Research-DevIntent / README.md
nv78's picture
Configure dataset viewer splits
00863c0 verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
5.26 kB
---
license: mit
task_categories:
- text-generation
- text-classification
language:
- en
pretty_name: IntentSpec Benchmark
size_categories:
- n<1K
configs:
- config_name: spec_pairs
default: true
data_files:
- split: train
path: spec_pairs.jsonl
- config_name: canonicals
data_files:
- split: train
path: canonicals.jsonl
---
# IntentSpec Benchmark — Data Supplement
This archive contains the benchmark data used to compute Intent Violation
Rate (IVR) in the paper: 49 tasks, each derived from a HumanEval problem and
extended with an ambiguous/gold prompt pair and a decomposed set of
executable constraints.
## Files
### `spec_pairs.jsonl`
The benchmark itself — one JSON object per line, one line per task. This is
the file consumed directly by the evaluation pipeline (`run_experiment1.py`,
`validate_benchmark.py` in the software supplement).
Fields:
| Field | Type | Description |
|---------------------|-----------------|-------------|
| `task_id` | string | HumanEval task identifier, e.g. `"HumanEval/26"`. Matches the `task_id` in `canonicals.jsonl`. |
| `spec_type` | string | Category of the task. Currently always `"algorithm"`. |
| `ambiguous_prompt` | string | The under-specified prompt a developer might plausibly write — states only some of the task's real constraints. |
| `gold_prompt` | string | The fully clarified version of the prompt, stating every constraint explicitly. |
| `constraints` | list of objects | All atomic, executable constraints implied by the gold prompt (see below). |
| `stated_test_ids` | list of strings | IDs (from `constraints`) that are mentioned, even implicitly, in `ambiguous_prompt`. |
| `hidden_test_ids` | list of strings | IDs (from `constraints`) that appear only in `gold_prompt`, not in `ambiguous_prompt`. A solution that passes all `stated_test_ids` but fails one or more `hidden_test_ids` counts as an intent violation — this is what IVR measures. |
Each entry in `constraints` is an object:
| Field | Type | Description |
|---------------|--------|-------------|
| `id` | string | Local constraint identifier (e.g. `"C1"`), referenced by `stated_test_ids`/`hidden_test_ids`. |
| `description` | string | Human-readable statement of the constraint. |
| `test_code` | string | Executable Python snippet that calls `solution(...)` and asserts the constraint holds. Run by concatenating a candidate solution with this snippet and executing it; a zero exit code means the constraint passed. |
Example (abbreviated):
```json
{
"task_id": "HumanEval/26",
"spec_type": "algorithm",
"ambiguous_prompt": "Write a function named `solution` that takes a list of integers and removes any elements that appear more than once.",
"gold_prompt": "Write a function named `solution` that takes a list of integers, removes all elements that occur more than once, preserves the original order of remaining elements, and returns a new list without mutating the input.",
"constraints": [
{"id": "C1", "description": "Elements appearing more than once are removed", "test_code": "result = solution([1, 2, 3, 2, 4])\nassert 2 not in result"},
{"id": "C2", "description": "Original order of remaining elements is preserved", "test_code": "..."},
{"id": "C3", "description": "Input list is not mutated", "test_code": "..."},
{"id": "C4", "description": "Empty list returns empty list", "test_code": "..."}
],
"stated_test_ids": ["C1"],
"hidden_test_ids": ["C2", "C3", "C4"]
}
```
### `canonicals.jsonl`
The original HumanEval reference (gold) solutions that `spec_pairs.jsonl`
was built from. Used for benchmark validation — confirming that a correct,
known-good solution passes every constraint (stated and hidden) for its
task, i.e. that IVR == 0 for canonical solutions.
Fields:
| Field | Type | Description |
|----------------------|--------|-------------|
| `task_id` | string | HumanEval task identifier, matches `spec_pairs.jsonl`. |
| `entry_point` | string | Name of the function under test in the original HumanEval problem. |
| `prompt` | string | Original HumanEval function signature + docstring. |
| `canonical_solution` | string | Original HumanEval reference implementation body. |
| `full_source` | string | `prompt` + `canonical_solution` concatenated into a runnable module. |
## Provenance and licensing
Both files are derived from **HumanEval**
(https://github.com/openai/human-eval), released by OpenAI under the
**MIT License**. `canonicals.jsonl` reproduces HumanEval's original prompts
and reference solutions verbatim (field-renamed for our pipeline).
`spec_pairs.jsonl` is new work built on top of HumanEval: for each of the 49
selected HumanEval tasks, we authored an ambiguous/gold prompt pair and a
decomposed set of constraint tests by hand, using the HumanEval problem
statement and reference solution as the source of ground truth. `task_id`
values (e.g. `"HumanEval/26"`) directly reference the corresponding upstream
HumanEval problem.
This derived data is released under the same MIT License as HumanEval, in
accordance with its terms.