path stringlengths 87 181 | folder name stringclasses 11
values | file name stringlengths 28 122 | original word count int64 32 237k | original token count int64 163 439k | content stringlengths 75 9.43k | word count int64 15 1.29k | text stringlengths 482 9.83k | token count int64 163 2.05k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Skeletons/Closings/Appendix B to COPA's Closing Submissions - Schedule of Transcript References.pdf | Closings | part 124 of 220 Appendix B to COPA's Closing Submissions - Schedule of Transcript References.pdf | 236,795 | 438,889 | but Satoshi Nakamoto would know why it had been done. A. I do know why it's been done. Like I just said, I told you about the overflow for left shift and people were actually complaining about this as well. Most of the things have been turned on one by one in BSV, as we checked the code, so we've been rigorous in that,... | 1,077 | Trial document files for the COPA v Wright case.
The claimant is CRYPTO OPEN PATENT ALLIANCE (COPA).
The defendant is DR CRAIG STEVEN WRIGHT (Craig Wright).
### File name: part 124 of 220 Appendix B to COPA's Closing Submissions - Schedule of Transcript References.pdf
### Folder name: Closings
### File path: /content/C... | 1,796 |
/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Expert Reports/Patrick Madden/Appendix PM14.pdf | Patrick Madden | part 13 of 19 Appendix PM14.pdf | 12,691 | 37,451 | the right is outside of the picture box, which led me to consider that it would be worthwhile to conduct a deeper image analysis asfollows. 119. St arting with the signature, by zooming in on the section, it can be seen that there are two different pixelation quality level s in that section . {H/29} {ID_001926} {ID_001... | 668 | Trial document files for the COPA v Wright case.
The claimant is CRYPTO OPEN PATENT ALLIANCE (COPA).
The defendant is DR CRAIG STEVEN WRIGHT (Craig Wright).
### File name: part 13 of 19 Appendix PM14.pdf
### Folder name: Patrick Madden
### File path: /content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Expert Reports/Patrick Madde... | 1,385 |
/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Skeletons/Closings/COPA's Closing Submissions.pdf | Closings | part 12 of 82 COPA's Closing Submissions.pdf | 90,245 | 162,533 | was the background leading up to it? Were there prior attempts that failed? Some of the human aspects and conflicts will be important, as well… knowledge of / interactions with DPR and others and related sites that rose to prominence in ass ociation? What security measures were taken to preserve SN’s anonymity? Why? Ba... | 1,101 | Trial document files for the COPA v Wright case.
The claimant is CRYPTO OPEN PATENT ALLIANCE (COPA).
The defendant is DR CRAIG STEVEN WRIGHT (Craig Wright).
### File name: part 12 of 82 COPA's Closing Submissions.pdf
### Folder name: Closings
### File path: /content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Skeletons/Closings/CO... | 1,800 |
/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Expert Reports/Patrick Madden/First Expert Report of Patrick Madden.pdf | Patrick Madden | part 16 of 27 First Expert Report of Patrick Madden.pdf | 31,645 | 53,480 | of Patrick Madden Page 48 of 98 48interacted with by the user and which is receiving input. The term “ In f ocus ” refers to the window that is currently receiving keyboar d input (and is invariably the same as the Active window). b. It does not matter whether a user actually types into or makes changes to the document... | 1,173 | Trial document files for the COPA v Wright case.
The claimant is CRYPTO OPEN PATENT ALLIANCE (COPA).
The defendant is DR CRAIG STEVEN WRIGHT (Craig Wright).
### File name: part 16 of 27 First Expert Report of Patrick Madden.pdf
### Folder name: Patrick Madden
### File path: /content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Expe... | 1,831 |
/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Skeletons/Openings/COPA v Wright - Opening Skeleton of COPA.pdf | Openings | part 36 of 51 COPA v Wright - Opening Skeleton of COPA.pdf | 46,694 | 100,132 | to the differences between the document and the control version of the White Paper.348 204.4. A further touchup textedit tag was found which referenced Dr Wright’s contact details at nChain, a company which did not exist in 2008/9. 204.5. Metadata showed reference to Dr Wright’s details at nChain (which of course he di... | 916 | Trial document files for the COPA v Wright case.
The claimant is CRYPTO OPEN PATENT ALLIANCE (COPA).
The defendant is DR CRAIG STEVEN WRIGHT (Craig Wright).
### File name: part 36 of 51 COPA v Wright - Opening Skeleton of COPA.pdf
### Folder name: Openings
### File path: /content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Skeleto... | 1,579 |
/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Skeletons/Closings/Appendix B to COPA's Closing Submissions - Schedule of Transcript References.pdf | Closings | part 96 of 220 Appendix B to COPA's Closing Submissions - Schedule of Transcript References.pdf | 236,795 | 438,889 | No, actually, Greg Maxwell and a few of the other COPA members contacted WIRED and put together what has already been debunked, false information, as well as some of this other stuff that they put together. So one of the people involved was Mr Greg Maxw ell - Q. I'm going to dispute - just to stop you on all of these a... | 1,077 | Trial document files for the COPA v Wright case.
The claimant is CRYPTO OPEN PATENT ALLIANCE (COPA).
The defendant is DR CRAIG STEVEN WRIGHT (Craig Wright).
### File name: part 96 of 220 Appendix B to COPA's Closing Submissions - Schedule of Transcript References.pdf
### Folder name: Closings
### File path: /content/Co... | 1,871 |
/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Skeletons/Closings/Appendix A to COPA's Closing Submissions - Consolidated Forgery Schedule.pdf | Closings | part 29 of 50 Appendix A to COPA's Closing Submissions - Consolidated Forgery Schedule.pdf | 55,528 | 99,982 | document dating from 2008, contrary to fact. Dr Wright’s explanations should be rejected, for the followin g reasons: a. Mr Madden established in appendix PM44 that this document derived from {ID_000537}. Apart from the two documents sharing the irregular hyphenation in the title and other features of the title (includ... | 1,111 | Trial document files for the COPA v Wright case.
The claimant is CRYPTO OPEN PATENT ALLIANCE (COPA).
The defendant is DR CRAIG STEVEN WRIGHT (Craig Wright).
### File name: part 29 of 50 Appendix A to COPA's Closing Submissions - Consolidated Forgery Schedule.pdf
### Folder name: Closings
### File path: /content/Copa v ... | 1,892 |
/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Skeletons/Closings/Appendix B to COPA's Closing Submissions - Schedule of Transcript References.pdf | Closings | part 208 of 220 Appendix B to COPA's Closing Submissions - Schedule of Transcript References.pdf | 236,795 | 438,889 | it? A. No, I actually didn't want an adjournment. I actually had a fight with my lawyers over that and they made it happen. Q. Dr Wright, your presentation of those documents as uniquely coding for the Bitcoin White Paper was a fraud on us and on COPA, wasn't it? A. No, I actually believe Mr Ager -Hanssen is working wi... | 1,077 | Trial document files for the COPA v Wright case.
The claimant is CRYPTO OPEN PATENT ALLIANCE (COPA).
The defendant is DR CRAIG STEVEN WRIGHT (Craig Wright).
### File name: part 208 of 220 Appendix B to COPA's Closing Submissions - Schedule of Transcript References.pdf
### Folder name: Closings
### File path: /content/C... | 1,703 |
/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Skeletons/Closings/Appendix A to COPA's Closing Submissions - Consolidated Forgery Schedule.pdf | Closings | part 48 of 50 Appendix A to COPA's Closing Submissions - Consolidated Forgery Schedule.pdf | 55,528 | 99,982 | in the circumstances or explain the irregularities. d. The use of a version of Windows Text Editor dating from 2020 shows these documents were not contemporaneous to the alleged time capsule. e. Mr Lynch agreed with Mr Madden that ID_000473 was manipulated: {Q/6/5}. Appendix A to COPA’s Closing Skeleton Argument Consol... | 1,111 | Trial document files for the COPA v Wright case.
The claimant is CRYPTO OPEN PATENT ALLIANCE (COPA).
The defendant is DR CRAIG STEVEN WRIGHT (Craig Wright).
### File name: part 48 of 50 Appendix A to COPA's Closing Submissions - Consolidated Forgery Schedule.pdf
### Folder name: Closings
### File path: /content/Copa v ... | 2,013 |
/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Martti Malmi - Exhibits/Martti Malmi - Exhibit MM1 - SN to MM.pdf | Martti Malmi - Exhibits | part 25 of 44 Martti Malmi - Exhibit MM1 - SN to MM.pdf | 44,150 | 86,849 | > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com > <mailto:satoshin@gmx.com> > wrote: > > Here's one where I linked Berkeley DB a different way. It's worth a > try. Otherwise identical to test5. > > (Keep the datadir on the hard drive at least until you get it to > fail the same way there. That ... | 1,004 | Trial document files for the COPA v Wright case.
The claimant is CRYPTO OPEN PATENT ALLIANCE (COPA).
The defendant is DR CRAIG STEVEN WRIGHT (Craig Wright).
### File name: part 25 of 44 Martti Malmi - Exhibit MM1 - SN to MM.pdf
### Folder name: Martti Malmi - Exhibits
### File path: /content/Copa v Wright - Trial Docum... | 1,744 |
/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Expert Reports/Patrick Madden/Appendix PM21.pdf | Patrick Madden | part 14 of 15 Appendix PM21.pdf | 12,484 | 29,601 | explain the conclusion above and illustrate what is meant by “spoofing” in moredetail, I have recreated a spoofing process first using MS Outlook, and second using a well - known email spoofing website called Emk ei.cz. 81. Before proceeding, I point out that I have conducted these tests using different infrastructuret... | 833 | Trial document files for the COPA v Wright case.
The claimant is CRYPTO OPEN PATENT ALLIANCE (COPA).
The defendant is DR CRAIG STEVEN WRIGHT (Craig Wright).
### File name: part 14 of 15 Appendix PM21.pdf
### Folder name: Patrick Madden
### File path: /content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Expert Reports/Patrick Madde... | 1,608 |
/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Expert Reports/Arthur Rosendahl/First Expert Report of Arthur Rosendahl.pdf | Arthur Rosendahl | part 7 of 40 First Expert Report of Arthur Rosendahl.pdf | 45,150 | 79,556 | the choice of fonts. The main text is in Times New Roman, which is indeed used very often in scientific articles; alongside with the L ATEX default, Computer Modern Roman; but the white paper’s title and section headings are in a different font, Century Schoolbook. It is uncommon in L ATEX to use different fonts for th... | 1,129 | Trial document files for the COPA v Wright case.
The claimant is CRYPTO OPEN PATENT ALLIANCE (COPA).
The defendant is DR CRAIG STEVEN WRIGHT (Craig Wright).
### File name: part 7 of 40 First Expert Report of Arthur Rosendahl.pdf
### Folder name: Arthur Rosendahl
### File path: /content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/E... | 1,797 |
/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Expert Reports/Patrick Madden/Appendix PM11.pdf | Patrick Madden | part 1 of 8 Appendix PM11.pdf | 6,261 | 14,012 | Madden Appendix PM11 “LOG FILES” / ID_000746, ID_000748, ID_000753, ID_000754, ID_000840, ID_000848 Page 1 of 22 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS OF ENGLAND & WALES INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LIST (ChD) Claim No: IL -2021 -000019 BETWEEN: CRYPTO OPEN PATENT ALLIANCE Claimant -and- DR CRAIG STEVEN WR... | 783 | Trial document files for the COPA v Wright case.
The claimant is CRYPTO OPEN PATENT ALLIANCE (COPA).
The defendant is DR CRAIG STEVEN WRIGHT (Craig Wright).
### File name: part 1 of 8 Appendix PM11.pdf
### Folder name: Patrick Madden
### File path: /content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Expert Reports/Patrick Madden/... | 1,937 |
/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Skeletons/Closings/Appendix B to COPA's Closing Submissions - Schedule of Transcript References.pdf | Closings | part 23 of 220 Appendix B to COPA's Closing Submissions - Schedule of Transcript References.pdf | 236,795 | 438,889 | Q. You had every opportunity in that part of the chain of custody schedule to provide further information if you wanted to, didn't you? A. Yes , I did. Dr Wright admits he had an opportunity to set out in his Chain of Custody the fact that documents were different in some way, but did not take it. {CSW/2/71} CSW 11 App... | 1,077 | Trial document files for the COPA v Wright case.
The claimant is CRYPTO OPEN PATENT ALLIANCE (COPA).
The defendant is DR CRAIG STEVEN WRIGHT (Craig Wright).
### File name: part 23 of 220 Appendix B to COPA's Closing Submissions - Schedule of Transcript References.pdf
### Folder name: Closings
### File path: /content/Co... | 1,819 |
/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Skeletons/Closings/COPA's Closing Submissions.pdf | Closings | part 4 of 82 COPA's Closing Submissions.pdf | 90,245 | 162,533 | 7 See {Day5/180:2} – intervention by Lord Grabiner KC. 10 20. It is COPA’s case that Dr Wright produced these forgeries himself or alternatively (if others were somehow involved) he at least knew that he was presenting false evidence. Furthermore, Dr Wright’s forg eries and lies are not merely historic. This is not a c... | 1,101 | Trial document files for the COPA v Wright case.
The claimant is CRYPTO OPEN PATENT ALLIANCE (COPA).
The defendant is DR CRAIG STEVEN WRIGHT (Craig Wright).
### File name: part 4 of 82 COPA's Closing Submissions.pdf
### Folder name: Closings
### File path: /content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Skeletons/Closings/COP... | 1,889 |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 20