id stringlengths 20 20 | source stringclasses 1
value | family stringclasses 4
values | group stringclasses 10
values | split stringclasses 1
value | input stringlengths 21 1.03k | answer stringlengths 5 913 | options listlengths 4 4 ⌀ | tier stringclasses 2
values | label_source stringclasses 2
values | audit_accuracy float32 0.95 1 | provenance stringlengths 199 270 | record stringlengths 272 455 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
cid:250f960a9920459f | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Forum update: The enforcement schedule is exhaustive, and it says an operator who dumps untreated waste into the river is subject to a fine. So an operator who does not dump untreated waste into the river is not subject to that fine under this schedule. | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario",
"Preponderance of the Evidence",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulator deciding an enforcement action", "genre": "a forum post", "seed_word": "downpour"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0060", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0060", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:250f960a9920459f"} |
cid:af59915a1cf62b95 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | “The contract permits termination without penalty when notice is delivered within 30 days, and that provision exhausts the circumstances in which penalty-free termination is available,” Judge Ana Hollis said in her ruling. “Ivo Galvan’s notice arrived after that period, so penalty-free termination is not permitted.” | A Contrario | [
"Beyond a Reasonable Doubt",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a judge explaining a ruling in a contract case", "genre": "a quoted statement in a news story", "seed_word": "lifeless"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0095", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0095", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:af59915a1cf62b95"} |
cid:1bc4279f46b6cf84 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Hana Forde told Ana Galvan in closing, “The sentencing rule is exhaustive: it assigns a one-year term to anyone who knowingly removes a sealed evidence envelope from the courthouse. Kira Engel’s envelope was unsealed, so that rule does not assign her the one-year term.” | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario",
"Clear and Convincing Evidence",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a criminal trial's closing arguments", "genre": "an exchange in a courtroom", "seed_word": "underfunded"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0117", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0117", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:1bc4279f46b6cf84"} |
cid:4cecffe1a8627d56 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Jun Ivers said the statute imposes the filing fee on applications for emergency review, and the committee record says that list is exhaustive. Gus Galvan noted that Ben Forde’s application is for routine review, not emergency review. Jun concluded that the statute does not impose the filing fee on Ben’s application. | A Contrario | [
"Analogy to Precedent",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "lawyers arguing over how to read a statute", "genre": "meeting minutes", "seed_word": "wrongfully"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0156", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0156", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:4cecffe1a8627d56"} |
cid:8f0c63a3fd05f7e1 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | “Section 8 says petitions filed with a signed notice receive expedited review, and the section defines that as the exhaustive rule for expedited review,” Gus Brandt wrote to Jun Duarte. “So a petition without a signed notice does not receive expedited review.” | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"Clear and Convincing Evidence",
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "lawyers arguing over how to read a statute", "genre": "a short dialogue between two people", "seed_word": "unchecked"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0169", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0169", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:8f0c63a3fd05f7e1"} |
cid:33d540125cee5c07 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | In a statement to Luis Engel, HR director Hana Ivers said, “Our policy says employees who complete the required training by June 1 keep their wellness stipend; that is the full class the policy covers. Employees who don’t complete the training by then won’t keep the stipend.” | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario",
"Analogy to Precedent"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an HR team applying a workplace policy", "genre": "a quoted statement in a news story", "seed_word": "kiddie"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0171", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0171", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:33d540125cee5c07"} |
cid:1f820a61d8c671ab | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | In its opinion, the appellate court says that if the claim is a certified-walkout case, then the claim receives reinstatement. Ana Ivers writes to Jun Castell on the court forum: “The opinion treats that category as the complete set eligible for reinstatement, so if the claim is not a certified-walkout case, then the c... | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"Elements Test",
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an appellate court opinion", "genre": "a forum post", "seed_word": "homely"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0185", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0185", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:1f820a61d8c671ab"} |
cid:7523df3faa83f2c2 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | “The complete site-access rule gives access to staff with current safety certification,” compliance officer Ivo Forde told Ana Abara. “So staff without current safety certification do not get site access.” | A Contrario | [
"Burden of Proof",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a compliance officer reviewing company rules", "genre": "a quoted statement in a news story", "seed_word": "mauve"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0191", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0191", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:7523df3faa83f2c2"} |
cid:93f61b9527b6a33f | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | To: Ben Brandt
From: Ana Engel
Re: Jun Hollis’s injury claim
The courthouse rule awards damages for injuries on employer-owned stairways, and the rule is exhaustive. Jun was injured on a public walkway, not an employer-owned stairway. Under this rule, his injury does not qualify for damages. | A Contrario | [
"Elements Test",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a civil trial about an injury", "genre": "an internal memo", "seed_word": "unionization"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0192", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0192", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:93f61b9527b6a33f"} |
cid:194a5b7c52d0c88b | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | In a textbook exercise, Ivo Duarte wrote to Luis Galvan: “The statute says that if a filing is an emergency filing, it receives expedited review. The statute sets out the exhaustive classes of filings eligible for expedited review, and emergency filings are the class it names. So a filing that is not an emergency filin... | A Contrario | [
"Elements Test",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "lawyers arguing over how to read a statute", "genre": "a textbook exercise written as a short story", "seed_word": "inborn"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0239", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0239", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:194a5b7c52d0c88b"} |
cid:c286afe6612e316f | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | To Hana Forde, from Ivo Castell: The trial provision sets out the exclusive categories for damages, and it says, “If the injury was caused by a collapsing scaffold, the injured party receives damages.” On that exhaustive reading, if the injury was not caused by a collapsing scaffold, the injured party does not receive ... | A Contrario | [
"Analogy to Precedent",
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a civil trial about an injury", "genre": "an internal memo", "seed_word": "aficionado"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0272", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0272", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:c286afe6612e316f"} |
cid:4bd70bb04c1075ec | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Meeting minutes: Kira Engel noted that the policy grants the after-hours stipend when an employee is assigned to overnight response, and that the policy lists this as the exhaustive category for the stipend. Luis Galvan confirmed that Farah Hollis is not assigned to overnight response. The team therefore recorded that ... | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario",
"Balancing Test"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an HR team applying a workplace policy", "genre": "meeting minutes", "seed_word": "cranium"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0288", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0288", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:4bd70bb04c1075ec"} |
cid:3a01111dc9821643 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | “The statute says cars parked in marked loading zones may be towed, and it sets out that rule as the complete towing rule,” Dara Hollis told Hana Castell. “So cars parked outside marked loading zones cannot be towed under this statute.” | A Contrario | [
"Analogy to Precedent",
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "lawyers arguing over how to read a statute", "genre": "a quoted statement in a news story", "seed_word": "barricade"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0296", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0296", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:3a01111dc9821643"} |
cid:6bb238d3aaa33336 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Subject: Draft opinion on the stay request
Gus, the statute grants a stay to an applicant facing imminent irreparable injury, and it says that this is the complete category of applicants eligible for a stay. Farah’s client faces only financial loss, not imminent irreparable injury, so the client is not eligible for a ... | A Contrario | [
"Clear and Convincing Evidence",
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an appellate court opinion", "genre": "an email", "seed_word": "chairlift"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0331", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0331", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:6bb238d3aaa33336"} |
cid:c41b64320b6abcec | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | In a statement quoted by the news story, landlord Gus Abara said, “The lease’s exhaustive termination clause grants tenants who give 30 days’ written notice the right to end their tenancy. Dara Duarte didn’t give 30 days’ written notice, so she lacks the right to end her tenancy.” | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario",
"Distinguishing a Precedent"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a landlord and tenant disputing a lease", "genre": "a quoted statement in a news story", "seed_word": "rhombus"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0350", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0350", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:c41b64320b6abcec"} |
cid:be283ef5105a40f8 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Kira Hollis writes: “The statute makes its coverage exhaustive: if the injury occurred on a marked public ski slope, then the injured person receives statutory compensation. Hana Brandt was hurt while riding a toboggan on an unmarked hillside, so her injury did not occur on a marked public ski slope. Farah Abara is rig... | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Elements Test",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a civil trial about an injury", "genre": "a paragraph from an opinion column", "seed_word": "toboggan"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0457", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0457", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:be283ef5105a40f8"} |
cid:a36a3741efb2a1bb | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Dear Ana, HR’s complete warning schedule says employees who submit expense claims after the monthly cutoff receive a written warning, and HR says the schedule covers every situation in which it issues that warning. Jun submitted his claim before the cutoff, so he should not receive a written warning under this policy. ... | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"Burden of Proof",
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an HR team applying a workplace policy", "genre": "a reader's letter and an advice columnist's reply", "seed_word": "bailiwick"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0469", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0469", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:a36a3741efb2a1bb"} |
cid:0c6f993897679074 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | To: Hana Engel
From: Farah Castell
Subject: Late expense submissions
The reimbursement rule says that expense reports filed more than 30 days after purchase incur a $25 processing charge, and states that this is the complete set of cases to which the charge applies. Kira Forde’s report was filed 12 days after purchase... | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"Analogy to Precedent"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a compliance officer reviewing company rules", "genre": "an internal memo", "seed_word": "gipsy"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0524", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0524", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:0c6f993897679074"} |
cid:8dbdc13b5411a23d | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | In her closing argument, Hana Brandt told the jury, “The statute gives the enhanced sentence to cases involving forged court orders, and Luis Engel’s case does not involve a forged court order. The statute sets out that sentencing rule as a complete list, so the enhanced sentence does not apply to Luis.” Gus Castell’s ... | A Contrario | [
"Elements Test",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a criminal trial's closing arguments", "genre": "a paragraph from an opinion column", "seed_word": "deference"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0527", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0527", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:8dbdc13b5411a23d"} |
cid:f1a0a97020349824 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | In a training exercise, regulator Ana Duarte wrote to Eli Ivers: “The regulation’s complete exemption from the filing penalty applies to parties formally recognized as participants in an armed conflict.” Her review found that Ivo Forde’s organization was not formally recognized as a participant in an armed conflict. An... | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"Burden of Proof",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulator deciding an enforcement action", "genre": "a textbook exercise written as a short story", "seed_word": "belligerent"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0601", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0601", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:f1a0a97020349824"} |
cid:6d65da5b3f094d31 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Dear Farah, in Kira Castell’s civil injury trial, the statute says that if Kira’s injury occurred during a scheduled maintenance inspection, then the defendant is liable for Kira’s injury. I take that rule to cover every basis for liability in this case. So if Kira’s injury did not occur during a scheduled maintenance ... | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"Clear and Convincing Evidence",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a civil trial about an injury", "genre": "a reader's letter and an advice columnist's reply", "seed_word": "pediatricians"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0627", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0627", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:6d65da5b3f094d31"} |
cid:5d6b42becac27d02 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | In her closing argument, Farah Hollis told the jury that the statute’s exhaustive rule makes the seized evidence admissible when the search was conducted under a warrant. Hana Forde’s account says the search was not conducted under a warrant, so the seized evidence is not admissible. That is the consequence of reading ... | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"Balancing Test",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a criminal trial's closing arguments", "genre": "a paragraph from an opinion column", "seed_word": "entitle"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0629", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0629", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:5d6b42becac27d02"} |
cid:3bb19abfd7a26bda | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Dara Abara writes: “The lease says that if Hana Engel gives written notice by May 1, Ana Castell must renew Hana’s lease. Hana did not give written notice by May 1, so Ana does not have to renew Hana’s lease. That is a hard bargain, but the renewal clause draws a clear line.” | A Contrario | [
"Reasonable Person Standard",
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a landlord and tenant disputing a lease", "genre": "a paragraph from an opinion column", "seed_word": "ploy"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0631", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0631", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:3bb19abfd7a26bda"} |
cid:6e1eb6d506280833 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Dear Ben, I’m reviewing an enforcement action against a small greenhouse that discharged below the regulator’s stated threshold. The regulation says operators whose discharge exceeds the threshold must pay a surcharge, and the regulator’s guidance treats that as the complete rule for surcharges. Since this greenhouse’s... | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario",
"Analogy to Precedent",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulator deciding an enforcement action", "genre": "a reader's letter and an advice columnist's reply", "seed_word": "larkspur"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0638", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0638", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:6e1eb6d506280833"} |
cid:4d79ec1ddd31afd5 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Dear Ana, I’m following Eli’s civil trial over his injury, and the court’s rule grants compensation to workers injured while carrying out assigned inspections. Eli was injured while doing something else, so the rule does not grant him compensation. —Gus Forde
Dear Gus, Read as an exhaustive rule, that is the distincti... | A Contrario | [
"Elements Test",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a civil trial about an injury", "genre": "a reader's letter and an advice columnist's reply", "seed_word": "trickster"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0695", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0695", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:4d79ec1ddd31afd5"} |
cid:666abfff5c88db38 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Hi Gus, our lease grants a rent credit when a tenant’s apartment is unusable because of a building-wide water outage. The lease says this clause is the complete rule for rent credits, so an apartment that is unusable for another reason does not qualify for a rent credit. Best, Chen | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori",
"Reasonable Person Standard"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a landlord and tenant disputing a lease", "genre": "an email", "seed_word": "migraine"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0798", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0798", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:666abfff5c88db38"} |
cid:abcd4c786b86c9c2 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Dara Duarte said, “Our lease says its rule is exhaustive: if the lease was signed before July 1, then the tenant may end the lease with 30 days’ notice.” Ana Hollis replied, “The lease was not signed before July 1, so the tenant may not end the lease with 30 days’ notice.” | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Beyond a Reasonable Doubt",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a landlord and tenant disputing a lease", "genre": "a short dialogue between two people", "seed_word": "episcopacy"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0809", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0809", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:abcd4c786b86c9c2"} |
cid:6f2e24973997d494 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Luis Engel asked Gus Brandt whether the team could deny Ivo Abara’s remote-work request. “The policy says employees with a documented medical accommodation may work remotely,” Gus said. “Ivo has no documented medical accommodation, so the policy means he cannot work remotely.” | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario",
"Clear and Convincing Evidence"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an HR team applying a workplace policy", "genre": "a short dialogue between two people", "seed_word": "pita"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0814", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0814", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:6f2e24973997d494"} |
cid:70e1067312396bdc | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Luis Brandt addressed Judge Jun Forde: “Your Honor, the statute makes forfeiture under this section apply to property brought into the courthouse archive without a court permit, and it says this section exhaustively defines which property may be forfeited. Ivo Hollis argues that the statute also reaches property brough... | A Contrario | [
"Beyond a Reasonable Doubt",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "lawyers arguing over how to read a statute", "genre": "an exchange in a courtroom", "seed_word": "sanctity"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0822", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0822", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:70e1067312396bdc"} |
cid:333b72b636c34784 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Chen Hollis said, “The statute says a permit holder may operate an operable device in the harbor, and that rule is exhaustive. So a person without a permit cannot operate an operable device there.” Kira Duarte replied, “That reading fits the statute’s stated limit.” | A Contrario | [
"Preponderance of the Evidence",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "lawyers arguing over how to read a statute", "genre": "a short dialogue between two people", "seed_word": "stalwart"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0835", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0835", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:333b72b636c34784"} |
cid:b3b3e7b9a5d3c305 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | In the hearing, Ana Abara testified that the HR policy requiring approval before copying employee records applies when a supervisor copies one employee’s ordinary personnel file for routine scheduling. Ben Duarte, representing HR, said Jun Brandt copied the entire staff archive, including medical records, to send to an... | A Fortiori | [
"Elements Test",
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Clear and Convincing Evidence"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an HR team applying a workplace policy", "genre": "an exchange in a courtroom", "seed_word": "regicide"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0005", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0005", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:b3b3e7b9a5d3c305"} |
cid:840a28658637cc34 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Dear Hana, I’m trying to understand the appellate court’s ruling on courthouse security. In its opinion, the court said the entry rule applies to a visitor carrying a small knife, and that a visitor carrying a loaded firearm presents the danger the rule addresses even more strongly. So the court concluded that the entr... | A Fortiori | [
"A Fortiori",
"Preponderance of the Evidence",
"Distinguishing a Precedent",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an appellate court opinion", "genre": "a reader's letter and an advice columnist's reply", "seed_word": "daze"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0011", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0011", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:840a28658637cc34"} |
cid:d518bd6298697938 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | “The contract’s delay remedy applies to a one-day delay,” Judge Dara Galvan said. “A deliberate refusal to deliver creates the concern behind that remedy more strongly than a one-day delay does, so the remedy applies to the refusal as well.” Hana Ivers nodded. “I understand the ruling.” | A Fortiori | [
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Analogy to Precedent",
"Elements Test"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a judge explaining a ruling in a contract case", "genre": "a short dialogue between two people", "seed_word": "councilwoman"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0047", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0047", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:d518bd6298697938"} |
cid:1c897c71a38d47cd | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | In a news story, compliance officer Kira Hollis said, “Our protective-eyewear rule applies to staff handling ordinary dusty stock, because the dust can injure their eyes. Ben Duarte is handling corrosive powder, which poses an even greater risk to his eyes, so the protective-eyewear rule applies to Ben.” | A Fortiori | [
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario",
"Beyond a Reasonable Doubt",
"Burden of Proof"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a compliance officer reviewing company rules", "genre": "a quoted statement in a news story", "seed_word": "alluvium"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0048", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0048", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:1c897c71a38d47cd"} |
cid:e25cad68c2afe3de | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | In the textbook’s short story, Farah Galvan asked Kira Hollis whether Chen Engel’s overnight stay counted under the statute’s lodging rule. Kira pointed to a provision applying the rule to a guest who stays one night in a rooming house to protect residents from overnight disturbances. Chen had stayed three nights in a ... | A Fortiori | [
"A Contrario",
"Elements Test",
"Clear and Convincing Evidence",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "lawyers arguing over how to read a statute", "genre": "a textbook exercise written as a short story", "seed_word": "gander"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0054", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0054", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:e25cad68c2afe3de"} |
cid:1185bcbbfeb48565 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Dear Hana Brandt, I read Judge Eli Engel’s ruling on Dara Ivers’s contract dispute and wondered why he applied the written-notice rule to a shipment delayed six weeks. In his explanation, Judge Engel said the rule applies to a shipment delayed one day, and that a six-week delay gives an even stronger reason to require ... | A Fortiori | [
"Elements Test",
"Balancing Test",
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a judge explaining a ruling in a contract case", "genre": "a reader's letter and an advice columnist's reply", "seed_word": "sluggish"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0072", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0072", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:1185bcbbfeb48565"} |
cid:e35ce4e5ff8e1667 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Posting this for the HR team: our policy bars recording a routine staff meeting to protect employees’ confidential workplace discussions. A one-on-one meeting about an employee’s medical accommodation puts that confidentiality concern even more strongly in play, so the same policy bars recording it too. | A Fortiori | [
"Distinguishing a Precedent",
"Beyond a Reasonable Doubt",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an HR team applying a workplace policy", "genre": "a forum post", "seed_word": "lull"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0098", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0098", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:e35ce4e5ff8e1667"} |
cid:35230a8b3cd39265 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | To Luis, from Farah: In his closing, Ivo argued that the courthouse rule bars carrying a knife into the courtroom because weapons there threaten people. A loaded handgun presents that danger even more sharply than a knife. So the rule bars carrying a loaded handgun into the courtroom as well. | A Fortiori | [
"Elements Test",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario",
"Burden of Proof"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a criminal trial's closing arguments", "genre": "an internal memo", "seed_word": "silverware"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0122", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0122", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:35230a8b3cd39265"} |
cid:00713d3d48f763b4 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | In a statement to Hana Forde, regulator Farah Brandt said, “Our rule applies to a one-gallon solvent discharge into the reservoir because it threatens the drinking water. Gus Galvan’s ten-gallon discharge threatens that water even more, so our rule applies to his discharge as well.” | A Fortiori | [
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario",
"Clear and Convincing Evidence",
"Preponderance of the Evidence"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulator deciding an enforcement action", "genre": "a quoted statement in a news story", "seed_word": "grievous"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0206", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0206", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:00713d3d48f763b4"} |
cid:755e18dc520f3787 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | In his closing argument, Eli Abara made the point a jury should weigh: “The warrant rule applies to a search of a shared office. Searching Ana Ivers’s locked bedroom, where her child slept, implicates privacy even more strongly than searching a shared office. The warrant rule applies to the search of Ana’s bedroom.” Th... | A Fortiori | [
"A Fortiori",
"Burden of Proof",
"A Contrario",
"Reasonable Person Standard"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a criminal trial's closing arguments", "genre": "a paragraph from an opinion column", "seed_word": "felon"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0211", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0211", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:755e18dc520f3787"} |
cid:7fc75c7c8caead03 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | In a civil-trial exercise, Farah Hollis sent Eli Ivers her argument about the courthouse’s floor-safety rule, which requires a warning where a wet floor creates a slipping hazard. “The rule applies to the small wet patch that made Ivo Engel slip,” she wrote, “so it applies even more clearly to the broad, soapy spill, w... | A Fortiori | [
"Balancing Test",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario",
"Reasonable Person Standard"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a civil trial about an injury", "genre": "a textbook exercise written as a short story", "seed_word": "excitable"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0223", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0223", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:7fc75c7c8caead03"} |
cid:a63d6c2238e771a8 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Farah Abara, replying to Ivo Forde on the HR forum: Our data-handling policy applies to an employee who sends one staff file to a personal account. Luis Brandt uploaded the entire staff directory to a public site, a case that implicates the policy’s confidentiality rationale more strongly than sending one file to a per... | A Fortiori | [
"Balancing Test",
"Burden of Proof",
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an HR team applying a workplace policy", "genre": "a forum post", "seed_word": "ruinous"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0265", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0265", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:a63d6c2238e771a8"} |
cid:ac82ed79fffdbfe5 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | In a textbook exercise, Hana Brandt sends Ivo Ivers a note about a statute barring visitors from entering the archive with a borrowed ordinary badge. “The statute’s prohibition applies to a visitor who enters the archive using a borrowed ordinary badge,” she writes. “The risk of unauthorized archive access that justifi... | A Fortiori | [
"Reasonable Person Standard",
"A Contrario",
"Distinguishing a Precedent",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "lawyers arguing over how to read a statute", "genre": "a textbook exercise written as a short story", "seed_word": "minion"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0276", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0276", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:ac82ed79fffdbfe5"} |
cid:4bf03f0cab92d27b | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | “Hana, the contract’s cancellation-fee rule applies when the seller has begun custom work,” Judge Kira Duarte said. “Its purpose is to compensate the seller for costs already incurred, and Ben Abara cancelled after the custom goods were fully made, so that purpose weighs even more strongly here. The fee therefore appli... | A Fortiori | [
"Burden of Proof",
"A Contrario",
"Distinguishing a Precedent",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a judge explaining a ruling in a contract case", "genre": "a short dialogue between two people", "seed_word": "antimatter"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0282", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0282", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:4bf03f0cab92d27b"} |
cid:de2ff254c409692b | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Dear Ben Hollis, I’m Farah Ivers, a compliance officer reviewing our company’s gift rule. It bars officers from approving a vendor gift worth $100, because the rule protects impartial purchasing decisions. A vendor’s offer of a luxury weekend creates an even greater risk to impartial purchasing decisions than the $100 ... | A Fortiori | [
"Distinguishing a Precedent",
"A Fortiori",
"Clear and Convincing Evidence",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a compliance officer reviewing company rules", "genre": "a reader's letter and an advice columnist's reply", "seed_word": "tenderloin"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0365", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0365", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:de2ff254c409692b"} |
cid:d5376f129a9b916c | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | In a textbook exercise, tenant Chen Galvan wrote to landlord Gus Hollis about the delicatessen kitchen she planned to install in her apartment. Gus replied that the lease’s commercial-equipment restriction applies to a tenant installing a commercial fryer in an apartment, and Chen’s proposed kitchen presents an even gr... | A Fortiori | [
"A Fortiori",
"Elements Test",
"Clear and Convincing Evidence",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a landlord and tenant disputing a lease", "genre": "a textbook exercise written as a short story", "seed_word": "delicatessen"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0369", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0369", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:d5376f129a9b916c"} |
cid:88025abcb713a3bc | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | In the textbook’s contract case, Judge Hana Ivers explained her ruling to Ivo Brandt and Ana Galvan: “Their contract lets a buyer cancel when delivery is delayed at least 30 days by an event beyond the seller’s control, because a long delay leaves the buyer’s money tied up in goods that may not arrive. That rule applie... | A Fortiori | [
"A Fortiori",
"Preponderance of the Evidence",
"A Contrario",
"Burden of Proof"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a judge explaining a ruling in a contract case", "genre": "a textbook exercise written as a short story", "seed_word": "frontiersman"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0405", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0405", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:88025abcb713a3bc"} |
cid:60d3a7433e515426 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | To: Kira Engel
From: Eli Galvan
For closing, emphasize that the court’s appearance rule covers a defendant who deliberately misses a personally served summons. Chen Forde’s evidence shows the defendant deliberately ignored the judge’s direct order to appear after hearing it in court, which gives the rule’s concern for... | A Fortiori | [
"A Fortiori",
"Beyond a Reasonable Doubt",
"A Contrario",
"Reasonable Person Standard"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a criminal trial's closing arguments", "genre": "an internal memo", "seed_word": "summoner"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0410", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0410", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:60d3a7433e515426"} |
cid:5d17f164b46694a1 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | In Farah Castell’s appeal, the court’s notice rule applies to a landlord’s inspection of an ordinary storage locker. A search of a sealed personal diary has the rule’s privacy rationale more strongly than an inspection of an ordinary storage locker. So the notice rule applies to a search of a sealed personal diary, as ... | A Fortiori | [
"Reasonable Person Standard",
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Elements Test"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an appellate court opinion", "genre": "a paragraph from an opinion column", "seed_word": "duplicity"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0414", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0414", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:5d17f164b46694a1"} |
cid:3e92db10ceb390e1 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Judge Ben Engel writes, “Our rule permits supplemental briefing in an appeal with a 12,000-page record because the record is unusually difficult to review. This appeal has a 40,000-page record, so that concern applies even more strongly; the rule permits supplemental briefing here.” Judge Dara Hollis replies, “I agree.... | A Fortiori | [
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario",
"Distinguishing a Precedent",
"Elements Test"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an appellate court opinion", "genre": "a short dialogue between two people", "seed_word": "brisk"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0417", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0417", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:3e92db10ceb390e1"} |
cid:3c72e4a4d7a2387b | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | In a reader’s letter to the appellate court’s advice column, Gus Galvan asks Hana Brandt whether the courthouse drone rule can cover a drone flown inside a courtroom. Hana replies that the rule against operating drones in the courthouse applies to flights over the public lobby, where a drone could interrupt proceedings... | A Fortiori | [
"A Fortiori",
"Burden of Proof",
"Elements Test",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an appellate court opinion", "genre": "a reader's letter and an advice columnist's reply", "seed_word": "blasphemous"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0433", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0433", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:3c72e4a4d7a2387b"} |
cid:2dfdc01a9c7a9965 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Ana Ivers told Gus Forde that the statute’s advance inspection rule applies to delivery vans because it is meant to protect the old bridge from vehicle loads. She added that fully loaded quarry lorries put an even greater load on the bridge, so the rule’s reason applies more strongly to them. Hana Castell recorded Ana’... | A Fortiori | [
"Elements Test",
"A Fortiori",
"Clear and Convincing Evidence",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "lawyers arguing over how to read a statute", "genre": "meeting minutes", "seed_word": "footman"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0448", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0448", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:2dfdc01a9c7a9965"} |
cid:0f3564b21e5da5f9 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Ana, the court applied the warning rule to a small puddle in the courthouse corridor because it could cause a visitor to slip and be injured. The exposed metal rod in our case presents that same danger more strongly: it projects into the walkway and could cause a more serious injury. The warning rule therefore applies ... | A Fortiori | [
"A Fortiori",
"Balancing Test",
"Reasonable Person Standard",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a civil trial about an injury", "genre": "an internal memo", "seed_word": "indigent"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0551", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0551", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:0f3564b21e5da5f9"} |
cid:76ecc25b2dfce824 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | In a textbook exercise, Hana Castell asks Gus Abara how to read a statute barring gasoline containers from courthouse basements to reduce fire danger. Gus says the rule applies to a one-gallon can stored there, and a tanker holding thousands of gallons has the fire danger behind the rule even more strongly. So, he conc... | A Fortiori | [
"A Fortiori",
"Elements Test",
"A Contrario",
"Balancing Test"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "lawyers arguing over how to read a statute", "genre": "a textbook exercise written as a short story", "seed_word": "drunkard"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0565", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0565", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:76ecc25b2dfce824"} |
cid:86f4cd8a27f9f6f2 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | “The lease bars a landlord from cutting heat in one room to pressure a tenant over rent,” Eli Forde told the court. “That rule protects tenants from coercive loss of habitable conditions. If it covers a one-room cutoff, it covers Jun Ivers’s cutoff of heat throughout the apartment, where that concern is even stronger.” | A Fortiori | [
"A Contrario",
"Balancing Test",
"Beyond a Reasonable Doubt",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a landlord and tenant disputing a lease", "genre": "an exchange in a courtroom", "seed_word": "brawler"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0584", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0584", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:86f4cd8a27f9f6f2"} |
cid:402c49f010b67e91 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Hana Galvan writes: Our HR policy requires written consent before a manager reads an employee’s individual medical-leave file, protecting the employee’s confidentiality. A bulk download of medical-leave files exposes more sensitive information and puts more employees’ privacy at risk than reading one file, so the polic... | A Fortiori | [
"A Contrario",
"Beyond a Reasonable Doubt",
"A Fortiori",
"Reasonable Person Standard"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an HR team applying a workplace policy", "genre": "a paragraph from an opinion column", "seed_word": "tipper"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0601", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0601", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:402c49f010b67e91"} |
cid:fea461fa5df3cdbf | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | In this textbook exercise, Dara Abara sends Eli Galvan a note about the HR team’s anti-fatigue policy. “The policy requires HR to provide an anti-fatigue mat for an employee who stands for four hours a shift, because the mat reduces strain from prolonged standing. Ivo Engel stands for eight hours a shift, so that reaso... | A Fortiori | [
"A Fortiori",
"Beyond a Reasonable Doubt",
"Clear and Convincing Evidence",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an HR team applying a workplace policy", "genre": "a textbook exercise written as a short story", "seed_word": "bumpy"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0610", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0610", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:fea461fa5df3cdbf"} |
cid:e698c461284701d2 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Meeting minutes: Gus Duarte told Ivo Brandt that the lease rule applies to a tenant keeping one fuel can in the basement because of the fire risk. Hana Galvan is keeping several fuel drums there, creating an even greater fire risk than one can. Gus concluded that the lease rule applies to Hana’s drums. | A Fortiori | [
"Beyond a Reasonable Doubt",
"Burden of Proof",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a landlord and tenant disputing a lease", "genre": "meeting minutes", "seed_word": "oblate"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0612", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0612", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:e698c461284701d2"} |
cid:af592c1abb025ee3 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Farah Castell, posting to the regulator’s forum: The notice rule applies when an automated system merely delays a benefit payment, since even a delay can leave someone without money for essentials. Ivo Galvan’s system permanently terminated a recipient’s benefits without notice, putting that person at even greater risk... | A Fortiori | [
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Clear and Convincing Evidence",
"Preponderance of the Evidence"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulator deciding an enforcement action", "genre": "a forum post", "seed_word": "biophysicist"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0687", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0687", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:af592c1abb025ee3"} |
cid:f32e12b1b5febf6d | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Judge Hana Engel was right to apply the contract’s cancellation clause to Luis Galvan’s sale to Ana Duarte. The clause covers a seller’s concealment of a modest defect, since it protects buyers from being misled about what they are purchasing; Luis concealed a structural defect that made the house unsafe, so that prote... | A Fortiori | [
"A Fortiori",
"Reasonable Person Standard",
"Beyond a Reasonable Doubt",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a judge explaining a ruling in a contract case", "genre": "a paragraph from an opinion column", "seed_word": "thrifty"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0735", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0735", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:f32e12b1b5febf6d"} |
cid:a140e02041f81988 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | In a statement to Jun Duarte, regulator Kira Ivers said, “The secure-storage rule applies to a small niter shipment whose spill could contaminate one well. This bulk shipment could contaminate several wells, so the rule applies to it as well, and we will enforce it against the carrier.” | A Fortiori | [
"Reasonable Person Standard",
"Elements Test",
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulator deciding an enforcement action", "genre": "a quoted statement in a news story", "seed_word": "niter"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0750", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0750", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:a140e02041f81988"} |
cid:faa59db9934fa6b2 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | In a news interview, lawyer Dara Hollis told reporter Ana Abara, “Section 8 requires disclosure of a lobbyist’s $500 gift because even that amount can create concealed influence. A $50,000 gift creates that concern far more strongly, so Section 8’s disclosure rule should apply to a $50,000 gift as well.” | A Fortiori | [
"Reasonable Person Standard",
"Analogy to Precedent",
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "lawyers arguing over how to read a statute", "genre": "a quoted statement in a news story", "seed_word": "rigidly"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0787", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0787", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:faa59db9934fa6b2"} |
cid:b3ca7e2914966b68 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Dear Farah, I’m reviewing our company rules as compliance officer, and our handbook bars sending confidential project files to even an approved outside contractor because they could be exposed. It also seems clear that the same concern applies more strongly when someone posts those files publicly, where anyone can acce... | A Fortiori | [
"Preponderance of the Evidence",
"Reasonable Person Standard",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a compliance officer reviewing company rules", "genre": "a reader's letter and an advice columnist's reply", "seed_word": "crawfish"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0797", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0797", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:b3ca7e2914966b68"} |
cid:b5b769d450d8dd82 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | To Ivo Duarte, from Eli Ivers: The reporting rule applies to a firm's late filing of an ordinary monthly report. Farah Galvan's delay in filing an active-hazard report frustrates the rule's aim of timely intervention more strongly than a late ordinary monthly report does. The reporting rule therefore applies to Farah's... | A Fortiori | [
"Preponderance of the Evidence",
"A Contrario",
"Analogy to Precedent",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulator deciding an enforcement action", "genre": "an internal memo", "seed_word": "unseat"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0808", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0808", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:b5b769d450d8dd82"} |
cid:ebacdee7f1e5fac0 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | To: Ivo Abara
From: Jun Brandt
Subject: Consent rule and continuous tracking
I read the statute’s consent rule to cover an app collecting even a single location ping. Continuous minute-by-minute GPS tracking reveals a person’s movements far more extensively than a single ping, so the statute’s concern about exposing l... | A Fortiori | [
"A Contrario",
"Analogy to Precedent",
"Balancing Test",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "lawyers arguing over how to read a statute", "genre": "an email", "seed_word": "copycat"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0828", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0828", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:ebacdee7f1e5fac0"} |
cid:cfcffb34281f40fc | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Chen, the notice clause applies when a buyer misses a single scheduled installment, because notice gives the buyer a chance to cure before termination. Ben Forde missed four installments, making the need for that chance to cure even stronger than in the single-installment case. I therefore rule that the notice clause a... | A Fortiori | [
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario",
"Elements Test",
"Analogy to Precedent"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a judge explaining a ruling in a contract case", "genre": "an internal memo", "seed_word": "attentive"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0838", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0838", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:cfcffb34281f40fc"} |
cid:b0bb5a93ff32bf53 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | heldout | Hana Ivers writes to Chen Hollis: The warning duty covers a loose handrail that creates a modest risk of injury. The courthouse's broken balcony rail created a much greater risk of injury than that loose handrail, so the warning duty covers the courthouse's broken balcony rail. That is the sound result in this injury t... | A Fortiori | [
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Elements Test",
"Preponderance of the Evidence"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a civil trial about an injury", "genre": "a paragraph from an opinion column", "seed_word": "trusteeship"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-fortiori", "construct": "A Fortiori", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-fortiori:0842", "lexeme_id": "c:a-fortiori:0842", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:b0bb5a93ff32bf53"} |
cid:2290a555afed5d09 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | During the accounting review, Dara Ivers showed Ben Duarte that the same invoice number appeared twice in the books, while the company’s bank statement showed just one payment. The duplicate entry had been posted on the day a new clerk was learning the ledger system. “The most likely explanation is that the clerk enter... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Cost-Benefit Analysis",
"Affirming the Consequent",
"Probabilistic Reasoning",
"Abductive Reasoning"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an accounting review of a company's books", "genre": "a textbook exercise written as a short story", "seed_word": "resourcefulness"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0023", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0023", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:2290a555afed5d09"} |
cid:69714d043793ae10 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | In the lab-team exercise, Luis messaged Ivo: “Ivo, every test tube with the new reagent turned cloudy, while the untreated controls stayed clear. The reagent most likely reacted with something in the samples to form a cloudy substance.” | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Proof by Contrapositive",
"Abductive Reasoning",
"Affirming the Consequent",
"Inductive Reasoning"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a lab team discussing an experiment", "genre": "a textbook exercise written as a short story", "seed_word": "boney"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0062", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0062", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:69714d043793ae10"} |
cid:e88a294e0db623f6 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | Subject: Run 4 results
Hi Ana and Luis,
The pressure sensor recorded a sharp drop just after the chamber door was opened, and the door-seal indicator stayed green. The best explanation is that the sensor’s connector loosened during the run; that would account for the pressure reading without a seal warning. I suggest... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Analogical Reasoning",
"Bayesian Reasoning",
"Affirming the Consequent",
"Abductive Reasoning"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a lab team discussing an experiment", "genre": "an email", "seed_word": "parachutist"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0071", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0071", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:e88a294e0db623f6"} |
cid:c7be5a6e95d182da | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | Dara Galvan’s column argues that the council should expand its compost pickup pilot. Since the pilot began, the market district’s bins have stopped overflowing with food scraps, and the alley behind the restaurants has lost its usual sour smell. The weather has been much the same, and the council made no other sanitati... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Proof by Counterexample",
"Abductive Reasoning",
"Affirming the Consequent",
"Proof by Induction"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a town council debating a local policy", "genre": "a paragraph from an opinion column", "seed_word": "balsam"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0091", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0091", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:c7be5a6e95d182da"} |
cid:3c8ec6579cab9d62 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | Jun Forde: “Since the last three school mornings began with a line of students waiting outside the office, and each morning the office was locked at the first bell, I think the most likely explanation is that the office staff need more time to open up.” Ana Ivers: “Then perhaps we should delicately ask the staff and co... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Direct Proof",
"Abductive Reasoning",
"Affirming the Consequent",
"Counterfactual Reasoning"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a school deciding on a new rule", "genre": "a short dialogue between two people", "seed_word": "delicately"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0117", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0117", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:3c8ec6579cab9d62"} |
cid:94a9b75443da4133 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | Dara Engel opened her savings app and saw that the balance was lower than she expected. “I’ve been buying shares in a broad-market fund, and the market fell this week,” she told Hana Duarte. “That’s probably why my balance dropped; before I sell anything, I’ll check whether the fund moved with the market.” | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Proof by Contrapositive",
"Proof by Induction",
"Abductive Reasoning",
"Affirming the Consequent"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a conversation about investing savings", "genre": "a textbook exercise written as a short story", "seed_word": "chanter"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0164", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0164", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:94a9b75443da4133"} |
cid:8f0c922f6cc759ac | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | Jun Hollis told Farah Castell that the east hallway has been crowded at the bell every day this week, and that students from that hallway have arrived late to class despite leaving when the bell rang. He said the most likely explanation is that students are getting held up where the east and central hallways meet, and ... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Direct Proof",
"Proof by Induction",
"Affirming the Consequent",
"Abductive Reasoning"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a school deciding on a new rule", "genre": "meeting minutes", "seed_word": "hoot"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0196", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0196", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:8f0c922f6cc759ac"} |
cid:45ae6c059580cdd4 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | Farah Duarte noted in the meeting minutes that the project’s prototype passed every test, yet the latest build is running slowly. Eli Engel said the new analytics module is the most likely explanation: it was added just before the slowdown began, and it processes large datasets on every run. Kira Galvan agreed that the... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Cost-Benefit Analysis",
"Abductive Reasoning",
"Deductive Reasoning",
"Affirming the Consequent"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a disagreement at work about a project", "genre": "meeting minutes", "seed_word": "cytology"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0264", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0264", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:45ae6c059580cdd4"} |
cid:ce84d00c6c5f368f | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | Jun Ivers writes: The school’s trial of a clear-bag rule coincided with fewer reports of lost belongings, and students say they can find their things more quickly. The most likely explanation is that clear bags make it easier to spot misplaced items, so the school should adopt the rule permanently. This is a sensible r... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Affirming the Consequent",
"Proof by Contrapositive",
"Proof by Induction",
"Abductive Reasoning"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a school deciding on a new rule", "genre": "a paragraph from an opinion column", "seed_word": "pinafore"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0267", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0267", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:ce84d00c6c5f368f"} |
cid:a2b0969cc92682f0 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | Subject: Why the duplicate entries appeared
Hi Ben,
The review found the same supplier invoice entered twice, and both entries were posted by Eli on the final afternoon of the quarter. The most likely explanation is that Eli accidentally imported the invoice batch twice while rushing to close the books; the entries s... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Abductive Reasoning",
"Proof by Counterexample",
"Bayesian Reasoning",
"Affirming the Consequent"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an accounting review of a company's books", "genre": "an email", "seed_word": "expressiveness"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0304", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0304", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:a2b0969cc92682f0"} |
cid:02d307832ee59150 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | In her opinion column to Farah Hollis, Ana Duarte notes that the worst passing-period crowds form around the lockers, where students stop to retrieve books, while the corridors clear quickly once students move on. The simplest explanation is that locker stops are creating the bottleneck, so the school should adopt a ru... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Counterfactual Reasoning",
"Proof by Induction",
"Affirming the Consequent",
"Abductive Reasoning"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a school deciding on a new rule", "genre": "a paragraph from an opinion column", "seed_word": "lumpy"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0331", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0331", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:02d307832ee59150"} |
cid:f5a37d7d91d1bf6b | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | During a compliance review at the bank, Ben Brandt sent Farah Forde a note: “The overnight audit found three unusual transfers, all approved through Dara Hollis’s account, and the approval log shows Dara’s security token was used from a newly registered device.” Farah checked the device record and found it was register... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Affirming the Consequent",
"Abductive Reasoning",
"Proof by Contradiction (Reductio ad Absurdum)",
"Proof by Contrapositive"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulatory compliance review at a bank", "genre": "a textbook exercise written as a short story", "seed_word": "caveman"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0347", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0347", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:f5a37d7d91d1bf6b"} |
cid:86636d5478e2f151 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | Hana Castell’s notes to Kira Abara after reviewing Chen Galvan’s civil suit point to a straightforward explanation for the missing delivery records: Chen’s former office manager likely removed them while preparing the file for the hearing. The records vanished during the manager’s final week, and the manager had sole a... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Analogical Reasoning",
"Affirming the Consequent",
"Abductive Reasoning",
"Deductive Reasoning"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a civil lawsuit being argued in court", "genre": "an internal memo", "seed_word": "confection"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0351", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0351", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:86636d5478e2f151"} |
cid:ea6b58ad232bd32f | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | Hi Chen, the shipment arrived three weeks late, and the tracking record shows it sat at the carrier’s regional depot during that time. That makes a carrier-side delay the most likely explanation, rather than a problem with our dispatch; the depot hold is where the delay appears to have occurred. Ana Hollis has the carr... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Deductive Reasoning",
"Affirming the Consequent",
"Proof by Cases (Disjunction Elimination)",
"Abductive Reasoning"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a contract dispute between two small businesses", "genre": "an email", "seed_word": "psych"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0375", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0375", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:ea6b58ad232bd32f"} |
cid:0d84514277bd96a4 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | Kira, in our last four away matches, the team’s energy dropped sharply after long overnight bus rides, while it stayed high after trips with an extra day of rest. The travel schedule is the most likely explanation for our late-season away-game slump. We should plan more recovery time before away matches next year. | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Abductive Reasoning",
"Proof by Contrapositive",
"Affirming the Consequent",
"Bayesian Reasoning"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a sports team reviewing its season", "genre": "a forum post", "seed_word": "stargazer"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0406", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0406", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:0d84514277bd96a4"} |
cid:29d448e09dcb2507 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | Dara Brandt: Luis Castell, the fund Ivo Galvan recommended has paid out steadily and held its value through a rough month, while several comparable funds stumbled. The likeliest explanation is that its managers have built a more resilient portfolio, not that the market simply happened to spare it; that’s why I’d keep p... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Bayesian Reasoning",
"Abductive Reasoning",
"Probabilistic Reasoning",
"Affirming the Consequent"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a conversation about investing savings", "genre": "a paragraph from an opinion column", "seed_word": "coppice"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0417", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0417", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:29d448e09dcb2507"} |
cid:2e3bf462be11bba8 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | Hana Ivers, the forum’s attendance chart shows that late arrivals have risen sharply, mostly among students who take Route 6. The district moved Route 6’s pickup time last week, putting it closer to the first bell. That schedule change is the most likely explanation, so I’d hold off on a stricter tardy rule until we re... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Inductive Reasoning",
"Affirming the Consequent",
"Abductive Reasoning",
"Proof by Counterexample"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a school deciding on a new rule", "genre": "a forum post", "seed_word": "springtime"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0425", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0425", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:2e3bf462be11bba8"} |
cid:506a7f2c4b5047bf | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | Meeting minutes: Chen Ivers noted that the kitchen light had been left on three nights in a row, and Ben Castell said the motion sensor was likely malfunctioning. Gus Engel suggested that the family replace the sensor before deciding whether to change their evening routine, since that explanation best fit the repeated ... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Abductive Reasoning",
"Affirming the Consequent",
"Proof by Cases (Disjunction Elimination)",
"Proof by Induction"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a family planning a household decision", "genre": "meeting minutes", "seed_word": "needless"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0495", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0495", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:506a7f2c4b5047bf"} |
cid:317d5cf7584a964b | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | To: Eli Hollis
From: Luis Castell
Subject: Review of Jun Galvan’s approval log
Jun’s account approved three transactions while his badge record shows he was outside the bank, and the approvals came from a terminal assigned to another employee. The most coherent explanation is that someone else used Jun’s credentials a... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Abductive Reasoning",
"Bayesian Reasoning",
"Probabilistic Reasoning",
"Affirming the Consequent"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulatory compliance review at a bank", "genre": "an internal memo", "seed_word": "fondly"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0504", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0504", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:317d5cf7584a964b"} |
cid:250503f87e96424c | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | In court, Kira Forde asked Ivo Hollis why Chen Duarte’s savings account had grown. Ivo replied, “The statements show no outside deposits, and they show Chen’s Treasury bills matured just before the balance rose. The most likely explanation is that Chen moved the proceeds into the savings account.” | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Proof by Contradiction (Reductio ad Absurdum)",
"Affirming the Consequent",
"Deductive Reasoning",
"Abductive Reasoning"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a conversation about investing savings", "genre": "an exchange in a courtroom", "seed_word": "kilowatt"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0506", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0506", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:250503f87e96424c"} |
cid:be2458c6e6c323e4 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | Dear Jun, Ben and I are deciding whether to replace our old refrigerator, and lately the milk spoils quickly even when the temperature dial is set low. The back of the fridge feels warm, and the motor runs almost constantly, so I think its cooling system is failing and replacing it is our best bet. —Kira
Kira, those s... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Abductive Reasoning",
"Affirming the Consequent",
"Proof by Induction",
"Proof by Contradiction (Reductio ad Absurdum)"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a family planning a household decision", "genre": "a reader's letter and an advice columnist's reply", "seed_word": "leathery"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0530", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0530", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:be2458c6e6c323e4"} |
cid:650d900b24a2ea9d | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | Chen: The statements show that Ben moved his savings into short-term Treasury bills two days before his bank announced financial troubles. Ben, you testified that you had been worried about protecting your emergency fund and wanted an investment that was easy to access. Luis: On that evidence, the most likely explanati... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Affirming the Consequent",
"Abductive Reasoning",
"Direct Proof",
"Proof by Cases (Disjunction Elimination)"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a conversation about investing savings", "genre": "an exchange in a courtroom", "seed_word": "retrial"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0547", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0547", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:650d900b24a2ea9d"} |
cid:8b075f65e8b954a4 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | To: Ivo Duarte
From: Ana Engel
Our savings account earned less interest this month, even though its balance stayed steady. The bank also lowered the rate on its savings accounts last week. The rate cut is the most likely explanation for the smaller interest payment, so we should compare rates before deciding where to m... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Proof by Contrapositive",
"Abductive Reasoning",
"Deductive Reasoning",
"Affirming the Consequent"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a conversation about investing savings", "genre": "an internal memo", "seed_word": "lunchtime"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0568", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0568", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:8b075f65e8b954a4"} |
cid:8bcca2ec037b78be | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | To Ben Duarte and Eli Galvan — Household planning memo from Farah Abara: On our last three grocery trips, we bought more produce than would fit comfortably in the refrigerator, and several vegetables were crushed when we closed the drawers. The simplest explanation is that our refrigerator is too small for the way we s... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Direct Proof",
"Affirming the Consequent",
"Abductive Reasoning",
"Bayesian Reasoning"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a family planning a household decision", "genre": "an internal memo", "seed_word": "chlorophyll"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0576", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0576", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:8bcca2ec037b78be"} |
cid:b117cf997e6c66fe | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | Ana Ivers: Chen, the delivery arrived two days late, but the carrier’s tracking record shows it sat at the depot during the regional snowstorm, and our dispatch log shows we handed it over on the contracted date. Chen Forde: Then the most likely explanation is that the storm delayed the shipment, rather than your busin... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Abductive Reasoning",
"Proof by Counterexample",
"Direct Proof",
"Affirming the Consequent"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a contract dispute between two small businesses", "genre": "a short dialogue between two people", "seed_word": "inequity"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0600", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0600", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:b117cf997e6c66fe"} |
cid:220d79195f6fc6d6 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | Ana Duarte: “Kira, Dara Hollis’s application lists a steady salary, but the recent deposits are irregular and her employer’s phone number goes to a disconnected line.” Kira Galvan: “The most likely explanation is that the application’s employment details are outdated; let’s verify them before deciding.” | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Deductive Reasoning",
"Affirming the Consequent",
"Abductive Reasoning",
"Counterfactual Reasoning"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a loan application being assessed", "genre": "a short dialogue between two people", "seed_word": "levitation"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0623", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0623", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:220d79195f6fc6d6"} |
cid:a8b28722677d9359 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | Hi Luis and Chen, our match review shows that we created fewer clear chances in the final six games, and the tracking data shows our midfielders covered less ground in those matches. The most likely explanation is that fatigue caught up with the squad late in the season, so we should look at our recovery schedule befor... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Affirming the Consequent",
"Counterfactual Reasoning",
"Proof by Contrapositive",
"Abductive Reasoning"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a sports team reviewing its season", "genre": "an email", "seed_word": "easel"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0650", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0650", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:a8b28722677d9359"} |
cid:1ed78e01d1a555c7 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | Dara Castell: “We conceded far fewer goals from counterattacks in the final month, even though opponents kept sending quick runners forward.” Eli Engel: “The match footage shows our midfielders dropping back immediately after we lost the ball, giving the defenders time to regroup. That change is the clearest explanatio... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Bayesian Reasoning",
"Affirming the Consequent",
"Inductive Reasoning",
"Abductive Reasoning"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a sports team reviewing its season", "genre": "a short dialogue between two people", "seed_word": "vex"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0707", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0707", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:1ed78e01d1a555c7"} |
cid:00b68b787662f0e1 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | “The review found repeated payments to the same supplier, while the corresponding invoices were missing from the books,” Dara Castell told Farah Abara in a statement quoted in the news story. “The most likely explanation is that someone entered payments without valid invoices.” | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Abductive Reasoning",
"Affirming the Consequent",
"Direct Proof",
"Proof by Contrapositive"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an accounting review of a company's books", "genre": "a quoted statement in a news story", "seed_word": "cava"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0734", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0734", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:00b68b787662f0e1"} |
cid:27954b4e178e2fe7 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | Hana Abara: In the review logs, three loan files were approved minutes after Farah Duarte’s credentials were used, even though Farah says she was offline. The shared terminal shows Gus Galvan’s badge logged in at those times, and the files all bypassed the usual second review. The most likely explanation is that Gus us... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Proof by Contrapositive",
"Abductive Reasoning",
"Proof by Counterexample",
"Affirming the Consequent"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulatory compliance review at a bank", "genre": "a forum post", "seed_word": "hypnotize"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0798", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0798", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:27954b4e178e2fe7"} |
cid:2e037d68a5648dba | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | Hi Luis, Farah’s season review shows that opponents repeatedly found space down our left side after the winter break, even though our players and formation stayed the same. The match notes also show that our training sessions had shifted toward pressing centrally during that stretch. That shift best explains the patter... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Abductive Reasoning",
"Affirming the Consequent",
"Probabilistic Reasoning",
"Proof by Induction"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a sports team reviewing its season", "genre": "an email", "seed_word": "hallucination"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0823", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0823", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:2e037d68a5648dba"} |
cid:179871299093fb07 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | Ben, during the council’s food-scrap collection pilot, landfill tonnage fell, and participation rose after the town delivered kitchen pails and posted clear sorting guides. The simplest explanation is that the pails and guides made composting easier for residents. I’d support expanding the program townwide. | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Abductive Reasoning",
"Affirming the Consequent",
"Proof by Contrapositive",
"Proof by Contradiction (Reductio ad Absurdum)"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a town council debating a local policy", "genre": "a forum post", "seed_word": "subjectivity"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0826", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0826", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:179871299093fb07"} |
cid:6a90b1138f98c97f | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | technique | heldout | In my view, Dr. Luis Hollis is right to recommend that Ben Forde begin the new treatment. Ben’s fever and shortness of breath eased soon after he started it, while his symptoms had persisted for days before. The most likely explanation is that the treatment helped bring about the improvement, so continuing it under med... | Abductive Reasoning | [
"Abductive Reasoning",
"Deductive Reasoning",
"Affirming the Consequent",
"Proof by Induction"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.995 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a doctor explaining a treatment choice", "genre": "a paragraph from an opinion column", "seed_word": "imprison"} | {"construct_id": "construct:abductive-reasoning", "construct": "Abductive Reasoning", "kind": "technique", "group": "technique", "split": "heldout", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0832", "lexeme_id": "c:abductive-reasoning:0832", "task": "technique", "item_id": "cid:6a90b1138f98c97f"} |
OpenLemma v0.1: evaluation
Probes and held-out items. Never in the training data.
- Copy-rate probes are multiple-choice k-shot prompts. In
record,copy_indexmarks the option that copies the previous demonstration's answer, andprev_answer_is_goldmarks when copying happens to be right (base rate). Score accuracy, copy rate and anti-copy rate. - Held-out items come from held-out seeds, task types or headwords.
| Config | Rows |
|---|---|
constructs-1-heldout |
10,783 |
gloss-probes |
3,716 |
gloss-run2 |
12,633 |
gloss-run3 |
0 |
gloss-run4 |
63,214 |
lemma-v1-heldout |
23,734 |
lemma-v1-probes |
4,677 |
Provenance and verification
Every row comes from OpenLemma (code: MIT; the documentation in docs/ covers
every source).
- Generation: procedural generators and gpt-6-luna (OpenAI, flex, reasoning effort low). Some upstream retrieval material was written by gpt-5.4-mini.
- Auditing only: gpt-6-sol.
- Checks:
verified: an independent checker, solver (axeyum), CAS route or truth table recomputed the answer;constructed: the label is fixed by how the item was built (planted values, code corruptions, the sense a sentence was written for);agreed: a model-proposed label that independent blind model checks agreed with, in a family whose gpt-6-sol audit is >= 95% (default) or 80-95% (extended, withaudit_accuracyon every row);prose: model-written explanatory text about verified facts.
Anti-copy packing. k-shot documents (k in {0, 1, 3, 8}) never reward copying the previous answer:
- open answers are pairwise distinct;
- label answers repeat the last demonstration's label only at the base rate 1/n, with labels balanced over the demonstrations;
- copy traps and symbol labels appear on 10% of documents each.
Batches v0/v1 were originally packed so that "any label but the last one" was always right; this release repacks those families.
Plain text. Documents in default/extended contain no control tokens. ALEA-style
<|start|>/<|end|> boundaries are added at tokenization. Reasoning glyphs (① ∴ ∵ ⊢ ● ⚠ …)
are ordinary characters. The special_tokens config keeps the original ALEA control-token
renderings for replication.
Token counts use the ALEA tokenizer alea-p1-prefix-16k.
Licence and attribution
CC-BY-4.0. Attribute OpenLemma (https://github.com/mjbommar/openlemma). Upstream sources:
- axeyum (MIT OR Apache-2.0): curriculum, facts, scenarios, CAS and solver checks;
- OpenGloss v2.4 (CC-BY-4.0): lexical seeds and grounding;
- WordNet 3.0: rows derived from WordNet senses carry the WordNet licence, included as
LICENSE-WordNet.txt; - alea-quality-model: the 93 foundational reasoning constructs.
Generated text was produced with OpenAI models and is subject to the provider's terms.
Known limitations
agreedlabels are model-checked, not proven; readaudit_accuracyand the per-family audits in the repository docs.- OpenGloss v2.4 has known defects (about 10% of common senses invalid, unreliable etymologies). Etymology tasks are excluded, and seed senses were validity-checked for the newer runs.
- Two deontic constructs are thin (Permission Operator, Prohibition Operator).
- This release was published before any model was trained on it. It makes no claim about downstream gains.
Citation
@misc{openlemma2026,
title = {OpenLemma: verified, bottom-up synthetic data for logic, reasoning, algorithms and language},
author = {Bommarito, Michael J.},
year = {2026},
note = {Version 0.1},
url = {https://github.com/mjbommar/openlemma}
}
- Downloads last month
- 63