 'end_char': Value('int64'), 'method': Value('string'), 'raw_text': Value('string'), 'section': Value('string'), 'source_url': Value('string'), 'start_char': Value('int64')}), 'reason': Value('string'), 'status': Value('string'), 'value': Value('string')}, 'material_weakness_disclosed': {'confidence': Value('float64'), 'evidence': List({'concept': Value('null'), 'context_ref': Value('null'), 'end_char': Value('int64'), 'method': Value('string'), 'raw_text': Value('string'), 'section': Value('string'), 'source_url': Value('string'), 'start_char': Value('int64')}), 'reason': Value('string'), 'status': Value('string'), 'value': Value('bool')}, 'remediation_status': {'confidence': Value('float64'), 'evidence': List({'concept': Value('null'), 'context_ref': Value('null'), 'end_char': Value('int64'), 'method': Value('string'), 'raw_text': Value('string'), 'section': Value('string'), 'source_url': Value('string'), 'start_char': Value('int64')}), 'reason': Value('string'), 'status': Value('string'), 'value': Value('string')}}, 'telemetry': {'inference_cost_usd': Value('float64'), 'latency_ms': Value('float64'), 'model': Value('string'), 'peak_python_memory_mb': Value('float64')}}, 'record_id': Value('string'), 'scores': {'disclosure_controls_effectiveness': {'correct': Value('bool')}, 'icfr_effectiveness': {'correct': Value('bool')}, 'material_weakness_disclosed': {'correct': Value('bool')}, 'remediation_status': {'correct': Value('bool')}}, 'split': Value('string')}
because column names don't match
Traceback: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/utils.py", line 149, in get_rows_or_raise
return get_rows(
dataset=dataset,
...<4 lines>...
column_names=column_names,
)
File "/src/libs/libcommon/src/libcommon/utils.py", line 272, in decorator
return func(*args, **kwargs)
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/utils.py", line 129, in get_rows
rows_plus_one = list(itertools.islice(safe_iter(ds, dataset=dataset), rows_max_number + 1))
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/utils.py", line 489, in safe_iter
yield from ds.decode(False) if ds.features else ds
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/iterable_dataset.py", line 2818, in __iter__
for key, example in ex_iterable:
^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/iterable_dataset.py", line 2355, in __iter__
for key, pa_table in self._iter_arrow():
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/iterable_dataset.py", line 2380, in _iter_arrow
for key, pa_table in self.ex_iterable._iter_arrow():
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/iterable_dataset.py", line 536, in _iter_arrow
for key, pa_table in iterator:
^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/iterable_dataset.py", line 419, in _iter_arrow
for key, pa_table in self.generate_tables_fn(**gen_kwags):
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/json/json.py", line 343, in _generate_tables
self._cast_table(pa_table, json_field_paths=json_field_paths),
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/json/json.py", line 132, in _cast_table
pa_table = table_cast(pa_table, self.info.features.arrow_schema)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 2369, in table_cast
return cast_table_to_schema(table, schema)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 2297, in cast_table_to_schema
raise CastError(
...<3 lines>...
)
datasets.table.CastError: Couldn't cast
annotation: struct<adjudicated: bool, guideline_version: string, source: string, state: string>
child 0, adjudicated: bool
child 1, guideline_version: string
child 2, source: string
child 3, state: string
filing: struct<accession: string, form: string, url: string>
child 0, accession: string
child 1, form: string
child 2, url: string
issuer: struct<cik: string, name: string>
child 0, cik: string
child 1, name: string
labels: struct<disclosure_controls_effectiveness: struct<status: string, value: string>, icfr_effectiveness: (... 212 chars omitted)
child 0, disclosure_controls_effectiveness: struct<status: string, value: string>
child 0, status: string
child 1, value: string
child 1, icfr_effectiveness: struct<status: string, value: string, reason: string>
child 0, status: string
child 1, value: string
child 2, reason: string
child 2, material_weakness_disclosed: struct<status: string, value: bool, reason: string>
child 0, status: string
child 1, value: bool
child 2, reason: string
child 3, remediation_status: struct<status: string, value: string, reason: string>
child 0, status: string
child 1, value: string
child 2, reason: string
record_id: string
split: string
prediction: struct<document: struct<schema_version: string, source_url: string>, fields: struct<disclosure_contr (... 1181 chars omitted)
child 0, document: struct<schema_version: string, source_url: string>
child 0, s
...
ld 1, evidence: list<item: struct<concept: null, context_ref: null, end_char: int64, method: string, raw_text: strin (... 59 chars omitted)
child 0, item: struct<concept: null, context_ref: null, end_char: int64, method: string, raw_text: string, section: (... 47 chars omitted)
child 0, concept: null
child 1, context_ref: null
child 2, end_char: int64
child 3, method: string
child 4, raw_text: string
child 5, section: string
child 6, source_url: string
child 7, start_char: int64
child 2, reason: string
child 3, status: string
child 4, value: string
child 2, telemetry: struct<inference_cost_usd: double, latency_ms: double, model: string, peak_python_memory_mb: double>
child 0, inference_cost_usd: double
child 1, latency_ms: double
child 2, model: string
child 3, peak_python_memory_mb: double
scores: struct<disclosure_controls_effectiveness: struct<correct: bool>, icfr_effectiveness: struct<correct: (... 102 chars omitted)
child 0, disclosure_controls_effectiveness: struct<correct: bool>
child 0, correct: bool
child 1, icfr_effectiveness: struct<correct: bool>
child 0, correct: bool
child 2, material_weakness_disclosed: struct<correct: bool>
child 0, correct: bool
child 3, remediation_status: struct<correct: bool>
child 0, correct: bool
to
{'prediction': {'document': {'schema_version': Value('string'), 'source_url': Value('string')}, 'fields': {'disclosure_controls_effectiveness': {'confidence': Value('float64'), 'evidence': List({'concept': Value('null'), 'context_ref': Value('null'), 'end_char': Value('int64'), 'method': Value('string'), 'raw_text': Value('string'), 'section': Value('string'), 'source_url': Value('string'), 'start_char': Value('int64')}), 'reason': Value('null'), 'status': Value('string'), 'value': Value('string')}, 'icfr_effectiveness': {'confidence': Value('float64'), 'evidence': List({'concept': Value('null'), 'context_ref': Value('null'), 'end_char': Value('int64'), 'method': Value('string'), 'raw_text': Value('string'), 'section': Value('string'), 'source_url': Value('string'), 'start_char': Value('int64')}), 'reason': Value('string'), 'status': Value('string'), 'value': Value('string')}, 'material_weakness_disclosed': {'confidence': Value('float64'), 'evidence': List({'concept': Value('null'), 'context_ref': Value('null'), 'end_char': Value('int64'), 'method': Value('string'), 'raw_text': Value('string'), 'section': Value('string'), 'source_url': Value('string'), 'start_char': Value('int64')}), 'reason': Value('string'), 'status': Value('string'), 'value': Value('bool')}, 'remediation_status': {'confidence': Value('float64'), 'evidence': List({'concept': Value('null'), 'context_ref': Value('null'), 'end_char': Value('int64'), 'method': Value('string'), 'raw_text': Value('string'), 'section': Value('string'), 'source_url': Value('string'), 'start_char': Value('int64')}), 'reason': Value('string'), 'status': Value('string'), 'value': Value('string')}}, 'telemetry': {'inference_cost_usd': Value('float64'), 'latency_ms': Value('float64'), 'model': Value('string'), 'peak_python_memory_mb': Value('float64')}}, 'record_id': Value('string'), 'scores': {'disclosure_controls_effectiveness': {'correct': Value('bool')}, 'icfr_effectiveness': {'correct': Value('bool')}, 'material_weakness_disclosed': {'correct': Value('bool')}, 'remediation_status': {'correct': Value('bool')}}, 'split': Value('string')}
because column names don't matchNeed help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
FilingsBench
An accession-linked, issuer-disjoint benchmark for auditable extraction from SEC 10-K, 10-Q, and
8-K filings. The financial-facts v0.1 slice contains 60 filings from 15 issuers and eight fields;
its labels are explicitly silver SEC cross-source, not human-gold. Narrative slices use
candidate_pending_independent_review until blinded review and adjudication are complete.
The repository contains provenance and labels, not copies of filing HTML. See FinStruct for builders, raw predictions, metrics, schemas, and known failures.
Financial-facts dataset SHA-256:
fbac61331b715ac196e6af57dc8276c40d3819b31489cf77c7a7914bb17b5725.
Controls v0.1 candidate slice
The controls/ directory adds 12 issuer-disjoint filings and four narrative fields: ICFR
effectiveness, disclosure-controls effectiveness, material-weakness presence, and remediation
status. The deterministic v0.2.0 baseline matched all 48 candidate outcomes and attached exact
evidence to every present prediction. Labels remain candidate_pending_independent_review.
Controls dataset SHA-256:
9de0c23ed5e971d9426b7d235b52332fb13c257829d4a09743641eef213717de.
Form 8-K Item 4.02 v0.1 candidate slice
The non_reliance/ directory adds 14 issuer-disjoint Form 8-K primary documents and six fields:
Item 4.02 paragraph variant, non-reliance scope, latest conclusion/notice date, restatement status,
auditor-discussion disclosure, and controlled accounting topics. Twelve records contain Item 4.02;
two are negative 8-K controls that should abstain on every field.
The deterministic v0.3.0 baseline matched all 84 candidate outcomes, attached evidence to every present prediction, and passed 82/82 normalized-document offset checks. The first run exposed an incomplete candidate label for one filing; exact evidence corrected the label without a parser change. These labels are not human-gold or a prevalence sample.
Item 4.02 dataset SHA-256:
2113ed77793a52c133d674c74c29238d684e77c3fdff1888f92d97dc5b9b594e.
The directory includes a label- and prediction-free review_packet.jsonl for blinded independent
review, with SHA-256
3ea7169169698ea9155df7d90705719df46fe3e799a37e5814911643ec814aec.
The v0.3.1 reviewer kit adds review_template.csv, a spreadsheet handoff generated from the blind
packet, plus its submission schema and walkthrough. FinStruct validates all 14 records and 84
field decisions, enforces controlled values and abstention rationales, and can verify exact quotes
against SEC filed text before emitting normalized JSONL offsets. The template SHA-256 is
ca24011b90c85204d581aefeca8a5cdbee3a239fff1cab5aed2c570540c5d027.
The v0.3.3 starter kit adds review_packet_starter.jsonl and
review_template_starter.csv: four filings and 24 field decisions selected only by ascending
sha256(starter-v0.1:record_id). The packet remains label- and prediction-free and uses the same
validator as the full review. A validated starter is partial independent coverage, not a complete
slice review or human-gold claim. The packet SHA-256 is
17954faa8388889b6ca59ecec40be39a377bd01c671e43ae5251947397299cab; the template SHA-256 is
22a9d97c1dc68559e93520fe134706750aa4f4505236baff882c13701622f8e9.
FinStruct v0.5.0 adds deterministic comparison and adjudication for two normalized submissions.
It isolates status, value, and exact-evidence disagreements; requires a third distinct adjudicator;
and re-verifies every present source and final quote against SEC filed text before emitting the
human_gold_double_review_adjudicated state. This is promotion infrastructure only: the dataset
currently contains zero independent submissions and zero human-gold records.
Item 4.02 report · Independent review walkthrough · Tutorial · v0.5.0 release
Zero-setup v0.3.2 quickstart
Open the executed notebook in Colab to install the immutable v0.3.2 wheel, verify one tagged temporal-audit filing hash, extract the six Item 4.02 fields, and round-trip all seven emitted evidence offsets. It requires no repository checkout, model, GPU, inference API, SEC credential, or private document.
The notebook reproduces installation and system behavior on unlabeled development data. It does not establish accuracy, human-gold status, post-tuning generalization, or production quality.
Item 4.02 temporal audit v0.2
The temporal/ directory adds a label-free 25-issuer audit frozen before prediction from a fixed
May 1–July 27, 2026 SEC EFTS query. It contains the exact selection manifest, accession-linked
records, and separate v0.3.1 baseline and v0.3.2 development-replay outputs. The records SHA-256
is 0044db83e2782d4a02f75f7b9f376274a0ea6f056129e22fb8eec441069e620e.
Accuracy is explicitly null. Maintainer inspection changed 37 field outputs across 18 filings; the final development replay emitted 141/150 fields and passed 154/154 evidence-offset checks. Because the set was used for development, it is not human-gold, an untouched post-tuning holdout, market prevalence, or production accuracy.
- Downloads last month
- 55