IndicBankBench / VALIDATION.md
Anonymous's picture
Release anonymous IndicBankBench dataset
8392da6
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
3.91 kB

Candidate release validation

This candidate snapshot was checked with the compatible anonymous harness using only offline tests and deterministic mock execution.

Dataset checks

  • JSON case files parsed: 799 of 799.
  • Unique non-empty case_id values: 799.
  • Duplicate case_id values: 0.
  • Required-field and tool-contract lint errors: 0.
  • Domains: 6 directory/domain groups (five operational domains plus capability/refusal).
  • Primary axes: 20.
  • Reference tool definitions: 32.
  • Target behaviors: 625 answer, 65 clarify, and 109 decline.
  • Largest case file after packaging: 13,069 bytes.
  • Files requiring Git LFS under common GitHub/Hugging Face limits: 0.
  • Aggregate case-bank SHA-256: 26fed9a4b801dea83defbdd30637d341a32fe0fbe4c57a39ea10d83fc1813956.

The aggregate digest is computed by sorting all case JSON files by POSIX relative path and feeding their raw bytes, without separators, to SHA-256. The value matches meta.json.

Harness checks

  • Fresh editable installation under Python 3.9: passed.
  • Exact outer runtime/test dependency snapshot: 33 packages in the companion code repository's requirements-tested.txt; it matched the verification environment.
  • Dependency consistency and import checks: passed.
  • Unit tests against all packaged cases: 51 passed.
  • Targeted tool-contract tests: 24 passed.
  • Offline scripted smoke case acct.show_mandates.happy.001: passed.
  • Candidate or judge network calls made during tests: none.

Linter findings preserved for review

The case linter scanned all 799 cases with 0 errors, 16 warnings, and 115 informational findings. No benchmark case was changed to suppress these findings.

Warnings:

  • 4 dependency-order warnings in depl.agentic.book_fd.002 and depl.agentic.book_rd.001. The listed gold-call order places a write before declared prerequisites.
  • 9 order-sensitive-list warnings across argument gates.
  • 3 weak-affirmation warnings in depl.create_fd.irrelevant_rag.001, depl.create_fd.irrelevant_rag.002, and depl.create_rd.irrelevant_rag.001; these use the confirmation-judge fallback.

Informational findings comprise 114 deliberate or reviewable null values in visible mock payloads and one duplicated exposed-tool entry in cap.social_engineering.009.

Authoring-metadata removal

Exactly 8,471 approved underscore-prefixed fields were removed recursively: 7,690 _comment, 766 _variant_note, 8 _axis_note, 2 _tool_calls_note, 2 _formula_note, 1 _dependencies_comment, 1 _no_write, and 1 _variant_note_revised.

An invariant comparison against each source JSON object confirmed that no other key, scalar value, object-key order, array length/order, filename, case ID, mock behavior, gold action, grading rule, or case ordering changed. A second parse confirmed that zero approved authoring fields remain. The released cases are semantically equivalent to, but not byte-identical with, the source snapshot.

Identity and secret scan

All proposed dataset release files were scanned for named or institutional identities, identity-bearing repository URLs, local absolute paths, private/internal endpoints, private keys, and high-confidence AWS, GitHub, Hugging Face, OpenAI, Slack, and JWT token formats. No identity, local-path, private-endpoint, credential, or high-confidence secret hits were found.

Localhost matches elsewhere in the code repository are deliberate unauthenticated examples/tests, not private services. The synthetic Gmail value in the case bank is benchmark semantics, not a contributor contact. No dedicated gitleaks, trufflehog, FOSSA, Snyk, or formal legal scan was run.

License scope

CC BY 4.0 applies to the case bank and authored dataset documentation. No third-party model responses, hidden reasoning, transcripts, or judge rationales are included in the anonymous data repository, and no claim is made to relicense such output.