rezonans-problem-space / problems /recursive-definitions.md
eminakdas's picture
Publish Rezonans research problem-space v0.2.0
da1f002 verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
2.37 kB

Unfolding definitions without hiding cycles

How can a vocabulary be unfolded through its own definitions without concealing circularity?

Expose definitions that reuse other defined objects, and compare compact names with recursively substituted forms.

Status: open problem. Formulation and comparisons: reconstruction. Development: historical branch.

Alternative representations

Named concepts

Affords: Keeps a large definition compact.

Limits or losses: Dependencies remain implicit.

Substituted definitions

Affords: Makes reused definitions visible.

Limits or losses: Recursive substitution may never terminate or may erase useful distinctions.

Tension

Unfolding can clarify a concept or merely move its circularity out of sight.

Challenge

What marks an unresolved cycle, and when is a cycle a valid recursive definition?

This challenge is an editorial prompt, not a claim that the evidence already resolved it.

Proposed next move

Unfold a small vocabulary with a depth bound and explicit cycle markers; compare readers’ interpretations.

Status: new model-proposed experiment or extension; not a reported result.

Related problems

  • One structure, several renderings — opens a local operation (corpus_evidence). Changing the representation included substituting defined objects with their definitions.
  • The next description becomes another object — exposes a recurrence (retrospective_connection). A definition can become an object for another definition; the analogy does not equate linguistic circularity with every formal limit.

Evidence anchors

  • basis-recursive-definitions: The material asks to identify defined objects that appear inside other definitions and replace their names with their definitions. A separate methodological question asks whether internal variants of an idea can help challenge it alongside opposing ideas. [Editorial paraphrase; presence of a proposal does not verify its truth.]

Root evidence and private recovery mappings are not part of this public release.

Open in the reader · All problems

Research editions