Request access to RoboCap-10k
Please tell us a bit about yourself and how you plan to use the data. We review access requests within 2-3 business days.
Grounded Superintelligence will use the information you provide to evaluate and manage dataset access, understand the RoboCap-10k community, and contact you about your request. RoboCap-10k is released under CC BY 4.0, which permits research and commercial use with attribution.
Log in or Sign Up to review the conditions and access this dataset content.
RoboCap-10k: A Metrically Accurate Egocentric Dataset for Robot Learning
10,000 curated hours of unscripted egocentric manipulation, recorded while people did their paid jobs, with metric 3D head and hand poses and two levels of language annotations.
Data Bucket · Paper · Grounded Superintelligence
Data location: RoboCap-10k is distributed through the groundedsi/RoboCap-10k Bucket. This repository holds the dataset card and the access request form; download the data from the Bucket. Once your request is approved, you can read from the Bucket with your Hugging Face account.
Overview
RoboCap-10k is a single-device, egocentric corpus of real occupational work for training robot policies and world models. It contains 10,000 hours (1,363,915 episodes) across 21 industry verticals, 365 site types, and 619 distinct tasks, recorded in 11 countries, including India, Nigeria, Colombia, the United States, the United Kingdom, Mexico, Chile and Spain.
Every hour was recorded on the same device, the RoboCap: a 250 g hat with six synchronized global-shutter cameras and two IMUs. Every hour was also processed by the same 3D pipeline, so there is no domain shift between devices in either the images or the quality of the 3D labels.
| Hours | 10,000 (curated; wall-clock capture time) |
| Episodes | 1,363,915 (10–600 s; median 17.8 s, mean 26.4 s) |
| Synchronized timesteps | ~1.08 × 10⁹ |
| Camera frames | ~6.5 × 10⁹ (6 streams) |
| Industry verticals / site types / tasks | 21 / 365 / 619 |
| Skill groups | 14 |
| Devices | 214 |
| Video size | ~108 TB (H.265) |
| Audio | None recorded |
What makes it different
- Calibrated stereo on every hour. Each recording session is recalibrated online, which brings every released device below 1 px of average Sampson error (median 0.63 px on the front pair, 0.60 px on the eye pair).
- Metric 6-DoF head pose. Head trajectories are gravity-aligned and come from multi-camera visual-inertial SLAM with offline bundle adjustment. Median ATE against motion capture is 3.0 mm.
- World-frame 3D hands. Both hands have MANO parameters and 21 keypoints from a multi-view hand tracker. PA-MPJPE against motion capture is 4.5 mm.
- Two levels of language. Each interval has one sparse caption, and dense sub-task captions are segmented in time within it.
- Real occupational work. Examples include bread production, industrial garment stitching, engine and motorcycle repair, PCB soldering, rebar tying and onion harvesting.
- Raw streams included. The synchronized raw streams are released alongside the labels, so the labels can be audited and regenerated as methods improve.
Capture device: RoboCap
| Subsystem | Optics / FoV | Baseline / Overlap | Rate / Sync |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front stereo | Fisheye, 180° × 112° | 86.8 mm (157° overlap) | 1080p @ 30 Hz, HW trigger |
| Eye stereo | Fisheye, 180° × 112° | 106.2 mm (154° overlap) | 1080p @ 30 Hz, HW trigger |
| Lateral (2×) | Wide-angle, 161° × 98° | 85° off-axis, 30° down | 1080p @ 30 Hz, HW trigger |
| IMUs (2×) | 6-axis, crown sides | Cam–IMU ≤ 3 ms | 200 Hz |
| Clock | 24 MHz TCXO | 1-to-6 PWM | ±1.81 ppm |
All cameras are global-shutter, 10-bit RGB, with f ≈ 590–630 px. One PWM signal triggers all six cameras, so their frames are captured at the same instant.
Data format
Every episode comes in two formats.
1. LeRobot format (for training)
- Each camera is an H.265-encoded MP4.
- Per-frame data is stored in Parquet tables indexed by frame:
- SLAM head pose (6-DoF, metric, gravity-aligned world frame)
- MANO parameters and 21 keypoints (16 joints + 5 fingertips) for both hands, in the world frame
- IMU readings
2. Rerun recording (.rrd, for inspection)
- Shows the six camera streams, the head trajectory and the hand meshes in one shared 3D world frame on a common timeline.
Each episode also includes:
- Factory and online-corrected intrinsics and extrinsics
- A JSON sidecar with taxonomy labels, sparse and dense captions, and per-session quality statistics
All streams share one device clock, so video frames, poses and captions line up frame for frame.
Data access
The full dataset (~108 TB) is hosted in a Hugging Face Storage Bucket:
hf://buckets/groundedsi/RoboCap-10k.
1. Request access with the form at the top of this page. After your request is approved, install and authenticate the Hugging Face CLI with the account you used to request access:
pip install -U huggingface_hub lerobot
hf auth login
2. Inspect the available prefixes:
hf buckets list groundedsi/RoboCap-10k -h -R
The Bucket is large and may be updated over time, so its current file listing is the source of truth for published prefixes.
3. Stream the full dataset (recommended):
from lerobot.datasets import StreamingLeRobotDataset
ds = StreamingLeRobotDataset("groundedsi/RoboCap-10k", repo_type="bucket")
for frame in ds:
...
Train with streaming:
lerobot-train \
--dataset.repo_id=groundedsi/RoboCap-10k \
--dataset.repo_type=bucket \
--dataset.streaming=true \
...
4. Download a selected directory or a single file:
# Replace PREFIX and LOCAL_DIR with paths chosen from the listing
hf buckets sync hf://buckets/groundedsi/RoboCap-10k/PREFIX ./LOCAL_DIR
# Replace PATH/TO/FILE and FILE with the selected object path and filename
hf buckets cp hf://buckets/groundedsi/RoboCap-10k/PATH/TO/FILE ./FILE
To work with a downloaded directory locally, point LeRobotDataset at it with the root argument. See the Hugging Face Bucket guide for filtering, mounting, Python access and sync options.
Language annotations
| Tier | Granularity | Content |
|---|---|---|
| Sparse caption | One per interval | A single free-text sentence describing the whole clip |
| Dense units | Many per interval, non-overlapping | scene, high_level_task, low_level_task, joined into a three-sentence full_caption |
Example interval:
| Span | Tier | Caption |
|---|---|---|
| 0.00–14.80 s | Sparse | Tears a piece of paper towel from a roll, folds it, and wipes a glass beaker. |
| 0.00–3.50 s | Dense | Tears a section of paper towel from the roll. |
| 3.50–9.50 s | Dense | Folds the torn paper towel sheet. |
| 9.50–14.80 s | Dense | Wipes the interior of a small clear container with the folded paper. |
Fields stored with each dense unit:
| Category | Fields |
|---|---|
| Links | unit_id, parent_id, episode_id |
| Timing | start/end frames and clip-relative seconds, continuation_of_previous |
| Text | scene, high_level_task, low_level_task, full_caption |
| Grounding evidence | evidence_frames, evidence_views, grounding_note, review_warnings |
| Provenance | origin, offline_edited, human_visual_review |
Dense units are generated by Gemini 3.8 Flash from the two front-stereo views. The model is not given the sparse caption, so the two tiers are produced independently. Human annotators visually reviewed the captions for 1,000 hours (10% of the corpus) against the source video, and those reviewed labels were used to fit the captioning pipeline.
Taxonomy
The dataset uses a three-level taxonomy: industry vertical → site type → task. Each task also has a difficulty tier and one of 14 manual skill groups.
| Difficulty | Tasks | Description | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| Easy | 170 | Single step, no training needed | Sorting groundnuts, picking products from shelves |
| Medium | 277 | Multi-step, needs coordination or planning | Shaping dough into loaves, portioning meals into trays |
| Hard | 172 | Skilled work that requires training or expertise | Soldering PCB components, tying rebar cages, weaving cane, industrial stitching |
Verticals by number of distinct tasks:
| Industry vertical | Site types | Tasks |
|---|---|---|
| Food & Beverage | 39 | 117 |
| Furniture & Woodworking | 26 | 68 |
| Automotive & Transport | 36 | 66 |
| Industrial Manufacturing | 39 | 62 |
| Agriculture & Farming | 32 | 56 |
| Clothing & Fashion | 34 | 49 |
| Construction & Hardware | 33 | 43 |
| Household / Domestic | 15 | 25 |
| Logistics & Warehousing | 9 | 22 |
| Retail & Consumer Goods | 20 | 20 |
| Creative Workshops & Crafts | 13 | 20 |
| Printing, Packaging & Design | 14 | 18 |
| Beauty & Personal Care | 13 | 12 |
| Cleaning, Laundry & Sanitation | 13 | 11 |
| Repair Services | 9 | 11 |
| Healthcare & Pharmacy | 6 | 4 |
| Laboratory / Scientific | 4 | 4 |
| Energy & Utilities | 3 | 3 |
| Administrative & Office | 3 | 2 |
| Hospitality & Lodging | 3 | 0* |
| Sports & Recreation | 2 | 0* |
| Other / Mixed Trades | 5 | 6 |
| Total (distinct) | 365 | 619 |
* Footage for these verticals is on file and waiting for task labels.
Annotation quality
| Component | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Calibration | Held-out Sampson error, 214 devices | Median 0.63 px (front) / 0.60 px (eye); all < 1 px |
| Head trajectory | RoboMoCap (153.4 h, 4,669 trajectories, NOKOV mocap @ 120 Hz) | Median ATE 3.0 mm, mean 3.19 mm; scale error 0.17% median |
| SLAM | LaMAria (63 city-scale walks, 27.5 h) | Control-point score 72.4 (Aria SLAM: 75.9) |
| Hand pose | RoboMoCap held-out test split (9.2 min) | PA-MPJPE 4.5 mm over 21 keypoints |
| Face detection | 1,336 held-out faces @ 0.05 FP/frame | 77.3% recall / 92.4% precision (IoU 0.3) |
Two devices whose front-pair calibration error averaged above 1 px were excluded from the release, which removed 34 hours (0.6%) of footage.
Curation
An episode is one continuous clip of at least 10 s in which one person performs one recognizable task in one setting, both hands are tracked, and SLAM is available. An episode is kept only if it:
- shows active bimanual manipulation with an identifiable task,
- passes the calibration, SLAM and hand-tracking quality checks,
- has complete, consistently timed camera streams, and
- is not a duplicate of another episode by file fingerprint, content signature or recording metadata.
Trained annotators segment the recordings into episodes following written guidelines, and a second person reviews every segmentation. Taxonomy labels come from both the recording metadata and a frame-level review of the footage done without seeing that metadata. Where the two disagree, the footage review wins.
Privacy and ethics
- Consent. Every recorded operator signed an informed consent form, and every partner enterprise signed a data agreement. Participation was voluntary.
- Compensation. Wearers are paid on top of their regular wages. The footage is never used to evaluate individual workers' performance.
- No audio was recorded.
- Face anonymization. A custom face detector, trained on about 1,000 hours of human-labeled RoboCap footage, runs on every frame of all six streams. Detections are tracked, propagated forward and backward, dilated by 15%, and blurred with a Gaussian blur. The blur is permanent: released videos are re-encoded from the blurred frames, and the originals are not distributed.
- Minimal metadata. The released metadata identifies only the country and site type, never the site, employer or participant.
Limitations
- Labels are estimates, not ground truth. All 3D annotations are model outputs. Hand-pose errors concentrate where fingers are hidden at the point of contact during tight grasps.
- Coverage and selection bias. Collection is concentrated in a few countries, and India accounts for most verticals. Curation keeps only bimanual work that passes the 3D quality checks, so one-handed work and the hardest tracking conditions (heavy occlusion, fast motion, poor lighting) are underrepresented. Household and personal activities are underrepresented, and task counts are uneven across verticals.
- No tactile or force sensing. Contact must be inferred from vision alone.
- Embodiment gap. Retargeting human hands to robot end-effectors has to handle joint limits and singularities. The human arms visible in the images also differ from robot arms.
License
Released under CC BY 4.0. You may use, share and adapt the data for any purpose, including commercial use, as long as you give appropriate credit by citing the paper below.
Citation
@article{hughes2026robocap10k,
title = {RoboCap-10k: A Metrically Accurate Egocentric Dataset for Robot Learning},
author = {Hughes, Kheri and Ali, Qasim and Bhardwaj, Nikash and Akhibi, Owen and
Dravin, Niresh and Sharma, Vivek and Cho, Sam and Lee, Ethan and Luo, Paul and
Yu, Sunny and Victor, Jonathan and Young, Amanda and Cho, Michael and
Adeniji, Ademi and Liu, Vincent},
year = {2026}
}
For details on the hardware and processing pipeline, see the companion report:
@article{ali2026robocap,
title = {RoboCap: A New Platform for Egocentric Robot Learning},
author = {Ali, Qasim and Bhardwaj, Nikash and Hughes, Kheri and Cho, Sam and Lee, Ethan and
Luo, Paul and Chong, Shinn and Yu, Sunny and Akhibi, Owen and Proshkin, Alex and
Zhan, Haotian and Dravin, Niresh and Sharma, Vivek and Victor, Jonathan and
Young, Amanda and Cho, Michael and Adeniji, Ademi and Liu, Vincent},
year = {2026}
}
- Downloads last month
- 2