GeoSim / README.md
irenier's picture
Add GeoSim dataset card
a9c00ab verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
10.5 kB
---
pretty_name: GeoSim Mantle Plume Simulation Dataset
license: cc-by-4.0
language:
- en
tags:
- pde
- geodynamics
- geophysic
- mantle-convection
- scientific-machine-learning
- simulation
size_categories:
- 100B<n<1T
---
# GeoSim Mantle Plume Simulation Dataset
## Overview
GeoSim contains two-dimensional thermo-mechanical mantle plume simulations generated with **I2VIS**, a geodynamic solver based on Marker-in-Cell and finite-difference methods. The dataset supports spatiotemporal forecasting, surrogate modeling, operator learning, and related scientific machine-learning tasks.
The simulations are divided into two parameter-sampling groups:
- `plume1`: one model parameter is sampled.
- `plume2`: two model parameters are sampled.
Each group provides train and test splits at two resolutions:
- `401x309_physical`: physical field values on the non-uniform I2VIS grid;
- `128x128_norm`: normalized fields conservatively remapped to a 128 x 128 grid;
## Files
Files follow the naming pattern:
```text
geosim_<case>_<split>_<grid>_<values>.hdf5
```
Each field shape is `(n_sample, n_time, H, W)`.
| File | Field shape | Time unit |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| `geosim_plume1_train_401x309_physical.hdf5` | `(97, 97, 401, 309)` | yr |
| `geosim_plume1_test_401x309_physical.hdf5` | `(12, 131, 401, 309)` | yr |
| `geosim_plume2_train_401x309_physical.hdf5` | `(103, 131, 401, 309)` | yr |
| `geosim_plume2_test_401x309_physical.hdf5` | `(25, 131, 401, 309)` | yr |
| `geosim_plume1_train_128x128_norm.hdf5` | `(97, 97, 128, 128)` | Myr |
| `geosim_plume1_test_128x128_norm.hdf5` | `(12, 131, 128, 128)` | Myr |
| `geosim_plume2_train_128x128_norm.hdf5` | `(103, 131, 128, 128)` | Myr |
| `geosim_plume2_test_128x128_norm.hdf5` | `(25, 131, 128, 128)` | Myr |
## HDF5 Format
All files contain the same nine datasets:
```text
<file>.hdf5
├── nu (n_sample, n_time, H, W) float32
├── pr (n_sample, n_time, H, W) float32
├── ro (n_sample, n_time, H, W) float32
├── t-coordinate (n_sample, n_time) float32
├── tk (n_sample, n_time, H, W) float32
├── vx (n_sample, n_time, H, W) float32
├── vy (n_sample, n_time, H, W) float32
├── x-coordinate (H,) float32
└── y-coordinate (W,) float32
```
Field axes are ordered as follows:
| Axis | Meaning |
| ---: | --- |
| 0 | sample |
| 1 | time |
| 2 | x |
| 3 | y |
Access datasets by key rather than relying on HDF5 key order. For spatial meshes, use:
```python
X, Y = np.meshgrid(x, y, indexing="ij")
```
## Fields and Units
| Key | Quantity | `401x309_physical` | `128x128_norm` |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `ro` | density | kg/m³ | normalized |
| `pr` | mechanical pressure | Pa | normalized |
| `tk` | temperature | K | normalized |
| `nu` | log10 viscosity | log10(Pa·s) | normalized |
| `vx` | horizontal velocity | m/s | normalized |
| `vy` | vertical velocity, positive upward | m/s | normalized |
| `t-coordinate` | physical time | yr | Myr |
`pr` is the mechanical pressure unknown solved jointly with `vx` and `vy` in the Stokes-continuity system.
## Coordinates and Time
The physical grid spans **1150 km × 660 km**. It is non-uniform in both directions: horizontal spacing decreases from approximately 4 km near the lateral boundaries to 1 km in the central plume region, while the upper 220 km uses 1 km vertical spacing and the deeper domain gradually coarsens to approximately 9 km.
- `x-coordinate`: 0 to 1,150,000 m
- `y-coordinate`: 0 to 660,000 m
The 128 x 128 files contain their remapped coordinate arrays. Read `x-coordinate` and `y-coordinate` from each file instead of assuming a fixed normalized coordinate sequence.
For paired physical and normalized products,
```python
t_myr = t_years / 1e6
```
This conversion applies only to `t-coordinate`. The unit is recorded in both metadata locations:
| Product | Root attribute `time_unit` | `t-coordinate` attribute `units` |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `401x309_physical` | `yr` | `yr` |
| `128x128_norm` | `Myr` | `Myr` |
## Normalization and Remapping
The 128 x 128 products use per-field max normalization:
```python
field_norm = field_physical / max_value
```
Train and test files within each case use the same constants.
| Field | plume1 | plume2 |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| `ro` | 3828.61 | 3829.551 |
| `pr` | 2.18068e10 | 2.1789805e10 |
| `tk` | 2113.0 | 2260.3352 |
| `nu` | 24.0 | 24.000002 |
| `vx` | 7.59748e-09 | 1.9177052e-07 |
| `vy` | 4.59946e-09 | 9.3668184e-08 |
Normalized values are not guaranteed to lie within `[-1, 1]`. Signed velocity components may exceed this range because the constants are not maximum absolute values in both directions.
Spatial remapping uses separable first-order conservative interpolation:
```text
F_target = w_x @ F_source @ w_y.T
```
The weights are source-target cell-overlap fractions on the non-uniform grid. This method preserves constant fields and area-weighted averages.
## Physical Model
### Numerical framework
The production simulations use a two-dimensional Marker-in-Cell formulation on a `401 x 309` non-uniform Eulerian grid. Lagrangian markers carry material identity and history, with an initial density of approximately `5 x 5` markers per cell. Finite-difference and interpolation weights on the non-uniform grid are generated with the Fornberg algorithm.
Gravity is
$$
g_x=0,\qquad g_y=9.80665\ \mathrm{m\,s^{-2}}.
$$
### Mechanical equations
At each mechanical solve, pressure and velocity are obtained from the coupled Stokes-continuity system:
$$
\frac{\partial \tau_{xx}}{\partial x}
+\frac{\partial \tau_{xy}}{\partial y}
-\frac{\partial P}{\partial x}
=-\rho g_x,
$$
$$
\frac{\partial \tau_{yy}}{\partial y}
+\frac{\partial \tau_{xy}}{\partial x}
-\frac{\partial P}{\partial y}
=-\rho g_y.
$$
The continuity residual includes volumetric and compressibility contributions:
$$
R_{\mathrm{cont}}
=\nabla\cdot\mathbf{v}
-d_v
+\beta_{\mathrm{comp}}\frac{P-P_0}{\Delta t}.
$$
The global sparse system is solved with Intel MKL PARDISO. All velocity boundaries are free slip. Marker-to-grid viscosity uses arithmetic averaging, and the final viscosity is limited to
$$
10^{18}\leq\eta\leq10^{24}\ \mathrm{Pa\,s}.
$$
### Rheology
The configured mantle, plume, and crustal materials use Ranalli-style visco-plastic parameterizations. Ductile deformation depends on pressure, temperature, and strain rate. Its general power-law form is
$$
\eta_{\mathrm{ductile}}
\propto
\left[
\eta_0\exp\left(\frac{E+PV}{RT}\right)
\right]^{1/n}
\dot{\varepsilon}_{II}^{(1-n)/n},
$$
with material-dependent diffusion-dislocation transitions. Dry mantle materials use $n=3.5$, while plume material uses $n=4.0$.
Brittle yielding follows a Mohr-Coulomb-type relation:
$$
\tau_y=A(\varepsilon_{\mathrm{acc}})
+\lambda B(\varepsilon_{\mathrm{acc}})P,
$$
$$
\eta_{\mathrm{brittle}}
=\frac{\tau_y}{2\dot{\varepsilon}_{II}}.
$$
Cohesion $A$ and friction coefficient $B$ weaken with accumulated strain. When plastic yielding is active, marker strain history evolves as
$$
\varepsilon_{\mathrm{acc}}^{n+1}
=\varepsilon_{\mathrm{acc}}^n
+\Delta t\,\dot{\varepsilon}_{II}.
$$
The weakest active ductile or brittle mechanism controls the effective viscosity. A conditional Peierls mechanism is also included for eligible materials when
$$
T<1473\ \mathrm{K},\qquad
\tau_{II}>10^7\ \mathrm{Pa},\qquad
\dot{\varepsilon}_{II}>0.
$$
### Thermal model
Temperature is advanced with an implicit thermal solve:
$$
\rho C_p\frac{DT}{Dt}
=\nabla\cdot(k\nabla T)+H_r+H_a+H_s.
$$
The configured source terms are radiogenic heating, viscous or shear heating, and simplified adiabatic heating. The latter uses
$$
\frac{\alpha_T T}{C_p}
\left(g_xv_x+g_yv_y\right).
$$
The top and bottom temperatures are fixed at 273 K and 2113 K, respectively. Both lateral thermal boundaries are symmetric.
### Material properties and conditional processes
Material properties are evaluated from the configured material laws, including enabled material and melt corrections. With `densimod=3`, the final density, heat capacity, and thermal conductivity used for marker-to-grid reconstruction are the material-law values. The thermodynamic database participates in the water, hydration, and material-state calculations but does not provide the final reconstructed density field.
The partial-melting routine is evaluated during marker updates and includes pressure- and water-dependent mantle melting. A conditional hydration and material-water subsystem is also enabled and contains an antigorite-stability criterion. These branches depend on the evolving marker state; their activation frequency and spatial extent are not encoded in the released fields.
### Marker transport and time stepping
Markers are advected through the Eulerian velocity field with a four-stage Runge-Kutta scheme. After advection, density, viscosity, heat capacity, thermal conductivity, and related material properties are reconstructed on the Eulerian grid. Consequently, `ro` and `nu` reflect material identity, marker history, constitutive laws, and marker-to-grid reconstruction rather than independent scalar evolution alone.
The solver timestep is adaptive. It is bounded by the configured maximum timestep and by the allowed marker displacement:
$$
\Delta t\leq
\min\left(
\frac{f_{\mathrm{move}}\Delta x_{\mathrm{ref}}}{|v_x|_{\max}},
\frac{f_{\mathrm{move}}\Delta y_{\mathrm{ref}}}{|v_y|_{\max}}
\right).
$$
The thermal solver can reduce it further using
$$
\Delta t_T=\frac{\Delta T_{\max}}{\max|dT/dt|}.
$$
The internal solver timestep is distinct from both the saved output interval and any time normalization used by machine-learning pipelines.
## Usage
```python
import h5py
import numpy as np
path = "geosim_plume2_train_128x128_norm.hdf5"
fields = ["ro", "pr", "tk", "nu", "vx", "vy"]
with h5py.File(path, "r") as f:
# Read one simulation while keeping the full time axis.
sample = np.stack([f[key][0] for key in fields], axis=-1)
time = f["t-coordinate"][0]
time_unit = f["t-coordinate"].attrs["units"]
x = f["x-coordinate"][:]
y = f["y-coordinate"][:]
X, Y = np.meshgrid(x, y, indexing="ij")
print(sample.shape) # (n_time, H, W, 6)
print(time.shape) # (n_time,)
print(time_unit) # Myr
```