|
Download README.md from nutrientdocs/chart-parsing-benchmark: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 5.37 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/nutrientdocs/chart-parsing-benchmark/resolve/main/README.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/nutrientdocs/chart-parsing-benchmark/README.md
-
curl -L -o README.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/nutrientdocs/chart-parsing-benchmark/resolve/main/README.md
5.37 kB
| license: cc-by-4.0 | |
| pretty_name: Chart Parsing Benchmark | |
| language: | |
| - en | |
| task_categories: | |
| - image-to-text | |
| - image-text-to-text | |
| tags: | |
| - chart | |
| - chart-understanding | |
| - chart-to-table | |
| - structured-extraction | |
| - benchmark | |
| - leaderboard | |
| size_categories: | |
| - 1K<n<10K | |
| configs: | |
| - config_name: default | |
| data_files: | |
| - split: test | |
| path: data/test-* | |
| # Chart Parsing Benchmark | |
| **Chart image in, structured JSON out.** A fixed, test-only benchmark for turning a chart image into its | |
| title, chart type, data table, encoding, axes, series, legend, and data labels. It holds | |
| **2500 charts** and is the set behind the [leaderboard](https://huggingface.co/spaces/nutrientdocs/chart-parsing-leaderboard). Every entry sees the same charts and the same | |
| prompt, and the reference scorer ships in this repository, so any result here can be reproduced. | |
| - 🎯 **Model:** [`nutrientdocs/chart-parsing-vlm`](https://huggingface.co/nutrientdocs/chart-parsing-vlm) | |
| - 🧪 **Try it:** [`nutrientdocs/chart-parsing-demo`](https://huggingface.co/spaces/nutrientdocs/chart-parsing-demo) | |
| - 🏆 **Leaderboard:** [`nutrientdocs/chart-parsing-leaderboard`](https://huggingface.co/spaces/nutrientdocs/chart-parsing-leaderboard) | |
| | chart type | charts | | |
| | --- | --- | | |
| | line | 552 | | |
| | bar | 463 | | |
| | pie | 249 | | |
| | scatter | 235 | | |
| | area | 224 | | |
| | box | 171 | | |
| | bubble | 164 | | |
| | heatmap | 100 | | |
| | histogram | 54 | | |
| | treemap | 54 | | |
| | combo | 51 | | |
| | funnel | 49 | | |
| | radar | 46 | | |
| | violin | 33 | | |
| | stem | 25 | | |
| | step | 15 | | |
| | candlestick | 15 | | |
| ## Task and prompt | |
| Every entry on the leaderboard uses the same system prompt and instruction, shipped with the scorer. The | |
| model returns one JSON object. The `target` column holds the reference JSON as a string. | |
| ## Metrics | |
| The ranking metric is the **mean per-chart cell F1 at 3% tolerance** (`mean_f1_tol3`): each chart's data cells | |
| are scored for precision, recall, and F1, and the per-chart F1 is averaged so every chart counts once, | |
| whatever its table size. Cells are never pooled across charts. | |
| A cell matches when its row identity (the first column plus every text column) and its column agree and | |
| the value is close enough. Row order never matters. Tables with a single value column, or whose rows all | |
| repeat one value, match on row identity alone. Three tolerance levels are reported side by side: | |
| | metric | a value counts as correct when it is | | |
| |---|---| | |
| | `mean_f1` | strict: relative 1e-3 | | |
| | `mean_f1_tol3` | exact (relative 1e-3) when the chart prints data labels, 3% in percentage points for share charts (pie, donut, 100%-stacked, treemap), otherwise 3% of the chart's value range. Histogram bin-edge columns are not scored; histograms are scored on the per-bin frequency | | |
| | `mean_f1_tol5` | exact (relative 1e-3) when the chart prints data labels, 5% in percentage points for share charts (pie, donut, 100%-stacked, treemap), otherwise 5% of the chart's value range. Histogram bin-edge columns are not scored; histograms are scored on the per-bin frequency | | |
| The 3% level is the ranking metric because it matches what a careful reader can recover from the pixels; | |
| the strict level exposes models that copy printed labels well, and the 5% level shows how much is lost | |
| to small estimation error. Also reported: table shape match, per-field accuracy (chart type, title, axis | |
| labels, scales, legend, data labels, column types and roles), and set F1 for `encoding` and `series`. | |
| ## Scoring | |
| ```bash | |
| python score.py --benchmark-repo nutrientdocs/chart-parsing-benchmark \ | |
| --predictions preds.jsonl --out result.json --name my-model | |
| ``` | |
| `preds.jsonl` has one `{"id": ..., "text": ...}` line per chart, where `text` is the raw model output. | |
| The scorer is self-contained and needs only `datasets`. Submit the resulting JSON with the model ID, | |
| license, and runtime details for review. Entries on the leaderboard carry one of three labels: | |
| | label | meaning | | |
| |---|---| | |
| | `commercial` | Nutrient model, weights under a commercial Nutrient license | | |
| | `provider` | cloud model reached through its vendor API | | |
| | `open` | open-weight model served locally with the benchmark prompt | | |
| ## Schema | |
| ```python | |
| from datasets import load_dataset | |
| benchmark = load_dataset("nutrientdocs/chart-parsing-benchmark", split="test") | |
| ``` | |
| | Field | Meaning | | |
| |---|---| | |
| | `id` | Stable chart identifier | | |
| | `image` | RGB chart image | | |
| | `chart_type`, `title` | Flat copies of target fields for filtering | | |
| | `category` | Source label from ChartGen | | |
| | `data_source` | Always `render` in this set | | |
| | `target` | Reference JSON as a string | | |
| ## License and attribution | |
| Charts derive from [SD122025/ChartGen-200K](https://huggingface.co/datasets/SD122025/ChartGen-200K), | |
| released under CC BY 4.0. This benchmark keeps the same license. The Nutrient Chart Parsing model | |
| evaluated on it is commercial; to evaluate or deploy it, [contact Nutrient](https://www.nutrient.io/contact-sales/). | |
| ## About the author | |
| <a href="https://nutrient.io/"> | |
| <img src="https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/1527679?v=3&s=200" height="80" /> | |
| </a> | |
| This project is maintained and funded by [Nutrient](https://nutrient.io/) - The deterministic document infrastructure enterprises run their highest-stakes workflows on: replayable output, clear exceptions, and full audit trails on the messy, regulated documents where AI alone breaks. | |