Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
n
int64
2
8
seed
int64
0
4
condition
stringclasses
2 values
level
stringclasses
3 values
probe
int64
0
3
gold
unknown
finish
stringclasses
1 value
correct
bool
1 class
answer_tail
stringlengths
4
160
2
0
oracle
L1
0
"done"
stop
true
ANSWER: done
2
0
full
L1
0
"done"
stop
true
ANSWER: done
2
0
full
L2
2
[ "A1" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A1
2
0
full
L2
1
[ "A1", "A2" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A1, A2
2
0
oracle
L2
1
[ "A1", "A2" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A2, A1
2
0
oracle
L2
2
[ "A1" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A1
2
1
full
L1
0
"test"
stop
true
ANSWER: test
2
1
full
L2
1
[ "A1", "A2" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A2, A1
2
1
oracle
L1
0
"test"
stop
true
test ANSWER: test
2
1
full
L2
2
[ "A1" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A1
2
1
oracle
L2
2
[ "A1" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A1
2
1
oracle
L2
1
[ "A1", "A2" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A1, A2
2
1
full
L3
3
[ "A1" ]
stop
true
A1 ANSWER: A1
2
0
full
L3
3
[ "A1" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A1
2
2
full
L1
0
"test"
stop
true
ANSWER: test
2
2
full
L2
1
[ "A1", "A2" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A1, A2
2
2
full
L2
2
[ "A1" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A1
2
2
oracle
L2
1
[ "A1", "A2" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A1, A2
2
2
oracle
L1
0
"test"
stop
true
test ANSWER: test
2
2
oracle
L2
2
[ "A1" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A1
2
3
full
L1
0
"implement"
stop
true
RM task T1 (owner A1): stage plan -> implement`. While A1 later claimed to be done, there is no platform record of T1 moving to test or done. ANSWER: implement
2
2
full
L3
3
[ "A1" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A1
2
3
full
L2
1
[ "A1", "A2" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A2, A1
2
0
oracle
L3
3
[ "A1" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A1
2
2
oracle
L3
3
[ "A1" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A1
2
3
oracle
L1
0
"implement"
stop
true
ANSWER: implement
2
3
full
L2
2
[ "A1" ]
stop
true
A1 had platform-recorded faults where retries went from 1 to 0, with the escalation threshold crossed. ANSWER: A1
2
3
oracle
L2
2
[ "A1" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A1
2
4
full
L1
0
"implement"
stop
true
ANSWER: implement
2
3
oracle
L2
1
[ "A1", "A2" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A1, A2
2
4
full
L2
1
[ "A1", "A2" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A1, A2
2
4
full
L2
2
[ "A2" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A2
2
4
oracle
L1
0
"implement"
stop
true
ANSWER: implement
2
3
oracle
L3
3
[ "A2" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A2
2
4
oracle
L2
1
[ "A1", "A2" ]
stop
true
onfig.timeout_s = 45 Both A1 and A2 made typed CLAIMs about the same configuration key (`config.timeout_s`) with conflicting values (15 vs 45). ANSWER: A1, A2
2
3
full
L3
3
[ "A2" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A2
2
4
oracle
L2
2
[ "A2" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A2
4
0
full
L1
0
"implement"
stop
true
implement ANSWER: implement
2
4
oracle
L3
3
[ "A2" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A2
4
0
full
L2
2
[ "A1" ]
stop
true
l failed (timeout), retries_remaining=1 - [t=17:01] PLATFORM fault: A1 tool call failed (timeout), retries_remaining=0, escalation threshold crossed ANSWER: A1
4
0
full
L2
1
[ "A2", "A4" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A2, A4
4
0
oracle
L1
0
"implement"
stop
true
ANSWER: implement
4
0
oracle
L2
1
[ "A2", "A4" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A2, A4
4
0
full
L3
3
[ "A2" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A2
4
0
oracle
L2
2
[ "A1" ]
stop
true
t with `retries_remaining=0` occurred for agent A1 at [t=17:01]: "A1 tool call failed (timeout), retries_remaining=0, escalation threshold crossed". ANSWER: A1
4
1
full
L1
0
"test"
stop
true
ANSWER: test
4
1
full
L2
2
[ "A4" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A4
4
1
full
L2
1
[ "A2", "A4" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A4, A2
4
1
oracle
L1
0
"test"
stop
true
ANSWER: test
4
1
oracle
L2
1
[ "A2", "A4" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A4, A2
4
1
oracle
L2
2
[ "A4" ]
stop
true
A4 ANSWER: A4
4
1
oracle
L3
3
[ "A1" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A1
4
1
full
L3
3
[ "A1" ]
stop
true
A1 bound art-A2 v1, which was later superseded by art-A2 v2. ANSWER: A1
4
2
full
L2
2
[ "A1" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A1
4
2
full
L1
0
"test"
stop
true
ANSWER: test
4
2
oracle
L1
0
"test"
stop
true
ANSWER: test
4
2
oracle
L2
1
[ "A2", "A3" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A2, A3
4
2
oracle
L2
2
[ "A1" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A1
4
2
full
L2
1
[ "A2", "A3" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A2, A3
4
3
full
L1
0
"implement"
stop
true
ANSWER: implement
4
3
full
L2
1
[ "A2", "A3" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A3, A2
4
2
oracle
L3
3
[ "A4" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A4
4
3
oracle
L1
0
"implement"
stop
true
ANSWER: implement
4
3
full
L2
2
[ "A4" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A4
4
3
full
L3
3
[ "A4" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A4
4
3
oracle
L2
2
[ "A4" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A4
4
3
oracle
L3
3
[ "A4" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A4
4
4
full
L1
0
"implement"
stop
true
ANSWER: implement
4
4
full
L2
2
[ "A3" ]
stop
true
l failed (timeout), retries_remaining=1 - [t=15:29] PLATFORM fault: A3 tool call failed (timeout), retries_remaining=0, escalation threshold crossed ANSWER: A3
4
4
full
L2
1
[ "A3", "A4" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A3, A4
4
4
oracle
L1
0
"implement"
stop
true
ANSWER: implement
4
0
oracle
L3
3
[ "A2" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A2
4
3
oracle
L2
1
[ "A2", "A3" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A2, A3
4
4
oracle
L2
2
[ "A3" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A3
4
4
oracle
L2
1
[ "A3", "A4" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A3, A4
8
0
full
L1
0
"test"
stop
true
ANSWER: test
8
0
full
L2
2
[ "A3" ]
stop
true
th a recorded fault that left it with no retries (retries_remaining=0), and the escalation threshold was crossed, indicating intervention is needed. ANSWER: A3
8
0
full
L2
1
[ "A5", "A6" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A5, A6
8
0
oracle
L1
0
"test"
stop
true
The last platform record for T5 is at [t=21:28], moving from implement to test. ANSWER: test
8
0
oracle
L2
1
[ "A5", "A6" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A5, A6
8
0
oracle
L2
2
[ "A3" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A3
8
0
full
L3
3
[ "A2" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A2
8
1
full
L1
0
"test"
stop
true
: stage plan -> implement - [t=12:24] PLATFORM task T3 (owner A3): stage implement -> test No further stage transitions for T3 appear after this. ANSWER: test
8
1
full
L2
1
[ "A5", "A8" ]
stop
true
eout_s**: A8 claims 60, A5 claims 45 → **conflict** (different values) - **config.retries**: A4 claims 3, A2 claims 3 → no conflict (same value) ANSWER: A8, A5
8
1
full
L2
2
[ "A8" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A8
8
1
full
L3
3
[ "A5" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A5
8
1
oracle
L1
0
"test"
stop
true
age plan -> implement - [t=12:24] PLATFORM task T3 (owner A3): stage implement -> test No further platform records show T3 advancing beyond test. ANSWER: test
8
1
oracle
L2
1
[ "A5", "A8" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A8, A5
8
1
oracle
L2
2
[ "A8" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A8
8
2
full
L1
0
"implement"
stop
true
ANSWER: implement
4
4
oracle
L3
3
[ "A1" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A1
8
2
full
L2
2
[ "A8" ]
stop
true
A8 had a platform-recorded fault at [t=24:33] with `retries_remaining=0` and the escalation threshold crossed, leaving it with no retries. ANSWER: A8
8
2
full
L2
1
[ "A2", "A8" ]
stop
true
7 and A5 both claim the same value (3) — no conflict. For `config.timeout_s`, A8 claims 90 while A2 claims 15 — these conflict on the same key. ANSWER: A8, A2
8
2
oracle
L1
0
"implement"
stop
true
implement ANSWER: implement
8
1
oracle
L3
3
[ "A5" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A5
8
2
oracle
L2
2
[ "A8" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A8
8
2
oracle
L2
1
[ "A2", "A8" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A8, A2
8
3
full
L1
0
"implement"
stop
true
ANSWER: implement
8
3
full
L2
1
[ "A1", "A7" ]
stop
true
ANSWER: A1, A7
8
3
full
L2
2
[ "A6" ]
stop
true
retries_remaining=0, escalation threshold crossed A6 had its retries depleted to zero and crossed the escalation threshold, requiring intervention. ANSWER: A6
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

Supervisory Capacity Model

Dataset accompanying the paper How Many Agents Can One Supervisor Track? A Mechanistic Capacity Model and Measurement Protocol for LLM-Agent Teams (Human-AI Coevolution Workshop (HAIC) at NeurIPS 2026).

Parameters and outputs of the mechanistic supervisory-capacity model (capacity parameters, service-time variance, simulation curves and summary), the computational probe pilot (per-row results and summary), and the scripts that produce them.

Paper How Many Agents Can One Supervisor Track? A Mechanistic Capacity Model and Measurement Protocol for LLM-Agent Teams
Venue Human-AI Coevolution Workshop (HAIC) at NeurIPS 2026
Authors Carlos Toxtli, Manuel Delaflor
License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (cc-by-4.0); code: MIT License
Dataset DOI 10.5281/zenodo.24179030
Version 1.0.0
Maintainer Human-AI Empowerment Lab, Clemson University

Paper abstract

Agentic deployments can assign many parallel agents to one supervisor without specifying when that supervisor can no longer recover the team's state. Human-factors research already establishes relevant constructs such as situation awareness, span of control, neglect tolerance, and multiple-resource workload, but language-model teams distribute state across text and can fail silently. This position paper translates those constructs into a measurement protocol designed for later calibration to people rather than a new human experiment. Typed event rates, isolated service costs, and a throughput budget define a nominal load-balance index; the midpoint of a separately fitted capacity curve remains an empirical quantity. Synthetic controls recover a known capacity boundary, while a seeded queue shows that deadline pressure can separate the fitted midpoint from nominal load balance. The resulting event ontology, operating envelope, executable stress tests, and preregisterable falsification criteria allow system designers to test staffing or interface interventions within a declared team-monitor channel. They do not turn synthetic behavior into evidence about human or model supervisors.

Dataset structure

Path Format Size Records
code/capacity_parameters.py py 5.6 KB
code/capacity_simulation.py py 9.9 KB
code/make_parameter_table.py py 1.0 KB
code/probe_pilot.py py 10.5 KB
code/service_variance.py py 3.2 KB
data/capacity_parameters.json json 3.5 KB
data/probe_pilot_results.json json 31.5 KB
data/probe_pilot_rows.jsonl jsonl 20.6 KB 120
data/service_variance.json json 828 B
data/simulation_curves.dat dat 281 B
data/simulation_summary.json json 5.1 KB
docs/SUPPLEMENT_README.md md 1.5 KB

12 files, 93.4 KB in total (metadata files excluded). Records are rows for CSV/TSV/JSONL files and list length for JSON arrays.

Loading the data

from datasets import load_dataset

ds = load_dataset("ai4he/supervisory-capacity-model", "probe_pilot_rows")

Available subsets: probe_pilot_rows. All other files can be downloaded with huggingface_hub.snapshot_download or from the Zenodo record.

Known limitations

  • Simulation and computational-pilot data only; the human study the protocol specifies has not been run.

Personal and sensitive information

None.

License

The data and documentation are released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. Source code files (.ipynb, .js, .m, .py, .sh) are released under the MIT License.

Citation

If you use this dataset, please cite the paper:

@inproceedings{Toxtli2026Supervisor,
 title = {How Many Agents Can One Supervisor Track? A Mechanistic Capacity Model and Measurement Protocol for LLM-Agent Teams},
 author = {Toxtli, Carlos and Delaflor, Manuel},
 booktitle = {Human-AI Coevolution: Measuring Human-Agent Teams in the Agentic Era (HAIC) Workshop at NeurIPS 2026},
 address = {Atlanta, GA},
 year = {2026},
 month = dec,
 note = {Workshop paper},
 url = {https://openreview.net/forum?id=czINRnBTpf}
}

and the dataset:

@dataset{Toxtli2026SupervisoryCapacityModelData,
  author = {Toxtli, Carlos and Delaflor, Manuel},
  title = {{Supervisory Capacity Model}: Dataset for ``How Many Agents Can One Supervisor Track? A Mechanistic Capacity Model and Measurement Protocol for LLM-Agent Teams''},
  year = {2026},
  version = {1.0.0},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.24179030},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24179030}
}

Further documentation: docs/SUPPLEMENT_README.md.

Downloads last month
31