Datasets:
audio audio |
|---|
nightjar flight 2026-08-06, session 2 — the fix, and a producer swap mid-session
The "after" half of a same-evening, same-site A/B against nightjar-flight-20260806-1, where the
chirp guard vetoed the drone outright. Here the guard is disabled and the gate cues while the
drone is airborne (0 → 8). ⚠ But GPS scoring (added after first publication) shows the
optical "locks" were NOT the drone and most cheap-gate cues were a second site emitter — see
the scored findings below. An earlier revision of this card claimed "the full chain fires";
that claim is RETRACTED.
⚠ This session contains TWO different cue producers. Treat it as two segments, not one:
| segment | UTC | producer | chirp guard |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 00:25:15 – 00:42:28 | cue_daemon_subhunt.py (ft16 neural) |
off |
| B | 00:42:28 – 00:53:27 | cue_daemon.py (cheap gate) |
off |
The swap was made live because SubHunt was starving the cue rate (below).
★ Finding 1 — the chirp guard was real, but it was not the only problem
With CHIRP_GUARD=0 the gate produces 8 cues coincident with an airborne drone (session 1:
zero). That part of the fix stands.
⚠ Scored against the DJI GPS record, most of those cues are NOT the drone either:
| cue disposition (14 total) | n |
|---|---|
| fired while the drone was not airborne | 6 |
| pinned at array az 322.6–323.4 — a second fixed site emitter | 6 |
| consistent with the drone | 2 (SubHunt az 184.0 vs GPS 193.0 = −9.0°; one cheap az 164.4 vs 208.9 = −44.5°, marginal) |
Best-fit constant-offset residual over the 8 airborne-coincident cues: 56.5° robust sigma, 12% within 10° — the beamformer mostly locked the loudest static source, not the drone.
⚠ Lesson recorded: wandering line_hz is NOT a drone signature by itself. The az-323
emitter cluster wanders 363–1166 Hz (the peak-picker hops harmonics on a stationary machine)
while its bearing stays pinned to 0.8°. Bearing spread is the discriminator; frequency
spread fooled the first read of this data.
★ Finding 2 — SubHunt starves the agreement window on this hardware
| segment A (SubHunt) | segment B (cheap) | |
|---|---|---|
| duration | 17.2 min | 11.0 min |
| cue candidates | 1 | 13 |
The gate needs 4 agreeing bearings inside a 5 s window at ~1 Hz. SubHunt logged
analysis behind, skipped ~81 hops over 825 hops (10 %). That rate is the documented
steady-state, not the retracted "runaway" — but losing one hop in ten still prevents the
4-of-5 s window from filling. The 2026-08-05 preallocated-ring fix is real and present
(1 startup overrun, skips flat); it removed the ALSA overruns but did not make ft16 fast
enough to sustain the gate under a live tracker.
⚠ Rate is not accuracy. GPS scoring reverses the quality read: SubHunt's single cue was the only clearly drone-consistent bearing of the session (−9.0° vs truth), while the cheap gate's 13 cues were dominated by the az-323 emitter and not-airborne false alarms. n=1 proves nothing about ft16 either — but do not cite this session as "cheap gate beats SubHunt"; on bearing truth it was the other way around.
Tracker outcome
| session 1 (guard ON) | session 2 (guard OFF) | |
|---|---|---|
| track active | 0.2 % | 5.7 % |
| frames with detection | 1 | 83 |
| track episodes | 1 (2.0 s) | 22 (longest 7.6 s) |
| max focal | 15.17 mm | 11.59 mm (2.70x) |
| SEARCH | 96.6 % | 89.7 % |
⚠ The FSM numbers above are NOT drone locks. Scored against GPS (256 tracked samples with truth within 2 s): camera-implied bearing vs drone bearing has 27.5° robust sigma after removing the best-fit constant offset — a time-shuffled placebo scores 27.2°, i.e. the real pairing beats exactly 50 % of random pairings. The 22 episodes were clutter (treeline / cloud edges), indistinguishable from real locks in the FSM but not pointed anywhere near the drone. An earlier revision of this card counted them as drone acquisitions; that is RETRACTED.
The honest statement: the guard fix restored cueing; nothing in this session demonstrates a verified optical lock on the drone. (Caveat on the scoring itself: rig position was taken from the 07-27 survey and the rig moved 08-05 — at 24–83 m slant a ~10 m rig-position error is up to ~13° of bearing, which inflates the residuals but cannot produce a placebo-level track result or the pinned az-323 cue cluster.)
⚠ cue.blob_seed: true was enabled for the first time on 2026-08-06 and is present in both
sessions. It is NOT yet validated — no analysis here separates blob-seeded acquisitions from
YOLO-seeded ones. Do not credit it for the improvement above; the controlled variable between
the two sessions is the chirp guard, not blob seeding.
Drone truth — two flights
dji/ holds both records. Flight A spans the session boundary; flight B is wholly inside.
flight A [20-15-21] |
flight B [20-37-43] |
|
|---|---|---|
| airborne | 00:15:21 – 00:28:10 UTC | 00:37:43 – 00:50:47 UTC |
| captured here | 00:25:15 – 00:28:10 (175 s) | 784 s (all) |
| also in | session 1 (287 s) | — |
| max slant | 84 m | 138 m |
| max height | 51 m | 47 m |
| elevation | median 17, p90 31 deg | median 26, p90 44 deg |
| bearing from rig | 172 – 264 deg | 166 – 302 deg |
Operator notes the drone flew approximately the same positions in both sorties, which is what makes the session-1 / session-2 comparison fair.
⚠ DJI stamp sparsity: 5 of 7,846 rows (flight B) and 7 of 7,694 (flight A) carry a valid
CUSTOM.dateTime. Anchor ONCE off the first valid stamp and derive every row from
OSD.flyTime.
⚠ Timezone: Jetson clock is Denver (MDT); DJI wall-stamps are US Eastern. Filename
[20-37-43] is 00:37:43 UTC the next day.
Configuration in force
cue producer SubHunt (ft16) then cheap gate - SEE SEGMENT TABLE ABOVE
chirp guard OFF (CHIRP_GUARD=0; no KT pinger was running)
detector.mode day
yolo_engine nightjar_v3.pt (yolo_conf 0.15 / seed 0.45 / imgsz 1280)
cue.blob_seed true (unvalidated)
search.scan_enabled false - SEARCH holds for a cue, it does not sweep
UMA-16 az_offset_deg 297.644 invert_az true
SB-POLARIS NOT RECORDED
⚠ SB-POLARIS produced no audio: the card dropped off the USB bus before session 1 and did not return. UMA-16 only for both sessions of 2026-08-06.
Contents
audio/uma16_<epoch>.wav UMA-16, 16 ch, 48 kHz, S16_LE, 5-min splits
audio/cue_log.jsonl every candidate and reject, both producers
video_segments.tar 1080p native + 768x432 substream, H.264, 60 s MPEG-TS
blackbox/state.jsonl tracker FSM ~3 Hz: state, pose, focal, detection, track
blackbox/frames.tar 1,760 substream stills
dji/ both DJI FlightRecords (txt + decoded csv + geojson)
Channel identity is not guessable. UMA-16 0-based channel 9 is dead — exclude it, run on 15.
Load the serpentine geometry from uma16_geom.json.
Open questions this session raises
- Tune the chirp guard rather than disabling it. Reject records now log
hiandhi_med, so an absolute floor (or the cheap gate presence-override) can be fitted instead ofCHIRP_FACTORalone. Portingchirp_ovrinto the SubHunt daemon is the obvious fix. - The az-323 emitter needs suppression (survey it; a bearing mask now exists in the cheap
daemon:
AZ_MASK="315-331", loggingev:az_masked). - A verified drone lock is still outstanding — next session runs a truth-scored look-away drill (hovering drone at a surveyed station) instead of free flight, so every cue and every lock is scored against a fixed truth pose at the moment it happens.
- Fresh rig GPS fix needed — all bearing scoring above leans on the 07-27 rig position.
Companion
nightjar-flight-20260806-1— same evening, guard ON, the negative control.
- Downloads last month
- 37