Datasets:

mlfoundations-dev
/

lawma-annotations-deepseek-all-1x-formated

Modalities:

Formats:

Size:

Libraries:

Dataset card Data Studio Files Files and versions

Dataset Viewer

Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate

Split (1)

train · 5.44k rows

opinion stringlengths 155 298k	instruction stringclasses 1 value	question stringclasses 1 value	choices sequencelengths 3 3	answer sequencelengths 1 1	id int64 1 5.44k	problem stringlengths 3.37k 41k	reasoning stringlengths 1.19k 24.6k	deepseek_solution stringlengths 350 3.6k	verify bool 2 classes	deepseek_solution_formatted stringlengths 15 3.6k	__original_row_idx int64 0 5.44k
BARTKUS v. ILLINOIS. No. 39. Argued November 19, 1957. Decided January 6, 1958. Walter T. Fisher, acting under appointment by the Court, 352 U. S. 958, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were...	What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy...	What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court?	[ "Conservative", "Liberal", "Unspeciﬁable" ]	[ 2 ]	16	What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy...	Okay, so I need to figure out whether the decision from the lower court that the Supreme Court reviewed in Bartkus v. Illinois was liberal or conservative. Let me start by recalling what the case is about. First, I remember that Bartkus v. Illinois (1958) dealt with double jeopardy. The issue was whether a state could...	The lower court's decision in Bartkus v. Illinois upheld the state's ability to prosecute the petitioner after a federal acquittal, rejecting the double jeopardy argument. Under the provided framework for criminal procedure, a conservative decision aligns with pro-government and anti-defendant positions. Since ...	false	The lower court's decision in Bartkus v. Illinois upheld the state's ability to prosecute the petitioner after a federal acquittal, rejecting the double jeopardy argument. Under the provided framework for criminal procedure, a conservative decision aligns with pro-government and anti-defendant positions. Since ...	15
VENUS v. UNITED STATES. No. 75. Argued December 14, 1961. Decided December 18, 1961. Hayden C. Covington argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. Jerome M. Feit argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg. P...	What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy...	What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court?	[ "Conservative", "Liberal", "Unspeciﬁable" ]	[ 0 ]	45	What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy...	Okay, let's try to figure out the ideological direction of the lower court decision that the Supreme Court reviewed in the case Venus v. United States. The Supreme Court reversed the lower court's judgment and instructed to dismiss the indictment. The per curiam decision cites Ward v. United States, which reversed a Fi...	The Supreme Court reversed the lower court's decision, instructing the dismissal of the indictment. In criminal procedure cases, a liberal decision typically favors the defendant (e.g., overturning a conviction or indictment), while a conservative decision aligns with the government (e.g., upholding charges or ...	true	The Supreme Court reversed the lower court's decision, instructing the dismissal of the indictment. In criminal procedure cases, a liberal decision typically favors the defendant (e.g., overturning a conviction or indictment), while a conservative decision aligns with the government (e.g., upholding charges or ...	44
UNITED STATES v. RADDATZ No. 79-8. Argued February 25, 1980 Decided June 23, 1980 Burger, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which White, Blackmun, Rehnquist, and Stevens, JJ., joined. Blackmun, J., filed a concurring opinion, post, p. 684. Powell, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in pa...	What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy...	What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court?	[ "Conservative", "Liberal", "Unspeciﬁable" ]	[ 1 ]	18	What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy...	Okay, let's try to figure out whether the lower court's decision in United States v. Raddatz was liberal or conservative. First, I need to recall the case details. The Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals decision. The case involved the Federal Magistrates Act, specifically whether a district court can refer a m...	The decision reviewed by the Supreme Court in United States v. Raddatz was rendered by the Court of Appeals, which ruled in favor of the defendant (Raddatz). The Court of Appeals held that the district court’s failure to personally hear disputed testimony on credibility issues during a suppression hearing violated du...	true	The decision reviewed by the Supreme Court in United States v. Raddatz was rendered by the Court of Appeals, which ruled in favor of the defendant (Raddatz). The Court of Appeals held that the district court’s failure to personally hear disputed testimony on credibility issues during a suppression hearing violated du...	17
GERSTEIN et al. v. COE et al. No. 73-1157. Decided June 3, 1974 Per Curiam. A three-judge District Court entered a declaratory-judgment holding unconstitutional a Florida statute, Fla. Stat. Ann. §458.22 (3) (Supp. 1974^-1975), which forbids an abortion without the consent of the husband, if the woman is married, and i...	What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy...	What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court?	[ "Conservative", "Liberal", "Unspeciﬁable" ]	[ 0 ]	1	What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy...	Okay, let's tackle this question. So, we need to figure out whether the lower court's decision that the Supreme Court reviewed was liberal or conservative. The case here is Gerstein v. Coe, decided in 1974. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and denied certiorari. But we're focused on the l...	The decision reviewed by the Supreme Court in Gerstein v. Coe was issued by a three-judge District Court that declared unconstitutional a Florida statute requiring spousal or parental consent for abortions. Applying the provided ideological framework: 1. Context: The case pertains to abortion rights, w...	false	The decision reviewed by the Supreme Court in Gerstein v. Coe was issued by a three-judge District Court that declared unconstitutional a Florida statute requiring spousal or parental consent for abortions. Applying the provided ideological framework: 1. Context: The case pertains to abortion rights, w...	0
RIVERA v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS No. 98-7450. Decided March 22, 1999 Per Curiam. Pro se petitioner Rivera seeks leave to proceed informa pauperis under Rule 39 of this Court. We deny this request pursuant to Rule 39.8. Rivera is allowed until April 12, 1999, within which to pay the docketing fee required by ...	What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy...	What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court?	[ "Conservative", "Liberal", "Unspeciﬁable" ]	[ 0 ]	46	What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy...	Okay, let's try to figure out the ideological direction of the lower court's decision that the Supreme Court reviewed in Rivera v. Florida Department of Corrections. First, I need to understand the case summary provided. The Supreme Court's per curiam decision here is about denying Rivera's request to proceed in form...	The Supreme Court's decision in this case pertains to procedural sanctions against Rivera for filing multiple frivolous petitions, not the substantive merits of any lower court ruling. The Court denied certiorari, leaving the lower court’s decision intact, but the record provides no details about the nature of that dec...	false	The Supreme Court's decision in this case pertains to procedural sanctions against Rivera for filing multiple frivolous petitions, not the substantive merits of any lower court ruling. The Court denied certiorari, leaving the lower court’s decision intact, but the record provides no details about the nature of that dec...	45
"CALMAR STEAMSHIP CORP. v. SCOTT et al.\nNo. 303.\nArgued January 15, 1953.\nDecided April 27, 1953.(...TRUNCATED)	"What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine w(...TRUNCATED)	What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court?	[ "Conservative", "Liberal", "Unspeciﬁable" ]	[ 0 ]	19	"What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine w(...TRUNCATED)	"Okay, let's try to figure out whether the lower court's decision that the Supreme Court reviewed in(...TRUNCATED)	"The decision of the Court of Appeals reviewed by the Supreme Court in **Calmar Steamship Corp. v. S(...TRUNCATED)	true	"The decision of the Court of Appeals reviewed by the Supreme Court in **Calmar Steamship Corp. v. S(...TRUNCATED)	18
"LOPINSON v. PENNSYLVANIA.\nNo. 1133.\nDecided June 17, 1968.\nLester J. Schaffer for petitioner in (...TRUNCATED)	"What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine w(...TRUNCATED)	What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court?	[ "Conservative", "Liberal", "Unspeciﬁable" ]	[ 0 ]	73	"What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine w(...TRUNCATED)	"Okay, I need to determine whether the lower court's decision that the Supreme Court reviewed in Lop(...TRUNCATED)	"The Supreme Court's decision in Lopinson v. Pennsylvania vacated the lower court judgments and re(...TRUNCATED)	true	"The Supreme Court's decision in Lopinson v. Pennsylvania vacated the lower court judgments and re(...TRUNCATED)	72
"ORNELAS et al. v. UNITED STATES\nNo. 95-5257.\nArgued March 26, 1996\nDecided May 28, 1996\nRehnqui(...TRUNCATED)	"What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine w(...TRUNCATED)	What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court?	[ "Conservative", "Liberal", "Unspeciﬁable" ]	[ 0 ]	85	"What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine w(...TRUNCATED)	"Okay, so I need to figure out whether the lower court's decision that the Supreme Court reviewed in(...TRUNCATED)	"The Supreme Court reviewed the decision of the Court of Appeals, which had applied a deferential \"(...TRUNCATED)	true	"The Supreme Court reviewed the decision of the Court of Appeals, which had applied a deferential \"(...TRUNCATED)	84
"CALIFORNIA et al. v. DEEP SEA RESEARCH, INC., et al.\nNo. 96-1400.\nArgued December 1, 1997\nDecide(...TRUNCATED)	"What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine w(...TRUNCATED)	What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court?	[ "Conservative", "Liberal", "Unspeciﬁable" ]	[ 1 ]	37	"What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine w(...TRUNCATED)	"Okay, so I need to figure out whether the lower court's decision that the Supreme Court reviewed in(...TRUNCATED)	"The ideological direction of the lower court's decision (the Ninth Circuit) reviewed by the Supreme(...TRUNCATED)	true	"The ideological direction of the lower court's decision (the Ninth Circuit) reviewed by the Supreme(...TRUNCATED)	36
"GARRETT v. UNITED STATES\nNo. 83-1842.\nArgued January 16, 1985\nDecided June 3, 1985\nRehnquist, J(...TRUNCATED)	"What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine w(...TRUNCATED)	What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court?	[ "Conservative", "Liberal", "Unspeciﬁable" ]	[ 0 ]	34	"What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine w(...TRUNCATED)	"Okay, so I need to figure out whether the lower court's decision that the Supreme Court reviewed in(...TRUNCATED)	"The ideological direction of the lower court's decision (the Eleventh Circuit) reviewed by the Supr(...TRUNCATED)	false	"The ideological direction of the lower court's decision (the Eleventh Circuit) reviewed by the Supr(...TRUNCATED)	33

End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

README.md exists but content is empty.

Downloads last month: 17

Number of rows:

Total file size: