The dataset viewer is not available for this split.
Error code: StreamingRowsError
Exception: ArrowInvalid
Message: Mismatching child array lengths
Traceback: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/utils.py", line 149, in get_rows_or_raise
return get_rows(
dataset=dataset,
...<4 lines>...
column_names=column_names,
)
File "/src/libs/libcommon/src/libcommon/utils.py", line 272, in decorator
return func(*args, **kwargs)
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/utils.py", line 129, in get_rows
rows_plus_one = list(itertools.islice(safe_iter(ds, dataset=dataset), rows_max_number + 1))
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/utils.py", line 544, in safe_iter
yield from ds.decode(False) if ds.features else ds
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/iterable_dataset.py", line 3052, in __iter__
for key, example in ex_iterable:
^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/iterable_dataset.py", line 2559, in __iter__
for key, pa_table in self._iter_arrow():
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/iterable_dataset.py", line 2584, in _iter_arrow
for key, pa_table in self.ex_iterable._iter_arrow():
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/iterable_dataset.py", line 558, in _iter_arrow
for key, pa_table in iterator:
^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/iterable_dataset.py", line 440, in _iter_arrow
for key, pa_table in self.generate_tables_fn(**gen_kwags):
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/hdf5/hdf5.py", line 83, in _generate_tables
pa_table = _recursive_load_arrays(h5, self.info.features, start, end)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/hdf5/hdf5.py", line 267, in _recursive_load_arrays
arr = _recursive_load_arrays(obj, features[path], start, end)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/hdf5/hdf5.py", line 288, in _recursive_load_arrays
sarr = pa.StructArray.from_arrays(values, names=keys)
File "pyarrow/array.pxi", line 4385, in pyarrow.lib.StructArray.from_arrays
File "pyarrow/error.pxi", line 155, in pyarrow.lib.pyarrow_internal_check_status
File "pyarrow/error.pxi", line 92, in pyarrow.lib.check_status
raise convert_status(status)
pyarrow.lib.ArrowInvalid: Mismatching child array lengthsNeed help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
AV2 2026 Multi-Dataset Scene Flow Challenge β Test Set
Dataset Description
This is the anonymized test set of the 2026 Multi-Dataset Scene Flow Challenge, a scene flow benchmark for autonomous driving in which one method with one configuration is evaluated on five LiDAR datasets.
The test set aggregates evaluation frames from five diverse LiDAR datasets, covering urban, suburban and highway driving with different sensor configurations, ego-vehicle platforms and geographic regions. All scenes are assigned opaque random identifiers, so a method is never told which source dataset a scene comes from. This design reflects the real-world requirement that a deployed perception system must handle any LiDAR sensor it encounters.
- Leaderboard and submission: sceneflow.kth-rpl.se (challenge details)
- Start here: OpenSceneFlow: data processing, training, evaluation, pre-trained models and one command to write the submission zip
- Curated by: Challenge organizers (RPL, KTH Royal Institute of Technology; Carnegie Mellon University; University of Pennsylvania)
- License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, non-commercial use only; individual source datasets retain their original licenses
Note: the previous leaderboard at
sceneflow.argoverse.orgno longer accepts uploads. Please submit at sceneflow.kth-rpl.se.
Dataset Statistics
| Source dataset | LiDAR setup | # Scenes | # Eval frames |
|---|---|---|---|
| Argoverse 2 | 2Γ 32-beam | 150 | 2,410 |
| nuScenes | 32-beam | 85 | 1,981 |
| Waymo | 64-beam | 100 | 2,094 |
| TruckScenes | 2Γ 32-beam | 58 | 2,088 |
| Aeva | 6Γ FMCW LiDARs (128-beam) | 65 | 1,040 |
| Total | 458 | 9,613 |
Every evaluation frame is scored at two distance ranges, 0β35 m and 35β70 m. Evaluation frames are sampled every 5 or 8 frames depending on the dataset, following the protocol of the previous AV2 Scene Flow Challenges, and only frames with β₯ 10,000 non-ground points and valid flow annotations are kept. The scene files contain all 93,547 frames of the 458 scenes, so methods can use multi-frame temporal context.
Download (about 131 GB):
hf download kin-zhang/multidata-sf-challenge --repo-type dataset --local-dir ./challenge_data
# older huggingface_hub versions: huggingface-cli download (same arguments)
Dataset Structure
challenge_data/
βββ test/
βββ index_eval.pkl # the 9,613 (scene_id, timestamp) frames to predict
βββ index_total.pkl # all 93,547 (scene_id, timestamp) frames, used by data loaders
βββ 00ca029d111e42deacecc8f9ed00d125.h5
βββ ... # 458 scenes, one HDF5 file each
Each scene is a single HDF5 (.h5) file. Its groups are keyed by the timestamp string.
Fields per timestamp group
| Field | Shape | dtype | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
lidar |
(N, 3) or (N, 4) | float32 | Point cloud: x, y, z in metres. 143 of the 458 scenes add intensity as a 4th column, so use the first three columns. |
ground_mask |
(N,) | bool | True for ground points, which are excluded from evaluation. |
pose |
(4, 4) | float32 or float64 | Ego-vehicle pose in the world frame (SE3 matrix). |
Index file
index_eval.pkl is a Python pickle with the list of (scene_id, timestamp) pairs that need predictions.
Both values are strings.
import pickle
with open("challenge_data/test/index_eval.pkl", "rb") as f:
index = pickle.load(f) # [('26edc282bf814226a9e0e600adfe537e', '1521738135343166'), ...]
Loading a frame
import pickle
import h5py
root = "challenge_data/test"
with open(f"{root}/index_eval.pkl", "rb") as f:
index = pickle.load(f)
scene_id, timestamp = index[0]
with h5py.File(f"{root}/{scene_id}.h5", "r") as f:
frame = f[str(timestamp)]
pc = frame["lidar"][:, :3] # (N, 3) xyz
gm = frame["ground_mask"][:] # (N,) ground mask
pose = frame["pose"][:] # (4, 4) ego pose
Submission: Quick Start with OpenSceneFlow
The easiest way to train a model and write a valid submission is the OpenSceneFlow codebase, which supports this challenge's data format and submission protocol.
Step 1: Install OpenSceneFlow
git clone https://github.com/KTH-RPL/OpenSceneFlow.git
cd OpenSceneFlow
Then set up the environment as described in the OpenSceneFlow README.
Step 2: Train, or download a pre-trained checkpoint
Train on any combination of supported datasets following the OpenSceneFlow README, or start from the pre-trained checkpoints on Hugging Face. Optimization-based methods need no training.
Rules
- Use one configuration for all scenes of all datasets: a single checkpoint for learned models, or the same hyper-parameters for optimization-based methods. No per-dataset models or tuning.
- Do not train on any validation set of any dataset.
- Test-time (per-scene) optimization is allowed but must be declared in the submission notes.
Step 3: Run inference on the challenge test set
Set dataset_path to the folder that contains test/, plus leaderboard_version=3 and save_res=True:
python eval.py \
checkpoint=/path/to/your/model.ckpt \
data_mode=test \
dataset_path=/path/to/challenge_data \
leaderboard_version=3 \
save_res=True
Example output:
Model: DeltaFlow, Checkpoint from: /path/to/your/model.ckpt
Test results saved in: /path/to/results/deltaflow-xxx-test-v3, Please run submit command and upload to online leaderboard for results.
curl -O https://sceneflow.kth-rpl.se/download/sceneflow_submit.sh
export SCENEFLOW_API_KEY=your_api_key
bash sceneflow_submit.sh /path/to/results/deltaflow-xxx-test-v3.zip --method-name deltaflow-xxx-test-v3 --wait
The predictions are packaged into the correct zip layout automatically:
deltaflow-xxx-test-v3.zip
βββ {scene_id}/
βββ {timestamp_0}.feather
βββ {timestamp_1}.feather
βββ ...
Step 4: Submit
- Register your team, confirm your e-mail and wait for an organizer to approve the account.
- Create an API key on your profile page.
- Upload from a terminal. The uploader needs only
bashandcurl(Linux, macOS, WSL), no Python environment, and resumes interrupted uploads when you run the same command again:
curl -O https://sceneflow.kth-rpl.se/download/sceneflow_submit.sh
export SCENEFLOW_API_KEY=sfk_xxxxx
bash sceneflow_submit.sh --status # check the key and today's quota
bash sceneflow_submit.sh submission.zip --method-name "MyMethod" --training-data multi \
--project-url "https://github.com/user/repo" --notes "training data, backbone, ..." --wait
# a real example:
bash sceneflow_submit.sh /home/kin/results/deltaflow-891323-e21-test-v3-SynFlow.zip --method-name SynFlow-4k --wait
| Option | Meaning |
|---|---|
--training-data single or multi |
Trained on one dataset only (e.g. only AV2), or on several datasets (list them in --notes). Shown as a label on the leaderboard. |
--long-range |
Also publish the 35β70 m results and enter the overall 0β70 m ranking. Leave it off if your model crops the point cloud (e.g. at 51.2 m). |
--unsupervised |
Unsupervised track: no human labels of any real-world dataset (self-supervised losses, simulated labels and foundation models are allowed). |
--private |
Keep the result off the public leaderboard (you can publish it later). |
--wait |
Wait for the evaluation and print the scores. |
All options can also be changed later on the website, and bash sceneflow_submit.sh --help lists them.
You can also upload in the browser on the Submit page, or use the Python
version sceneflow_submit.py (standard library only, same options).
Each team can submit 10 times per 24 hours, and one submission is evaluated at a time; results usually appear
within 10 minutes under My submissions.
The old single-request curl -X POST .../submissions/upload command no longer works, because files over 100 MB
cannot pass the proxy.
Submission Format (manual)
If you do not use OpenSceneFlow, predict the per-point flow for every (scene_id, timestamp) in
index_eval.pkl in ego-motion-removed (relative) form and save each frame as an Apache Feather file:
import pandas as pd
from pathlib import Path
# final_absolute_flow = pred_flow + pose_flow -> submit pred_flow, NOT the absolute flow
# pred_flow: (N, 3) float32 numpy array, N = number of points in lidar (ground points included; they are masked on the server)
out_dir = Path("submission") / scene_id
out_dir.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
pd.DataFrame({
"flow_tx_m": pred_flow[:, 0],
"flow_ty_m": pred_flow[:, 1],
"flow_tz_m": pred_flow[:, 2],
}).to_feather(out_dir / f"{timestamp}.feather") # file name = the exact timestamp from index_eval.pkl
Then zip the contents of submission/, so the scene folders are at the top level of the zip, and upload it as in Step 4:
cd submission && zip -r -0 ../submission.zip .
Evaluation Metric
The primary metric is Dynamic Bucket-Normalized EPE
(Khatri et al., ECCV 2024; lower is better), the metric of the previous
AV2 Scene Flow Challenges. It is class-aware and speed-normalized, so slow pedestrians and fast vehicles count
fairly. Mean Static EPE, the classic Threeway EPE and per-class EPE are reported as well.
Distances are Chebyshev distances in XY (max(|x|, |y|)):
| Range | Description |
|---|---|
| 0β35 m | Near range, same as the previous challenges; every entry is evaluated here |
| 35β70 m | Long range, following the range-wise evaluation of SSF; optional (--long-range) |
The leaderboard has three rankings, all by mean Dynamic averaged over the five datasets:
- Overview 0β70 m (default): mean of both ranges, for entries that evaluate 35β70 m
- 0β35 m: every entry
- 35β70 m: entries that evaluate 35β70 m
Entries without 35β70 m are listed below the Overview and 35β70 m rankings instead of being compared, and their 35β70 m numbers stay private. Every entry is shown in the Supervised or Unsupervised track and labelled single-dataset or multi-dataset; per-dataset and per-range breakdowns are in each entry's details.
Uses
Intended Use
This dataset is intended for the 2026 Multi-Dataset Scene Flow Challenge. It benchmarks the ability of one method with one configuration to estimate LiDAR scene flow across diverse sensors and driving scenarios without knowing the source dataset.
Participants should use the test set only for generating challenge submissions. No validation set of any of the five source datasets may be used for training.
Out-of-Scope Use
- Training or fine-tuning models on this test set (declared per-scene test-time optimization is allowed)
- Any commercial application
- Any use that violates the license terms of the individual source datasets
Dataset Creation
Curation Rationale
Prior scene flow benchmarks evaluate models on a single dataset and sensor. This dataset was created to measure zero-shot cross-domain generalization, a property that becomes more important as autonomous systems are deployed across diverse hardware platforms and geographic regions.
The scene anonymization ensures that leaderboard rankings reflect genuine multi-sensor generalization rather than dataset-specific tuning.
Source Data
Frames are selected from five publicly available autonomous driving datasets: the Argoverse 2 scenes come from the sensor test split, and the other four datasets from their validation splits. Frames are filtered to keep only those with sufficient non-ground point density and valid flow ground-truth annotations. Ground-truth flow is derived from 3D bounding-box tracks with rigid-body point assignment, following Khatri et al. (2024).
Scene IDs are replaced with random 32-character hex strings before public release. A private server-side mapping links each anonymous ID to the source dataset and real scene for per-dataset scoring.
Personal and Sensitive Information
All point clouds were collected from ego-vehicles in public road environments. Individual source datasets apply face and license-plate blurring where applicable. No personally identifiable information is present in the LiDAR point clouds.
Bias, Risks, and Limitations
- Geographic coverage is limited to North America, Europe and Singapore (urban and highway driving).
- Sensor diversity covers spinning mechanical LiDARs (32- and 64-beam) and FMCW LiDARs; other modalities are not represented.
- Ground-truth flow is derived from 3D bounding-box annotations, which may miss unlabeled or partially visible objects.
- Evaluation covers non-ground points only; ground-level motion (e.g., debris) is not measured.
- The anonymization prevents dataset-specific debugging; participants must rely on their own held-out data for ablations.
Citation
If you take part in the challenge or use this dataset, please cite the OpenSceneFlow works and the evaluation metric:
@inproceedings{zhang2024deflow,
author={Zhang, Qingwen and Yang, Yi and Fang, Heng and Geng, Ruoyu and Jensfelt, Patric},
booktitle={2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)},
title={{DeFlow}: Decoder of Scene Flow Network in Autonomous Driving},
year={2024},
pages={2105-2111},
doi={10.1109/ICRA57147.2024.10610278}
}
@inproceedings{zhang2024seflow,
author={Zhang, Qingwen and Yang, Yi and Li, Peizheng and Andersson, Olov and Jensfelt, Patric},
title={{SeFlow}: A Self-Supervised Scene Flow Method in Autonomous Driving},
booktitle={European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV)},
year={2024},
pages={353β369},
organization={Springer},
doi={10.1007/978-3-031-73232-4_20},
}
@inproceedings{zhang2025deltaflow,
title={{DeltaFlow}: An Efficient Multi-frame Scene Flow Estimation Method},
author={Zhang, Qingwen and Zhu, Xiaomeng and Zhang, Yushan and Cai, Yixi and Andersson, Olov and Jensfelt, Patric},
booktitle={The Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems},
year={2025},
url={https://openreview.net/forum?id=T9qNDtvAJX}
}
@article{zhang2025himo,
title={{HiMo}: High-Speed Objects Motion Compensation in Point Cloud},
author={Zhang, Qingwen and Khoche, Ajinkya and Yang, Yi and Ling, Li and Mansouri, Sina Sharif and Andersson, Olov and Jensfelt, Patric},
journal={IEEE Transactions on Robotics},
year={2025},
volume={41},
pages={5896-5911},
doi={10.1109/TRO.2025.3619042}
}
@inproceedings{zhang2026teflow,
title = {{TeFlow}: Enabling Multi-frame Supervision for Self-Supervised Feed-forward Scene Flow Estimation},
author = {Zhang, Qingwen and Jiang, Chenhan and Zhu, Xiaomeng and Miao, Yunqi and Zhang, Yushan and Andersson, Olov and Jensfelt, Patric},
year = {2026},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition},
pages = {3667-3676},
}
@article{zhang2026synflow,
title={{SynFlow}: Scaling Up LiDAR Scene Flow Estimation with Synthetic Data},
author={Zhang, Qingwen and Zhu, Xiaomeng and Jiang, Chenhan and Jensfelt, Patric},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.09411},
year={2026}
}
@inproceedings{khoche2025ssf,
title={{SSF}: Sparse Long-Range Scene Flow for Autonomous Driving},
author={Khoche, Ajinkya and Zhang, Qingwen and Sanchez, Laura Pereira and Asefaw, Aron and Mansouri, Sina Sharif and Jensfelt, Patric},
booktitle={2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)},
year={2025},
pages={6394-6400},
doi={10.1109/ICRA55743.2025.11128770}
}
@inproceedings{khatri2024trackflow,
author = {Khatri, Ishan and Vedder, Kyle and Peri, Neehar and Ramanan, Deva and Hays, James},
title = {I Can't Believe It's Not Scene Flow!},
booktitle = {European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV)},
year = {2024}
}
Other methods in OpenSceneFlow (collaborators)
@article{li2025uniflow,
title={{UniFlow}: Zero-Shot {LiDAR} Scene Flow for Autonomous Vehicles},
author={Li, Siyi and Zhang, Qingwen and Khatri, Ishan and Vedder, Kyle and Eaton, Eric and Ramanan, Deva and Peri, Neehar},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.18254},
year={2025}
}
@article{khoche2026dogflow,
author={Khoche, Ajinkya and Zhang, Qingwen and Cai, Yixi and Mansouri, Sina Sharif and Jensfelt, Patric},
journal = {IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters},
title = {{DoGFlow}: Self-Supervised LiDAR Scene Flow via Cross-Modal Doppler Guidance},
year = {2026},
volume = {11},
number = {3},
pages = {3836-3843},
doi = {10.1109/LRA.2026.3662592},
}
@article{kim2025flow4d,
author={Kim, Jaeyeul and Woo, Jungwan and Shin, Ukcheol and Oh, Jean and Im, Sunghoon},
journal={IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters},
title={Flow4D: Leveraging 4D Voxel Network for LiDAR Scene Flow Estimation},
year={2025},
volume={10},
number={4},
pages={3462-3469},
doi={10.1109/LRA.2025.3542327}
}
@inproceedings{lin2025voteflow,
title={VoteFlow: Enforcing Local Rigidity in Self-Supervised Scene Flow},
author={Lin, Yancong and Wang, Shiming and Nan, Liangliang and Kooij, Julian and Caesar, Holger},
booktitle={CVPR},
year={2025},
}
Dataset Card Contact
Please open an issue on OpenSceneFlow, or contact the challenge organizers. Challenge details and the leaderboard: sceneflow.kth-rpl.se.
- Downloads last month
- 488