|
Download README.md from WhySoCodius/in-context-grid-reasoning: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 4.14 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/WhySoCodius/in-context-grid-reasoning/resolve/main/README.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/WhySoCodius/in-context-grid-reasoning/README.md
-
curl -L -o README.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/WhySoCodius/in-context-grid-reasoning/resolve/main/README.md
4.14 kB
| license: cc-by-4.0 | |
| task_categories: | |
| - text-generation | |
| - other | |
| language: | |
| - en | |
| tags: | |
| - in-context-learning | |
| - reasoning | |
| - arc-agi | |
| - synthetic | |
| - rule-induction | |
| pretty_name: In-Context Grid Reasoning (ICGR) | |
| size_categories: | |
| - 1K<n<10K | |
| configs: | |
| - config_name: default | |
| data_files: | |
| - split: train | |
| path: data/train.jsonl | |
| - split: test | |
| path: data/test.jsonl | |
| # In-Context Grid Reasoning (ICGR) | |
| A small, fully synthetic benchmark for **demonstration-conditioned rule induction**: | |
| each task shows 2–4 `(input grid → output grid)` support pairs that share one | |
| hidden transformation, and the model must apply the same transformation to a | |
| held-out query input. | |
| It targets the same behaviour probed by recent in-context / latent-reasoning work | |
| on ARC-AGI (e.g. *BDH-CQ: In-Context Learning with Recurrent Latent Reasoning*, | |
| [arXiv:2608.09888](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.09888)), but is deliberately tiny, | |
| transparent, and license-clean so it can be used freely for quick probes and | |
| ablations. | |
| ## Why this exists | |
| ARC-AGI itself is excellent but small and easy to overfit to via public solvers. | |
| ICGR is **procedurally generated from a single script** ([`generate.py`](generate.py)), | |
| so you can: | |
| - regenerate it deterministically (`--seed`), | |
| - scale it up (`--n`), | |
| - know exactly which rule family each task belongs to (for per-concept scoring), | |
| - trust its provenance — no scraped text, images, or third-party datasets, so | |
| there is no upstream copyright. Released under CC-BY-4.0. | |
| ## Format | |
| One JSON object per line. | |
| | field | type | notes | | |
| |---|---|---| | |
| | `task_id` | str | e.g. `icgr-00042` | | |
| | `rule` | str | rule id(s), `+`-joined for compositions | | |
| | `rule_kind` | str | `atomic` or `composed` | | |
| | `rule_description` | str | plain-English statement of the transformation | | |
| | `num_colors` | int | cell alphabet size (4–6) | | |
| | `grid_h`, `grid_w` | int | query/support grid dimensions before the rule | | |
| | `num_support` | int | number of demonstration pairs (2–4) | | |
| | `support` | list | `[{"input": grid, "output": grid}, ...]` | | |
| | `query_input` | str | grid to transform | | |
| | `query_output` | str | expected answer | | |
| Grids are serialised as rows of space-separated integers, rows joined by `;`. | |
| Example: `"1 2 0;0 1 2"` is the 2×3 grid `[[1,2,0],[0,1,2]]`. | |
| ```python | |
| from datasets import load_dataset | |
| ds = load_dataset("WhySoCodius/in-context-grid-reasoning", split="test") | |
| ex = ds[0] | |
| print(ex["rule_description"]) | |
| for pair in ex["support"]: | |
| print(pair["input"], "->", pair["output"]) | |
| print("Q:", ex["query_input"], "=>", ex["query_output"]) | |
| ``` | |
| ## Rule families | |
| `flip_h`, `flip_v`, `transpose`, `rotate90`, `add_mod` (add constant mod colour | |
| count), `color_swap`, `shift_rows` (cyclic), `tile_h` (self-concat), `border` | |
| (paint outer ring), `max_pool2` (2×2 max). ~35% of tasks compose two of the | |
| size-preserving rules; `rule` records which and in what order. | |
| ## Splits | |
| | split | tasks | | |
| |---|---| | |
| | train | 800 | | |
| | test | 200 | | |
| Split is a random shuffle at a fixed seed; the same rule family appears in both. | |
| It is a convenience split, not an adversarial generalisation split — if you need | |
| held-out rules, filter by `rule`. | |
| ## Suggested metric | |
| Exact string match on `query_output` after normalising whitespace. Report overall | |
| accuracy plus a breakdown by `rule` and by `rule_kind`. | |
| ## Limitations | |
| - Rules are simple and enumerable; a symbolic solver can reach 100%. The point is | |
| to measure whether a *learning* system infers the rule from demonstrations | |
| alone, not to be unsolvable. | |
| - Grids are small (3×5 max, 6×6 for pooling) and dense. | |
| - English rule descriptions are templated. | |
| ## Reproduce / extend | |
| ```bash | |
| python generate.py --n 5000 --seed 123 | |
| python test_generate.py # self-check | |
| ``` | |
| ## Citation | |
| ```bibtex | |
| @misc{icgr2026, | |
| title = {In-Context Grid Reasoning (ICGR): a synthetic benchmark for | |
| demonstration-conditioned rule induction}, | |
| author = {WhySoCodius}, | |
| year = {2026}, | |
| howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/datasets/WhySoCodius/in-context-grid-reasoning}} | |
| } | |
| ``` | |
| License: [CC-BY-4.0](LICENSE). Attribution appreciated; no other restrictions. | |