thanhdath's picture
Update README.md
feb4086 verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
3.32 kB
metadata
license: cc-by-4.0
language:
  - en
tags:
  - text-to-sql
  - schema-linking
pretty_name: GRAST-SL evaluation sets
configs:
  - config_name: spider_dev
    data_files: evaluation_set/spider_dev.csv
  - config_name: bird_dev
    data_files: evaluation_set/bird_dev.csv
  - config_name: spider2_lite_256
    data_files: evaluation_set/spider2_lite_256.csv
  - config_name: spider2_snow_256
    data_files: evaluation_set/spider2_snow_256.csv
  - config_name: spider_dev_case_by_case
    data_files: comparison_with_prior_golds/spider_dev_case_by_case.parquet
  - config_name: bird_dev_case_by_case
    data_files: comparison_with_prior_golds/bird_dev_case_by_case.parquet
  - config_name: spider_dev_label_errors
    data_files: comparison_with_prior_golds/spider_dev_label_errors.parquet
  - config_name: bird_dev_label_errors
    data_files: comparison_with_prior_golds/bird_dev_label_errors.parquet
  - config_name: summary_statistics
    data_files: comparison_with_prior_golds/summary_statistics.parquet

GRAST-SL evaluation sets

Schema-linking evaluation sets of the paper "Scaling Text2SQL via LLM-efficient Schema Filtering with Functional Dependency Graph Rerankers".

Structure

evaluation_set/
  spider_dev.csv         1,034 questions - question, gold SQL, gold columns
  bird_dev.csv           1,534 questions
  spider2_lite_256.csv     256 instances (Spider 2.0-Lite)
  spider2_snow_256.csv     256 instances (Spider 2.0-Snow)
  check_gold.py          gold-error checker: every gold set non-empty and
                         every gold column present in the database schema
                         (all four sets pass with 0 errors)
schemas/                 full schema list per database (db_id -> columns);
                         join on each row's db_id to get the schema of that
                         sample; what check_gold.py validates against
comparison_with_prior_golds/
  {spider,bird}_dev_case_by_case.parquet   per-question comparison with the prior
                                           released gold labels (lexical matching);
                                           error columns first
  {spider,bird}_dev_label_errors.parquet   one row per wrong gold column + reason
  summary_statistics.parquet               aggregate numbers

How the gold was built

One pipeline for all three benchmarks:

  • Spider / BIRD: released gold SQL + schema → o4-mini extracts used columns → post-processing: gold ⊆ schema (0 invalid) → no empty gold set → parser cross-check → PK convention for star-only tables → per-instance audit.
  • Spider 2.0 (Lite / Snow): shard-table grouping (events_20201101, … → events_*) → same steps as above.

check_gold.py re-verifies gold ⊆ schema and non-emptiness from the shipped files. Prior released Spider/BIRD golds used lexical name matching (a name is credited to every table containing it) — the case-by-case CSVs list each resulting error.

Citation

@article{hoang2025scaling,
  title={Scaling Text2SQL via LLM-efficient Schema Filtering with Functional Dependency Graph Rerankers},
  author={Hoang, Thanh Dat and Nguyen, Thanh Tam and Huynh, Thanh Trung and Yin, Hongzhi and Nguyen, Quoc Viet Hung},
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.16083},
  year={2025}
}

Code: https://github.com/thanhdath/grast-sql