qid string | query string | model_a string | model_b string | score_a float64 | raw list | reasoning string | parsed_ok list | task string | judge string | query_set string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
00002 | This appeal arises from the judgment of the learned Single Judge of High Court dated 6th June, 1988 whereby the learned Single Judge declined to quash the prosecution of the petitioner. The petitioner therein has been prosecuted for selling adulterated supari on the basis of a certificate issued by the Director of Cent... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A better covers the query's core food-adulteration/PFA and quashing-prosecution aspects with more topically relevant results, whereas System B mainly adds unrelated acquittal/murder cases after the same top hit. | Both systems rank the only Prevention of Food Adulteration quashing case first, but B’s inclusion o... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00008 | The complainant P1 filed a Special Leave Petition in this court seeking leave to appeal against the judgment dated 6th April, 1993 of the High Court. The incident for which these accused were charged is the murder of P2, son of the complainant P1 (appellant) on 13th June, 1982. As per the case of the prosecution, the ... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A ranks closer factual analogies (field/relative murder, crop-labourer assault) and includes the rare procedural aspect of victim-family/informant special leave, whereas B buries the most analogous crop case lower and lacks the complainant-appeal cases. | System B better matches the query by ranking the most fac... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00011 | The petitioner has been under detention pursuant to the order dated June 5, 1990 passed by the District Magistrate with a view to preventing him "from doing any such work which is prejudicial for the maintenance of public order". The grounds of detention were furnished to the detenu in time. Therein it was stated inter... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A ranks more preventive-detention and public-order cases that address grounds of detention and related procedural issues, whereas System B dilutes its list with less relevant bail, death-sentence, and internment matters. | System B ranks a more focused set of preventive-detention judgments and adds relevant case... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00012 | This is an appeal with a certificate granted by the judicial Commissioner. P1-hereinafter referred to as the respondent'-was appointed a constable in the Police Force of L1 by the Superintendent of Police, L2 by order dated April 18, 1954. The employment was temporary and was liable to be terminated with one month's no... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A places the most on-point Satish Chandra Anand case first and also includes more relevant police-termination and termination-versus-punishment cases than System B. | B provides better overall coverage by including the police-constable dismissal and termination-versus-punishment authorities that more closely mat... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00022 | The petitioner is a firm carrying on business as builders, colonizers and contractors. The petitioner is the owner of 24.45 acres of vacant land situated in s village. Being engaged in construction activities it made an application under the provisions for the grant of licence for group housing scheme. This application... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A retrieves more property, construction, housing, and licence-related precedents such as Shantistar Builders and Teri Oat Estates, while System B contains more unrelated service and employment matters. | System B ranks multiple builder, housing-scheme, land-development, and construction-contractor cases near the... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00036 | Appellants call in question legality of the judgment rendered by the High Court upholding conviction of the appellants (hereinafter referred to as the 'accused') and sentence as imposed by the trial Court which had sentenced each to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months, two years and seven years respectively ... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 0.5 | [
"B",
"B"
] | System B ranks more procedurally and factually analogous criminal appeals against High Court-confirmed convictions and sentences higher, especially top results on murder/assault, eyewitness/FIR issues, and sentence/fine, whereas A’s top results are less directly aligned. | System B surfaces more directly analogous case... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00038 | Challenge in this appeal is to the order of a High Court allowing the appeal filed by the respondent (hereinafter referred to as the 'accused'). The accused was convicted for offence and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- with default stipulation by Principal District Judge. He ... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A includes more directly relevant State appeals against High Court acquittals based on circumstantial evidence, especially State of U.P. v Anil Singh, while System B contains fewer such on-point cases and ranks several less relevant conviction-appeal decisions higher. | System B better covers the central legal i... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00044 | The appellants were tried for offences on the allegations that about four months prior to the incident, some quarrel had taken place between the deceased P1 and the appellant No. 4 P2 in relation to raising of boundary wall. On 12 April 1983 at about 7.00 P.M. the deceased accompanied by P3, had gone to P4 (PW-8) to en... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A provides more and higher-ranked cases matching the query's agricultural crop context, lathi assault, removal of body, trial acquittal reversed on State appeal, and concurrent life/short-term sentencing pattern than System B. | System B contains closer matches to the query's agricultural/boundary dispute, trial... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00000 | The appellant on February 9, 1961 was appointed as an Officer in Grade III in the respondent Bank ( for short 'the Bank'). He was promoted on April 1, 1968 to the Grade officer in the Foreign Exchange Department in the Head Office of the Bank. Sometime in 1964, MCH Society ( for short 'the Society') was formed of which... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 0 | [
"B",
"A"
] | System B retrieves cases directly on-point on reinstatement, back wages, and natural justice following acquittal and domestic inquiry, while System A is largely off-target bank amalgamation or unrelated employment cases. | System A includes more directly relevant cases on disciplinary termination, natural justice, misa... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00001 | The appellant before us was examined as prime witness in the trial of T.R. on the file of the Special Judge against the first respondent. The trial ended in conviction against the first respondent and when the appeal filed by him came to be heard by the High Court the appellant had become a Cabinet Minister. On account... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A is more relevant because it includes an expunction-of-remarks case and a corruption sanction case that cites the likely controlling authority, while System B contains only tangential and largely unrelated cases. | System B is more relevant because it includes R. K. Lakshmanan v. A. K. Srinivasan, a directly on... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00003 | The Petitioner was married to the Respondent No.2, on 27th November, 2005, as per Hindu traditions and customs. At the time of marriage 12 lakhs in cash, 45 sovereigns of gold and 50,000/- is alleged to have been given to the Accused Nos.1 to 4, who are the husband, the mother-in-law and other relatives of the husband.... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A ranks a highly relevant dowry/cruelty 498A case first and includes several more substantive dowry cases, whereas System B places less relevant commercial quashing cases above the relevant family-law matters. | System B ranks several relevant dowry/498A/304B and quashing/SLP-related cases near the top, while Sy... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00004 | This appeal is preferred against the judgment dated 19.8.2011 passed by the High Court, whereby the High Court partly allowed the appeal filed by the appellants thereby confirming the conviction of the appellants with certain modifications. On 18.11.1994, at about 8.00 A.M. in the morning the complainant P1 (PW-5) alon... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A ranks the more closely matching cases (especially Kallu @ Masih, a convicted-appellant appeal after High Court partly allowed and group assault causing injuries) higher than System B, whose unique results are less relevant and its top result is weak. | one sentence | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00005 | On 19.3.1999, SI P1 along Ct. P2 went to Village V1 where Inspector P1, PW-16, had reached along with his staff. After some time, ACP, arrived at the spot. On enquiry, they came to know that one constable of Police Station, namely, P2, having suffered a gun shot injury, had been taken to the hospital. The Head Constabl... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 0 | [
"B",
"A"
] | System B's list contains slightly more relevant partial matches such as FIR, charge-sheet, shooting, and IPC 302/307/148/149 cases, and ranks one closer to the top than System A, although both share an irrelevant top result. | System A slightly better covers the query's distinctive elements, including knife violence, 3... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00006 | This criminal appeal is directed against the judgment of the High Court dismissing the appeal but modifying the sentence. The appellant took his trial on the allegations that he had dishonestly and fraudulently misappropriated a sum of Rs. 3851.60, which amount was in his control in the capacity of a public servant, i.... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A ranks the closer public-servant misappropriation/cheating appeal first and then the cashier/forgery case, with several other corruption, forgery, or appeal-related cases, while System B leads with a less procedurally similar sanction issue and includes many unrelated violent-crime cases. | System B ranks the m... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00007 | This appeal, by special leave, has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 23 February 2005 of the High Court (Aurangabad Bench), by which the appeal preferred by the appellants was dismissed and their conviction and sentence of 7 years RI imposed thereunder was affirmed. The deceased P1 was daughter of PW... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 0 | [
"B",
"A"
] | System B ranks several cases more closely aligned to the query's dowry-death, seven-year sentence, special leave, and Aurangabad Bench context, including Sharad v. State and Gangaram v. State, whereas A includes more unrelated land, dacoity, and assault cases. | System A covers the dowry-death/cruelty issue more strong... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00009 | The four appellants, along with P1 son of P2, were jointly tried in the court of Additional Sessions Judge on the following charges: "That you all accused nos. 1 to 5 on or about 12th day of November, 1967 at about 5-45 a.m. near XYZ Road, formed an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of such asse... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 0.5 | [
"B",
"B"
] | System B better captures the core legal issue by including the directly relevant co-accused/in-limine appeal precedent (Ashok Kumar) along with Sakharam, whereas System A returns more factually similar but less on-point cases and misses that key authority. | System B is slightly better because it includes Bani Singh on... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00010 | The detenu P1, a French national, at the relevant time was employed as Airport Manager by A1 in L1. By an A1 flight, on September 20, 1981, he arrived at International Airport, L2 and passed through green channel indicating he had no dutiable goods to declare to the Customs Authorities. When he was at Exit Gate No. 1, ... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A ranks the most temporally and statutorily relevant 1981 COFEPOSA smuggling/habeas-corpus cases first, better matching the query's facts and primary issues than System B's later gold-smuggling cases. | System B places the most relevant 1981 Maharashtra COFEPOSA habeas corpus cases involving representation and A... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00013 | P1 is before us being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 17.10.2005 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court. Appellant herein along with P2 (Accused No.1), P3 (Accused No. 3) and P4 (Accused No.4) were tried for committing the murder of one P5. P5 was an accused in a case of murder of ... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 0 | [
"B",
"A"
] | System B places the exact matching case, Gangaram Shantaram Salunkhe v. State of Maharashtra, at rank 1, while System A includes the same case but ranks it only seventh, making B significantly better in ranking quality and immediate usefulness. | System A's top hit is the exact matching judgment with the same 17.10.200... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00014 | The appellants are five in number and they have filed this appeal as of right. They were acquitted by the trial court but convicted by the High Court on appeal filed by the State, besides the offence of rioting. On the first count they were each sentenced to imprisonment for life besides fine and to lesser sentences fo... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A ranks several cases closely matching the query's procedural posture and legal context (trial acquittal reversed by a High Court on a State appeal, unlawful assembly/rioting with murder/attempt and life sentences with fines) higher and covers the rioting/unlawful-assembly issue better than System B, whose top r... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00015 | The appellant P1 is convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge by judgment and order dated 5th/9th August, 1991 and was sentenced to death subject to confirmation by the High Court. Appellant appealed against the conviction and sentence which was partly allowed. The order with regard to the death penalty was set aside ... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 0 | [
"B",
"A"
] | System B better matches the query's central facts and legal issues because it includes a dagger-blod murder case plus more death-penalty and family/property-related murder precedents, whereas System A includes more riot, robbery, and attempt cases with less direct relevance. | System A surfaces more directly relevant d... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00016 | facts of the matter, as is evident from the present Writ Petition challenging an order of detention dated 1st March, 2001 it appears that the petitioner is presently confined in Central Prison and it is this detention which the petitioner contended is without the authority of law and constitute an infringement of his g... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 0.5 | [
"B",
"B"
] | System B ranks the more directly relevant COFEPOSA detention-delay cases higher, especially placing T.A. Abdul Rahman first, which better addresses the query's stale-material and delayed-detention issue than System A's weaker top result. | Both sets contain the key COFEPOSA/customs delay cases, but B ranks the factuall... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00017 | These appeals involve a pure question of law as to whether an award by which residue assets of a partnership firm are distributed amongst the partners on dissolution of the partnership firm requires registration. Briefly the facts are that a partnership firm was constituted comprising of four persons belonging to the s... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 0.25 | [
"B",
"tie"
] | Both sets are identical through the most relevant top seven arbitration/partnership results, but B's tenth result is at least an arbitration/commercial dispute, giving it marginally better coverage than A's entirely unrelated final three. | The two sets share the same top seven results, which include the few cases rele... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00018 | This appeal is preferred by the appellants against the judgment and order dated 31.08.2012 passed by the High Court whereby the High Court has allowed the appeal filed by the State and convicted all the appellants and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- each. The br... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A places a decision involving hand-made bombs and multiple cases matching the trial-acquittal/High-Court-conviction posture higher, making it marginally closer to the query's distinctive facts. | System B ranks the most on-point case (Sambasivan, involving bombs, multiple accused, unlawful assembly, and a high-c... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00019 | This appeal by special leave is directed against the Judgment rendered by a High Court confirming the conviction of the appellant for the offences punishable. The High Court by the impugned judgment confirmed the judgment passed by the Principal Sessions Judge convicting the appellant and sentencing him to suffer impri... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 0 | [
"B",
"A"
] | System B ranks more relevant murder/attempt appeal cases with closer factual and jurisdictional overlap (house attack, eyewitness reliance, Andhra Pradesh, life and fine sentencing) higher, while A includes clearly off-topic results such as rape. | System A ranks closer special-leave murder/attempt cases with High Cour... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00020 | Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the High Court by which two Writ Petitions filed by the respondent were disposed of. The controversy lies within a very narrow compass. Before dealing with the rival contentions the factual background needs to be noted. Respondent was appointed on... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 0.5 | [
"tie",
"tie"
] | Both systems rank the exact matching judgment first and provide similarly relevant employment law cases afterward, making them equally useful. | Both systems rank the exact Himachal Pradesh v. Ravinder Singh judgment first and provide broadly comparable secondary employment-law results, so they are equally useful. | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00021 | Assailing the legal acceptability of the judgment and order passed by the High Court where it has given endorsement to the judgment passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge wherein the learned trial Judge had found the appellants guilty of the offences and imposed the sentence of rigorous imprisonment of seven y... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A provides more directly relevant dowry-death/cruelty and appellate-standards cases in better positions, whereas System B contains several less relevant matters and places its most valuable dowry-death precedent at the bottom. | System B provides a better overall balance of topically relevant dowry-death and pro... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00023 | These appeals are directed against the judgment of a High Court whereby an appeal and a criminal revision were disposed of. The appellants were found guilty and sentenced to undergo various terms of sentences. The Criminal Appeal was filed by three appellants questioning the conviction and sentence as recorded. Complai... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A ranks more directly on-point land-dispute/criminal-appeal-and-revision cases higher and avoids several irrelevant top items present in System B. | System B better ranks cases matching the query's criminal-appeal/revision structure and the close-relative land-dispute context, while System A's top result is weak... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00024 | These appeals involving common questions of law and fact were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. The lands situated inter alia in villages V1, V2, V3 and V4 were acquired by the State for the purpose of use thereof by the Appellant. A notification was issued on 31.7.1986. ... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | Both systems retrieve the same top land-acquisition compensation cases, but System A places an additional directly relevant land-acquisition case higher and generally offers better topical coverage of the acquisition/compensation issue than System B. | System B ranks relevant land-acquisition compensation cases higher ... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00025 | The hearing before us now relates to certain objections filed to the Award made by a former Judge of this Court who was appointed the sole arbitrator to adjudicate upon the dispute between the parties pursuant to the Order of this Court dated 18th November, 1987 in the circumstances as set out hereinafter. In order to ... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A places the closest analogous court-appointed arbitrator case higher and avoids several clearly irrelevant industrial/container results present in System B. | System B ranks the more directly relevant arbitration/award and court-appointed arbitrator cases higher and avoids several clearly off-topic results. | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00026 | Appellant before us was detained. He is the Managing Director of a company, registered and incorporated as CompanyC1. It was an exporter and held a valid licence therefor. The company was to export products of alloy steel. Upon exporting of alloy steel, it was entitled to credits under the Duty Entitlement Pass Book (D... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A is more useful overall because it includes more directly relevant COFEPOSA/detention-order authorities, especially Masuma on supply of documents and representation, despite B’s slightly better first result. | System B ranks the closest DRI/export-related detention case first and includes more directly relevant... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00027 | Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of the High Court dismissing the appeal filed by the appellants. The appeal was directed against the judgment dated 31.8.2004 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge convicting the appellants for offence and sentencing each to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fi... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 0 | [
"B",
"A"
] | System B better matches the core posture of a High Court-confirmed trial conviction for murder and ranks the closest field-based case and the life/Rs.2,000-fine case higher, whereas A includes more sentence-amount matches but weaker procedural and factual alignment. | System A ranks the procedurally and sentencing-clos... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00028 | This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 5.8.2008, passed by the High Court reversing the judgment of acquittal dated 8.4.2003 recorded by the Sessions Court wherein the appellant was charge sheeted for murdering his wife, P1, by giving her Sodium Cyanide. This is a most unfortunate case, in ... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A better aligns with the query’s procedural posture and factual context by ranking cases on High Court reversal of acquittal and wife-murder/dowry death matters, including the directly relevant Shyamal Saha decision on appellate interference, while System B substitutes several less relevant matters. | System B r... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00029 | That the deceased P1 got married to P2, the 2nd respondent herein, in the year 2001. In her marital home, she was ill-treated by her parents-in-law, respondents 1 and 3 herein. They would constantly tell her that she was incapable of doing the house work properly, and her mother-in-law did not give her sufficient food ... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A ranks the most factually similar kerosene-burning dowry-murder case higher and includes a procedurally closer State appeal case instead of B's less relevant Bihar case. | System B is slightly better because it ranks the more factually analogous Babu Ram case higher and replaces the relatively irrelevant Bihar ... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00030 | This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 26.5.2006 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court whereby the learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition and set aside the impugned order passed by the Revisional Court and remanded the matter back to the Revisional Court... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A ranks the two most relevant Section 145/attachment/revision cases at the top, whereas System B inserts more irrelevant matters earlier. | System B ranks the two most pertinent Section 145/attachment/revision precedents at the top, whereas System A interposes an unrelated criminal-appeal judgment before the clo... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00031 | On 9th May, 2004, the marriage of the daughter of one P1, the brother of P2 PW.1, was to be solemnized in village Janephal, District Aurangabad. P2 PW.1, arranged a water tanker on the 6th May, 2004. As the tanker was being taken towards P2's house the accused appellants, obstructed the way by putting stones and thorny... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 0 | [
"B",
"A"
] | System B is slightly better because it includes a Maharashtra/Aurangabad-connected Supreme Court murder appeal and more procedurally similar special-leave cases, whereas System A’s results are largely unrelated to the query’s specific facts. | System A ranks the available results with stronger jurisdictional and factua... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00032 | This is an appeal by special leave from the judgment and order of the High Court dated March 27, 1958, whereby the said High Court maintained the conviction of the appellant but reduced the sentence of four years' rigorous imprisonment passed on the appellant by the Special Judge, Kanpur, to two years' rigorous impriso... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A contains more results related to public servants, criminal misappropriation/corruption, and related procedural issues, whereas System B includes many unrelated murder, service, cheque, and dowry cases. | System B offers a more focused set of corruption/public-servant and misappropriation cases, including a U.P... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00033 | These writ petitions are filed as Public Interest Litigation by the two petitioners herein who were Members of the Parliament at the time of filing the petitions. Respondent nos. 4 and 5 were formerly Chief Ministers. It is alleged by the petitioners that they filed writ petitions before the High Court alleging large-s... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 0 | [
"B",
"A"
] | System B ranks the most directly relevant fodder-scam/CBI and High Court supervision cases higher and includes the closely relevant West Bengal CBI-consent decision, while System A buries key cases behind less relevant results. | System A ranks the most directly relevant fodder-scam/CBI continuation higher and includes... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00034 | Two appellants, who are brothers, along with their father P1 was prosecuted for an offence. Prosecution case in that the appellants have a sweetmeat shop in L1. PW 6 P2 is residing in a house opposite to the shop. On April 13, 1980, P1, the father of the appellants requested P2 to permit him to tie a rope of the canopy... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 0 | [
"B",
"A"
] | System B better satisfies the query because it includes closer matches on the father’s prosecution/acquittal, single dagger blow, brief quarrel, and youthful/one-blow legal issues, whereas System A contains more generic unrelated murder and riot cases. | System A is slightly better because, in addition to the same top ... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00035 | Interpretation and/or application of Medical Benefit Rules applicable in the State S1 as also in the State S2 is in question before us in these appeals which arise out of the judgment and order dated 20th June, 2005 passed by S1 High Court in Writ Petition No. 10942 and that of the judgment and order dated 4th August, ... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | A's top result is more directly about entitlement and scale under state medical-benefit policies, while both sets share the same relevant core and irrelevant tail. | Both sets retrieve the same core medical reimbursement precedents, but B ranks the broader Medical Benefit Rules case first and has slightly more domain-r... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00037 | The appellant herein is a Senior Manager in a fertilizer company C1. The said company is engaged in manufacturing and selling of fertilizer. The Government of India in exercise of power has framed an order known as the Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985 for controlling the quality of fertilizer. It appears that the sampl... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A includes several decisions closer to the query's procedural and substantive concerns, such as quashing criminal proceedings and no-case scenarios involving regulatory or report-based allegations, whereas System B adds mostly unrelated criminal appeal, acquittal, and administrative appointment matters. | System... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00039 | Having been selected by the Public Service Commission, the respondent herein was appointed as Law Officer-cum-Draftsman in the Directorate of Cooperation. There was only one post in the same Cadre and it had no promotional avenues. He filed a representation that his post be upgraded or two promotional avenues be provid... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 0 | [
"B",
"A"
] | System B places the two most on-point service-law precedents on non-promotional avenues and pay scale higher and includes a more relevant promotion/service case, whereas System A buries the no-promotional-channel case and adds more irrelevant recruitment/termination cases. | System A better covers the query's core issu... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00040 | Appellant calls in question legality of the judgment rendered by High Court confirming his conviction for offence and sentence of imprisonment for life as awarded by the learned Sessions Judge. Background facts as unfolded during trial by the prosecution are essentially as follows. One P1 (hereinafter referred to as th... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 0 | [
"B",
"A"
] | System B's third result (Kikar Singh) and fourth result (Randhir Singh) more closely match the query's core features of a single accused, fatal head injury, life sentence, high court confirmation, and credible eye witnesses, whereas System A's strongest matches appear lower and its top results are less aligned. | Syste... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00041 | This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 23.8.2016, passed by the High Court wherein High Court has dismissed the petition filed by the appellant. Records reveal that the parents of the appellant, namely, P1 and P2, entered into an agreement to sell dated 14.1.1997 with Respondent No.2 herein. The sale consideratio... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 0 | [
"B",
"A"
] | Both systems share the top three results, but System B adds more relevant quashing/commercial-dispute precedents at positions 4 and 7, while System A includes more unrelated criminal-appeal and procedure cases. | Both sets overlap on the first three results, but System A better aligns with the query’s core issue by inc... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00042 | Transfer Petition have been filed to transfer the petitions filed pending before the High Court of S1 to the High Court of S2. The petitioner got married to Lt. P1 on 09.03.2012 as per Hindu rites and customs. Petitioner's husband Lt. P1 is a naval officer who was then posted at S1. After marriage, the petitioner was r... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 0.5 | [
"B",
"B"
] | System B ranks more cases concerning quashing, criminal procedure, and prosecution of public servants, which are closer to the underlying transfer/quash petition context than System A’s mix of property, TADA, and unrelated employment matters. | System B is marginally better because it includes a case involving a wife's... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00043 | This petition is by the State directed against the order dated 10.11.1998 passed by the High Court by which the charges framed against the respondent were quashed. The relevant and necessary facts to dispose of this petition are: The respondent was working as a Road Transport Inspector in the Regional Office of the Roa... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 0 | [
"B",
"A"
] | System B places the most relevant result, a State of Madhya Pradesh challenge to a Madhya Pradesh High Court order quashing charges against public servants in Bhopal, at rank 1, making it more useful than System A, which starts with a less relevant case. | System A ranks the closest State of Madhya Pradesh quashing-of-... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00045 | In this appeal by special leave the sole appellant is P1 who alongwith six others was put up for trial before the Additional Sessions Judge in charged of the offence. It is not necessary to refer to the charges framed against the remaining accused since they are not appellants before us. The trial court by its judgment... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A is marginally better because it includes a dacoity case involving an armed house attack, multiple accused, and an Additional Sessions Judge, which is closer to the query’s specific factual and procedural setting than System B’s set. | Both sets omit the exact anonymized judgment, but B is more useful because i... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00046 | Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of the High Court upholding the conviction of the appellant for offences punishable and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and also to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- with default stipulations, as recorded by the Principal Sessions Judge. The prosecution version, in a n... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 0 | [
"B",
"A"
] | System B includes a closer single-accused land-dispute murder case involving a spade/Kassi and life imprisonment near the top, whereas System A offers mostly less similar multi-accused, riot, or unrelated criminal appeals. | System A slightly better satisfies the query because its second result closely matches the core... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00047 | Whether sanction is required to initiate criminal proceedings in respect of offences is the question arising for consideration in these cases. The District Registrar lodged a complaint with the Inspector of Police, CBCID on 07.07.1999. The main allegation against the respondents was that while they were working as Sub-... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A's top-ranked results more directly address the central sanction issue for public servants under Section 197 CrPC/PCA, while System B includes a clearly less relevant contract/quashing case (Indian Oil v. NEPC). | System B ranks the sanction-specific public-servant prosecution cases higher and replaces a clearl... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00048 | Appellant was a Patwari working at village V1 in the year 1976. On an allegation that he had sought illegal gratification, on or about 13 July 1976, a complaint was lodged in the office of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti-Corruption that the appellant had asked for illegal gratification. A raiding party laid a tra... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 0 | [
"B",
"A"
] | System B ranks the two most on-point service-consequences-after-acquittal cases at the top and adds tangentially useful retirement/pension cases, while System A dilutes its list with many less relevant corruption/sanction cases. | System A ranks the two most directly relevant service-consequence/acquittal cases first a... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00049 | A peculiar feature of this appeal by special leave is that it is not an appeal against conviction or against acquittal but one preferred by a prosecution witness for expunction of several highly derogatory remarks made against him by a learned Judge of the High Court while allowing a Criminal Appeal at the High Court. ... | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | BAAI/bge-en-icl | 1 | [
"A",
"B"
] | System A ranks two close legal precedents—an unusual prosecution-witness appeal involving adverse High Court remarks and an appeal for expunction of judicial remarks—near the top, whereas System B’s second and several later results are less relevant to the specific prosecution-witness expunction context. | System B ran... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
00001 | The appellant before us was examined as prime witness in the trial of T.R. on the file of the Special Judge against the first respondent. The trial ended in conviction against the first respondent and when the appeal filed by him came to be heard by the High Court the appellant had become a Cabinet Minister. On account... | BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5 | Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct | 0.5 | [
"B",
"B"
] | System B returns more relevant corruption and adverse-remarks cases across the top, including the closest factual Mohd. Iqbal trap case and the expunction/remarks case R.K. Lakshmanan, while System A begins with an irrelevant case and has fewer relevant matches. | System B places the on-point expunction-of-remarks case... | [
true,
true
] | AILACasedocs | Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B+0b10ec2f1ed6 | mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0 |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
The files behind the results in embeddings-benchmark/gym-results. Each result there is one record; its config names the files here that it was computed from, and mteb_gym.cache_files(record) lists their paths.
- verdicts: one row per comparison, with the query, both models, the winner in each presentation order, the score and the judge's reasoning. Files are
verdicts/<task>/<pair>-<key>.jsonl, where the key identifies the judge and its settings. - predictions: mteb's prediction file for each model, unchanged:
{query id: {document id: score}}. Files arepredictions/<task>/<model>@<revision>/<query set>/<task>_predictions.json. - queries: generated query sets, each query with the documents it was written from and its filter score, and the generator's settings. Files are
queries/<task>/<query set>.json; a record'sconfig.query_setnames its file. A run on a dataset's own queries has none.
from datasets import load_dataset
from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download
verdicts = load_dataset("mteb/gym-runs", "verdicts", split="data")
snapshot_download("mteb/gym-runs", repo_type="dataset", allow_patterns=["predictions/NFCorpus/*"]) # files
- Downloads last month
- 3,491