Introduce Jev and System One classifiers in benchmark overview
#12
by jfbrown95 - opened
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ viewer: false
|
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
# Perch benchmark results
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
-
This benchmark
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
The pairs come from open-source projects in Rust, JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Go, Java, C, C++, C#, PHP, and other languages. Bug and security detection are scored separately. Each model is judged on whether it flags issue-bearing methods, avoids alerts on methods without the issue, and ranks an affected before method above its fixed after method.
|
| 12 |
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
# Perch benchmark results
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
+
This benchmark compares [TypeSafe's Jev](https://typesafe.ai/blog/introducing-system-one-models-and-jev), a [System One classifier](https://typesafe.ai/), with open-weight models on finding bugs and security issues in individual code methods. Each record contains a method before and after a transaction change, plus the input adapted from a [Perch scan](https://github.com/lakeday-org/perch): method source, imports, callers, callees, and static call-graph edges where available. Models score each version independently, without seeing the patch or the other version. The labels also include benign reference methods, so a `before` method is not automatically positive.
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
The pairs come from open-source projects in Rust, JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Go, Java, C, C++, C#, PHP, and other languages. Bug and security detection are scored separately. Each model is judged on whether it flags issue-bearing methods, avoids alerts on methods without the issue, and ranks an affected before method above its fixed after method.
|
| 12 |
|