Datasets:

docketx
/

us-caselaw-ok

id string	doc_type string	jurisdiction string	title string	text string	source string	license string	retrieved_at timestamp[s]	court string	date timestamp[s]	extra dict
3acce8cde4814b04	opinion	ok	State v. One 1965 Red Chevrolet Pickup, VIN/C1445S172380	OPALA, J. ¶ 1 The dispositive issue presented on cer-tiorari is whether the legislative exemption of certain automobiles from forced sale (upon execution or other court-issued process) for satisfaction of a debt bars the State from invoking in this case the statute that authorizes the forfeiture of prope...	cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/2602352	public-domain-edict-of-government	2026-06-30T00:00:00	ok-okla	2001-10-09T00:00:00	{ "cl_opinion_id": "2602352", "cluster_id": "2602352", "opinion_type": "010combined", "text_kind": "html_with_citations", "source_label": "courtlistener" }
7f148cc508240c11	opinion	ok	Fent v. Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority	¶ 1 KAUGER, J. with whom SUMMERS, C.J. and WATT, J. join, concurring specially: ¶2 I agree with the majority that the proposed bond issues are constitutional within the meaning of the Okla. Const, art. 5, § 33 1 and art. 10, §§ 23, 2 24 3 and 25. 4 I also acknowledge that the language contained in *211 the ...	cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/9793101	public-domain-edict-of-government	2026-06-30T00:00:00	ok-okla	1999-07-08T00:00:00	{ "cl_opinion_id": "9793101", "cluster_id": "2614544", "opinion_type": "030concurrence", "text_kind": "html_with_citations", "source_label": "courtlistener" }
82a07a8a4b6b96a0	opinion	ok	Fent v. Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority	PER CURIAM: ¶ 1 Under 73 O.S.1991, § 160, this Court is given exclusive original jurisdiction to determine the validity of bond issues proposed by respondent, Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority (OCIA). Petitioners, Jerry R. Fent and Margaret B. Fent (husband and wife), two resident taxpayers and registered vot...	cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/9793100	public-domain-edict-of-government	2026-06-30T00:00:00	ok-okla	1999-07-08T00:00:00	{ "cl_opinion_id": "9793100", "cluster_id": "2614544", "opinion_type": "020lead", "text_kind": "html_with_citations", "source_label": "courtlistener" }
255f3a888f02de99	opinion	ok	SANDERS v. RIVER PARKS AUTHORITY	OPINION BY JERRY L. GOODMAN, CHIEF JUDGE: ¶ 1, James Lloyd Bogdanieh Sanders, an individual, and Lee Clack, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of George R. Bogdanieh (collectively “Plaintiffs”), appeal a February 19, 2016, order granting the River Parks Authority’s (RPA) mot...	cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/4108243	public-domain-edict-of-government	2026-06-30T00:00:00	ok-oklacivapp	2016-11-18T00:00:00	{ "cl_opinion_id": "4108243", "cluster_id": "4330982", "opinion_type": "010combined", "text_kind": "html_with_citations", "source_label": "courtlistener" }
4ff975374535c88c	opinion	ok	Haenchen v. Sand Products Co., Inc.	BOYDSTON, Judge. This is an appeal by Fred Haenchen from the trial court’s decision to sustain a demurrer at the close of his case-in-chief. The case was a nuisance action brought to recover damages to farm land and to abate flooding allegedly caused by adjacent landowner’s earthen dam. The trial judge g...	cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/2613659	public-domain-edict-of-government	2026-06-30T00:00:00	ok-oklacivapp	1981-03-26T00:00:00	{ "cl_opinion_id": "2613659", "cluster_id": "2613659", "opinion_type": "010combined", "text_kind": "html_with_citations", "source_label": "courtlistener" }
f3daba9609c5f5a9	opinion	ok	Ex Parte Smith	DOYLE, P. J. In this proceeding petitioner by his counsel, Jeff D. McLendon, presented to this court on April 1, 1920, a petition alleging that he is unlawfully imprisoned in the state penitentiary at McAlester and restrained of his liberty by Fred .Switzer, warden of said institution; that said imprison...	cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/3833304	public-domain-edict-of-government	2026-06-30T00:00:00	ok-oklacrimapp	1920-07-20T00:00:00	{ "cl_opinion_id": "3833304", "cluster_id": "4075214", "opinion_type": "020lead", "text_kind": "html_with_citations", "source_label": "courtlistener" }
dce4ccaa3ecd6ec2	opinion	ok	State Ex Rel. Rucker v. Tapp	380 P.2d 260 (1963) STATE of Oklahoma ex rel. William W. RUCKER, Petitioner, v. Hon. G. Michael TAPP, Assuming to Act as Judge of the Purported Superior Court of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, Respondent, Hon. Raymond A. Trapp, Judge of the Superior Court of Kay County, Oklahoma, Intervenor-Respondent. No...	cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/1198342	public-domain-edict-of-government	2026-06-30T00:00:00	ok-okla	1963-02-19T00:00:00	{ "cl_opinion_id": "1198342", "cluster_id": "1198342", "opinion_type": "010combined", "text_kind": "html_with_citations", "source_label": "courtlistener" }
27f428151e5ea025	opinion	ok	Oklahoma City v. State Industrial Com.	PER CURIAM. On rehearing, attention is called to the opinion of this court in Maryland Casualty Co. et al. v. Stevenson, 143 Okla. 285 , 288 Pac. 954 , as being directly in conflict with the opinion “in this case. It is here asserted that subdivision 5, section 7284, C. O. S. 1921, reading as follows...	cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/3833525	public-domain-edict-of-government	2026-06-30T00:00:00	ok-okla	1931-04-28T00:00:00	{ "cl_opinion_id": "3833525", "cluster_id": "4075422", "opinion_type": "020lead", "text_kind": "html_with_citations", "source_label": "courtlistener" }
42ce8452c3481266	opinion	ok	Thomas v. Darks	LESTER, J. The parties to this action will be referred to as they appeared in the district court. Plaintiffs commenced this action by filing their petition in the district court of Hughes county, Okla. Upon trial plaintiffs recovered a judgment against the defendant quieting title to the land in question...	cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/3833527	public-domain-edict-of-government	2026-06-30T00:00:00	ok-okla	1927-06-21T00:00:00	{ "cl_opinion_id": "3833527", "cluster_id": "4075424", "opinion_type": "020lead", "text_kind": "html_with_citations", "source_label": "courtlistener" }
8df9112faf59096d	opinion	ok	Damaras v. Dance	PER CURIAM. This was an action in replevin for a frigidaire or the value thereof in the sum of $152.17, the amount due on an installment contract. There was no defense at the trial of the cause other than some testimony introduced by the plaintiff in error, defendant below, relative to some payments. ...	cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/3833528	public-domain-edict-of-government	2026-06-30T00:00:00	ok-okla	1933-06-06T00:00:00	{ "cl_opinion_id": "3833528", "cluster_id": "4075425", "opinion_type": "020lead", "text_kind": "html_with_citations", "source_label": "courtlistener" }
16384845087fc60d	opinion	ok	Stott v. State	CHAPPELL, J. This case was prosecuted in the district court of Cotton county, Oklahoma, upon information filed 'by the county attorney, in which it is alleged that on the 9th day of July, 1926, Ed Stott, plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, did then and there willfully, unlawfully, wrongfull...	cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/3833531	public-domain-edict-of-government	2026-06-30T00:00:00	ok-oklacrimapp	1929-09-14T00:00:00	{ "cl_opinion_id": "3833531", "cluster_id": "4075427", "opinion_type": "020lead", "text_kind": "html_with_citations", "source_label": "courtlistener" }
3f2a94e5f4608b0a	opinion	ok	Fuller & Fuller Co. v. Johnson	-Opinion of the court by Irwin, J.: The first error assigned by the plaintiff in -error, upon which a reversal of the case is asked, is that the statute of limitations invoked by the defendant in his answer does not apply to this case, for the reason that the statute of 1890 was superseded and rep...	cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/3833469	public-domain-edict-of-government	2026-06-30T00:00:00	ok-okla	1899-08-24T00:00:00	{ "cl_opinion_id": "3833469", "cluster_id": "4075369", "opinion_type": "020lead", "text_kind": "html_with_citations", "source_label": "courtlistener" }
2012226ad4f3816b	opinion	ok	Lee v. Ellis	Opinion of the court by Reauoi-iaMP, J.: This case involves the question as to' whether one who made the race into the Cherokee outlet on September 16,1893, from the Chilocco Indian School Reservation, is a “sooner”, and therefore disqualified to make homestead entry on any of the lands thrown ope...	cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/3833472	public-domain-edict-of-government	2026-06-30T00:00:00	ok-okla	1905-09-06T00:00:00	{ "cl_opinion_id": "3833472", "cluster_id": "4075372", "opinion_type": "020lead", "text_kind": "html_with_citations", "source_label": "courtlistener" }

End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

Oklahoma Case Law

Code & tools: github.com/docketx — legal-scrambler pseudonymises a case file on your own hardware before a frontier model sees it; claude-for-legal is the Claude Code plugin (docketx-open-law) that loads these datasets and checks citations against them.

Source & credit — Free Law Project / CourtListener

Every opinion in this dataset comes from the Free Law Project / CourtListener bulk export of 2026-06-30 (10,798,347 opinions). CourtListener gathered, cleaned, deduplicated and published that record; Free Law Project — the 501(c)(3) non-profit behind it, building free public access to American law since 2010 — pays for it. We sliced and reformatted; they did the hard part. Go to the source: https://www.courtlistener.com.

Free Law Project is a non-profit, and it is worth supporting: https://free.law/donate/. If this data is useful to you, credit Free Law Project and CourtListener too, and consider going straight to the source: CourtListener runs its own API and MCP server.

Full text of 81,558 Oklahoma appellate opinion documents from the public record, sliced from the Free Law Project / CourtListener bulk export of 2026-06-30.

Court coverage (3 court ids, explicit allowlist — never prefix-matched): okla, oklacivapp, oklacrimapp.

Lead opinions and separate opinions; documents under 1 characters excluded. Slice sha256 71343b0393d3db31ce6eb282b4a27ead0f2a92acaed39edc1042ffdb761d2bf5 (also in slice.manifest.json).

Composition

Measured on this exact slice: 70,515 documents (86.5%) carry 2,000+ characters of text, 10,522 (12.9%) carry 200-1,999, and 521 (0.6%) are under 200 characters. The short ones are real records, not errors: certiorari denials, one-line orders, and judgment entries. They are kept deliberately (min_chars = 1) so this is the complete public record rather than a filtered subset. Filter on len(text) if you want only substantive opinions.

Format

Rows follow docketx record v1 (one opinion per line): id, doc_type, jurisdiction, title, text, source, license, retrieved_at, plus citation, court, date, and extra (CourtListener opinion/cluster ids, opinion type). The same format is used across every docketx dataset.

Provenance and license

Judicial opinions are edicts of government: uncopyrightable works of the public domain (Banks v. Manchester, 128 U.S. 244 (1888); Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 590 U.S. 255 (2020)). This packaging is released under CC0 1.0. Source: CourtListener bulk export (2026-06-30), Free Law Project — https://free.law. This dataset redistributes public-domain court text; it adds no annotation and asserts no rights.

Load it

from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("docketx/us-caselaw-ok")

Part of the DocketRouter legal corpora: https://huggingface.co/docketx

Downloads last month: 156