pattern2code / README.md
knguyennguyen's picture
Use the Zenodo concept DOI for the artifact link
48a8688 verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
6.57 kB
---
pretty_name: Pattern2Code
license: odc-by
task_categories:
- image-to-text
- text-generation
language:
- en
tags:
- screenshot-to-code
- multimodal
- html
- css
- visual-grounding
- benchmark
size_categories:
- n<1K
configs:
- config_name: default
default: true
data_files:
- split: train
path: data/train-*.parquet
dataset_info:
features:
- name: standard_image
dtype: image
- name: noise_image
dtype: image
- name: example_id
dtype: string
- name: source_id
dtype: string
- name: pattern_family
dtype: string
- name: pattern_name
dtype: string
- name: attribute_name
dtype: string
- name: attribute_token
dtype: string
- name: position
dtype: string
- name: target_value
dtype: string
- name: target_value_from_filename
dtype: string
- name: bias_value
dtype: string
- name: pattern_description
dtype: string
- name: element_description
dtype: string
- name: code_snippet_line
dtype: string
- name: code_snippet_context
dtype: string
- name: html_path
dtype: string
- name: standard_image_path
dtype: string
- name: noise_image_path
dtype: string
- name: modified_index
dtype: int32
splits:
- name: train
num_examples: 720
---
# Pattern2Code
**Benchmark for the ASE 2026 paper *"Pattern Over Pixels: Measuring Pattern Completion Bias in Multimodal Code Generation."***
Project page: https://pattern2code.github.io/ · Artifact (Zenodo): https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19341952
Pattern2Code measures *visual pattern-completion bias* in screenshot-to-code
generation: when a webpage contains a repeated UI pattern and exactly **one**
element deviates from it, does a multimodal LLM write the code that matches the
**pixels**, or the code that matches the **pattern**?
Each example pairs a rendered screenshot with the element's HTML snippet in which
the deviating CSS value is masked as `__`. The model must recover the masked
value from the image.
## Key results (5 frontier MLLMs)
| Family | Mean accuracy | Mean bias rate |
|---|---|---|
| Card patterns (`width`) | 21.17% | **69.78%** |
| Text patterns (`font-size`) | 7.89% | **80.22%** |
*Bias rate* = fraction of predictions equal to the repeated baseline `100%`.
## Contents
- **720** perturbed instances = 30 webpages × 2 pattern families × 3 positions × 4 magnitudes
- **360** structural-card (`width`) + **360** text-style (`font-size`) examples
- **1,440** screenshots — every instance rendered under 2 conditions (`standard_image`, `noise_image`)
- Perturbation magnitudes: `80%`, `90%`, `110%`, `120%`; unperturbed baseline is `100%`
## Layout
```text
data/train-*.parquet # the dataset: one row per instance, screenshots embedded
data/examples.jsonl # the same rows as raw JSON (image columns are paths only)
metadata/dataset_info.json # summary statistics
metadata/validation_report.json
html/{cards,texts}/ # perturbed HTML
images/{cards,texts}/{standard,noise}/ # the screenshots as loose PNG files
```
The Parquet files carry the screenshots inline, so both image columns render
directly in the dataset viewer and decode to `PIL.Image` with no extra setup.
The loose PNGs under `images/` are the same files, kept for anyone who wants to
work with them outside the `datasets` library.
## Row schema
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
| `standard_image` | **Image** — the rendered screenshot |
| `noise_image` | **Image** — the same page with eight opaque rectangles overlaid |
| `example_id` | Unique instance id |
| `source_id` | Seed webpage id (Design2Code) |
| `pattern_family` | `structural_card` or `text_style` |
| `pattern_name`, `pattern_description`, `element_description` | The repeated pattern being probed |
| `attribute_name` | Masked CSS property (`width` or `font_size`) |
| `attribute_token` | The mask token (`__`) |
| `position` | Which element was perturbed: `first`, `mid`, `last` |
| `modified_index` | Index of the perturbed element within the pattern |
| `target_value` | **Ground truth** — the perturbed value (e.g. `120%`) |
| `bias_value` | The pattern-consistent baseline (always `100%`) |
| `code_snippet_line` | The masked element's HTML |
| `code_snippet_context` | Masked element plus its sibling elements (model input) |
| `html_path` | Relative path to the full perturbed HTML |
| `standard_image_path` / `noise_image_path` | Relative paths to the two screenshot files |
## Loading
```python
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("knguyennguyen/pattern2code", split="train")
ex = ds[0]
ex["standard_image"] # PIL.Image — already decoded, no cast_column needed
ex["noise_image"] # PIL.Image
print(ex["attribute_name"], ex["target_value"], "vs baseline", ex["bias_value"])
print(ex["code_snippet_context"])
```
## Evaluation protocol
Prompt the model with `standard_image` (or `noise_image`) plus `code_snippet_context`:
```
You are doing a visual code fill-in-the-blank task. Given the webpage screenshot
and HTML snippet below, fill the blank token __ with ONLY the missing CSS/HTML
value. The goal is to predict the masked value to recreate the {pattern} in the
webpage design. Return the final answer in JSON format: {"answer":"<value>"}.
The blank must be a percentage value divisible by 10.
```
Score each prediction into three mutually exclusive outcomes:
- **Correct** — equals `target_value`
- **Bias-aligned** — equals `bias_value` (`100%`)
- **Other error** — neither
## Citation
```bibtex
@inproceedings{nguyen2026pattern,
title = {Pattern Over Pixels: Measuring Pattern Completion Bias in
Multimodal Code Generation},
author = {Nguyen, Khai-Nguyen and Chaparro, Oscar and Mastropaolo, Antonio},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 41st IEEE/ACM International Conference on
Automated Software Engineering (ASE)},
year = {2026}
}
```
## License & provenance
The seed webpages come from the
[Design2Code](https://github.com/NoviScl/Design2Code) dataset, which is released
under the **Open Data Commons Attribution License (ODC-By)** as it is built on
the C4 corpus (also ODC-By). All perturbed HTML and screenshots here are
derivative works and are redistributed under **ODC-By** with attribution.
Copyright in the original website content remains with the respective site
owners; the material is shared for research and reproducibility purposes.