|
Download README.md from apodex/FrontierChallenge: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 5.89 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/apodex/FrontierChallenge/resolve/main/README.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/apodex/FrontierChallenge/README.md
-
curl -L -o README.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/apodex/FrontierChallenge/resolve/main/README.md
5.89 kB
| license: cc-by-4.0 | |
| language: | |
| - en | |
| task_categories: | |
| - other | |
| tags: | |
| - scientific-agents | |
| - benchmark | |
| - evaluation | |
| pretty_name: FrontierChallenge | |
| configs: | |
| - config_name: default | |
| data_files: | |
| - split: train | |
| path: manifest.jsonl | |
| # FrontierChallenge | |
| FrontierChallenge provides **97 scientific workflow tasks** with plaintext | |
| English instructions, inputs, Harbor definitions, domain labels, and the | |
| redistributable open runtime image. | |
| | Path | Contents | | |
| |---|---| | |
| | `manifest.jsonl` | Dataset Viewer rows with task ID, taxonomy, difficulty, runtime, and instruction | | |
| | `tasks/<task-id>/` | `instruction.md`, task metadata, environment definition, and agent-visible inputs | | |
| | `images/` | Verified `linux/amd64` Docker archive for the 81 open-image tasks | | |
| This repository contains no graders, rubrics, fixtures, or reference outputs. | |
| Those are stored as encrypted archives in the separate | |
| [`apodex/FrontierChallenge-reference`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/apodex/FrontierChallenge-reference) | |
| dataset. | |
| Use the [FrontierChallenge runtime](https://github.com/ApodexAI/FrontierAgent/tree/main/benchmarks/frontierchallenge) | |
| to download both datasets, verify their shared registry, load the image archive, | |
| run Harbor, and score a task. The evaluator host needs Python 3.12+ for the | |
| pinned Harbor 0.20.0; task containers keep their own frozen Python versions. | |
| ```bash | |
| git clone https://github.com/ApodexAI/FrontierAgent.git | |
| cd FrontierAgent/benchmarks/frontierchallenge | |
| python3.12 -m venv .venv | |
| source .venv/bin/activate | |
| python -m pip install -e . | |
| HF_TOKEN=hf_... ./scripts/setup.sh --track open | |
| cp .env.example .env | |
| # Fill model and judge credentials in .env before running. | |
| ./scripts/run_eval.sh \ | |
| --agent claude-code --model <model> \ | |
| --include-task-name task_011_cell_migration_wound_healing | |
| ``` | |
| The 16 task definitions that execute ORCA and their inputs are included | |
| normally. ORCA itself and an ORCA-configured image are never distributed; | |
| evaluators obtain ORCA from its official provider and follow the runtime | |
| repository's [local-image tutorial](https://github.com/ApodexAI/FrontierAgent/blob/main/benchmarks/frontierchallenge/docs/providers/orca.md). | |
| Track membership follows what a task executes, not software named in supplied | |
| files. For example, `task_098_orca_claisen_thermochemistry` reads precomputed | |
| ORCA output without running ORCA, so it remains in the open track. | |
| Verify a downloaded solve package with: | |
| ```bash | |
| python tools/verify_dataset.py | |
| ``` | |
| ## Metrics | |
| Official Pass Rate uses a **strict score threshold**: a task passes only when | |
| `evaluation_complete == 1` and valid `task_score > 0.999`. Native per-task | |
| thresholds do not determine this metric. | |
| Use unrounded scores: exactly `0.999` does not pass; `0.9991` and `1.0` pass. | |
| - **Pass Rate (%)** = 100 × number of completed tasks with valid `task_score > 0.999` / 97. | |
| - **Score (0–100)** = 100 × sum of valid, completed `task_score` values / 97. | |
| - Partial credit remains the native rubric score normalized to [0, 1]. | |
| Missing tasks, invalid scores, and incomplete evaluations contribute zero | |
| to the fixed denominator and must be reported separately; incomplete runs | |
| are not final benchmark results. | |
| - Use one predeclared attempt per task. A subset may use its predeclared task | |
| count as denominator, but must be labeled as a subset, not the 97-task result. | |
| There is only one pass field, `passed`, using the same strict threshold in | |
| `reward.json`, `summary.csv`, and `summary.json`. No alternate pass field is | |
| emitted. The runtime applies this rule to the staged reward adapter after | |
| unsealing; encrypted archives and partial-credit rubrics remain unchanged. | |
| The updated runtime also removes native pass decisions from published verifier | |
| diagnostics. Jobs created by older runtimes cannot be resumed under the new | |
| policy: use a fresh job name. Old files are left untouched; summarizing an old | |
| job recomputes the official metric but does not rewrite its logs or rewards. | |
| The summary records `metric_definition: score-gt-0.999`. Historical results | |
| using per-task thresholds, `== 1.0`, or `>= 0.999` must be recomputed from raw | |
| scores before comparison. See the | |
| [scoring guide](https://github.com/ApodexAI/FrontierAgent/blob/main/benchmarks/frontierchallenge/docs/scoring.md) | |
| and [runtime update](https://github.com/ApodexAI/FrontierAgent/pull/30). | |
| **Runtime rollout:** the runtime update is pending. Before reporting results, | |
| check that your summary records `metric_definition: score-gt-0.999`; | |
| older runtimes use the legacy rule. Use the runtime summary for the fixed | |
| 97-task denominator; Harbor may aggregate only attempted trials. | |
| ## Integrity | |
| The root `README.md` is a mutable dataset card and is intentionally outside | |
| `checksums.sha256`. Task files (including task-level READMEs), manifests, | |
| registries, and verification tools remain checksummed. Payload changes require | |
| regenerating their checksum entries; editing this card does not. | |
| ## Citation | |
| ```bibtex | |
| @misc{apodex11, | |
| title = {Apodex 1.1: Scaling Agentic Intelligence for Complex Work}, | |
| author = {{Apodex Team}}, | |
| year = {2026}, | |
| eprint = {2608.23283}, | |
| archivePrefix = {arXiv}, | |
| primaryClass = {cs.AI}, | |
| url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.23283} | |
| } | |
| @misc{frontierchallenge, | |
| title = {FrontierChallenge: Evaluating Scientific Workflow Completion}, | |
| author = {Liangcai Su and Zhaopeng Feng and Zhuo Chen and Zhen Zhang | |
| and Xiang Lin and Ruilin Li and Handuo Zhang and Ning Wang | |
| and Kailong Wen and Yueqi Guo and Feng Xing and Yiling Guo | |
| and Chenxiong Qian and Simon Shaolei Du and Lidong Bing | |
| and Xinyu Wang}, | |
| year = {2026}, | |
| eprint = {2608.24979}, | |
| archivePrefix = {arXiv}, | |
| primaryClass = {cs.AI}, | |
| url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.24979} | |
| } | |
| ``` | |