openAI-math-dataset / lean /OAI /Computability /Scheduling /GlobalBoundaries.lean
roseking's picture
Add lean source and binary files (part 63)
760f90e verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
25.8 kB
import OAI.Computability.Scheduling.SeparatorWalk
namespace OAI
section
namespace ThreeMachine.Structure
def GlobalUpset {J : Type} (r : J → J → Prop) (A : Set J) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃x y⦄, r x y → x ∈ A → y ∈ A
def GlobalDownset {J : Type} (r : J → J → Prop) (A : Set J) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃x y⦄, r x y → y ∈ A → x ∈ A
theorem GlobalUpset.inter {J : Type} {r : J → J → Prop} {A B : Set J}
(hA : GlobalUpset r A) (hB : GlobalUpset r B) : GlobalUpset r (A ∩ B) := by
intro x y hxy hx
exact ⟨hA hxy hx.1, hB hxy hx.2⟩
theorem GlobalUpset.union {J : Type} {r : J → J → Prop} {A B : Set J}
(hA : GlobalUpset r A) (hB : GlobalUpset r B) : GlobalUpset r (A ∪ B) := by
intro x y hxy hx
exact hx.elim (fun h => Or.inl (hA hxy h)) (fun h => Or.inr (hB hxy h))
theorem GlobalDownset.compl {J : Type} {r : J → J → Prop} {A : Set J}
(hA : GlobalDownset r A) : GlobalUpset r Aᶜ := by
intro x y hxy hx hy
exact hx (hA hxy hy)
structure GlobalList (J : Type) where
indices : Finset ℕ
entry : ℕ → Set J
namespace GlobalList
variable {J : Type}
def Qual (K : GlobalList J) : Set J := {x | ∃ i ∈ K.indices, x ∈ K.entry i}
def Upsets (K : GlobalList J) (r : J → J → Prop) : Prop :=
∀ i ∈ K.indices, GlobalUpset r (K.entry i)
noncomputable def memberships (K : GlobalList J) (x : J) : Finset ℕ := by
classical
exact K.indices.filter (fun i => x ∈ K.entry i)
noncomputable def lastIndex (K : GlobalList J) (x : J) : ℕ :=
(K.memberships x).sup id
def KeyLT (K : GlobalList J) (rank : J → ℕ) (x y : J) : Prop :=
K.lastIndex x < K.lastIndex y ∨
K.lastIndex x = K.lastIndex y ∧ rank x < rank y
@[simp] theorem mem_memberships (K : GlobalList J) (x : J) (i : ℕ) :
i ∈ K.memberships x ↔ i ∈ K.indices ∧ x ∈ K.entry i := by
classical
simp [memberships]
theorem le_lastIndex {K : GlobalList J} {x : J} {i : ℕ}
(hi : i ∈ K.indices) (hx : x ∈ K.entry i) : i ≤ K.lastIndex x := by
exact Finset.le_sup (f := id) ((mem_memberships K x i).mpr ⟨hi, hx⟩)
theorem lastIndex_mem {K : GlobalList J} {x : J} (hx : x ∈ K.Qual) :
K.lastIndex x ∈ K.indices ∧ x ∈ K.entry (K.lastIndex x) := by
obtain ⟨i, hi, hxi⟩ := hx
have hne : (K.memberships x).Nonempty := ⟨i, (mem_memberships K x i).mpr ⟨hi, hxi⟩⟩
have := Finset.sup_mem_of_nonempty (f := id) hne
obtain ⟨j, hj, e⟩ := this
change j = K.lastIndex x at e
apply (mem_memberships K x (K.lastIndex x)).mp
rw [← e]
exact hj
theorem qual_upset {K : GlobalList J} {r : J → J → Prop}
(hK : K.Upsets r) : GlobalUpset r K.Qual := by
rintro x y hxy ⟨i, hi, hx⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, hK i hi hxy hx⟩
theorem key_extends {K : GlobalList J} {r : J → J → Prop} {rank : J → ℕ}
(hK : K.Upsets r) (hrank : ∀ x y, r x y → rank x < rank y)
{x y : J} (hx : x ∈ K.Qual) (hxy : r x y) : K.KeyLT rank x y := by
obtain ⟨hi, hxlast⟩ := lastIndex_mem hx
have hle : K.lastIndex x ≤ K.lastIndex y := le_lastIndex hi (hK _ hi hxy hxlast)
rcases hle.lt_or_eq with h | h
· exact Or.inl h
· exact Or.inr ⟨h, hrank x y hxy⟩
noncomputable def carry (K : GlobalList J) (rank : J → ℕ) (d r : ℕ) : GlobalList J := by
classical
exact ⟨K.indices.filter (d ≤ ·), fun i =>
if i = d then K.entry i ∩ {x | r ≤ rank x} else K.entry i⟩
theorem carry_membership (K : GlobalList J) (rank : J → ℕ) (d r i : ℕ) (x : J) :
i ∈ (K.carry rank d r).memberships x ↔
i ∈ K.indices ∧ d ≤ i ∧ x ∈ K.entry i ∧ (i = d → r ≤ rank x) := by
classical
rw [mem_memberships]
change (i ∈ K.indices.filter (d ≤ ·) ∧
x ∈ (if i = d then K.entry i ∩ {x | r ≤ rank x} else K.entry i)) ↔ _
rw [Finset.mem_filter]
by_cases hi : i = d <;> simp [hi, and_assoc]
theorem carry_selection (K : GlobalList J) (rank : J → ℕ) (d r : ℕ) (x : J) :
x ∈ (K.carry rank d r).Qual ↔ x ∈ K.Qual ∧
(d < K.lastIndex x ∨ K.lastIndex x = d ∧ r ≤ rank x) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, hi, hx⟩
have hc := (carry_membership K rank d r i x).mp
((mem_memberships _ _ _).mpr ⟨hi, hx⟩)
refine ⟨⟨i, hc.1, hc.2.2.1⟩, ?_⟩
have hle := le_lastIndex hc.1 hc.2.2.1
by_cases h : d < K.lastIndex x
· exact Or.inl h
· have hid : i = d := by omega
exact Or.inr ⟨by omega, hc.2.2.2 hid⟩
· rintro ⟨hq, hmax⟩
obtain ⟨hi, hx⟩ := lastIndex_mem hq
refine ⟨K.lastIndex x, ?_⟩
apply (mem_memberships _ _ _).mp
apply (carry_membership K rank d r _ x).mpr
refine ⟨hi, ?_, hx, ?_⟩
· rcases hmax with h | ⟨h, _⟩ <;> omega
· intro e
rcases hmax with h | ⟨_, hr⟩
· omega
· exact hr
theorem carry_lastIndex {K : GlobalList J} {rank : J → ℕ} {d r : ℕ} {x : J}
(hx : x ∈ (K.carry rank d r).Qual) :
(K.carry rank d r).lastIndex x = K.lastIndex x := by
have hsel := (carry_selection K rank d r x).mp hx
apply le_antisymm
· apply Finset.sup_le
intro i hi
have hm := (carry_membership K rank d r i x).mp hi
exact le_lastIndex hm.1 hm.2.2.1
· obtain ⟨hi, hxi⟩ := lastIndex_mem hsel.1
apply Finset.le_sup (f := id) (b := K.lastIndex x)
apply (carry_membership K rank d r (K.lastIndex x) x).mpr
refine ⟨hi, ?_, hxi, ?_⟩
· rcases hsel.2 with h | ⟨h, _⟩ <;> omega
· intro e
rcases hsel.2 with h | ⟨_, hr⟩
· omega
· exact hr
theorem carry_key {K : GlobalList J} {rank : J → ℕ} {d r : ℕ} {x y : J}
(hx : x ∈ (K.carry rank d r).Qual) (hy : y ∈ (K.carry rank d r).Qual) :
(K.carry rank d r).KeyLT rank x y ↔ K.KeyLT rank x y := by
simp only [KeyLT, carry_lastIndex hx, carry_lastIndex hy]
theorem carry_upsets {K : GlobalList J} {rank : J → ℕ} {d t : ℕ}
{r : J → J → Prop} (hK : K.Upsets r)
(hrank : ∀ x y, r x y → rank x < rank y) : (K.carry rank d t).Upsets r := by
classical
intro i hi x y hxy hx
have hi' : i ∈ K.indices ∧ d ≤ i := by simpa [carry] using hi
by_cases hid : i = d
· have hx' : x ∈ K.entry i ∧ t ≤ rank x := by simpa [carry, hid] using hx
have hrankxy := hrank x y hxy
have hy : y ∈ K.entry i := hK i hi'.1 hxy hx'.1
simpa [carry, hid] using And.intro hy (show t ≤ rank y by omega)
· have hx' : x ∈ K.entry i := by simpa [carry, hid] using hx
simpa [carry, hid] using hK i hi'.1 hxy hx'
noncomputable def prune (K : GlobalList J) (W : Set J) : GlobalList J := by
classical
exact ⟨K.indices.filter (fun i => (K.entry i ∩ W).Nonempty), K.entry⟩
theorem prune_membership (K : GlobalList J) (W : Set J) (i : ℕ) (x : J) :
i ∈ (K.prune W).memberships x ↔
i ∈ K.indices ∧ (K.entry i ∩ W).Nonempty ∧ x ∈ K.entry i := by
classical
rw [mem_memberships]
change (i ∈ K.indices.filter (fun j => (K.entry j ∩ W).Nonempty) ∧
x ∈ K.entry i) ↔ _
rw [Finset.mem_filter]
exact and_assoc
theorem prune_qual_subset (K : GlobalList J) (W : Set J) : (K.prune W).Qual ⊆ K.Qual := by
rintro x ⟨i, hi, hx⟩
have hm := (prune_membership K W i x).mp ((mem_memberships _ _ _).mpr ⟨hi, hx⟩)
exact ⟨i, hm.1, hm.2.2⟩
theorem prune_qual (K : GlobalList J) {W : Set J} {x : J} (hx : x ∈ W) :
x ∈ (K.prune W).Qual ↔ x ∈ K.Qual := by
refine ⟨fun h => prune_qual_subset K W h, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨i, hi, hxi⟩
refine ⟨i, ?_⟩
apply (mem_memberships _ _ _).mp
exact (prune_membership K W i x).mpr ⟨hi, ⟨x, hxi, hx⟩, hxi⟩
theorem prune_lastIndex_le (K : GlobalList J) (W : Set J) (x : J) :
(K.prune W).lastIndex x ≤ K.lastIndex x := by
apply Finset.sup_le
intro i hi
have hm := (prune_membership K W i x).mp hi
exact le_lastIndex hm.1 hm.2.2
theorem prune_lastIndex (K : GlobalList J) {W : Set J} {x : J} (hx : x ∈ W) :
(K.prune W).lastIndex x = K.lastIndex x := by
apply le_antisymm (prune_lastIndex_le K W x)
apply Finset.sup_le
intro i hi
have hm := (mem_memberships K x i).mp hi
apply Finset.le_sup (f := id)
exact (prune_membership K W i x).mpr ⟨hm.1, ⟨x, hm.2, hx⟩, hm.2⟩
theorem prune_key {K : GlobalList J} {W : Set J} {rank : J → ℕ} {x y : J}
(hx : x ∈ W) (hkey : (K.prune W).KeyLT rank x y) : K.KeyLT rank x y := by
have heq := prune_lastIndex K hx
have hle := prune_lastIndex_le K W y
rcases hkey with h | ⟨h, hr⟩
· exact Or.inl (by omega)
· by_cases hlt : K.lastIndex x < K.lastIndex y
· exact Or.inl hlt
· exact Or.inr ⟨by omega, hr⟩
theorem prune_upsets {K : GlobalList J} {W : Set J} {r : J → J → Prop}
(hK : K.Upsets r) : (K.prune W).Upsets r := by
classical
intro i hi
have hi' : i ∈ K.indices ∧ (K.entry i ∩ W).Nonempty := by simpa [prune] using hi
exact hK i hi'.1
end GlobalList
end ThreeMachine.Structure
namespace ThreeMachine.Structure
section IntervalNormalization
variable {J : Type} [Fintype J]
def Layout.FixedOutside (p q : Layout J) (W : Set J) : Prop :=
∀ x, x ∉ W → q x = p x
theorem Layout.FixedOutside.refl (p : Layout J) (W : Set J) : p.FixedOutside p W :=
fun _ _ => rfl
theorem Layout.FixedOutside.trans {p q u : Layout J} {W : Set J}
(hpq : p.FixedOutside q W) (hqu : q.FixedOutside u W) : p.FixedOutside u W :=
fun x hx => (hqu x hx).trans (hpq x hx)
theorem Layout.FixedOutside.mono {p q : Layout J} {W U : Set J}
(h : p.FixedOutside q W) (hWU : W ⊆ U) : p.FixedOutside q U :=
fun x hx => h x (fun hW => hx (hWU hW))
theorem Layout.FixedOutside.time {p q : Layout J} {W : Set J}
(h : p.FixedOutside q W) {x : J} (hx : x ∉ W) : q.time x = p.time x := by
simp [Layout.time, h x hx]
theorem Layout.FixedOutside.symm_position {p q : Layout J} {W : Set J}
(h : p.FixedOutside q W) (i : Fin (Fintype.card J)) (hi : p.symm i ∉ W) :
q.symm i = p.symm i := by
apply q.injective
rw [q.apply_symm_apply, h _ hi, p.apply_symm_apply]
theorem Layout.FixedOutside.position_mem {p q : Layout J} {W : Set J}
(h : p.FixedOutside q W) {x : J} (hx : x ∈ W) : p.symm (q x) ∈ W := by
by_contra hn
have he : q (p.symm (q x)) = q x := by rw [h _ hn, p.apply_symm_apply]
apply hn
rw [q.injective he]
exact hx
theorem Layout.FixedOutside.time_range {p q : Layout J} {W : Set J} {a b : ℕ}
(h : p.FixedOutside q W) (hW : ∀ x ∈ W, a < p.time x ∧ p.time x < b)
{x : J} (hx : x ∈ W) : a < q.time x ∧ q.time x < b := by
have hr := hW _ (h.position_mem hx)
simpa [Layout.time] using hr
theorem reorder_respects {p q : Layout J} {W : Set J} {a b : ℕ}
{r : J → J → Prop} (hp : p.Respects r) (hfix : p.FixedOutside q W)
(hW : ∀ x, x ∈ W ↔ a < p.time x ∧ p.time x < b)
(hq : ∀ x ∈ W, ∀ y ∈ W, r x y → q.time x < q.time y) : q.Respects r := by
intro x y hxy
have ht := hp x y hxy
by_cases hx : x ∈ W
· by_cases hy : y ∈ W
· exact hq x hx y hy hxy
· have hxt := hfix.time_range (fun z hz => (hW z).mp hz) hx
have hxp := (hW x).mp hx
have hyp : ¬(a < p.time y ∧ p.time y < b) := fun h => hy ((hW y).mpr h)
rw [hfix.time hy]
omega
· rw [hfix.time hx]
by_cases hy : y ∈ W
· have hyt := hfix.time_range (fun z hz => (hW z).mp hz) hy
have hyp := (hW y).mp hy
have hxp : ¬(a < p.time x ∧ p.time x < b) := fun h => hx ((hW x).mpr h)
omega
· rw [hfix.time hy]
exact ht
def Layout.NormalizedOn (p : Layout J) (W : Set J)
(r : J → J → Prop) (priority : J → ℕ) : Prop :=
p.Respects r ∧ ∀ q : Layout J, q.Respects r → p.FixedOutside q W →
p.signature priority ≤ q.signature priority
theorem exists_normalizedOn (p : Layout J) (W : Set J) (r : J → J → Prop)
(priority : J → ℕ) (hp : p.Respects r) :
∃ q : Layout J, p.FixedOutside q W ∧ q.NormalizedOn W r priority := by
classical
let candidates : Finset (Layout J) := Finset.univ.filter
(fun q => q.Respects r ∧ p.FixedOutside q W)
have hne : candidates.Nonempty := ⟨p, by simp [candidates, hp, Layout.FixedOutside.refl]⟩
obtain ⟨q, hq, hmin⟩ := candidates.exists_min_image (fun q => q.signature priority) hne
have hq' : q.Respects r ∧ p.FixedOutside q W := by simpa [candidates] using hq
refine ⟨q, hq'.2, hq'.1, ?_⟩
intro u hu hqu
exact hmin u (by simp [candidates, hu, hq'.2.trans hqu])
theorem normalizedOn_no_improvement {p q : Layout J} {W : Set J}
{r : J → J → Prop} {priority : J → ℕ} (hp : p.NormalizedOn W r priority)
(hq : q.Respects r) (hfix : p.FixedOutside q W)
(i : Fin (Fintype.card J))
(hbefore : ∀ j, j < i → priority (q.symm j) = priority (p.symm j))
(hi : priority (q.symm i) < priority (p.symm i)) : False := by
have hlt : q.signature priority < p.signature priority :=
ofFn_lt_of_first_difference _ _ i hbefore hi
exact (not_lt_of_ge (hp.2 q hq hfix)) hlt
theorem exchange_fixedOutside [DecidableEq J] {p : Layout J} {W : Set J}
{x y : J} (hx : x ∈ W) (hy : y ∈ W) : p.FixedOutside (p.exchange x y) W := by
intro z hz
have hzx : z ≠ x := fun e => hz (e ▸ hx)
have hzy : z ≠ y := fun e => hz (e ▸ hy)
simp [Layout.exchange, Equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hzx hzy]
theorem normalizedOn_prefix_no_exchange [DecidableEq J]
{p q : Layout J} {W : Set J} {r : J → J → Prop} {priority : J → ℕ}
(hp : p.NormalizedOn W r priority) (hfix : p.FixedOutside q W)
{x y : J} (hx : x ∈ W) (hy : y ∈ W)
(hprefix : ∀ j, j ≤ p y → q.symm j = p.symm j)
(ht : q.time y < q.time x) (hbetter : priority x < priority y)
(hswap : (q.exchange x y).Respects r) : False := by
have hqy : q y = p y := by
have he := hprefix (p y) le_rfl
simp only [p.symm_apply_apply] at he
exact (congrArg q he).symm.trans (q.apply_symm_apply _)
have hpos : p y < q x := by
change (p y).val < (q x).val
dsimp [Layout.time] at ht
rw [hqy] at ht
omega
apply normalizedOn_no_improvement hp hswap
(hfix.trans (exchange_fixedOutside hx hy)) (p y)
· intro j hj
have hpy := hprefix j hj.le
have hny : q.symm j ≠ y := by
intro e
have he : j = p y := by simpa [hqy] using congrArg q e
exact (ne_of_lt hj) he
have hnx : q.symm j ≠ x := by
intro e
have he : j = q x := by simpa using congrArg q e
rw [he] at hj
exact (not_lt_of_ge hpos.le) hj
change priority ((Equiv.swap x y) (q.symm j)) = priority (p.symm j)
rw [Equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hnx hny, hpy]
· have hpy := hprefix (p y) le_rfl
simp only [p.symm_apply_apply] at hpy
simpa [Layout.exchange, hpy] using hbetter
theorem normalizedOn_local_obstruction {p : Layout J} {W : Finset J}
{a b : ℕ} {r : J → J → Prop} {priority : J → ℕ}
(hp : p.NormalizedOn (W : Set J) r priority)
(hW : ∀ z, z ∈ W ↔ a < p.time z ∧ p.time z < b) :
LocalObstruction W r p.time priority := by
classical
intro x hx y hy htyx hbetter hpred
by_contra hn
have hsucc : ∀ v, r y v → p.time x < p.time v := by
intro v hyv
have hyvTime := hp.1 y v hyv
by_cases hv : v ∈ W
· by_contra h
exact hn ⟨v, hv, hyv, by omega⟩
· have hnt : ¬(a < p.time v ∧ p.time v < b) := fun h => hv ((hW v).mpr h)
have hxt := (hW x).mp hx
have hyt := (hW y).mp hy
omega
have hready : ∀ u, r u x → p.time u < p.time y := by
intro u hux
by_cases hu : u ∈ W
· exact hpred u hu hux
· have huxTime := hp.1 u x hux
have hnt : ¬(a < p.time u ∧ p.time u < b) := fun h => hu ((hW u).mpr h)
have hxt := (hW x).mp hx
have hyt := (hW y).mp hy
omega
exact normalizedOn_prefix_no_exchange hp (Layout.FixedOutside.refl p _)
hx hy (fun _ _ => rfl) htyx hbetter (respects_exchange hp.1 x y htyx hready hsucc)
end IntervalNormalization
end ThreeMachine.Structure
namespace ThreeMachine.Structure
abbrev Triple (J : Type) := {Z : Finset J // Z.card = 3}
inductive Boundary (J : Type)
| left
| actual (Z : Triple J)
| right
namespace Boundary
variable {J : Type}
def pred (r : J → J → Prop) : Boundary J → Set J
| .left => ∅
| .actual Z => {x | ∃ y ∈ Z.val, r x y}
| .right => Set.univ
def desc (r : J → J → Prop) : Boundary J → Set J
| .left => Set.univ
| .actual Z => {x | ∃ y ∈ Z.val, r y x}
| .right => ∅
def weakPred (r : J → J → Prop) : Boundary J → Set J
| .left => ∅
| .actual Z => pred r (.actual Z) ∪ (Z.val : Set J)
| .right => Set.univ
def weakDesc (r : J → J → Prop) : Boundary J → Set J
| .left => Set.univ
| .actual Z => desc r (.actual Z) ∪ (Z.val : Set J)
| .right => ∅
def reverse : Boundary J → Boundary J
| .left => .right
| .actual Z => .actual Z
| .right => .left
@[simp] theorem reverse_reverse (B : Boundary J) : B.reverse.reverse = B := by cases B <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem pred_reverse (r : J → J → Prop) (B : Boundary J) :
B.reverse.pred (fun x y => r y x) = B.desc r := by cases B <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem desc_reverse (r : J → J → Prop) (B : Boundary J) :
B.reverse.desc (fun x y => r y x) = B.pred r := by cases B <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem weakPred_reverse (r : J → J → Prop) (B : Boundary J) :
B.reverse.weakPred (fun x y => r y x) = B.weakDesc r := by cases B <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem weakDesc_reverse (r : J → J → Prop) (B : Boundary J) :
B.reverse.weakDesc (fun x y => r y x) = B.weakPred r := by cases B <;> rfl
theorem pred_downset {r : J → J → Prop}
(htrans : ∀ ⦃a b c⦄, r a b → r b c → r a c) (B : Boundary J) :
GlobalDownset r (B.pred r) := by
intro x y hxy hy
cases B with
| left => exact hy.elim
| right => trivial
| actual Z =>
obtain ⟨z, hz, hyz⟩ := hy
exact ⟨z, hz, htrans hxy hyz⟩
theorem desc_upset {r : J → J → Prop}
(htrans : ∀ ⦃a b c⦄, r a b → r b c → r a c) (B : Boundary J) :
GlobalUpset r (B.desc r) := by
intro x y hxy hx
cases B with
| left => trivial
| right => exact hx.elim
| actual Z =>
obtain ⟨z, hz, hzx⟩ := hx
exact ⟨z, hz, htrans hzx hxy⟩
theorem weakPred_downset {r : J → J → Prop}
(htrans : ∀ ⦃a b c⦄, r a b → r b c → r a c) (B : Boundary J) :
GlobalDownset r (B.weakPred r) := by
intro x y hxy hy
cases B with
| left => exact hy.elim
| right => trivial
| actual Z =>
rcases hy with h | h
· exact Or.inl (pred_downset htrans (.actual Z) hxy h)
· exact Or.inl ⟨y, h, hxy⟩
theorem weakDesc_upset {r : J → J → Prop}
(htrans : ∀ ⦃a b c⦄, r a b → r b c → r a c) (B : Boundary J) :
GlobalUpset r (B.weakDesc r) := by
intro x y hxy hx
cases B with
| left => trivial
| right => exact hx.elim
| actual Z =>
rcases hx with h | h
· exact Or.inl (desc_upset htrans (.actual Z) hxy h)
· exact Or.inl ⟨x, h, hxy⟩
def At (time : J → ℕ) (T : ℕ) : Boundary J → ℕ → Prop
| .left, s => s = 0
| .actual Z, s => 1 ≤ s ∧ s ≤ T ∧ ∀ x, x ∈ Z.val ↔ time x = s
| .right, s => s = T + 1
theorem pred_time {r : J → J → Prop} {time : J → ℕ} {T s : ℕ} {B : Boundary J}
(hrespect : ∀ u v, r u v → time u < time v)
(hbound : ∀ x, 1 ≤ time x ∧ time x ≤ T) (hB : B.At time T s)
{x : J} (hx : x ∈ B.pred r) : time x < s := by
cases B with
| left => exact hx.elim
| right => have := (hbound x).2; dsimp [At] at hB; omega
| actual Z =>
obtain ⟨y, hy, hxy⟩ := hx
have he := (hB.2.2 y).mp hy
have := hrespect x y hxy
omega
theorem desc_time {r : J → J → Prop} {time : J → ℕ} {T s : ℕ} {B : Boundary J}
(hrespect : ∀ u v, r u v → time u < time v)
(hbound : ∀ x, 1 ≤ time x ∧ time x ≤ T) (hB : B.At time T s)
{x : J} (hx : x ∈ B.desc r) : s < time x := by
cases B with
| left => have := (hbound x).1; dsimp [At] at hB; omega
| right => exact hx.elim
| actual Z =>
obtain ⟨y, hy, hyx⟩ := hx
have he := (hB.2.2 y).mp hy
have := hrespect y x hyx
omega
theorem weakPred_time {r : J → J → Prop} {time : J → ℕ} {T s : ℕ} {B : Boundary J}
(hrespect : ∀ u v, r u v → time u < time v)
(hbound : ∀ x, 1 ≤ time x ∧ time x ≤ T) (hB : B.At time T s)
{x : J} (hx : x ∈ B.weakPred r) : time x ≤ s := by
cases B with
| left => exact hx.elim
| right => have := (hbound x).2; dsimp [At] at hB; omega
| actual Z =>
rcases hx with h | h
· exact (pred_time hrespect hbound hB h).le
· exact ((hB.2.2 x).mp h).le
theorem weakDesc_time {r : J → J → Prop} {time : J → ℕ} {T s : ℕ} {B : Boundary J}
(hrespect : ∀ u v, r u v → time u < time v)
(hbound : ∀ x, 1 ≤ time x ∧ time x ≤ T) (hB : B.At time T s)
{x : J} (hx : x ∈ B.weakDesc r) : s ≤ time x := by
cases B with
| left => dsimp [At] at hB; omega
| right => exact hx.elim
| actual Z =>
rcases hx with h | h
· exact (desc_time hrespect hbound hB h).le
· exact ((hB.2.2 x).mp h).ge
theorem mem_weak_at_time {r : J → J → Prop} {time : J → ℕ} {T s : ℕ} {B : Boundary J}
(hbound : ∀ x, 1 ≤ time x ∧ time x ≤ T) (hB : B.At time T s)
{x : J} (hx : time x = s) : x ∈ B.weakPred r ∧ x ∈ B.weakDesc r := by
cases B with
| left => have := (hbound x).1; dsimp [At] at hB; omega
| right => have := (hbound x).2; dsimp [At] at hB; omega
| actual Z => exact ⟨Or.inr ((hB.2.2 x).mpr hx), Or.inr ((hB.2.2 x).mpr hx)⟩
theorem actual_pred_eq {r : J → J → Prop} {time : J → ℕ} {T s : ℕ} {Z : Triple J}
(hZ : (Boundary.actual Z).At time T s) :
(Boundary.actual Z).pred r = PredAt r time s := by
ext x
simp only [pred, PredAt, Set.mem_ofPred_eq, hZ.2.2]
theorem actual_desc_eq {r : J → J → Prop} {time : J → ℕ} {T s : ℕ} {Z : Triple J}
(hZ : (Boundary.actual Z).At time T s) :
(Boundary.actual Z).desc r = DescAt r time s := by
ext x
simp only [desc, DescAt, Set.mem_ofPred_eq, hZ.2.2]
end Boundary
inductive Formula (A : Type)
| leaf (atom : A) (negative : Bool)
| conj (p q : Formula A)
| disj (p q : Formula A)
namespace Formula
variable {A J : Type}
def leaves : Formula A → ℕ
| .leaf _ _ => 1
| .conj p q | .disj p q => p.leaves + q.leaves
def eval (atoms : A → Set J) : Formula A → Set J
| .leaf a false => atoms a
| .leaf a true => (atoms a)ᶜ
| .conj p q => p.eval atoms ∩ q.eval atoms
| .disj p q => p.eval atoms ∪ q.eval atoms
def negate : Formula A → Formula A
| .leaf a b => .leaf a (!b)
| .conj p q => .disj p.negate q.negate
| .disj p q => .conj p.negate q.negate
@[simp] theorem leaves_negate (p : Formula A) : p.negate.leaves = p.leaves := by
induction p with
| leaf a b => cases b <;> rfl
| conj p q hp hq | disj p q hp hq => simp [negate, leaves, hp, hq]
@[simp] theorem eval_negate (atoms : A → Set J) (p : Formula A) :
p.negate.eval atoms = (p.eval atoms)ᶜ := by
induction p with
| leaf a b => cases b <;> simp [negate, eval]
| conj p q hp hq =>
ext x
simp only [negate, eval, hp, hq, Set.mem_union, Set.mem_compl_iff, Set.mem_inter_iff]
tauto
| disj p q hp hq => simp [negate, eval, hp, hq]
theorem leaves_pos (p : Formula A) : 0 < p.leaves := by
induction p with
| leaf => exact Nat.zero_lt_one
| conj p q hp hq | disj p q hp hq => dsimp [leaves]; omega
end Formula
def Described {A J : Type} (atoms : A → Set J) (W : Set J) (k : ℕ) : Prop :=
∃ p : Formula A, p.eval atoms = W ∧ p.leaves ≤ k
namespace Described
variable {A J : Type} {atoms : A → Set J} {W U : Set J} {k l : ℕ}
theorem mono (h : Described atoms W k) (hkl : k ≤ l) : Described atoms W l := by
obtain ⟨p, hp, hk⟩ := h
exact ⟨p, hp, hk.trans hkl⟩
theorem atom (a : A) : Described atoms (atoms a) 1 := ⟨.leaf a false, rfl, le_rfl⟩
theorem compl (h : Described atoms W k) : Described atoms Wᶜ k := by
obtain ⟨p, hp, hk⟩ := h
exact ⟨p.negate, by simp [hp], by simpa using hk⟩
theorem inter (hW : Described atoms W k) (hU : Described atoms U l) :
Described atoms (W ∩ U) (k + l) := by
obtain ⟨p, hp, hk⟩ := hW
obtain ⟨q, hq, hl⟩ := hU
exact ⟨.conj p q, by simp [Formula.eval, hp, hq], Nat.add_le_add hk hl⟩
theorem union (hW : Described atoms W k) (hU : Described atoms U l) :
Described atoms (W ∪ U) (k + l) := by
obtain ⟨p, hp, hk⟩ := hW
obtain ⟨q, hq, hl⟩ := hU
exact ⟨.disj p q, by simp [Formula.eval, hp, hq], Nat.add_le_add hk hl⟩
theorem diff (hW : Described atoms W k) (hU : Described atoms U l) :
Described atoms (W \ U) (k + l) := hW.inter hU.compl
theorem finite_union {ι : Type} (s : Finset ι) (E : ι → Set J) (b : ι → ℕ)
(hne : s.Nonempty) (hE : ∀ i ∈ s, Described atoms (E i) (b i)) :
Described atoms {x | ∃ i ∈ s, x ∈ E i} (∑ i ∈ s, b i) := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => exact (Finset.not_nonempty_empty hne).elim
| @insert i s hi ih =>
by_cases hs : s.Nonempty
· have hrest := ih hs (fun j hj => hE j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj))
have hfirst := hE i (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _)
have he : {x | ∃ j ∈ insert i s, x ∈ E j} = E i ∪ {x | ∃ j ∈ s, x ∈ E j} := by
ext x
simp only [Set.mem_ofPred_eq, Finset.mem_insert, Set.mem_union]
aesop
rw [he, Finset.sum_insert hi]
exact hfirst.union hrest
· have es : s = ∅ := Finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.mp hs
subst s
simpa using hE i (Finset.mem_insert_self i ∅)
end Described
end ThreeMachine.Structure
end
end OAI