Datasets:
SpaceBio-Bench / GeneLab Benchmark v7.1.3 Public Fold Package
Corrections (September 2026; applied in v7.1.3, 2026-09-27). Two labelling errors in the released benchmark are corrected. (1) The gastrocnemius task (A2) lists a third mission as "RR-9"; those eight samples (OSD-326) come from the SpaceX-10 mission (Rodent Research-4) and are quadriceps femoris, not gastrocnemius. RR-9 contributes liver and thymus only. (2) The eye task (A6) evaluated the OSD-397 samples as a separate mission; they belong to RR-1 and share animals with OSD-100, so the task has two mission-held-out folds, not three. This card and
RESULTS_SUMMARY.mduse the corrected labels; fold directory names keep the historical labels (fold_RR-9_test,fold_OSD-397_test). See the changelog below for the other v7.1.3 corrections and the MAQC 2026 abstract erratum. The source code repository is private while the corrected release is prepared; code and fold definitions are available on request (contact: JangKeun Kim). Every other task and the mission-held-out design are unaffected.
Processed mission-held-out transcriptomics folds for evaluating whether machine-learning and foundation-model methods generalize spaceflight biological signatures across missions.
Public status: v7.1.3 correction patch over canonical v7.1 results (2026-09-27; earlier patch: v7.1.2 public-card/metadata patch, 2026-06-16)
Dataset freeze: 2026-03-01
Patch scope: documentation corrections over canonical v7.1 results (mission labels for OSD-326 and OSD-397, the v4 headline table regenerated from its result JSON, sample scope and averaging rules, fine-tuning epoch selection, the skin RR-7 open-validation row, fGSEA direction statements) and the MAQC 2026 abstract erratum. It does not introduce new benchmark result generation.
Code and full documentation: https://github.com/jang1563/GeneLab_benchmark
Maintainer / citation author: JangKeun Kim, Weill Cornell Medicine.
What Is In This Dataset
This Hugging Face dataset contains self-contained public fold packages from the GeneLab Benchmark v1-v7 surface. Each fold holds out one mission as the test set and provides all files needed to train on the remaining missions and evaluate on the held-out mission.
| Public package item | Description |
|---|---|
train_X.csv, test_X.csv |
Sample-by-gene expression matrices |
train_y.csv, test_y.csv |
Binary labels: 1 = Flight, 0 = Ground |
train_meta.csv, test_meta.csv |
Sample-level metadata used for fold auditing |
fold_info.json |
Held-out mission, train missions, and sample-count audit metadata |
selected_genes.txt |
Fold-specific genes selected from training missions only |
task_info.json |
Task-level metadata and source summary |
The web Dataset Viewer is disabled because these are high-dimensional sample-by-gene matrices plus JSON artifacts. Use direct downloads for reliable access.
Public Fold Layout
genelab-benchmark/
βββ A2_gastrocnemius_lomo/
β βββ task_info.json
β βββ fold_RR-1_test/
β βββ fold_RR-5_test/
β βββ fold_RR-9_test/
βββ A4_thymus_lomo/
β βββ task_info.json
β βββ fold_MHU-1_test/
β βββ fold_MHU-2_test/
β βββ fold_RR-6_test/
β βββ fold_RR-9_test/
β βββ fold_RR-23_holdout/ # retrospective open validation; labels public
βββ A5_skin_lomo/
β βββ task_info.json
β βββ fold_MHU-2_test/
β βββ fold_RR-6_test/
β βββ fold_RR-7_test/
β βββ fold_RR-7_holdout/ # identical copy of fold_RR-7_test; labels public
βββ A6_eye_lomo/
β βββ task_info.json
β βββ fold_RR-1_test/
β βββ fold_RR-3_test/
β βββ fold_OSD-397_test/
βββ v4/evaluation/
βββ v5/evaluation/
βββ v6/evaluation/
fold_OSD-397_test is the third A6 fold directory. Its samples belong to RR-1 (corrected 2026-09-25; they share animals with OSD-100), so A6 has two mission-held-out folds.
The two historical _holdout directories also contain public test_y.csv
files. They support retrospective reproducibility, not blind evaluation.
fold_RR-7_holdout repeats fold_RR-7_test exactly; only fold_RR-23_holdout
holds a mission outside the LOMO folds. See
the benchmark integrity note.
Scope
| Dimension | Coverage |
|---|---|
| Full v1-v7 benchmark surface | 8 tissues |
| Public source catalog | 24+ NASA OSDR accessions |
| Processed sample scope | 549 profiles in the v1 LOMO tasks A1βA6 (22 folds; 565 with the RR-23 open-validation fold) and 792 in the v4 8-tissue evaluation; counts are RNA-seq profiles, not animals |
| v4 multi-method evaluation | 8 tissues x 8 classifiers x 4 feature types = 256 evaluations |
| Public HF fold package | 4 reviewer-facing LOMO tasks plus selected result artifacts |
The full GitHub benchmark also includes historical v2-v7 extensions for temporal dynamics, cross-species analysis, single-cell and spatial pilots, foundation-model comparisons, graph/network baselines, and biological interpretation layers. This HF repository is optimized for processed dataset access; GitHub is the complete methods, code, and release-documentation surface.
Download Example
from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download
import pandas as pd
repo_id = "jang1563/genelab-benchmark"
fold = "A5_skin_lomo/fold_RR-7_test"
def hf_csv(name):
return pd.read_csv(
hf_hub_download(
repo_id=repo_id,
filename=f"{fold}/{name}",
repo_type="dataset",
),
index_col=0,
)
train_X = hf_csv("train_X.csv")
train_y = hf_csv("train_y.csv").iloc[:, 0]
test_X = hf_csv("test_X.csv")
test_y = hf_csv("test_y.csv").iloc[:, 0]
test_meta = hf_csv("test_meta.csv")
print(train_X.shape, train_y.shape, test_X.shape, test_y.shape)
Download a complete task:
from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download
snapshot_download(
repo_id="jang1563/genelab-benchmark",
repo_type="dataset",
allow_patterns="A5_skin_lomo/**",
local_dir="./data/genelab-benchmark",
)
File Contract
| File | Contract |
|---|---|
| Feature matrices | Rows are sample IDs; columns are Ensembl mouse gene IDs |
| Expression values | Log2(DESeq2 size-factor normalized counts + 1) |
| Gene selection | Top 75th percentile variance, computed on training missions only |
| Labels | Binary Flight/Ground labels |
| Metadata | Sample and fold metadata for auditability |
The fold design prevents test-mission leakage by applying variance filtering inside each training split.
Evaluation Summary
The canonical result source is docs/CANONICAL_RESULTS_V7_1.md in the GitHub
repository.
| Result surface | Takeaway |
|---|---|
| Multi-method benchmark | PCA-LR is the strongest gene-level baseline in v4: mean AUROC 0.776 over 8 tissues (0.753 over the 6 LOMO tissues). |
| Best tissue rows | Highest of 32 method-feature rows per tissue, selected after the fact: LOMO thymus 0.948, gastrocnemius 0.898, kidney 0.829, eye 0.823, skin 0.819, liver 0.766; single-mission colon 0.921 and lung 0.901 use 5-fold CV, not LOMO. |
| Cross-mission transfer | Thymus and gastrocnemius show the strongest mission-transfer signal; liver and kidney are harder. |
| Pathway features | Pathway representations rescue some weaker gene-level tissues, especially kidney and eye. |
| Foundation models | Tested gene-expression foundation models underperform tuned classical baselines on small-n bulk RNA-seq mission shift. Fine-tuned scGPT and Mouse-Geneformer fold AUROCs keep the best of 10 epochs scored on the held-out test mission itself (no inner validation split; scripts/scgpt_finetune.py, scripts/geneformer_finetune.py), so they are optimistic. |
| Retrospective open validation | Thymus RR-23 AUROC 0.905 (n=16); labels are public. The skin RR-7 split is a copy of the LOMO RR-7 fold; its recorded 0.885 does not reproduce (a converged refit gives the LOMO value 0.805), so it is not additional evidence. |
Intended Use
Use this dataset to:
- evaluate spaceflight transcriptomics classifiers under mission-held-out shift;
- compare classical ML, foundation-model, and adapter methods on fixed folds;
- test preprocessing or feature representations without changing test missions;
- reproduce public benchmark summaries from the GitHub repository.
For full methods and release status, use the GitHub documentation and release manifest.
Release Labels
| Surface | Public label |
|---|---|
| v7.1 GeneLab Benchmark | Canonical historical result surface and citation target |
| v7.1.2 public-card patch | Documentation and metadata patch over v7.1 results (2026-06-16) |
| v7.1.3 correction patch | Label, headline-table and documentation corrections over v7.1 results; MAQC 2026 abstract erratum (2026-09-27) |
This HF dataset card describes the v7.1 public fold package with the v7.1.3 correction patch.
Changelog
v7.1.3 (2026-09-27), correction patch.
- Mission labels: the A2 fold archived as RR-9 is the SpaceX-10 / RR-4 quadriceps study (OSD-326); the A6 OSD-397 samples belong to RR-1, so A6 has two mission-held-out folds.
- v4 headline table regenerated from
v4/evaluation/M1_summary.json, with a fixed PCA-LR column, a post hoc best-row column and the evaluation scheme (colon and lung use 5-fold stratified CV); the previous table held two values that are not v4 rows and three wrong method labels. - Sample scope stated as 549 profiles in 22 LOMO folds for the v1 tasks A1βA6 (565 with the RR-23 fold; 792 in the v4 evaluation); the six-tissue classical reference mean (0.758) is a fixed per-tissue model, not PCA-LR.
- Fine-tuned scGPT and Mouse-Geneformer values disclosed as best-of-10-epoch selections on the held-out test mission.
- Skin
fold_RR-7_holdoutdocumented as a copy of the LOMO RR-7 fold; its recorded logistic-regression AUROC (0.885) does not reproduce, and a converged refit gives 0.805, the LOMO value. - Pathway-direction statements corrected to the flight-positive fGSEA sign convention (files regenerated on 2026-08-14).
Erratum (MAQC 2026 abstract). The abstract "From Reproducible Pipelines to Reproducible Claims: An Audit of Model Selection and Aggregation in Spaceflight Omics" (Kim and Mason, submitted to MAQC 2026 on 19 August 2026) reported results on the six-tissue task surface of this dataset as released at the time (549 profiles, 22 leave-one-mission-out task folds): fixed PCA-logistic regression six-tissue macro AUROC 0.730; scGPT 0.666 with the best held-out test epoch per fold and 0.599 at a fixed epoch 10; Mouse-Geneformer 0.476 and 0.458; thymus PCA-logistic regression 0.923 as the mean of mission-level AUROCs and 0.631 pooled out of fold. As the abstract stated, the fixed-epoch values are a post hoc sensitivity analysis, not nested epoch selection. The values were computed correctly from the files released at the time, but three problems found afterwards affect them: (1) the scGPT and Mouse-Geneformer inputs were z-scored expression values, while both tokenizers expect raw counts; (2) the gastrocnemius task's third mission is the SpaceX-10 / Rodent Research-4 quadriceps study (OSD-326), not RR-9 gastrocnemius, and the eye task has two mission-held-out folds, not three, because the OSD-397 samples belong to RR-1 and share animals with OSD-100; (3) three MHU-2 thymus flight profiles carry swapped condition labels: the original BioSample records show that the profiles archived as MHU2_FLT_1G_Rep1-3 are microgravity and the uG-named profiles are artificial gravity. Read the abstract's numbers as results on the pre-correction surface; they are not comparable with later results. The reanalysis (raw-count inputs, nested epoch selection, corrected labels, a recorded evaluation contract) is reported separately.
v7.1.2 (2026-06-16). Public-card, citation, and metadata patch over canonical v7.1 results.
Citation
Please cite the software and benchmark using the GitHub CITATION.cff metadata.
@dataset{kim2026genelab,
title = {SpaceBio-Bench / GeneLab Benchmark: Mission-Held-Out Spaceflight Transcriptomics Benchmark},
author = {Kim, JangKeun},
year = {2026},
url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/jang1563/genelab-benchmark},
note = {v7.1.3 correction patch over canonical v7.1 results; data freeze 2026-03-01}
}
Source data: NASA Open Science Data Repository (OSDR), https://osdr.nasa.gov/bio/repo/.
License
- Processed dataset package: CC-BY-4.0
- Code: MIT, in the GitHub repository
- Source data: NASA OSDR public data; follow individual source-dataset terms
- Downloads last month
- 405
