VidScribe / README.md
Vicky0720's picture
Release VidScribe benchmark and evaluation results
1b29e5b verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
7.83 kB
metadata
pretty_name: VidScribe
license: other
language:
  - en
  - zh
task_categories:
  - text-to-video
  - image-to-video
  - video-to-video
tags:
  - video-generation
  - text-rendering
  - video-editing
  - ocr
  - benchmark
  - ai-generated
size_categories:
  - n<1K
configs:
  - config_name: i2v
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: viewer/i2v.parquet
    default: true
  - config_name: r2v
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: viewer/r2v.parquet
  - config_name: v2v
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: viewer/v2v.parquet
  - config_name: t2v
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: viewer/t2v.parquet
  - config_name: leaderboard
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: viewer/leaderboard.parquet
  - config_name: scores_per_sample
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: viewer/scores_per_sample.parquet

VidScribe

VidScribe is a diagnostic benchmark for visual text in video generation. It has four tasks: T2V (render text from a prompt), R2V (transfer text identity from a reference image), I2V (keep text intact under motion from a first frame), and V2V (edit localized text in an existing video). Every sample is labeled on 12 factor axes (F1–F12).

Release status. This repository hosts the public half of the benchmark: 403 of 803 human-verified samples. The remaining samples will be released after the paper is accepted.

AI-generated content. Everything in generated_videos/ is AI-generated, as are some of the reference images and source videos.

Contents

Task Released / full Input media
T2V 125 / 250 none
R2V 70 / 139 70 reference images
I2V 115 / 229 115 first frames
V2V 93 / 185 93 source videos

The repository also contains results for 7 commercial video generators on these samples: per-sample scores, a leaderboard, and the 2,821 scored videos (about 10 GB).

Each task was halved by stratified sampling with a fixed seed. For every value of F1–F12, the coverage attributes, the data source, and the difficulty quartile, the released share is within 2.1 percentage points of the full task. All samples shown in the paper are included.

benchmark/<task>/metadata_*.json       ground truth; a task is the union of its files
benchmark/<task>/{images,videos}/      model inputs
results/leaderboard.csv                model-level scores (%)
results/scores_per_sample.csv          one row per (model, sample), scores in [0, 1]
results/metric_keys.json               raw metric key -> ID, name, group
results/raw/<model>.jsonl              per-metric value, validity, N/A reason
generated_videos/<model>/<id>.mp4      scored model outputs
viewer/*.parquet                       flat copies for the Dataset Viewer

All file paths stored in the data are relative to the repository root. Model ids: minimax-h3, wan-3.0, seedance-2.5, gemini-omni-1.1-flash, happyhorse, pixverse-v6, kling-3.0-omni.

Metadata

  • sample_id, task, prompt
  • Factor axes: F1_text_amount … F12_content_dynamics
  • Coverage attributes: language, content_domain, visual_style, text_color
  • Conditional controls: font_name, text_color_desc, motion_pattern, occluder_type, deform_source, text_position, temporal_evidence, glyph_profile, v2v_edit_op
  • Target text: gt_text (for V2V, the source text), gt_text_after (V2V edit target), gt_text_switched (after a content switch), gt_text_visible (visible part under off-screen cropping)
  • Inputs: reference_image (R2V, I2V), source_video (V2V)

Fields that do not apply are null. For multi-level text, per-text fields are lists with one entry per level.

Metrics

Group Metrics
Text Fidelity A1 Content Accuracy, A2 Glyph Correctness
Temporal Stability B1 Content Stability, B2 Appearance Stability
Instruction Compliance C1 Color, C2 Stroke Weight, C3 Typographic Style, C4 Carrier Attachment, C5 Spatial Placement, C6 Layout Hierarchy
Non-Text Preservation D1 Background Consistency
V2V probes (not in Overall) E1 Editing Residue (lower is better), E2 Source Text Preservation

Overall averages each metric over the samples where it is valid, then averages metrics within each group, then averages the 4 groups with equal weight. Inapplicable metrics are left empty and excluded. Failed generations are still scored (low) and flagged with model_output_failure.

Leaderboard on the released half (%)

These numbers are close to, but not identical with, the full-benchmark results in the paper.

Model Overall A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 D1
MiniMax H3 79.0 83.0 56.6 75.4 82.6 82.2 73.4 73.9 74.2 71.8 81.8 90.8
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash 78.3 79.4 51.9 74.6 84.5 82.3 73.0 75.4 73.3 76.8 84.0 90.4
Wan 3.0 78.0 82.0 45.5 75.9 85.2 83.0 75.1 77.8 78.9 76.4 82.5 88.8
Seedance 2.5 77.2 75.2 57.8 71.3 82.6 84.8 71.4 69.7 74.7 68.8 78.9 90.8
HappyHorse 74.5 72.6 48.9 66.2 80.3 82.6 71.2 69.7 72.2 69.8 81.4 89.4
PixVerse V6 73.4 72.6 47.9 64.1 78.2 83.0 73.7 73.5 68.2 67.4 82.5 87.5
Kling3.0-Omni 70.9 58.5 45.1 56.0 80.2 79.6 72.7 67.6 71.8 68.1 83.2 89.8
Model T2V R2V I2V V2V E1 ↓ E2 ↑
MiniMax H3 80.4 82.1 83.5 67.8 31.6 50.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash 81.0 76.6 81.7 70.8 26.3 72.3
Wan 3.0 78.7 79.7 82.2 69.8 22.8 65.9
Seedance 2.5 79.8 80.0 82.6 63.8 43.9 62.1
HappyHorse 75.4 78.2 80.2 61.9 31.6 39.1
PixVerse V6 71.6 74.9 80.3 65.2 15.8 31.6
Kling3.0-Omni 66.8 72.3 84.0 57.4 36.8 50.2

Usage

from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download, snapshot_download
from pathlib import Path
import json, pandas as pd

repo = "Vicky0720/VidScribe"
root = Path(snapshot_download(repo, repo_type="dataset", ignore_patterns=["generated_videos/*"]))
gt = [r for f in sorted(root.glob("benchmark/*/metadata_*.json"))
      for r in json.loads(f.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))]
scores = pd.read_csv(root / "results/scores_per_sample.csv")
video = hf_hub_download(repo, scores.generated_video[0], repo_type="dataset")

Data notes and terms

  • Processing. Embedded metadata was removed from all media files; videos were remuxed without re-encoding. The generated videos are the exact bitstreams that were scored, and their visible content (including any service watermarks) is unchanged.
  • Privacy. Faces are masked in the I2V first frames and the V2V source videos. Some media contain incidental scene text. Do not use this dataset to identify or profile people.
  • Third-party material. Files prefixed real_textocr_ or real_lsvt_ are derived from TextOCR and LSVT and remain subject to their terms. The generated videos and scores concern third-party commercial services, reflect the model versions available at evaluation time, and remain subject to each provider's terms, including any restriction on training competing models.
  • Scores. All scores come from an automated evaluator and may contain errors.
  • Use. Non-commercial research only.
  • Takedown. Rights holders can open a discussion with the sample_id, and the material will be removed.

Citation

@article{vidscribe2026,
  title   = {Beyond Legibility: Benchmarking Visual Text Rendering and In-Place Editing in Unified Video Generation},
  author  = {TODO},
  journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:TODO},
  year    = {2026}
}