Datasets:
Tasks:
Text Classification
Modalities:
Text
Formats:
parquet
Languages:
English
Size:
10K - 100K
License:
Changed some dataset card phrasings for consistency.
#2
by bertaTorrents - opened
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -5,6 +5,11 @@ dataset_info:
|
|
| 5 |
dtype: string
|
| 6 |
- name: label
|
| 7 |
dtype: string
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
license: apache-2.0
|
| 9 |
task_categories:
|
| 10 |
- text-classification
|
|
@@ -20,22 +25,23 @@ source_datasets:
|
|
| 20 |
language_creators:
|
| 21 |
- found
|
| 22 |
annotations_creators:
|
| 23 |
-
-
|
| 24 |
size_categories:
|
| 25 |
- 10K<n<100K
|
| 26 |
---
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
# Dataset Card for Email Classification Dataset
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-
The Email Classification Dataset contains **10,900 English
|
|
|
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
## Dataset Details
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
### Dataset Description
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-
This dataset contains 10,900 English
|
| 37 |
The dataset is split into train (8,175 rows, 75%) and test (2,725 rows, 25%) splits. It
|
| 38 |
-
contains two columns: `text` (full
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
- **Curated by:** FIB-UPC MDS students, see [Dataset Card Contact](#dataset-card-contact). Source data by [Deysi](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Deysi/spam-detection-dataset).
|
| 41 |
- **Language(s) (NLP):** English
|
|
@@ -51,8 +57,8 @@ Due to the original dataset lacking a dataset card, the sources that originated
|
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
### Direct Use
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
-
- **Binary
|
| 55 |
-
- **Raw Text for LLM Training:** The `text` column provides raw English
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
| 58 |
|
|
@@ -67,12 +73,12 @@ Each instance contains the following fields:
|
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
| Field | Type | Description |
|
| 69 |
|-------|------|-------------|
|
| 70 |
-
| `text` | `string` | Full
|
| 71 |
| `label` | `string` | Binary label `spam` or `not_spam` |
|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
Example:
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
-
```
|
| 76 |
{
|
| 77 |
"text": "Get rich quick! Make millions in just days with our new and revolutionary system! Don't miss out on this amazing opportunity!",
|
| 78 |
"label": "spam"
|
|
@@ -87,13 +93,24 @@ Example:
|
|
| 87 |
| `test` | 2,725 | 25% |
|
| 88 |
| **Total** | **10,900** | **100%** |
|
| 89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 90 |
## Dataset Creation
|
| 91 |
|
| 92 |
### Curation Rationale
|
| 93 |
|
| 94 |
-
The dataset was
|
| 95 |
-
|
| 96 |
-
|
| 97 |
|
| 98 |
### Source Data
|
| 99 |
|
|
@@ -104,7 +121,7 @@ containing 10,900 English emails with binary spam/not_spam labels.
|
|
| 104 |
|
| 105 |
#### Who are the source data producers?
|
| 106 |
|
| 107 |
-
The
|
| 108 |
|
| 109 |
### Annotations
|
| 110 |
|
|
@@ -114,16 +131,16 @@ The annotation process for the binary labels is unknown.
|
|
| 114 |
|
| 115 |
#### Who are the annotators?
|
| 116 |
|
| 117 |
-
|
| 118 |
|
| 119 |
-
###
|
| 120 |
|
| 121 |
-
|
| 122 |
-
|
| 123 |
|
| 124 |
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 125 |
|
| 126 |
-
- **Synthetic spam style.**
|
| 127 |
- **Temporal drift.** Dataset likely reflects spam patterns from its original (and unknown) collection period. Current spam tactics may differ.
|
| 128 |
- **English-only.** No multilingual coverage. Performance on non-English email is not tested and likely to be worse.
|
| 129 |
|
|
@@ -131,30 +148,39 @@ No PII audit was performed. Use with care. Do not try to identify individuals.
|
|
| 131 |
|
| 132 |
Users should be made aware of the risks, biases, and limitations of the dataset. Specifically, users should:
|
| 133 |
|
| 134 |
-
-
|
| 135 |
- Be aware that temporal and linguistic biases may limit applicability to other contexts.
|
| 136 |
|
| 137 |
## Citation
|
| 138 |
|
| 139 |
**BibTeX:**
|
| 140 |
|
| 141 |
-
|
| 142 |
-
|
| 143 |
-
|
| 144 |
-
|
| 145 |
-
year = {2026},
|
| 146 |
publisher = {Hugging Face},
|
| 147 |
-
url
|
| 148 |
}
|
| 149 |
-
```
|
| 150 |
|
| 151 |
**APA:**
|
| 152 |
|
| 153 |
> Aguilera, C., Bueno, A., Delgado, J., Torrents, B., & Velilla, D. (2026). Email Classification Dataset. Hugging Face. https://huggingface.co/datasets/diegovelilla/email-classification-dataset
|
| 154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 155 |
## Dataset Card Contact
|
| 156 |
|
| 157 |
-
|
| 158 |
|
| 159 |
- [Carles Aguilera](https://github.com/carles-aguilera-pilo)
|
| 160 |
- [Alex Bueno](https://github.com/AlexBuenoL)
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
dtype: string
|
| 6 |
- name: label
|
| 7 |
dtype: string
|
| 8 |
+
splits:
|
| 9 |
+
- name: train
|
| 10 |
+
num_examples: 8175
|
| 11 |
+
- name: test
|
| 12 |
+
num_examples: 2725
|
| 13 |
license: apache-2.0
|
| 14 |
task_categories:
|
| 15 |
- text-classification
|
|
|
|
| 25 |
language_creators:
|
| 26 |
- found
|
| 27 |
annotations_creators:
|
| 28 |
+
- found
|
| 29 |
size_categories:
|
| 30 |
- 10K<n<100K
|
| 31 |
---
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
# Dataset Card for Email Classification Dataset
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
+
The Email Classification Dataset contains **10,900 English texts** labelled as `spam` or `not_spam`.
|
| 36 |
+
It is used as training and evaluation data for the spam detection component of the MLOps course project at FIB-UPC.
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
## Dataset Details
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
### Dataset Description
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
+
This dataset contains 10,900 English messages for text classification tasks.
|
| 43 |
The dataset is split into train (8,175 rows, 75%) and test (2,725 rows, 25%) splits. It
|
| 44 |
+
contains two columns: `text` (full message content) and `label` (binary label [spam, not_spam]).
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
- **Curated by:** FIB-UPC MDS students, see [Dataset Card Contact](#dataset-card-contact). Source data by [Deysi](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Deysi/spam-detection-dataset).
|
| 47 |
- **Language(s) (NLP):** English
|
|
|
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
### Direct Use
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
+
- **Binary spam classification:** The `label` column supports training and evaluating models that distinguish spam from legitimate (ham) messages.
|
| 61 |
+
- **Raw Text for LLM Training:** The `text` column provides raw English messages content suitable for language model pre-training or fine-tuning.
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
| 64 |
|
|
|
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
| Field | Type | Description |
|
| 75 |
|-------|------|-------------|
|
| 76 |
+
| `text` | `string` | Full message text |
|
| 77 |
| `label` | `string` | Binary label `spam` or `not_spam` |
|
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
Example:
|
| 80 |
|
| 81 |
+
```json
|
| 82 |
{
|
| 83 |
"text": "Get rich quick! Make millions in just days with our new and revolutionary system! Don't miss out on this amazing opportunity!",
|
| 84 |
"label": "spam"
|
|
|
|
| 93 |
| `test` | 2,725 | 25% |
|
| 94 |
| **Total** | **10,900** | **100%** |
|
| 95 |
|
| 96 |
+
The split was inherited unchanged from the source dataset.
|
| 97 |
+
|
| 98 |
+
### Label Distribution
|
| 99 |
+
|
| 100 |
+
| Label | Train | Test | Total |
|
| 101 |
+
|-------|-------|------|-------|
|
| 102 |
+
| `spam` | TODO | TODO | TODO |
|
| 103 |
+
| `not_spam` | TODO | TODO | TODO |
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
Text length ranges from TODO to approximately TODO characters.
|
| 106 |
+
|
| 107 |
## Dataset Creation
|
| 108 |
|
| 109 |
### Curation Rationale
|
| 110 |
|
| 111 |
+
The dataset was selected to train the spam detection component of the MLOps course project in the Master in Data Science at FIB-UPC.
|
| 112 |
+
It provides binary spam labels in English with a predefined train and test split. The source dataset was published without documentation.
|
| 113 |
+
It was therefore republished under the team's account with a dataset card that documents its content, limitations and intended use within the project.
|
| 114 |
|
| 115 |
### Source Data
|
| 116 |
|
|
|
|
| 121 |
|
| 122 |
#### Who are the source data producers?
|
| 123 |
|
| 124 |
+
The source dataset was published on Hugging Face by the user Deysi. Its dataset card provides no information about the origin of the data.
|
| 125 |
|
| 126 |
### Annotations
|
| 127 |
|
|
|
|
| 131 |
|
| 132 |
#### Who are the annotators?
|
| 133 |
|
| 134 |
+
The annotators of the binary labels are not documented in the source dataset.
|
| 135 |
|
| 136 |
+
### Personal and Sensitive Information
|
| 137 |
|
| 138 |
+
Anonymization not documented in the original dataset. However, the `not_spam` instances seem to be public forum posts. Some of them contain URLs, organisation names and details that authors disclosed about themselves, such as their employer or field of study.
|
| 139 |
+
The `spam` instances appear to be synthetic and are not expected to contain real personal data. No anonymisation or PII audit was performed on the texts.
|
| 140 |
|
| 141 |
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 142 |
|
| 143 |
+
- **Synthetic spam style.** Spam texts contain exaggerated, promotional language that may not reflect real-world phishing tactics. Models trained on this dataset may not generalize to real-life spam.
|
| 144 |
- **Temporal drift.** Dataset likely reflects spam patterns from its original (and unknown) collection period. Current spam tactics may differ.
|
| 145 |
- **English-only.** No multilingual coverage. Performance on non-English email is not tested and likely to be worse.
|
| 146 |
|
|
|
|
| 148 |
|
| 149 |
Users should be made aware of the risks, biases, and limitations of the dataset. Specifically, users should:
|
| 150 |
|
| 151 |
+
- Validate models trained on this dataset on real email data before using them for email filtering, as neither the domain nor the spam style may generalize.
|
| 152 |
- Be aware that temporal and linguistic biases may limit applicability to other contexts.
|
| 153 |
|
| 154 |
## Citation
|
| 155 |
|
| 156 |
**BibTeX:**
|
| 157 |
|
| 158 |
+
@misc{email_classification_2026,
|
| 159 |
+
author = {Aguilera, Carles and Bueno, Alex and Delgado, Joel and Torrents, Berta and Velilla, Diego},
|
| 160 |
+
title = {Email Classification Dataset},
|
| 161 |
+
year = {2026},
|
|
|
|
| 162 |
publisher = {Hugging Face},
|
| 163 |
+
url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/diegovelilla/email-classification-dataset}
|
| 164 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 165 |
|
| 166 |
**APA:**
|
| 167 |
|
| 168 |
> Aguilera, C., Bueno, A., Delgado, J., Torrents, B., & Velilla, D. (2026). Email Classification Dataset. Hugging Face. https://huggingface.co/datasets/diegovelilla/email-classification-dataset
|
| 169 |
|
| 170 |
+
Users of this dataset should also acknowledge the source dataset, [Deysi/spam-detection-dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Deysi/spam-detection-dataset).
|
| 171 |
+
|
| 172 |
+
## Glossary
|
| 173 |
+
|
| 174 |
+
- **Spam:** Unsolicited message, usually with promotional or fraudulent intent.
|
| 175 |
+
- **Ham:** Legitimate message that is not spam. It corresponds to the `not_spam` label.
|
| 176 |
+
|
| 177 |
+
## More Information
|
| 178 |
+
|
| 179 |
+
The code and documentation of the project are available in the team's repository, https://github.com/mlops-2627q1-mds-upc/MLOps-Datatouille.git
|
| 180 |
+
|
| 181 |
## Dataset Card Contact
|
| 182 |
|
| 183 |
+
Questions about the dataset can be addressed to TODO. The project was carried out by the following team members.
|
| 184 |
|
| 185 |
- [Carles Aguilera](https://github.com/carles-aguilera-pilo)
|
| 186 |
- [Alex Bueno](https://github.com/AlexBuenoL)
|